- Joined
- Mar 4, 2019
He made the demand on a saturday and they're pitching a fit about it the moment the sun comes up on the working week...Notary books are public information. Anyone can get a copy if they pay a fee. From Texas's FAQ on notaries:
View attachment 920568
Another random observation: remember how we've been saying Marchi's lawyer Sam Johnson is being quiet and generally competent? Turns out he was the one that noticed the issue and wanted to see Ty's book.
View attachment 920569
View attachment 920571
Johnson didn't explicitly offer to pay fees, but if he does upon Ty's request, then Ty is required to respond with those pages or else he gets a complaint filed against him to the Texas Secretary of State's Office.
Considering that letter is dated Aug 31, it means Johnson saw the potential issue immediately, without waiting for us to notice it on the Farms on Saturday night/Sunday morning. My guess is when Ty didn't clarify the issue with a quick scan and response, Johnson let Lemoine know and signed on to the resultant filing. He probably let Lemoine do the drafting to save on his own work and billable hours, too.
I'm legit interested to see this guy in court.
For all Johnson's general sanity, he's stooping to the same tactics as the rest of the super lolyers in this instance, by trying to end-run around the laws and regs governing these things. He "demanded", but he hasn't stumped up the money for the demand, so actually he's requested Ty's book. Ty has no obligation to provide it in any sort of timely manner. Even if the fees were offered, there's no time restriction on when the book should be provided (the rule in question doesn't even mention "reasonable" or "timely" or provide any sort of time limit. There's certainly nothing in the rule that requires Ty respond immediately on the saturday of a holiday weekend, nor any requirement that he respond by the start of the first business day following the request, as they seem to want to believe and represent.
Last edited: