- Joined
- Jan 31, 2015
Hitler wasn't autistic, he was just a German.
Wrong. He was Austrian. Read a history book.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hitler wasn't autistic, he was just a German.
He's proud of his ~female viewership ratio~ but doesn't understand how unrelatable bragging about his plastic surgeries is- especially for non-woke viewers who would think trans women would get THE surgery first (lol wrong). Even beautubers don't get away with stunting on their cheek fillers. It gets clicks initially, but people remember.Is there anything more privileged than thinking spending new Lexus money for surgeries in order to attract more (straight) cocks into your STD hole is "terrifying and difficult"?
He was German, Austria was German, the Grossdeutschland problem wasn't solved until after WW2.Wrong. He was Austrian. Read a history book.
HRT pills are just opiates for cowards - Che before blasting a black tranny in the dick with a shotgun.
-99% of women with congenital adrenal hyperplasia are lesbians -- of these, about 5% end up eventually identifying as male
-He's also a pioneer in a method for FtM patients where instead of the standard phalloplasty surgery (which has plenty of complications and really is more of a superficial construct), he uses a high dose of topical testosterone applied directly to these patient's clitorises in an effort to have them grow into an actually functional penis
-Vocal feminization surgery has apparently come a long long way
When did they start identifying as female, last i checked in they were being referred to as a he?
So regardless of how people on this thread feel about transgender issues in general, the relevant question is: is Natalie sincere with her status as a transwoman, or is it instead (as frequently posited here) a case of Nyk just riding the so-called ‘trans-trend’?
There’s no doubt that there’s been an increase in transgender diagnosis and treatment in recent years, but this is probably mostly because of an increase in the general understanding and attention given to the issue. A cynical view is that the medical and pharmaceutical establishments are cashing in, and given the high price of the various surgeries and hormonal treatments for gender dysphoria, perhaps there’s something to this.
But I really don’t think most people who are deliberately seeking out treatment are doing so just for “fun” or following a trend; transitioning is a painful, costly, and often embarrassing process that is still largely stigmatized in our culture. Yes, there are perverts out there, but overt autogynephiliacs aside, why does there seem to be so much doubt about the purity of intention for a lot of transfolk?
As specific examples, there’s a sense that certain troons, e.g. Contrapoints and J. Yaniv, aren’t being completely “sincere” in their motivation to transition. Is it simply due to the perceived element of perversion/paraphilia with these types of people? Isn’t it enough that they’re undergoing treatment to justify their identity as transwomen, regardless of their sexual fixations?
One of the most prolific posters on this thread has a handle literally saying “Nyk is not trans”, and frequently there are posts questioning the validity of Nyk’s intentions with transitioning. To be honest, I guess I just don’t completely get it. I agree that there’s a jarring dissonance when one compares the Nyk of 3 years ago with the Natalie of now, but people do change after all. Maybe all of the awkwardness and drag-queen-ness of Nyk’s current videos is largely due to the supposed “second puberty”? I don’t know, it seems like we should at least give Nyk/Natalie the benefit of the doubt on this particular matter.
Regardless, that doesn’t mean that the Contrapoints videos aren’t still a load of meandering navel-gazing tripe and aesthetic garbage that pander to some of the dumbest people on the internet. One can be trans and still be an idiot.
maybe we're getting too serious here, but I think it's a very good thing this thread exists lolcow or not.Rated late since Nyk has identified as Natalie for quite awhile now.
Btw I looked up who “Faye Kane” was based on a previous comment on this thread. Wow is all I can say — that’s the sort of lolcow actually worth commenting on.
Nyk just barely meets the criteria for lolcow given that that she’s an eccentric Internet personality who posts content semi-regularly, but in comparison to some of the people documented on the farms, she’s actually quite boring and her content is pedantic and repetitive.
KF can be considered a counter-culture in a way. We're the new free speech radicals.Lol about Trans-doubt. This site's community's majority is emphatically anti-trans and any other form of the human conditioning deviating from the blank slate, & not even that is safe from their derision! Sort of useful for catching potential rapists/pedophiles/criminals, genuinely fun in contemplating the misery of others and all too useless for engaging in critical thought (most of the time.) I would guess that ya landed on here because you wanted a forum verily lenient on differing social opinions. Sorry friend, no such a place exists.
Those who think Nick and these other autogynephilic types are insincere/faking it for attention and/or money are just plain wrong. They're just wrong. As a reformed troon with a similar educational background and personality type as Nick, I can confirm beyond a shadow of a doubt that Nick and these other autistic troons are sincere in their delusions. It is likely that Nick is having a crisis now, starting to realize the horror of what he's done to himself and others, and is just really really afraid and confused about what to do next.there’s a sense that certain troons, e.g. Contrapoints and J. Yaniv, aren’t being completely “sincere” in their motivation to transition.
Those who think Nick and these other autogynephilic types are insincere/faking it for attention and/or money are just plain wrong. They're just wrong. As a reformed troon with a similar educational background and personality type as Nick, I can confirm beyond a shadow of a doubt that Nick and these other autistic troons are sincere in their delusions. It is likely that Nick is having a crisis now, starting to realize the horror of what he's done to himself and others, and is just really really afraid and confused about what to do next.
Also, see pic for evidence of the true horror of what's going on.View attachment 912692
Nick isn't autistic. He never had trouble getting girlfriends and as was seen in videos from his atheism days, he was quite comfortable around them, including prancing around in a dress and demanding they wait on him.Those who think Nick and these other autogynephilic types are insincere/faking it for attention and/or money are just plain wrong. They're just wrong. As a reformed troon with a similar educational background and personality type as Nick, I can confirm beyond a shadow of a doubt that Nick and these other autistic troons are sincere in their delusions. It is likely that Nick is having a crisis now, starting to realize the horror of what he's done to himself and others, and is just really really afraid and confused about what to do next.
Also, see pic for evidence of the true horror of what's going on.View attachment 912692
He "keeps it light" because he's a wahmen now, silly. Women can't be expected to read heavy philosophical tomes.
They can't even open a beer can without male help!
bimbofication fetish is near universal among AGPs but mostly unknown to non trans people (except those of us into internet disaster tourism). he's getting bolder and bolder because he gets off on making the audience watch his "transformation". no doubt he gets special pleasure knowing how many liberal, feminist women are forcing themselves to laugh along, or reassuring themselves its ironic and they don't get the joke.A cult-member is slowly beginning to see right through the bullshit:
He's not dumbing himself down, he is a bimbo. Trooning out is just an excuse to act stupid in the name of "being a woman".
And here comes the evitable denial: "Oh no, she couldn't possibly be actually really stupid. No, it has to be an ironic pose."
no doubt he gets special pleasure knowing how many liberal, feminist women are forcing themselves to laugh along
There’s no doubt that there’s been an increase in transgender diagnosis and treatment in recent years, but this is probably mostly because of an increase in the general understanding and attention given to the issue.
So regardless of how people on this thread feel about transgender issues in general, the relevant question is: is Natalie sincere with her status as a transwoman, or is it instead (as frequently posited here) a case of Nyk just riding the so-called ‘trans-trend’?
There’s no doubt that there’s been an increase in transgender diagnosis and treatment in recent years, but this is probably mostly because of an increase in the general understanding and attention given to the issue. A cynical view is that the medical and pharmaceutical establishments are cashing in, and given the high price of the various surgeries and hormonal treatments for gender dysphoria, perhaps there’s something to this.
But I really don’t think most people who are deliberately seeking out treatment are doing so just for “fun” or following a trend; transitioning is a painful, costly, and often embarrassing process that is still largely stigmatized in our culture. Yes, there are perverts out there, but overt autogynephiliacs aside, why does there seem to be so much doubt about the purity of intention for a lot of transfolk?
I think you are starting from the wrong premise. All of this is just inane because the fact is that the only thing authentic for Nick is his hedonistic and nihilistic narcissism. His "politics" are paper thin and the vast majority of his videos very transparently relate some way to his own identity and sense of self-importance. His "identity" consists of no more than this: he wants to be young, beautiful, and desirable forever. Since this is a paradox in a universe where one of the only constants is entropy, his urge reflects itself in a drive towards his own annihilation. His trooning out is just an aspect of this.
Nothing for Nick has any meaning as a thing in itself. A given thing only has meaning to him in so far as it serves as a prop for his own self-absorption.
You can see this in his "politics" as well, and it's not incidentally something reflected in a fairly substantial portion of the left today. He doesn't propose any kind of vision or program for a new or different society. He just rails against things as being inadequate, or needing to be destroyed. Unlike other leftists as, say, Vladimir Lenin for whom the main question was, "What is to be done", which he wrote dozens of volumes on; neither Nick nor any of the breadtubers have anything concrete to offer(irrespective of whether it is horrific or good). Partially this is because they are partnered with big social media corporations whose money and support they need to stay afloat: if they proposed any kind of politics publically that was acceptable to big corporations, then they'd be revealing themselves as frauds to their followers; but as I said, it's also reflective of a deeper psychological reality that these people are vapid and nihilistic airheads.
Freud mostly talked about a lot of psuedo-scientific bunk, but you have to wonder if he was on to something at times. Nick's nature brings to mind his theory of "death drive". This was later expanded by Jacques Lacan and he considered it to be at the core of narcissism and suicidal tendencies. Seeing someone like Nick, it's not hard to see why.
View attachment 913599
In Lacan's first remarks on the death drive, in 1938, he describes it as a nostalgia for a lost harmony, a desire to return to the preoedipal fusion with the mother's breast, the loss of which is marked on the psyche in the weaning complex.
In 1946 he links the death drive to the suicidal tendency of narcissism.[3].
By linking the death drive with the preoedipal phase and with narcissism, these early remarks would place the death drive in what Lacan later comes to call the imaginary order.
However, when Lacan begins to develop his concept of the three orders of imaginary, symbolic and real, in the 1950s, he does not situate the death drive in the imaginary but in the symbolic.
This shift also marks a difference with Freud, for whom the death drive was closely bound up with biology, representing the fundamental tendency of every living thing to return to an inorganic state.
By situating the death drive firmly in the symbolic, Lacan articulates it with culture rather than nature; he states that the death drive"is not a question of biology,"[5], and must be distinguished from the biological instinct to return to the inanimate.[6]
Another difference between Lacan's concept of the death drive and Freud's emerges in 1964.
Freud opposed the death drive to the sexual drives, but now Lacan argues that the death drive is not a separate drive, but is in fact an aspect of every drive.
"The distinction between the life drive and the death drive is - true in as much as it manifests two aspects of the drive."[7]
Hence Lacan writes that "every drive is virtually a death drive" because:
1. every drive pursues its own extinction,
2. every drive involves the subject in repetition, and
3. every drive is an attempt to go beyond the pleasure principle, to the realm of excess jouissance where enjoyment is experienced as suffering.
Lacan makes an important distinction between jouissance and plaisir (pleasure). Pleasure obeys the law of homeostasis that Freudevokes in Beyond the Pleasure Principle, whereby, through discharge, the psyche seeks the lowest possible level of tension. The pleasure principle thus functions as a limit imposed on enjoyment; it commands the subject to "enjoy as little as possible." Jouissance transgresses this law and, in that respect, it is beyond the pleasure principle.
The symbolic prohibition of enjoyment in the Oedipus complex (the incest taboo) is thus, paradoxically, the prohibition of something which is already impossible; its function is therefore to sustain the neurotic illusion that enjoyment would be attainable if it were not forbidden. The very prohibition creates the desire to transgress it, and jouissance is therefore fundamentally transgressive.[1]