Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.

[Immaculate Ape]

Speaking of fuck ups. Huck's statement here is sorta damaging to Vic isn't it? I mean I know it depends on the judge but I don't think this statement is particularly helpful. In 77 particularly.

However, I'm not an idiot, in 78, huck says if he knew if someone didn't like Vic's advances, he'd stop.
So I'm conflicted. I feel like the judge can focus on 77.
View attachment 922201

It's not damaging to the case, which is what matters here. And as has been stated before, "That's Rock & Roll".

Being sexually promiscuous is not breaking a law, nor is it sexual assault, nor is it sexual harassment etc. It's yet another red herring that morons like Doucette like to parade around because they can't actually point to anything relevant.

 

[HTTP Error 404]

Speaking of fuck ups. Huck's statement here is sorta damaging to Vic isn't it? I mean I know it depends on the judge but I don't think this statement is particularly helpful. In 77 particularly.

However, I'm not an idiot, in 78, huck says if he knew if someone didn't like Vic's advances, he'd stop.
So I'm conflicted. I feel like the judge can focus on 77.
View attachment 922201

You are really, really, really bad at this.

 

[CuntBusterMan55]

It's not damaging to the case, which is what matters here. And as has been stated before, "That's Rock & Roll".

Being sexually promiscuous is not breaking a law, nor is it sexual assault, nor is it sexual harassment etc. It's yet another red herring that morons like Doucette like to parade around because they can't actually point to anything relevant.

Thanks for clarifying that. Makes sense I guess. Truth is, I'm arguing with a discord dude and he keeps posting stuff like this. I legit have no clue about American law or law in general so I can't really argue with him

 

[Immaculate Ape]

Thanks for clarifying that. Makes sense I guess. Truth is, I'm arguing with a discord dude and he keeps posting stuff like this. I legit have no clue about American law or law in general so I can't really argue with him

You don't need a firm understanding of American Law to have common sense. If someone online is pulling out nonsense like that, it's because they don't understand how the law works and they're trying to warp it to their clown logic.

No law degree needed to debunk stupidity

 

[PrinceofAllCucks]

Thanks for clarifying that. Makes sense I guess. Truth is, I'm arguing with a discord dude and he keeps posting stuff like this. I legit have no clue about American law or law in general so I can't really argue with him

Just keep in mind, "What bearing does it have on the case? Does it cover any of the allegations ever brought up? Does it come from Greg?" If it's the same dude you were arguing with before, he's the same dude basing his arguments on Greg's spin.

 

[Manwithn0n0men]

It's not damaging to the case, which is what matters here. And as has been stated before, "That's Rock & Roll".

Being sexually promiscuous is not breaking a law, nor is it sexual assault, nor is it sexual harassment etc. It's yet another red herring that morons like Doucette like to parade around because they can't actually point to anything relevant.

Also remember that scene in the Devils Advocate

"The more they think your screwing your mistress, the more they think you couldnt be killing your wife"

 

[TJ-Weber]

Thanks for clarifying that. Makes sense I guess. Truth is, I'm arguing with a discord dude and he keeps posting stuff like this. I legit have no clue about American law or law in general so I can't really argue with him

It's not worth your time, this person you are arguing is a dullard from kickvic who is just reguritating whatever he's seeing on twitter. Just move on, and lurk more. I think you need to go to the weeb wars index and read through the happenings.
There's been a lot of commentary on the law presented in the case that can help you cut through the BS.

 

[X Prime]

You have to remember that every mistake Ty Beard makes will be amplified by the Twitter mob, while every error the defense makes will be minimized.

It's an endless parade of stupidity and there is no point in engaging in anything but drive-by dunks on people who are too emotionally invested in a side (which thankfully tends to be KVers more often than not).

 

[feral cat #6385]

It seems pretty unlikely. If Lemoine had kept his powder dry and suddenly pulled it at the hearing, when Ty would have no opportunity to fix it, it might have been a real problem, but I now doubt it will be.

Lemoine shot his load prematurely and interrupted Ty's mistake.



Fraud would have to be intentional, not just being clueless about being a notary.

Fucker should have read Sun Tzu instead of making fun of it.

 

[TUGSTAN]

The rule 11 agreement said nothing about amending their petition.

You're right. Ty breached the Rule 11 agreement twice. Filing late and then trying to amend his laughably incompetent filing. Then on top of that you have breaching TRCP Rule 63 and the fraudulent notarization.

And it all could have been avoided if Ty had just done the paperwork right the first time. LOL

 

[AnotherPleb]

You're right. Ty breached the Rule 11 agreement twice. Filing late and then trying to amend his laughably incompetent filing. Then on top of that you have breaching TRCP Rule 63 and the fraudulent notarization.

And it all could have been avoided if Ty had just done the paperwork right the first time. LOL

PULL is that way, sped.

 

[Harvey Danger]

We’ve got a dozen pages in this thread arguing over notary shit which is exceptional in its own way, but understandable given the fact that Huber and Slatlosch testimonies mean that the defense is royally, unequivocably fucked.

Hi there, welcome to Kiwi Farms. We specialize in autism, as a consumer and as a source.

It's worth noting the notary shit, a procedural legal issue, was confined to the legal discussion thread, where it should be. The main Weeb Wars thread covered the Huber and Slatlosch revelations. We covered the strength of the defense filings too, because they're fucking exceptional, and landed a mere 3 days after.

Things are working as intended. 10 pages on getting basic bitch notarization wrong is a feature, not a bug, of this particular forum.

 

[GenericReviewerDraco]

Oh, to be a fly on the wall in Chupp's office.

Chupp: Ok, Friday the 6th. TCPA hearing for Vic lasagna. What's the motion practice look like?
Clerk: Let's see......in response to 500 pages from Mr Lemoine, Mr Beard filed nearly 1200 pages. Oh, and he submitted an amended petition.
Chupp: (reaching for a bottle of whisky) I'm going to need all fucking day for this, aren't I?
Clerk: Looks like it. Mr Lemoine is also being an asshole about Mr Beard's filings being half an hour late due to technical difficulties.
Chupp: (after taking a good hard swig) Remind me again why dueling isn't permitted anymore?

I'd say Andrew Jackson ruined it, but I've heard other stories.

 

[PrinceofAllCucks]

You're right. Ty breached the Rule 11 agreement twice. Filing late and then trying to amend his laughably incompetent filing. Then on top of that you have breaching TRCP Rule 63 and the fraudulent notarization.

And it all could have been avoided if Ty had just done the paperwork right the first time. LOL

Maybe we should make it more clear, for the speds in the nosebleeds. The late filing was due to technical difficulty, thus is excused through evidence of the technical difficulty. He hasn't put forth an amendment to the recent response, only the petition, which neither is specifically drafted into the rule 11 agreement to be a violation if they do. No evidence of him actively committing fraud has been produced, just that Ty had submitted the documents notarized, then immediately pulled back on them before any real damage to the defense could take place. So, what rule is he in violation of for documents that aren't part of the response any longer?

 

[Make Anime Illegal]

You're right. Ty breached the Rule 11 agreement twice. Filing late and then trying to amend his laughably incompetent filing.

Ty amended his petition, not the TCPA response.

Then on top of that you have breaching TRCP Rule 63 and the fraudulent notarization.

Ty’s amended petition went to form and correction not content...

And the most important thing, Ty requested leave to amend.

 

[Tour of Italy]

Hi there, welcome to Kiwi Farms. We specialize in autism, as a consumer and as a source.

It's worth noting the notary shit, a procedural legal issue, was confined to the legal discussion thread, where it should be. The main Weeb Wars thread covered the Huber and Slatlosch revelations. We covered the strength of the defense filings too, because they're fucking exceptional, and landed a mere 3 days after.

Things are working as intended. 10 pages on getting basic bitch notarization wrong is a feature, not a bug, of this particular forum.

Yeah you got me there. Entertaining as the commentary is, I made the mistake of forgetting that everyone on this whole site is fucking exceptional.

 

[BimWitted]

Yeah you got me there. Entertaining as the commentary is, I made the mistake of forgetting that everyone on this whole site is fucking exceptional.

Everyone? On the whole site?
I mean...
If you don't make an exception for yourself, then fair enough.

 

[Mr. Zed da Robot Poon Fed]

You're right. Ty breached the Rule 11 agreement twice. Filing late and then trying to amend his laughably incompetent filing. Then on top of that you have breaching TRCP Rule 63 and the fraudulent notarization.

And it all could have been avoided if Ty had just done the paperwork right the first time. LOL

You clearly don’t know what the Rule 11 agreement is.

 

[mindlessobserver]

Maybe we should make it more clear, for the speds in the nosebleeds. The late filing was due to technical difficulty, thus is excused through evidence of the technical difficulty. He hasn't put forth an amendment to the recent response, only the petition, which neither is specifically drafted into the rule 11 agreement to be a violation if they do. No evidence of him actively committing fraud has been produced, just that Ty had submitted the documents notarized, then immediately pulled back on them before any real damage to the defense could take place. So, what rule is he in violation of for documents that aren't part of the response any longer?

Also filings are filed late all the time and the court usually looks the other way. Sometimes they can be over a day late. The judge is not going to lose his shit over 30 minutes. That email from Lemoins 8 minutes after midnight is not going to do him any favors. There is zealously representing your client and then there is involving the court with constant petty bullshit that should be resolved between the lawyers. Note not a word was sent by Funimations Attorneys or Marchies. Just Lemoine.

 

[A_throwaway_name62919]

On the affidavits, does anyone else remember that just a day or so ago Nick was pointing out that it's a slightly bad idea for the lawyer to notarize the affidavits themselves as it means they can be called as a witness in their capacity as notary? So Ty would have had decent reason to quickly replace the affidavits with unsworn declarations or affidavits notarized by someone else anyways.

As for the rest, I'm not going to be too hard on Ty without hearing him out on an explanation of what happened. Is this a fuck up? Sure. Just from my limited knowledge I can think of a few possible scenarios. How big a fuck up depends on what actually happened. In any case, shame on Ty and he's admitted a mistake was made and the buck stops with him. However the one thing this blatantly isn't is an attempt at fraud on the court. And the documents have been withdrawn and replaced before they could do anything. So there shouldn't be cause to make a big deal out of it.

The only reason LeMosquitoed is whining about it, screaming about fraud and sanctions, and generally making a mountain out of a molehill is for the same reason he was sitting around at midnight on a Friday ready to send an email within minutes accusing his opposition of being late in breach of the agreement while making an unprofessional remark like "if you file anything". Namely that he's fucking desperate(they probably all are to an extent). He already had a bad case going into it. The affidavits and amended complaint are a significant gut punch ahead of the coming hearing. This follows the revelations that one of his clients is a domestic abuser who went to court ordered therapy, and one of the other defendants in the case had offensive and pornographic recordings lying around - including one of his other client laughing at crude jokes. It's looming storm clouds on the legal front and a PR disaster on the social media front. So he's desperately grasping for anything that could give him an advantage and making as much noise as he can in hopes of getting his way or at least regaining some lost ground on social media.