Culture Jane Doe in Brock Turner Case Goes Public, Writes Memoir

https://abc7news.com/chanel-miller-goes-public-woman-brock-turner-convicted-of-assaulting/5514799/
https://archive.is/OP5uX

Brock Turner's sex assault victim makes her name public
https://abc7news.com/watch/
The woman who was sexually assaulted while unconscious outside a Stanford fraternity in 2015 is releasing a book and making her name public for the first time.



By Amy Hollyfield and Chris Nguyen
Thursday, September 5, 2019 8:12AM
The woman who was sexually assaulted while unconscious outside a Stanford fraternity in 2015 is releasing a book and making her name public for the first time.

Chanel Miller's book "Know My Name" will be released on Sept. 24.

Stanford law professor Michele Dauber is applauding the move.

RELATED: Victim writes letter in ex-Stanford student sexual assault case

"She is a very talented writer and is good at making real the implications of sexual violence and the mishandling of sexual violence by powerful institutions," said Dauber.

Miller was sexually assaulted by Brock Turner. He was a freshman at Stanford at the time. She was a recent college graduate and was attending a Stanford fraternity party.

Wednesday afternoon, ABC7 News spoke to Congresswoman Jackie Speier, who led the efforts to have members of Congress read Miller's statement on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives in June of 2016.

RELATED: Judge Aaron Persky recalled over Brock Turner sentencing

"I'm looking forward to reading her memoir cause I'm sure it's going to be a powerful example of how we can overcome adversity," said Speier. "Let's never forget though that Brock Turner almost got off scot-free."

Judge Aaron Persky sentenced Turner to six months in county jail, even though he faced up to 14 years in prison. Persky said at the time he was worried about the impact a long sentence would have on Turner, a swimmer who once was considered a contender for the Olympics.

Take a look at full coverage of the Brock Turner sexual assault case.

Persky became the first California judge to be recalled in 80 years. Professor Dauber was the chairperson of the committee to recall Persky.

"I think people are going to read the book and be convinced that Aaron Persky had to go and the recall was correct. I want to point out that many victims of sexual violence are subjected every day to the same mistreatment from the legal system and universities like Stanford," Dauber said.

Stanford University released this statement:

"We applaud Ms. Miller's bravery in talking publicly about the ordeal she has experienced and the horrible act that she suffered on our campus. As a university, we are continuing our efforts to prevent and respond effectively to sexual violence, with the ultimate goal of eradicating it from our community."

Miller's book was profiled Wednesday morning in the New York Times. The paper says she was paid for the book but the publisher declined to say how much.

Lindsey Mansfield, a survivor's advocate with the YWCA of Silicon Valley, says the #MeToo movement continues to be empowering for many.

TIMELINE: How case against Brock Turner ignited debate on sexual assault

It's been more than a year since former Stanford swimmer Brock Turner was convicted of sexually assaulting a woman after a campus party.

"For some people, it may mean stepping forward and sharing something. For others, it may mean listening to other peoples' stories, or receiving support around their assault," said Mansfield.

Miller also gave an interview to 60 Minutes in advance of the release of her book.

Well this should be a shitshow.
 
She was passed out drunk and he was literally caught in the act with his pants down and then ran like a little bitch when confronted (guilty AF no doubt).

Fuck Turner. There is nothing ambiguous about this case unless you're a woman hating incel that thinks all women always lie about rape. This is not the case you want to die on if you are one. At least pick something where the dude wasn't literally caught in the act.
 
I'm sure all the rape dindus here will make sound, perfectly logical points.
To quote the Leader,
moral values have been destroyed, the foundation of the family is weak and shaky, the demon of alcoholism and addiction to drugs is more dominant than ever before and the attraction of spirituality and morality is less than ever before
but no, clearly this incident is the result of 'rape culture'.
 
#woke idiots who call EVERYTHING - every consensual sex act that got even slightly weird/uncomfortable, every consensual hookup that the woman (or man) later regretted, every drunk consensual hook up where one partner is slightly more tipsy than the other, every act of cheating where the cheater users it as a get out of jail free card, every cat call, every flirtation, accidentally bumping into a woman in public, telling a shrieking harpy that your name is "Hugh Mungus", EVERYTHING - rape are really fucking dumb and doing a disservice to victims of rape and sexual assault because they delegitimize the seriousness of actual rape, which I posit is probably the most horrific crime one can be a victim of and still live (murder obviously being worse, but, uh, you don't live through that); maybe a REALLY brutal assault and battery would come close, though I'm talking in generalities here.

That said, Brock Turner is an actual rapist and calling nothing rape (even if it is less prevalent a narrative) is just as retarded as calling everything rape.

People critical of the "rape culture"/"Me Too" narrative will, even if it is uncomfortable and "feels" cucked, sometimes end up on the same side as screeching 4th wave harpies in cases such as this where a dude had his day in court and got convicted of sexual assault. What is important is how we talk about it; that is, rather than self-aggrandize and shill for Patreon shekels like the #MeToo tards do, we should point to this as how shit SHOULD go down when someone is accused of rape: dude got caught in the act, the act had witnesses, he was arrested, charges were filed, he had his day in court, he got convicted and was punished. It wasn't just some danger hair outing some dude she knew 15 years ago as a rapist, despite no evidence, no charges filed and people crucifying him in public without a day in court.

Sucks that she'll get death threats over this but, welp, welcome to the internet where pointing out that a hotdog is a sandwich will probably get you doxed. If she weighed the risks and understood what would happen and still decided to go through with outing herself, she's either very brave, very stupid or a mixture. I'd like to think brave, since she didn't immediately out herself and start trying to cash in, but we'll see how this shakes out.
 
This is some bitch ass bickering right here; either he's a scummy fuck who tried to rape her or she's pulling the 'he tried to rape me' card out of embarrassment.
Endgame is Brock got off easy, Judge was recalled, Chanel gets to besmirch his name globally thus ruining him for the rest of his life.
It's called Karma, bitches, and it's the only thing I have faith in for us as a species.
 
They're glamour shots for the latest attempt to pretend that there is some big issue with sexual assault at universities that can only be fixed by lowering the burden of proof for their kangaroo courts from 51% to even lower. Of course she's pleased.

Given the media harassment campaign against this young man for being the poster child of 'campus sexual assault' (a student athlete who actually was a student and doesn't have twice as many vowels as expected in his name) for drunkenly fingerblasting a fellow drunk, we will never know if he was really guilty of the allegations against him or not.
I am a heterosexual male and I would never let any woman or goat be unattended for a heartbeat near Brock Turner or you. Sandniggers like you are the reason Mohammad thought all men are as slavering wolves.

This is some bitch ass bickering right here; either he's a scummy fuck who tried to rape her or she's pulling the 'he tried to rape me' card out of embarrassment.
Endgame is Brock got off easy, Judge was recalled, Chanel gets to besmirch his name globally thus ruining him for the rest of his life.
It's called Karma, bitches, and it's the only thing I have faith in for us as a species.
I applaud you for finding and taking the stance that will piss everyone with any sort of opinion on this matter off.
 
The JUDGE let him off easy likely because of his dad. He was later disbarred.

He got the sentence he received (which included lifetime registration as a sex offender, which is worse than five or ten years behind bars IMO) because that's what the sentencing guidelines were for the crimes for which he was convicted, in addition to the recommendations of the state parole department, within the restrictions also set by California's overcrowded prison system.

Furthermore, Judge Persky was well known for being a bleeding heart idealistic liberal, loathe to pass heavy sentences on first time offenders. This had nothing to do with improper conduct, as the state bar and professional organizations can attest.

He was recalled from his position following a strong propaganda campaign by this grifter's adopted aunt, a former Berkeley professor and advocate for campus justice reforms like allowing anonymous accusations decided in secret by a gender studies tribunal to expell male students. She used her ties to the Clinton campaign and California elites to round up a few million dollars by grifting on real rape victims to finance the recall.

As stated upthread, this has nothing to do with actual rape victims, it is only a narrative being used to undermine the foundations of Justice in this country. The progressive stack cannot be incorporated into our courts, and our system cannot be held to the present of woke Twitter mobs. It must be fair to all people, and steadfast in the face of mob rule.
 
He got the sentence he received (which included lifetime registration as a sex offender, which is worse than five or ten years behind bars IMO) because that's what the sentencing guidelines were for the crimes for which he was convicted, in addition to the recommendations of the state parole department, within the restrictions also set by California's overcrowded prison system.

Furthermore, Judge Persky was well known for being a bleeding heart idealistic liberal, loathe to pass heavy sentences on first time offenders. This had nothing to do with improper conduct, as the state bar and professional organizations can attest.

He was recalled from his position following a strong propaganda campaign by this grifter's adopted aunt, a former Berkeley professor and advocate for campus justice reforms like allowing anonymous accusations decided in secret by a gender studies tribunal to expell male students. She used her ties to the Clinton campaign and California elites to round up a few million dollars by grifting on real rape victims to finance the recall.

As stated upthread, this has nothing to do with actual rape victims, it is only a narrative being used to undermine the foundations of Justice in this country. The progressive stack cannot be incorporated into our courts, and our system cannot be held to the present of woke Twitter mobs. It must be fair to all people, and steadfast in the face of mob rule.
An actual dragged-behind-the-dumpster rape victim is a "grifter" because she dares to talk shit about the man who assaulted her.
You know, maybe Tumblr was on to something when they said this site was full of incels...
 
He got the sentence he received (which included lifetime registration as a sex offender, which is worse than five or ten years behind bars IMO) because that's what the sentencing guidelines were for the crimes for which he was convicted, in addition to the recommendations of the state parole department, within the restrictions also set by California's overcrowded prison system.

Furthermore, Judge Persky was well known for being a bleeding heart idealistic liberal, loathe to pass heavy sentences on first time offenders. This had nothing to do with improper conduct, as the state bar and professional organizations can attest.

He was recalled from his position following a strong propaganda campaign by this grifter's adopted aunt, a former Berkeley professor and advocate for campus justice reforms like allowing anonymous accusations decided in secret by a gender studies tribunal to expell male students. She used her ties to the Clinton campaign and California elites to round up a few million dollars by grifting on real rape victims to finance the recall.

As stated upthread, this has nothing to do with actual rape victims, it is only a narrative being used to undermine the foundations of Justice in this country. The progressive stack cannot be incorporated into our courts, and our system cannot be held to the present of woke Twitter mobs. It must be fair to all people, and steadfast in the face of mob rule.
A take so spicy hot that I'm now convinced the poster is Indian.
 
dragged-behind-the-dumpster rape victim
See, this is an interesting part of the case. If you were inclined to be a rapist, and you'd dragged a woman behind a dumpster, would you be finger-fucking her, not even getting your dick wet? It sounds weird, if you believe that he was an actual rapist, rather than just another victim of the cult of alcoholism and immorality that is Western society.
 
A take so spicy hot that I'm now convinced the poster is Indian.

In India they give you an extra helping of your 1st cousin and then a high five for raping a passed out girl behind a dumpster or trash bin. Problem is you gotta find a dumpster or bin first.

@3119967d0c he was probably having a hard time getting it up so was going for a little foreplay. IIRC he had his pants unzipped and was trying to penetrate her from on top when the Swedes found him.
 
An actual dragged-behind-the-dumpster rape victim is a "grifter" because she dares to talk shit about the man who assaulted her.
You know, maybe Tumblr was on to something when they said this site was full of incels...
That's the media's story and nobody else's.

His story is that they were drunk and hooking up at a bar or party or whatever and began walking back to his dorm room all over each other when they tripped and took him down with her where they continued to hook up on the ground.

She said she didn't recall the night at all. She had a boyfriend.

Obviously you don't get to finger someone who is passed out even if they were consenting before it. That's a crime that should be punished rather severely, but not quite the violent Arby's dumpster attack the media made it out to be.
 
Fucking good. Brock Turner is a fucking rapist shitbag who was let off easy because his dad pleaded with the judge that his son's life shouldn't be ruined for "just twenty minutes of action".

And for those still unsure about what actually went down, the court records are available online for free. It's not like they're impossible to find, and read for yourself.

http://documents.latimes.com/stanford-brock-turner/
He got the sentence he received (which included lifetime registration as a sex offender, which is worse than five or ten years behind bars IMO) because that's what the sentencing guidelines were for the crimes for which he was convicted, in addition to the recommendations of the state parole department, within the restrictions also set by California's overcrowded prison system.

Furthermore, Judge Persky was well known for being a bleeding heart idealistic liberal, loathe to pass heavy sentences on first time offenders. This had nothing to do with improper conduct, as the state bar and professional organizations can attest.

He was recalled from his position following a strong propaganda campaign by this grifter's adopted aunt, a former Berkeley professor and advocate for campus justice reforms like allowing anonymous accusations decided in secret by a gender studies tribunal to expell male students. She used her ties to the Clinton campaign and California elites to round up a few million dollars by grifting on real rape victims to finance the recall.

As stated upthread, this has nothing to do with actual rape victims, it is only a narrative being used to undermine the foundations of Justice in this country. The progressive stack cannot be incorporated into our courts, and our system cannot be held to the present of woke Twitter mobs. It must be fair to all people, and steadfast in the face of mob rule.
Says the guy who literally made a cringy-ass thread on how this judge was a victim of SJWs that had to be locked after everyone starting calling him faggot.
 
Last edited:
That's the media's story and nobody else's.

His story is that they were drunk and hooking up at a bar or party or whatever and began walking back to his dorm room all over each other when they tripped and took him down with her where they continued to hook up on the ground.

She said she didn't recall the night at all. She had a boyfriend.

Obviously you don't get to finger someone who is passed out even if they were consenting before it. That's a crime that should be punished rather severely, but not quite the violent Arby's dumpster attack the media made it out to be.
Shoving fingers in a hole instead of dicks doesn't somehow make you more virtuous.
 
He got the sentence he received (which included lifetime registration as a sex offender, which is worse than five or ten years behind bars IMO) because that's what the sentencing guidelines were for the crimes for which he was convicted, in addition to the recommendations of the state parole department, within the restrictions also set by California's overcrowded prison system.

Furthermore, Judge Persky was well known for being a bleeding heart idealistic liberal, loathe to pass heavy sentences on first time offenders. This had nothing to do with improper conduct, as the state bar and professional organizations can attest.

He was recalled from his position following a strong propaganda campaign by this grifter's adopted aunt, a former Berkeley professor and advocate for campus justice reforms like allowing anonymous accusations decided in secret by a gender studies tribunal to expell male students. She used her ties to the Clinton campaign and California elites to round up a few million dollars by grifting on real rape victims to finance the recall.

As stated upthread, this has nothing to do with actual rape victims, it is only a narrative being used to undermine the foundations of Justice in this country. The progressive stack cannot be incorporated into our courts, and our system cannot be held to the present of woke Twitter mobs. It must be fair to all people, and steadfast in the face of mob rule.
This is not a he said, she said situation. The woman was unconscious at 1 in the morning, while Turner was raping her behind a dumpster. TWO students had witnessed the attack, trying to stop him but he ran off. The woman had no recollection of the event and was traumatized to find out she was raped. Despite being eligible for 14 years in prison, the judge lets him off easy despite damning evidence. People have a right to be pissed off in this case.

How insensitive are you to think that a cut and dry case is considered "prograngda"? This is horseshoe theory at its finest; you're just as bad as those SJWs that claim "RAPE!" over any little interaction. A woman was raped without a doubt, tells the story of said incident after some time and you want to sympathize with her rapist? Sad state of affairs.
 
That's the media's story and nobody else's.

His story is that they were drunk and hooking up at a bar or party or whatever and began walking back to his dorm room all over each other when they tripped and took him down with her where they continued to hook up on the ground.

She said she didn't recall the night at all. She had a boyfriend.

Obviously you don't get to finger someone who is passed out even if they were consenting before it. That's a crime that should be punished rather severely, but not quite the violent Arby's dumpster attack the media made it out to be.

His story makes no sense because he fled and freaked the fuck out as soon as he was seen. If things were how he described why did he immediately run? Seems like he might have reacted a lot differently if things were fine and dandy before they "fell down together." Furthermore the chick was blackout drunk. She didn't come to consciousness until hours later at the hospital. It's quite the leap of logic to think she was giving consent, fell down, passed out black out drunk and old blue balls decided to just keep going because her last words were fuck me or something before she fell.

More likely is he followed her, saw her pass out wasted, and then made his move. Only Brock knows for sure but his "alibi" makes zero sense given the facts we have.
 
Back