- Joined
- Apr 19, 2019
Sony already has an alternative to Funimation with Aniplex. Aniplex has been around since ADV was a thing, there's really no reason for Funimation to continue existing.
Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.
- Thread starter 5t3n0g0ph3r
- Start date
Leonard Helplessness
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2018
Did Law Twitter provide anything to back up their claim that Vic's representation's 1200-page TCPA response is malpractice?
My understanding is that in order to defeat a TCPA motion, the plaintiff has to show that there is enough evidence backing their initial claims that they have a reasonable chance of winning the lawsuit. That's how most anti-SLAPP statutes are supposed to work, anyway -- unless the plaintiff can prove that they're not filing a bullshit lawsuit intended to swamp the defendant in ruinously-expensive litigation, the lawsuit gets thrown out and the plaintiff has to pay the defendant's attorney's fees.
The burden of proof is on the plaintiff -- Vic. Vic's counsel has to prove to the court that they have enough evidence behind their claims that their case might succeed. IANAL, but this it seems that the plaintiff's best course of action here is to respond with as much evidence as possible. Whether all of the evidence will hold up to scrutiny is a lower priority at the moment. The evidence's validity, under these circumstances, is less important than its volume.
That's my understanding, anyway. Legal kiwis can probably explain it much better than I can.
My understanding is that in order to defeat a TCPA motion, the plaintiff has to show that there is enough evidence backing their initial claims that they have a reasonable chance of winning the lawsuit. That's how most anti-SLAPP statutes are supposed to work, anyway -- unless the plaintiff can prove that they're not filing a bullshit lawsuit intended to swamp the defendant in ruinously-expensive litigation, the lawsuit gets thrown out and the plaintiff has to pay the defendant's attorney's fees.
The burden of proof is on the plaintiff -- Vic. Vic's counsel has to prove to the court that they have enough evidence behind their claims that their case might succeed. IANAL, but this it seems that the plaintiff's best course of action here is to respond with as much evidence as possible. Whether all of the evidence will hold up to scrutiny is a lower priority at the moment. The evidence's validity, under these circumstances, is less important than its volume.
That's my understanding, anyway. Legal kiwis can probably explain it much better than I can.
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2017
I'd love to hear their arguments on why its malpractice, but I know I won't get those so
I can't imagine
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2019
Sony will continue to have interest in putting out dubbed anime in the U.S., and Funimation has the facilities to do it. It's possible/probable that a large chunk of people in the company will not be there any longer, and obviously Okratron won't be getting those sweet, sweet deals anymore, but I believe the actual Flower Mound campus will still be used for anime for Sony, either under the Funimation or Aniplex name.
The Wisdom of Bassets
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2019
Law twitter is a furrie convention with sheepskin rather than sheep costumes. Lots of masturbation in either event.
Legioneer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2019
I don't know anything about anime or dubbing. Plus, I don't mind watching a video with subtitles. So I don't have a clear opinion on the prospects for the dub industry in general.
Although, as I see it, given that this is the U.S., which has a huge industry of voicing its own cartoon products - the place will not be empty. I guess.
But personally, I am really interested in the real prospects for Vic in this situation. KickVik doesn't understand the main thing is that even if Vic's reputation can't be repaired, he and his support still have a duty to do everything possible to punish the bastards. Not for the sake of revenge, but for other actors not to get the same thing next time.
And yet, apart from the fact that in the hands of KickVik, it's a stupid and pointless argument. It's still an interesting question. What can really be done for a person in such a situation. I mean, of course, it's not his fault, but even studios that understand this are unlikely will want to invite him and provoke the fire of the haters. They're in business, not in charity.
Accordingly. Is there a chance that in a year everything will settle down and he will still be able to work? Or does he need to change his profession somehow now?
Although, as I see it, given that this is the U.S., which has a huge industry of voicing its own cartoon products - the place will not be empty. I guess.
But personally, I am really interested in the real prospects for Vic in this situation. KickVik doesn't understand the main thing is that even if Vic's reputation can't be repaired, he and his support still have a duty to do everything possible to punish the bastards. Not for the sake of revenge, but for other actors not to get the same thing next time.
And yet, apart from the fact that in the hands of KickVik, it's a stupid and pointless argument. It's still an interesting question. What can really be done for a person in such a situation. I mean, of course, it's not his fault, but even studios that understand this are unlikely will want to invite him and provoke the fire of the haters. They're in business, not in charity.
Accordingly. Is there a chance that in a year everything will settle down and he will still be able to work? Or does he need to change his profession somehow now?
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2019
Here's a funny thing to consider: there have been firm-wide meetings where BHBH discuss KiwiFarms.
The Wisdom of Bassets
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2019
Win or lose, the major KickV players and vocal kicvic'ers alike have created a situation that guarantees their actions are going to follow them forever. For every snarky bastard out there, there is a fan or even just vindictive autist that will pop up in their internet existence at random to 'remind' or inform whatever group they become a part of, of the past deeds. Just to watch them spin out.
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2019
Today (1-Sept), because he was tweeting late last night. My guess why: He thought he could do what Nick does; snarky comments on law, making fun of the case, etc. Except, 90% of any comments on his tweets were mocking him, memes of him, and mosquito related--it didn't go the way he wanted.
Last edited:
Legioneer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2019
Yes. But I'm trying to assess the prospects that Vic will be offered new roles in the near future. Or will the companies continue to work with him on old projects?
The choice for them: to call Vic "strengthen security" and wait for a gang of crazy people to show up at any event and fight off the trash on the Internet. Or call any other actor and not have these problems.
It's not a question of whether companies believe in accusations against Vic or not.
We can assume that Vic will be able to gain a lot of money from the defendants in court, so he won't starve. But he also loved his job very much. I wonder if he will be able to continue working. Not just to go to a few conventions a year and nothing else.
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2019
Vic is still doing voice work. https://twitter.com/CasualOtakuMan/status/1167532573611966467
Legioneer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2019
I've seen it. I have no doubt that he will be able to participate in some projects.
But in my understanding, he was cut just when his career was supposed to go up the hill. And now it's not even clear how he'll get back to the same level as he was before.
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2017
Yeah thats why you sue.
The Wisdom of Bassets
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2019
I would guess, in light of the Funi revelations, that aside from RT and Funi (pre Sony action), he will at worst, spend a few months at modest levels of work. After the 'cooling off' period that many companies default to in order to dodge the mob, he'll be back stronger than before.
If he is exonerated, what does he offer outside his talent? The "Face" of wronged man who triumphed over massive odds who makes anyone hiring him look good for doing so.
Legioneer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2019
In my opinion, the best scenario. Which is very naive of course. That's if Vic really sues at least a few million dollars and creates his own big studio in Texas.
It's very hard, I guess. But he's a very capable guy who made the Star Trek continues. That would be cool, right? )
It's very hard, I guess. But he's a very capable guy who made the Star Trek continues. That would be cool, right? )
Markorian
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2019
Man, the overflowing of positive replies and the dearth of negative ones really show that outside of a small, idiotic, 3 months behind bubble, the pr war is going heavily in his favor.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
It's the exact opposite. The evidence's mere existence is what's important. The plaintiff has nothing to prove other than that there is a case, not the case itself. Just Vic's own affidavit proves most of the elements of his case, and Huber's fills in much of what was left.
Less is more. All filing voluminous mountains of garbage shows is you're so desperate to prove anything you fling a mountain of shit in the hopes that there's a kernel of corn somewhere in there.
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2018
All they need to do is ignore the “haters”.
Ever since the smear campaign, Vic has been to a number of conventions and, if Kamehacon was anything to go by, made them a SHIT TON of money. Vic is also still doing voice work for companies that Sabat doesn’t have his tentacles in (IIRC the only jobs he lost were Funimation and RT, and according to Huber Sabat is also involved with the latter). If a company has the integrity, they would tell the social justice weirdos to fuck off and life would go on. Most importantly, perhaps, Vic still has legions of dedicated fans who will support him, because they’ve seen the documents and are convinced of his innocence.
I think the only way for his reputation to be completely vindicated is if Season 2 completely turns the tables on Sabat, spilling the casting couch and conspiracy stories into the mainstream. But even what we have now is already quite a bit above the worst-case scenario.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
It's not even Law Twitter at this point, but a disgruntled Spednaught captain sock puppeting because he's banned, who has gone so utterly loony that he doesn't even pretend to be not just making shit up at this point.
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2017
Why do lawyers have twitter accounts at all? Why even fucking engage in that shit? I know a firm that had a Facebook account and all it brought them was misery, no clients just pure misery, I can't even imagine what Twitter is doing to these people.