Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.

If Ty notorized documents for people in California and Japan, when he was physically in Texas... That's the problem.

Yea, Ty really fucked up here. Even if he rectified this in his amended complaint, people will accuse him off fraudulent behavior, even if this was a mistake.

It is grimy, though, that in order to prove the case, we have to get unsworn affidavits from places like Georgia and Japan to do this. And the defense could use that against Ty. Meanwhile, the defendants have the convenience of having affidavits near where they live.

Honestly, it makes me worry about the hearing. Slightly.
 
The most important thing so far is that he's always been honest with the other party. And always came to a compromise and on the way of least resistance. For example, he notarized his own words, just to avoid an unnecessary argument, even knowing that he would win it. In this case, we cannot rule out the possibility that they misunderstood him.

He told them "Why should you try to chase this argument when it leads to a dead end". They figured it out so that they finally found vulnerability. But he had never lied to them before. So it's possible that they'll end up deadlocked.



Suppose the witnesses signed the document in his presence, but not on August 30. How should the proof that he is a fraud be built? In conditions when the original documents with "wet" seal are not available?
thats also fraud. His stamp. His responsibility.

He stamped it. Thats the liability. Thats the proof. I can see his stamp on that document, unless you are going to claim that is not his stamp.

Seriously, this Notary shit is not complex.
 
thats also fraud. His stamp. His responsibility.

He stamped it. Thats the liability. Thats the proof. I can see his stamp on that document, unless you are going to claim that is not his stamp.

Seriously, this Notary shit is not complex.
He's done goofed, people don't want to hear it because he's a likeable boomer. Such a silly thing to fuck up this late in the game.
 
Yea, Ty really fucked up here. Even if he rectified this in his amended complaint, people will accuse him off fraudulent behavior, even if this was a mistake.

It is grimy, though, that in order to prove the case, we have to get unsworn affidavits from places like Georgia and Japan to do this. And the defense could use that against Ty. Meanwhile, the defendants have the convenience of having affidavits near where they live.

Honestly, it makes me worry about the hearing. Slightly.
There was no notarized doc from Georgia or Japan...

The farthest point at contention is San Antonio.
 
Notice of Hearing regarding the Joint Response/Cross-Motion to Strike (1) Plaintiff’s Response to the TCPA Motions to Dismiss, (2) Plaintiff’s Second Amended Petition, and (3) Deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Late Response to Defendants’ TCPA Motions to Dismiss (including any of Defendants’ objections to evidence proffered by Plaintiff):
 

Attachments

If Ty knew that he could submit unsworn declarations, which he obviously does, having any notarized affidavits with his name on it was a mistake. This just invites problems. There were all sorts of things that he could have done to avoid the impression of impropriety. If he does not produce a book that shows the proper records and signatures, I have to say that defense is entirely entitled to seek sanctions, and that was a bad Ty. Bad Ty! Don't do that again!

That being said, I get the sense that Chupp is a no nonsense type of guy. To be fair, there was no harm done on the case as those affidavits didn't live an entire day before being withdrawn and substituted with unsworn declarations. I don't think Chupp will sanction Ty other than a verbal or written warning. I can't say if Ty should lose his notary license, but I would not cry if he did. (Again, assuming he didn't follow the proper procedure) Still, it is too soon for the defense to be accusing the plaintiffs of fraud; they have only suspicion to support their claims.

I suspect that sanctions will come to lawyers who maliciously or prematurely accuse another lawyer in court of fraud. That's a serious allegation, and it could severely impact the practice of an attorney in any state.

But, I'm to the point where I am frustrated with the games of both sides. If I were Chupp, I would tell the Furher the next time he files a motion to strike because a submission was 20 minutes late, he can go ahead and schedule a show cause hearing for frivolous filings. Stop wasting the court's time with games, and let's focus on the law and the facts of the case - not the lawyer's egos and gamesmanship. We're supposed to be finding the truth and judiciously applying the law. My patience would have run out with the defense, and the plaintiffs should know better than to act like the defense.

And honestly, Ty's work lately has been less than expected. Regardless, it does look like he laid out a solid case, but there was a lot of unprofessional mistakes and what looks like rushed work when BHBH had more than enough time to complete their work. As any college student will tell you, you don't submit an assignment at the last minute to account for submission mistakes. Don't take the chance, and it appears BHBH is playing a little too loose with their branding and professional reputation for my taste.

Maybe a little less time on Nick's stream and a little more time making sure you get your t's crossed and i's dotted and submitted on-time. I know Ty's got other cases, but hey, it's his name at the bottom of every motion, along with his firm. I'd be embarrassed.

Hopefully, Ty will bring his A game to the hearing. Sadly, I think we have already seen the Furher's A game.
 
This is not your typical “all in”.

This is more than a Hail Mary. Accusations like this are very serious, and the fact that several attorneys all were willing to co-sign it should give you pause. If it doesn’t you’ve drank the kool-aid.

Don’t assume Ty didn’t mess up just because he’s More likable, the easiest way to get burned is to marry yourself to beliefs you can’t independently verify.

I lean towards believing Ty, but I’m not going to blindly accept he didn’t do anything wrong. There is cause for concern, and until I see the notaries verified, that concern will remain.

Agreed, it's easy to pick a side and root for your personal good guys, but always be ready for surprises. I want Vic to win, I want the other side to be 100% bullshitting and just trying to ruin a poor man's life. Though I fully acknowledge having read Vic's ED article back in the day talking about him being grabby with his fangirls back then, so it's always possible those people too were bullshitting or blowing things out of proportion, or its all true and he has nothing to lose when denying it. The way I see it, if Rial and co are insane enough to pull a stunt like this, then it's just as likely that Vic could be crazy enough to do all of it and claim he didn't.
 
thats also fraud. His stamp. His responsibility.

He stamped it. Thats the liability. Thats the proof. I can see his stamp on that document, unless you are going to claim that is not his stamp.

Seriously, this Notary shit is not complex.
I can't wait for 6 more pages talking about Ty's fucking stamp. Forget talking about the case lets just theorize over and over about one thing that is a black and white scenario. He did or he didn't. He is fine or he is fucked.

I can't believe Lemoine is being less retarded than half the user's "theorys" about how Ty's stamp was used. (his theory was that they were too far to drive so Ty faked it)
 
Notice of Hearing regarding the Joint Response/Cross-Motion to Strike (1) Plaintiff’s Response to the TCPA Motions to Dismiss, (2) Plaintiff’s Second Amended Petition, and (3) Deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Late Response to Defendants’ TCPA Motions to Dismiss (including any of Defendants’ objections to evidence proffered by Plaintiff):
Funimation isn't listed on that at all, only the cunty defendants.
 
Notice of Hearing regarding the Joint Response/Cross-Motion to Strike (1) Plaintiff’s Response to the TCPA Motions to Dismiss, (2) Plaintiff’s Second Amended Petition, and (3) Deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Late Response to Defendants’ TCPA Motions to Dismiss (including any of Defendants’ objections to evidence proffered by Plaintiff):
Looks like my Friday morning just got a lot earlier and longer...
 
thats also fraud. His stamp. His responsibility.

He stamped it. Thats the liability. Thats the proof. I can see his stamp on that document, unless you are going to claim that is not his stamp.

Seriously, this Notary shit is not complex.

I don't know. Google says that in Texas fraud can only be considered very concrete things. 22 options. For now, I leave the possibility that Ty knows what he's talking about.
And i'm not sure that a mistake made without intent, and obviously giving absolutely no advantage, can be considered as fraud. If that's even the case. IANAL
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Imperial Agent
So, how would Ty prove his innocence in this situation? Would showing an accurate notory book be enough, and if not, what else would he need to do?

Also, has Nick commented on this anywhere? I would imagine the subject will come up on his stream at least, and he has lines of communication with Ty so maybe we'll get more info then.

Would be a bummer if fraud did happen, but ultimately that would be on Ty.
 
So, how would Ty prove his innocence in this situation? Would showing an accurate notory book be enough, and if not, what else would he need to do?

Also, has Nick commented on this anywhere? I would imagine the subject will come up on his stream at least, and he has lines of communication with Ty so maybe we'll get more info then.

Would be a bummer if fraud did happen, but ultimately that would be on Ty.
Yes, just show an accurate notary book.
 
A win by rule and procedure is still a win.
I don’t know any of these people, it would be short sided to assume a man I’ve never met is honest just because the defendants are cunts.

I get that it is a win. I just have the feeling that this was an action that wouldn't have raised any eyebrows in another case is being blown up as a major error.

LawTwitter was just looking for something to bitch about. If Ty turned his motion in early they would say "a smart lawyer uses all his available time." If he got another notary they would accuse him of "inflating the bill."

You can't win with these people. It is up to Ty to explain what he did and then the judge to decide what to do about it.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: ConSluttant and 774
Yes, just show an accurate notary book.
Ty's been accused of fraud. How do you know he didn't fake his book too? Then, of course, Huber, Vic, and Slatosh would have an interest in covering for Ty since they would have been a party to his fraud. So, we can't believe them either. I guess we can't accept the book as evidence. Therefore, Ty committed fraud, and no evidence will suffice. /sarcasm
 
Fucking hell people, the only reason this fraud thing came up is because the defendants lawyers say that Slatosh was 400 miles away at some point on the same day. They haven't actually offered any proof he actually was and if he was, hadn't factored in it is only an hour plane ride away/5 hour car journey.

It's a complete nothing burger and seems more like wishful thinking. Of course if he did commit fraud, Ty is a bigger moron than we all gave him credit but it's not worth getting exceptional about unless some real proof is offered.
 
Back