Monica Rial / Monica Jean Rial / Rialisms & Ron Toye / Ronald Toye III / rontoye3 - 5th Bulma and Ron "Pick Up the Phone or You'll Find Your Dog Dead When You Get Home" Toye

I have a cousin who is a cop. He's told me that when he arrives on a scene of DV, more often than not it's not some buff dude who can toss the woman around like a rag doll.

He says the control is psychological. To the point when even where you can see that victim's been roughed up, she'll plead with them not to arrest the guy. And when there's been an arrest, he's even seen cases where the victim turns around and assaults the officers.

And the number one question after the abuser has been taken to the car? "What do I do now?" Not as in, "what's the next step?" - as in, "Oh my God, my life is ruined, what am I going to do?"

I have literally zero training on this, but in my opinion, most of these assholes have are not world class manipulators. They just size up their victims well. They learn who can they can exploit, and simply walk away from those they can't. Sure, there are some master manipulators, but for most of them, all they have is the same sense a con man has for identifying a mark. Just one man's opinion.
 
I have literally zero training on this, but in my opinion, most of these assholes have are not world class manipulators. They just size up their victims well. They learn who can they can exploit, and simply walk away from those they can't. Sure, there are some master manipulators, but for most of them, all they have is the same sense a con man has for identifying a mark. Just one man's opinion.
They don't have to be a great manipulator if you can find someone who is easily manipulable.
 
I wish I had photoshop
71ygV3W2iYL._RI_.jpg
Nigga use GIMP. Dat sheit free
 
Lmao of course the wanabe feminist Chris Kyle is a cuck with rage.

What is the kiwifarms legal opinion on this making it into the case record? I wouldn't be surprised if this is deemed unrelated and more prejudicial than probative. Should be funny to see a motion and hearing to strike about it though.
 
Ron "Drinking some soy while killing a good boy" Toye
Ron "The judge will feel my grudge" Toye
Ron "Rule in her favor, I'll kill your neighbor" Toye
Ron "If I pay child support, you'll get my pistol's report" Toye
Ron "Suck my feller' or I'll kill Ol' Yeller" Toye
Ron "Call your mom and I'll mail her a bomb" Toye
 
Lmao of course the wanabe feminist Chris Kyle is a cuck with rage.

What is the kiwifarms legal opinion on this making it into the case record? I wouldn't be surprised if this is deemed unrelated and more prejudicial than probative. Should be funny to see a motion and hearing to strike about it though.

The legal thread has a fairly in-depth discussion of it, but the consensus seems to be that it won't be allowed unless Ron basically gets on the stand and says something that would allow it to be introduced. I'm not a lawyer, but my instinct would say that something like this would pretty much make the whole jury want to see him burn regardless of evidence, so the judge would probably need a really good reason to allow it.
 
I have literally zero training on this, but in my opinion, most of these assholes have are not world class manipulators. They just size up their victims well. They learn who can they can exploit, and simply walk away from those they can't. Sure, there are some master manipulators, but for most of them, all they have is the same sense a con man has for identifying a mark. Just one man's opinion.

I've dealt with countless DV victims over the years and every single one of them has said the mental abuse is far worse to deal with than the physical. I've seen some of the men involved go onto new relationships and they can smell vulnerability. How a woman reacts to the first slipping of the mask tells them everything they need to know about the degree to which they will be able to manipulate her.

So many women promise that "next time" they'll leave, but next time comes and goes again and again.
 
The legal thread has a fairly in-depth discussion of it, but the consensus seems to be that it won't be allowed unless Ron basically gets on the stand and says something that would allow it to be introduced. I'm not a lawyer, but my instinct would say that something like this would pretty much make the whole jury want to see him burn regardless of evidence, so the judge would probably need a really good reason to allow it.
Most likely. I'd imagine there would either have to be some so far undisclosed connection which would probably be an entire lawsuit on it's own worth of conspiracies to sort through or nailing him on perjury for his depo comments about lawsuits/arrests thusfar. And that's a stretch at best IMO.
 

No shit you stupid whore, people generally aren't fond of people who threaten to chop their pets up with a weapon in front of them, beat them up in front of their own kid, and threaten to murder the judge in their divorce case if he doesn't rule their way.

It's very understandable someone wouldn't like someone who was found by a court to have done that.
 
Lmao of course the wanabe feminist Chris Kyle is a cuck with rage.

What is the kiwifarms legal opinion on this making it into the case record? I wouldn't be surprised if this is deemed unrelated and more prejudicial than probative. Should be funny to see a motion and hearing to strike about it though.

More prejudicial than probative unless Ron does something to open the door to it, like trying to pull his sheepdog/Chris Kyle rant about what a great protecter of whammenses he is.

And he's just stupid enough that's a high possibility despite the fact that any sane lawyer will tell him not to.
 
Most likely. I'd imagine there would either have to be some so far undisclosed connection which would probably be an entire lawsuit on it's own worth of conspiracies to sort through or nailing him on perjury for his depo comments about lawsuits/arrests thusfar. And that's a stretch at best IMO.
I think the angle they're probably going to go for relevancy is make the argument that he's using his abusive and manipulative nature (corroborated by these reports) as a means to prove some kind of manipulation or control over the situation. Like if he pressured Monica or any of the witnesses/affiants with manipulation, threats, or power over them. Could be Ty has some evidence of this already and wants to use it to corroborate that evidence.

Otherwise yeah, it shows he's a monster but relevancy is a bit wishy washy.
 
You're the loose cannon cop who's two weeks away from retirement and doesn't play by the rules.
I literally posted my location 12 hours in advance and stood out in the open for over an hour today to see if Soye's cuckrage would induce him into visiting me.

Screenshot_20190828-192632_Chrome.jpg
20190828_191816.jpg

Also I invited them to sue me.
Screenshot_20190828-210550_Chrome.jpg
 
Most likely. I'd imagine there would either have to be some so far undisclosed connection which would probably be an entire lawsuit on it's own worth of conspiracies to sort through or nailing him on perjury for his depo comments about lawsuits/arrests thusfar. And that's a stretch at best IMO.

I had an idea on how it might get in, but it would be pimpy. Ty could ask monica if she was pressured into making the accusations by anyone. Ask if she was pressured by ron, if she was aware of ron's history of violence, if she was every threatened by him, if she was afraid, and if she might make those statements if she were threatened or intimidated. If she was aware of ron threatening or intimdating jamie or her boyfriend, threatening the boyfriends job, threatening or attacking the twins. Etc.

I really doubt that would be permitted, but if one of the exes were to come out with a statement that could show hes done something like that in the past, it could fly.

But the real value is that, despite the vocal apologists out there, there may be some people willing to come forward with more info on ron. And when the funi tcpa fails this ron shit ensures they will settle to avoid vicarious liability so a court record wont show this disgusting dung pile sheepdog as an agent of the company.
 
I had an idea on how it might get in, but it would be pimpy. Ty could ask monica if she was pressured into making the accusations by anyone. Ask if she was pressured by ron, if she was aware of ron's history of violence, if she was every threatened by him, if she was afraid, and if she might make those statements if she were threatened or intimidated. If she was aware of ron threatening or intimdating jamie or her boyfriend, threatening the boyfriends job, threatening or attacking the twins. Etc.

I really doubt that would be permitted, but if one of the exes were to come out with a statement that could show hes done something like that in the past, it could fly.

But the real value is that, despite the vocal apologists out there, there may be some people willing to come forward with more info on ron. And when the funi tcpa fails this ron shit ensures they will settle to avoid vicarious liability so a court record wont show this disgusting dung pile sheepdog as an agent of the company.
I have a feeling Carey would be the one who would actually do that line of questioning should they actually get to the point of that being permitted, but yeah that sounds about right.
 
I had an idea on how it might get in, but it would be pimpy. Ty could ask monica if she was pressured into making the accusations by anyone. Ask if she was pressured by ron, if she was aware of ron's history of violence, if she was every threatened by him, if she was afraid, and if she might make those statements if she were threatened or intimidated. If she was aware of ron threatening or intimdating jamie or her boyfriend, threatening the boyfriends job, threatening or attacking the twins. Etc.

I really doubt that would be permitted, but if one of the exes were to come out with a statement that could show hes done something like that in the past, it could fly.

But the real value is that, despite the vocal apologists out there, there may be some people willing to come forward with more info on ron. And when the funi tcpa fails this ron shit ensures they will settle to avoid vicarious liability so a court record wont show this disgusting dung pile sheepdog as an agent of the company.

I see only one thing preventing that. Vic. Because thats a total 'gloves off' he'd have to approve.
 
Back