ContraPoints / William Nicholas Parrott / Natalie Wynn Parrott / Nykytyne2 - GamerGhazi Cannibalism Victim, Youtube "Intellectual"

[Nykytyne3]

Even the non-political robots who are just lonely, sad, horny, depressed and have plain old low self-esteem, hypersexualize both fictional and real-life women to the point that a lot of SJW would find it problematic.

Nick is literally this now.

 

[ZulwayGodOfMercy]

What everyone seems to forget about inceldom is that it isn’t just a last recourse for lonely and dejected males who are on the lowest end of dating pools. Rather, it’s an enticing form of fatalism (black pill) that only corroborates a nihilistic worldview.

You cannot discover a cure for their conditioning via groups or medicine because their philosophy rejects all of these remedies beforehand. It is a malady born out of legitimate social criticisms (Some entities are “better” or more “fit” to pass their genes or attain sexual companionship from a looker) and outlooks that cannot be annulled by reasoning (How do you ever eradicate the premise that life’s fundamentally meaningless?)

Do they have mentally ill cohorts? Yep. Are there former incels who’d abandoned the movement? Sure. It doesn’t follow that the majority of these individuals are aching for one group or another to resolve their ills. No they relish in an incel movement because it reaffirms their ugly POV.

That is what breeds people like Alek Minassian or Elliot Rodger. They are given a guideline that exempts them from any sense of guilt and justifies their killings as A.) They won’t ever get what they like. B.) It’s just pranks brah, don’t matter don’t!

Jordy P. can either be a boon or an ill because his own world view either shifts the “black pill” to a slightly less misogynistic “red pill”, or it can work as a gateway for someone to adopt a more radical, bleak point of view.

As for Contra in all of this. Look at new vid’s steep decline of “quality” and a renewed focus on promoting that femininity she so desperately wants to attain. It’s an aggrandized v-log, nothing else. To say that Contra can give a shit about such people (or any other person for that matter) is just laughable at best.

The left itself does promote the idea that liberalization of women eventually leads to males being alleviated of their pressures as well (e.g. less pressure to seem stoic or fulfill socially mandated gatherer roles), but nobody has a remedy for the incel phenomenon. With many it’s like trying to convince solipsists that an outside world exists. Poops.

 

[Nykysnottrans]

It’s also about the MRA movement as well

Of course it's about the MRA movement. Theryn is pretty much writing his scripts for him now. Theryn was an MRA for years before her come-to-Jesus-Nyk moment. Anyway, I am not gonna waste my time watching Nyk recite Theryn's MRA scripts. Let's watch some vintage Nykytyne2. I have a very special response video to Nyk for you this time, one that is very topical in light of Assange's and Manning's recent arrest:

Re: Nykytyne2 on Wikileaks

At the time one of Assange's fanboys on Youtube responded to Nyk's criticism of Assange and Wikileaks saying:

"Nyk, I think you are quite fair in some aspects of it, but I feel you're kind of unfair to other aspects and I'll try and explain why.

First of all, I will definitely acknowledge that you said that Wikileaks has done good and that an organization like that has the potential to do good in the world. Your main problem seems to be with the head, Julian Assange himself, as a person, and with some of what they've done.

You said that it has the potential to do a lot of good but it's headed by a lunatic. And you quote, well, you referenced an article Chris Hitchens wrote, basically calling him a megalomaniac. I don't think those kind of character attacks are helpful. They are getting in the way of what is potentially a very important movement, and that's what it is. Unfortunately, it is being headed by this figurehead. Wikileaks, actually, as an organization tried to remain Anonymous. They actually started their operations in 2006. Initially they wanted to get the public involved to help check over, redacting and editing and helping with their work. They didn't have any interest at all... they found out very quickly that it's only media organizations that have the time resources and inclination to go into such detail. And that's why they started working with media partners. It's also one of the reason he [Assange] put himself forward as a figurehead."
...
"I was quite disappointed by your statement there that he[Assange] could have raped these women. What are you basing that on? Those kind of statements don't help. Anyone who has not looked into the case in any detail at all will tell you that if you were to come done on one side or the other it seems very likely that you'd come down on the side of it being a load of bullshit, basically."
(for those of you who don't know what this is in reference to, two of Assange groupies in Sweden alleged that Assange had raped them. It was these rape allegations that triggered a criminal investigation in Sweden which led to Assange's arrest in the UK. Assange fled into the Ecuadorian embassy while on bail, where he was recently arrested after 8 years of hikikomori at the embassy, because he worried that the Swedish rape allegations were just a pretext to get him arrested so he could then be extradited to the US to face trial over the Manning leaks. The UK recently refused to extradite Assange to the US, so he was dead wrong all along, his arrest in the UK could not be used as a pretext to get him extradited. I think a lot of young people don't realize that the whole #believethewomen on the internet first occured in response to these Swedish rape allegations. That was the first time the internet was confronted en masse with the novel idea that you should believe rape victims, years before #metoo started. The guy responding to Nyk in this video was one of Assange's fanboys who refused to entertain the idea that Assange could have raped anyone.)
(...)
"You said yourself that it [Wikileaks] has caused harm. I would like it if you would lay it out, what you believe to be the harm it has caused. Because as of yet, the only harm that has been caused is to the reputations of those people implicated in these releases. You said in your video, "If anything is going to bring about this 'revolution', it's going to be this information technology, rather than Assange as a person.". Well, I don't think you are being fair there either, really, because this is something that Assange himself has stated, many many times. It is because of this technology that Wikileaks and this kind of whistleblowing is possible.
(...)
You said that you think that you don't really see the point of the cable releases because you think that diplomats should be able to speak truths without the world knowing about it. Again, I think that kind of misses the point. The point is that we are seeing a lot of deception and manipulation and intimidation as a result of these leaks. We are seeing the culture of corruption that our governments have been allowed to get away with basically."

BTW, this video was public when I dug it up a few months ago (hence why I still had the link). The person who uploaded this video must have unlisted it only recently, presumably in response to either Manning's arrest or Assange's arrest. Don't know if this is because Nyk contacted him and requested that he unlist this video, presumably so that Nyk himself wouldn't be implicated in the Manning investigation. I can imagine Nyk being concerned about investigators discovering that Nyk has long had an interest (albeit a critical one) in Assange and Wikileaks, long before he actually met up with Manning after they both trooned out.

I bet all those people who watched that interview between Chelsea Manning and Nyk had no fucking idea that Nyk had once made a video criticizing Wikileaks and calling Assange a "lunatic" and a "megalomaniac", LMAO. I wonder if Manning knew this about Nyk.

Here are Nyk's responses to some of the comments underneath the video:
"It's interesting because the views I expressed in my Q&A video were much more pro-Wikileaks than what would be accepted in mainstream US politics, and yet many internet commenters react as if anything other than unqualified adoration for Wikileaks and Assange could only be the result of some kind of Orwellian brainwashing."

"As I said in the video, I think public access to much of the information that has been classified in the past is largely a good thing", except when it comes to Nyk's past on Youtube, of course, which Nyk is desperately trying to memory-hole in a very Orwellian manner indeed, with the lame excuse of his trans-LARP.

The article on Assange by Christopher Hitchens (where he called Assange a megalomaniac) that Nyk was referring to in his video is this:

Turn Yourself In, Julian Assange
The WikiLeaks founder is an unscrupulous megalomaniac with a political agenda.
By CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS
DEC 06, 2010

All you need to know about Assange is contained in the profile of him by the great John F. Burns and in his shockingly thuggish response to it. The man is plainly a micro-megalomaniac with few if any scruples and an undisguised agenda. As I wrote before, when he says that his aim is “to end two wars,” one knows at once what he means by the “ending.” In his fantasies he is probably some kind of guerrilla warrior, but in the real world he is a middle man and peddler who resents the civilization that nurtured him. This Monday, in two separate news reports, the New York Times described his little cabal as an “anti-secrecy” and “whistle-blowing” outfit. Such mush-headed approval at least can be withheld from the delightful Julian, even as we all help ourselves to his mart of ill-gotten goods.

The WikiLeaks Founder Is an Unscrupulous Megalomaniac With a Political Agenda

In my most recent book, I reprint some words from a British Embassy cable, sent from Baghdad to the Foreign Office in 1976. The subject is Iraq’s new...

slate.com

Christopher Hitchens might as well have written this about Nyk today: "In his fantasies he is probably some kind of Social Justice Warrior transwoman, in the real world he is a middle man and peddler who resents the civilization that nurtured him".

 

[ZulwayGodOfMercy]

Of course it's about the MRA movement. Theryn is pretty much writing his scripts for him now. Theryn was an MRA for years before her come-to-Jesus-Nyk moment. Anyway, I am not gonna waste my time watching Nyk recite Theryn's MRA scripts. Let's watch some vintage Nykytyne2. I have a very special response video to Nyk for you this time, one that is very topical in light of Assange's and Manning's recent arrest:

Re: Nykytyne2 on Wikileaks

At the time one of Assange's fanboys on Youtube responded to Nyk's criticism of Assange and Wikileaks saying:



BTW, this video was public when I dug it up a few months ago (hence why I still had the link). The person who uploaded this video must have unlisted it only recently, presumably in response to either Manning's arrest or Assange's arrest. Don't know if this is because Nyk contacted him and requested that he unlist this video, presumably so that Nyk himself wouldn't be implicated in the Manning investigation. I can imagine Nyk being concerned about investigators discovering that Nyk has long had an interest (albeit a critical one) in Assange and Wikileaks, long before he actually met up with Manning after they both trooned out.

I bet all those people who watched that interview between Chelsea Manning and Nyk had no fucking idea that Nyk had once made a video criticizing Wikileaks and calling Assange a "lunatic" and a "megalomaniac", LMAO. I wonder if Manning knew this about Nyk.

Here are Nyk's responses to some of the comments underneath the video:
"It's interesting because the views I expressed in my Q&A video were much more pro-Wikileaks than what would be accepted in mainstream US politics, and yet many internet commenters react as if anything other than unqualified adoration for Wikileaks and Assange could only be the result of some kind of Orwellian brainwashing."

View attachment 904912

"As I said in the video, I think public access to much of the information that has been classified in the past is largely a good thing", except when it comes to Nyk's past on Youtube, of course, which Nyk is desperately trying to memory-hole in a very Orwellian manner indeed, with the lame excuse of his trans-LARP.

The article on Assange by Christopher Hitchens (where he called Assange a megalomaniac) that Nyk was referring to in his video is this:



Christopher Hitchens might as well have written this about Nyk today: "In his fantasies he is probably some kind of Social Justice Warrior transwoman, in the real world he is a middle man and peddler who resents the civilization that nurtured him".

Far-fetched as always. Contra admitted to have gone through a Hitch-faze in her “intellectual” development, and the influence has obviously stuck to Contra’s psyche. It’s simpler to presume that Nicky simply deferred to Hitch when she was pressed to make up an opinion on Assange, which could never be positive owing to her, ah, political inclinations. All the while staying in good relations with Wikileaks. It’s a calculated political move, nothing else.

Hitchens himself turned into some very adamant war-hawk late in his life whom supported the invasion of Iraq. It’s obvious that his loathing of Assange was motivated by the fact that Assange harms the US’ interests and Hitch saw such as a force for good in this world. That’s where the whole “u attac da cultua dat bred u!” comes from.

Manning is a transsexual pop icon, of course Nicky would have wanted to make acquaintance with her. To think that there’s some incredibly deep interconnection between Con and Wikileaks is almost as absurd as mistaking identities over the use of computerized filters.

 

[Silence of the Troons]

Re: Nykytyne2 on Wikileaks

Back-up

 

[Wikipedia Scholar]

ContraPoints is a sophist who constantly uses intellectual sleights-of-hand to manipulate the audience. I'll give examples:

in a video I watched, he/she claimed that cultural marxism isn't a legitimate concept because it doesn't match the classical definition of marxism. however, this totally ignores how ideologies can evolve and mutate over time. neo-marxism assigns the 'bourgeois' role to straight white western males, and the 'proletariat' role to minorities (within a Western context). while this is different from the classical formulation of nobles/capitalists vs peasants/workers, it still follows the fundamental structure of marxism, and should be classified accordingly.
at another point, he/she tried to dismiss the West as a 'social construct', simply because there is some degree of vagueness in defining the West as a historical unit, and referenced some cuck's article to back this up. this ignores the fact that there are similar issues with defining any civilizational unit, yet no one ever attempts to dismiss Dar-al-Islam, Ancient Egypt/Kemet or the Sinosphere as 'social constructs'; if they did, it would be the end of their career. the world can be meaningfully interpreted in broader terms, and that includes a distinctly Western history and tradition. therefore, the far leftists only dismiss the West because of their fundamental bias against it.

I could say more, but that should be adequate to prove my point. if you were 'de-radicalized' by Contrapoints, I'm afraid you weren't very committed to being an evil internet nazi to begin with. also, pardon my sperging, just wanted to state my thoughts on this topic.

 

[ZulwayGodOfMercy]

ContraPoints is a sophist who constantly uses intellectual sleights-of-hand to manipulate the audience. I'll give examples:

in a video I watched, he/she claimed that cultural marxism isn't a legitimate concept because it doesn't match the classical definition of marxism. however, this totally ignores how ideologies can evolve and mutate over time. neo-marxism assigns the 'bourgeois' role to straight white western males, and the 'proletariat' role to minorities (within a Western context). while this is different from the classical formulation of nobles/capitalists vs peasants/workers, it still follows the fundamental structure of marxism, and should be classified accordingly.
at another point, he/she tried to dismiss the West as a 'social construct', simply because there is some degree of vagueness in defining the West as a historical unit, and referenced some cuck's article to back this up. this ignores the fact that there are similar issues with defining any civilizational unit, yet no one ever attempts to dismiss Dar-al-Islam, Ancient Egypt/Kemet or the Sinosphere as 'social constructs'; if they did, it would be the end of their career. the world can be meaningfully interpreted in broader terms, and that includes a distinctly Western history and tradition. therefore, the far leftists only dismiss the West because of their fundamental bias against it.

I could say more, but that should be adequate to prove my point. if you were 'de-radicalized' by Contrapoints, I'm afraid you weren't very committed to being an evil internet nazi to begin with. also, pardon my sperging, just wanted to state my thoughts on this topic.

Take the sperging one step further to ask “So what if it is a social construct?!” Dismissing anything because it is that, even if it uncovers a truth of some sort, doesn’t address the fact that the world largely operates on these so-called constructs that have real-life consequences, even if they reside in a collective consciousness rather than a materialistic reality. It is then still a meaningful construct.

 

[$MY_COCK]

Take the sperging one step further to ask “So what if it is a social construct?!” Dismissing anything because it is that, even if it uncovers a truth of some sort, doesn’t address the fact that the world largely operates on these so-called constructs that have real-life consequences, even if they reside in a collective consciousness rather than a materialistic reality. It is then still a meaningful construct.

If everything is a social construct, then why should I respect anyone’s gender or race?
Calling someone a niggerfaggot is a social construct, after all.

 

[ZulwayGodOfMercy]

If everything is a social construct, then why should I respect anyone’s gender or race?
Calling someone a niggerfaggot is a social construct, after all.

£FOR_YOUR_BRAIN, context! It’s about what Contra dismisses as a Social Construct. Nowhere did I say that everything’s a social construct, and nowhere did I invoke morality, either. You neither should or should not do anything in what is an ‘ought’ and not an ‘is’, it’s relative. Just don’t expect that nigger faggot to not club you to death after you call him that.

 

[$MY_COCK]

£FOR_YOUR_BRAIN, context! It’s about what Contra dismisses as a Social Construct. Nowhere did I say that everything’s a social construct, and nowhere did I invoke morality, either. You neither should or should not do anything in what is an ‘ought’ and not an ‘is’, it’s relative. Just don’t expect that nigger faggot to not club you to death after you call him that.

Nowhere did I state that you stated that everything is a social construct and nowhere did I suggest that you invoked morality either.
You illiterate niggerfaggot.

 

[ZulwayGodOfMercy]

Nowhere did I state that you stated that everything is a social construct and nowhere did I suggest that you invoked morality either.
You illiterate niggerfaggot.

Please use the dictionary (not dick tionary) and look up the definition of “Inference”, you silly Senegalese swish.

 

[Cool kitties club]

ContraPoints is a sophist who constantly uses intellectual sleights-of-hand to manipulate the audience. I'll give examples:

in a video I watched, he/she claimed that cultural marxism isn't a legitimate concept because it doesn't match the classical definition of marxism. however, this totally ignores how ideologies can evolve and mutate over time. neo-marxism assigns the 'bourgeois' role to straight white western males, and the 'proletariat' role to minorities (within a Western context). while this is different from the classical formulation of nobles/capitalists vs peasants/workers, it still follows the fundamental structure of marxism, and should be classified accordingly.
at another point, he/she tried to dismiss the West as a 'social construct', simply because there is some degree of vagueness in defining the West as a historical unit, and referenced some cuck's article to back this up. this ignores the fact that there are similar issues with defining any civilizational unit, yet no one ever attempts to dismiss Dar-al-Islam, Ancient Egypt/Kemet or the Sinosphere as 'social constructs'; if they did, it would be the end of their career. the world can be meaningfully interpreted in broader terms, and that includes a distinctly Western history and tradition. therefore, the far leftists only dismiss the West because of their fundamental bias against it.

I could say more, but that should be adequate to prove my point. if you were 'de-radicalized' by Contrapoints, I'm afraid you weren't very committed to being an evil internet nazi to begin with. also, pardon my sperging, just wanted to state my thoughts on this topic.

It is funny as modern "marxists" like Nyx are really far removed from original marxism, so it's funny seeing them act like anything not explicitly said by Marx has never been said by a Marxist.

 

[Spatula]

Please use the dictionary (not dick tionary) and look up the definition of “Inference”, you silly Senegalese swish.

I feel sadness, a person with such terrible wit has besmirched the name of one of my favorite animations.

 

[Nykysnottrans]

It is funny as modern "marxists" like Nyx are really far removed from original marxism, so it's funny seeing them act like anything not explicitly said by Marx has never been said by a Marxist.

I am seriously considering starting a Workers' Union for unpaid ContraPoints trolls, I am concerned that their labour rights are being violated by a greedy new media millionaire in Baltimore who's exploiting their unpaid labour. Also they seem to be working overtime uncompensated, which is another labour rights violation. I mean, this is ridiculous, even the Kremlin is paying their internet trolls at the troll-farm: "Workers at Vladimir Putin's troll factory earn almost £1,000 ($ 1,200) a week.". Interesting how Nyk wants to transition away from politics just as he's becoming rich enough to be able to pay his online trolls. That makes Nyk literally worse than Putin.

 

[ZulwayGodOfMercy]

I feel sadness, a person with such terrible wit has besmirched the name of one of my favorite animations.

Perhaps you would feel happy had you had even a smidgen of raillery yourself.

I am seriously considering starting a Workers' Union for unpaid ContraPoints trolls, I am concerned that their labour rights are being violated by a greedy new media millionaire in Baltimore who's exploiting their unpaid labour. Also they seem to be working overtime uncompensated, which is another labour rights violation. I mean, this is ridiculous, even the Kremlin is paying their internet trolls at the troll-farm: "Workers at Vladimir Putin's troll factory earn almost £1,000 ($ 1,200) a week.". Interesting how Nyk wants to transition away from politics just as he's becoming rich enough to be able to pay his online trolls. That makes Nyk literally worse than Putin.

 

[Freya]

I am seriously considering starting a Workers' Union for unpaid ContraPoints trolls, I am concerned that their labour rights are being violated by a greedy new media millionaire in Baltimore who's exploiting their unpaid labour. Also they seem to be working overtime uncompensated, which is another labour rights violation. I mean, this is ridiculous, even the Kremlin is paying their internet trolls at the troll-farm: "Workers at Vladimir Putin's troll factory earn almost £1,000 ($ 1,200) a week.". Interesting how Nyk wants to transition away from politics just as he's becoming rich enough to be able to pay his online trolls. That makes Nyk literally worse than Putin.

The funny thing is that Nyk wouldn't buy these schlubs a dollar menu cheeseburger if they showed up at his door starving to death.
He'd probably think of them as icky poor people and then slam the door shut, go inside, order takeout and then throw most of it away while giggling.

 

[Nykysnottrans]

The funny thing is that Nyk wouldn't buy these schlubs a dollar menu cheeseburger if they showed up at his door starving to death.
He'd probably think of them as icky poor people and then slam the door shut, go inside, order takeout and then throw most of it away while giggling.

Nah, he'd probably think they are drug dealers and would ask them if they have some product he can buy for the night. To be fair to Nyk, he did buy his former Discord mod Sabrina a couple of margaritas. I know, such exceptional generosity. She said he also paid her back her Patreon donations. Which is chum change for someone like Nyk, even back then before he really ranked in the big Patreon bux.

 

[ZulwayGodOfMercy]

Speaking of social constructs, here’s an excellent article breaking down the farcically facetious argy-bargies that Contra presents in her videos, specifically addressing gender in The Aesthetic. An oldie, but a goodie:

https://medium.com/@alysonescalante/how-contrapoints-misunderstands-gender-bd833cc6d8c8

As @Wikipedia Scholar rightfully pointed out, Nicky is a sophist who presents flashy content that obfuscates the intellectual bankruptcy of her own content. More often than not she holds incompatible views that are left unsolved not only to appeal to all the sides of an argument, but also because she genuinely lacks the ability of providing a solution to any given problem.

Edit: My Queen Needs Tough Love.

 

[NimertiS]

I know from personal experience that Nyk doesn't respect people's boundaries. I didn't need Brittany to post a comment about this under her video on Lefttube (and she is so scared of Nyk that she didn't dare mention Nyk's shitty views on consent in the video itself, only in a comment under the video) to learn that Nyk doesn't really give a shit about consent, I knew this myself long before Brittany posted about her experiences with Nyk. He will violate your personal boundaries, violate your private space, steal your shit and rub it in your face how he managed to get away with it while you were looking the other way minding your own business and not noticing how he invaded your private personal space to take your personal shit away from you and use it for himself. Why do you think he mentioned that some of his girlfriends had to lock up their drawers upon learning that he was a crossdresser so he wouldn't steal their shit? Because he really will come in and steal your shit and rub it in your face that he got away with it. How many tweets does he have to post where he brags about using sockpuppet accounts to infiltrate feminists and other groups online before people realize that Nyk doesn't give a shit about consent? I posted the videos here of that Youtube Atheist Gathering he went to in Ohio (that was organized by his fangirl The Healthy Addict) where Nyk was wearing a skimpy red dress in a restaurant where he was exposing himself in a sexual manner to non-consenting hapless strangers at a public establishment, getting his girlfriend to fondle his crotch under his skirt before everyone, shoving his crotch in his girlfriend's face, getting drunk and throwing up in the bushes at the parking lot. He doesn't care about getting consent, or how other people feel about being subjected to his lunacy. All he wants is to be at the center of attention, other people's comfort levels be damned.

On the topic of rape specifically, Nyk once had a back and forth with some skeptic philosopher on the topic of rape back in 2011. Here's what Nyk said at the time:



All these comments from Nyk (using his ContraPoints account to post comments already back then in 2011) were posted underneath this particular video, which was a response to one of Nyk's videos:

The original video from Nyk (titled "EvoPsych Does Not And Cannot Justify Rape") is no longer online (Nyk took it down as part of his grand cover up where he deleted all his past videos) but you can kind of infer what was said in Nyk's original video from this response video.



Speaking of chasers, here's something I was looking for to post here for you guys but I only recently managed to dig up these links. There is a ContraPoints stan on Twitter, who is a celebrity porn deepfake artist (who is also a transwoman), who upon learning that Nyk was gonna troon out back in 2017 had posted a series of rather creepy deepfakes depicting Nyk as a woman before Nyk had even begun to feminize himself:

(TW, very Islamic content, potentially NSFW):

https://twitter.com/Haganista/status/919600677156020231

https://twitter.com/Haganista/status/858058932291547136

https://twitter.com/Haganista/status/854394956882087937

This one is particularly creepy, depicting Nyk as a "mother" with huge breasts:

https://twitter.com/Haganista/status/853967596361854976

Interesting how all these trannie deepfakers were all so thirsty about Nyk's transition, that they went out of their way to provide Nyk with the feminized deepfake images of himself that Nyk could then use as an inspiration for his feminization: "This is what I might end up looking like." Chasers will happily show a transwoman exactly what they want/expect her to look like. They will give transwomen a goal to work towards.



Unfortunately I haven't seen any of Benjamin's more recent videos. I just saw he did another Livestream interview with GNC centric. I will definitely be watching that soon. I had posted here in the thread about the deep realization I had because of that particular Livestream interview. It was through Benjamin's interview with Ben/GNC centric that I realized that Nyk is really just a trannie chaser who became trans in order to be able to pray on young confused trans kids with impunity. It was through that particular interview that I realized that what Nyk did to Milo Stewart (getting Milo, who was barely legal at 18 at the time, to talk about her testosterone enlarged clitoris before 30,000 lurkers on a Livestream that Nyk and Milo both deleted as soon as I posted the link here on KF) really was a kind of online grooming that is very commonplace and is committed by usually older trannie-chasers-turned-transLARPers who like to use the larger trans movement as an excuse to pray on young sexually confused girls (who claim to be transmen or NBs).

I can’t see this Twitter, I’m blocked somehow? Someone please grab a screenshot to give me

 

[UngaWunga]

New video was pretty good.