Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.

Ok gang, since everyone is getting tired of this notary nonsense let's play a new game. Let's say Ty get through this and (gasps) wins all the TCPA motions, and this allows him to depose people again. Who would you want to see depose Marchi and Sabat? I'd personally want Ty to do it because I don't want to hear none of the girly shit like at Monica's.

They had the right idea in my opinion. Carey played into the victim mentality and allowed Monica to let her guard down. Any harsher and she probably would’ve clammed up. We likely wouldn’t have gotten her testimony that DIRECTLY contradicts her affidavit. She had other great hits too!
 
Looking at Lemoine's subpoena, he lists himself as the Attorney for Plaintiff. Seems peculiar.

Lemoine is clearly committing fraud by listing himself as the Plaintiff's lawyer. Ty should subpoena Ron and Monica to testify whether or not Lemoine is their attorney. If Lemoine is representing the plaintiff and two of the defendants, that is a conflict of interest. Lemoine might be facing twenty years in prison for this horrible act of fraud.
 
It isn't. It's captioned as in case 141-307474-19. It lists Vic as "Plaintiff Victor Mignogna." Then it lists Lemongrab as "Attorney for Plaintiffs."

That's the case that's stayed, and he knows it because he filed the motion that stayed it himself. A stay is a ruling of the court. He is violating a court ruling that the court put in place due to a motion he personally filed. He should be sanctioned or held in contempt.
But that's not true. it's IMPOSSIBLE. He's a TCPA expert!!!!1!! Oh wait have we figured out how many successful TCPA's hes got?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: BimWitted
It isn't. It's captioned as in case 141-307474-19. It lists Vic as "Plaintiff Victor Mignogna." Then it lists Lemongrab as "Attorney for Plaintiffs."

That's the case that's stayed, and he knows it because he filed the motion that stayed it himself. A stay is a ruling of the court. He is violating a court ruling that the court put in place due to a motion he personally filed. He should be sanctioned or held in contempt.

I figured it was pretty obvious I don't actually believe that Judge Chupp is going to go in there and hold an impromptu hearing about a criminal matter. I'm fully aware of what case is being discussed and was utilizing sarcasm to point out the absurdity of the claims that another user was making.
 
From what I've heard Lemoine hasn't won a single TCPA case. Is that true?
 
The TCPA discovery stay applies to discovery for the action being challenged. I don't know that it applies to a party wanting to figure out the truth of a fraudulent filing made to the court.
Discovery is stayed for the whole case and the filing isnt fraudulent. The only people who can claim that are the affiants
 
Is discovery allowed if they appeal the TCPA?

Discovery is generally not permitted on appeal. There aren't even any rules for it, usually. Exceptions are extremely narrow when they even exist.

Lemoine is clearly committing fraud by listing himself as the Plaintiff's lawyer. Ty should subpoena Ron and Monica to testify whether or not Lemoine is their attorney. If Lemoine is representing the plaintiff and two of the defendants, that is a conflict of interest. Lemoine might be facing twenty years in prison for this horrible act of fraud.

Obviously, he intended to do this because he gains a huge advantage from claiming to be the plaintiff's lawyer apparently issuing a subpoena against his own client. So he obviously intentionally listed himself as the plaintiff's lawyer and this wasn't a mistake, and he's guilty of super fraud and needs to be sentenced to life in super jail.
 
Jesus, I was gone for a few days and the thread derailed into memes that should be in WW and taking the lolyers for their word about “fraud”
I made it to page 367 before giving up because at that point I was just speed skimming like it was WW

As I said a while ago, only an amateur would call out a “late” filing and ignore clear evidence of why it wasn’t late... and an amateur grasping at the straws for a win on technically did just that.

Only an amateur would derail the current civil case and try to pretend their opposition is a criminal fraud, and more than one amateur did.


What’s gonna happen at the hearing Friday?

Regarding the “late” filing: in the interest of justice - nothing.

Regarding the “fraud”: Nothing - Chupp will ask what it has to do with the matter at hand? They will try to pretend it matters for their TCPA, Chupp will ask for evidence of criminal fraud, none will be there. Chupp will mention the reason he overruled plaintiffs objections likely saying that if they want to throw out plaintiffs key evidence he’ll be just as happy to go down the middle and throw out everything plaintiff asked to be thrown out... and it wouldn’t take 30 days to rule on the TCPA at that point.

I fully expect appeals, though, and they touch on issues other appeals courts have addressed in contradictory ways, and thus, I would not be at all surprised at a published intermediate appellate decision or even a Texas Supreme Court appeal.

As do I, however we know from the defendants not even being able to afford the deposition tapes that they can’t afford an appeal. Their counsel probably would want to be compensated on those late payments as well. Although Lemonfuhrer might be so butthirt enough that he would take an appeal on contingency to try to not make his record 0-6
 
As do I, however we know from the defendants not even being able to afford the deposition tapes that they can’t afford an appeal. Their counsel probably would want to be compensated on those late payments as well. Although Lemonfuhrer might be so butthirt enough that he would take an appeal on contingency to try to not make his record 0-6

Maybe it's all acting on his part, but Lemonhead really, really seems excessively invested in this case. I could totally buy him riding it as long as it goes just out of spite.
 
Ok gang, since everyone is getting tired of this notary nonsense let's play a new game. Let's say Ty get through this and (gasps) wins all the TCPA motions, and this allows him to depose people again. Who would you want to see depose Marchi and Sabat? I'd personally want Ty to do it because I don't want to hear none of the girly shit like at Monica's.
He's mentioned on a stream he doesn't like deposing. I think the way Monica was deposed was perfect.

She was baited in to revealing what the entire thing was all about, Carey exposed her truth factories and got some things out of her that revealed her true character. The funniest thing about it, is that one of the things she's mad about is Vic's name supposedly being on Tsubasa boxset, someone I know who owns it revealed to me that that's not even the case.


I've tried finding this, but I haven't and it really seems like a huge nothing burger for her to be salty about.
 
It isn't. It's captioned as in case 141-307474-19. It lists Vic as "Plaintiff Victor Mignogna." Then it lists Lemongrab as "Attorney for Plaintiffs."

That's the case that's stayed, and he knows it because he filed the motion that stayed it himself. A stay is a ruling of the court. He is violating a court ruling that the court put in place due to a motion he personally filed. He should be sanctioned or held in contempt.
I just thought of something else, doesn't Lemoine think there were motions for Discovery? Like he put that in his paperwork as a basis? So he may still be under that delusion and thought he could do this maybe?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RemoveKebab
He's mentioned on a stream he doesn't like deposing. I think the way Monica was deposed was perfect.

She was baited in to revealing what the entire thing was all about, Carey exposed her truth factories and got some things out of her that revealed her true character. The funniest thing about it, is that one of the things she's mad about is Vic's name supposedly being on Tsubasa boxset, someone I know who owns it revealed to me that that's not even the case.


I've tried finding this, but I haven't and it really seems like a huge nothing burger for her to be salty about.
Vic's name actually IS on Tsubasa Chronicle Box Sets. On 2 limited runs in the UK. Nowhere else just on those 2 sets. That was shown a long time ago in the main WW thread
 
correct he has as many won TCPA as i have. And i'm not a Lawyer.
Which is hilarious since TCPA is made to throw out frivolous lawsuits based on free speech. That he has any losses kind of shows he's not very good at either understanding TCPA or at being a lawyer.
 
Back