Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.

Personally I think it is him trying to make a statement of; MoRonica are the true VICTIMS, and I stand with them! He's just about exceptional to do that.

Court documents are not for making "statements" (I mean technically they literally are, but not in the righteous sense inferred here), they're for official record-keeping. Attempting to use them for this while ignoring proper procedure would likely result in the judge seeing through your bullshit and telling you to stop, and possibly making you resubmit your documentation properly, if not simply ignoring what you submitted entirely.

That said, he could be stupid enough to do it anyway, who knows.
 
Last edited:
Court documents are not for making "statements" (I mean technically they literally are, but not in the righteous sense inferred here), they're for official record-keeping. Attempting to use them for this while ignoring proper procedure would likely result in the judge seeing through your bullshit and telling you to stop, and possibly making you resubmit your documentation properly, if not simply ignoring what you submitted entirely.

That said, he could be stupid enough to do it anyway, who knows.

Oh I know they are. Everyone knows they are. I just find Lemwah a little out there. He and his Gay Ops. At this point in time I do think he is exceptional enough to try some weird ass shit cause he knows things will get quashed or struck down. I mean, I can't blame him for pushing the envelope a little bit. So far none of the strange and shitty legal things his side/team have done have been met with any form of consequence.

Will of course be waiting for the results of this hearing. Having a feeling Chupp will feel a lot of WTF today.
 
I could tolerate a settlement from Sony, but the other 3 need to burn. People donated to the gofundme because they want to see this metoo shit get put out and the only way it will is going to be if there is punishment on the record for the fuckers.

Denbow, Sabat, Mika and maybe Barretto too, and everyone who had anything to do with those tweets.

PLUS all the cons that put out their own unsupported lies and fabricated allegations when they had the opportunity to pile on.

They look to be integral parts, enablers and participants in this whole shit show
 
  • Agree
Reactions: lemmiwinks
I could tolerate a settlement from Sony, but the other 3 need to burn. People donated to the gofundme because they want to see this metoo shit get put out and the only way it will is going to be if there is punishment on the record for the fuckers.

Well, remembering that no donations were made with expectation of any specific result or strategy, other than supporting Vic. But yeah, I would certainly prefer the people who did this to have some comeuppance.
 
As far as I understand, KickVik now has a new hope for what to hold on to.
Even if they lose all the TCPAs, they will hope that because Vic's declaration is not signed by the real signature, but is fabricated by Ty illegally with the same signature-copy he put in Vic's affidavit, they have good reason to strike that declaration even after losing the TCPA, and on that basis there is a better chance of appeal.

There isn't anything to strike, the affidavits were withdrawn and Ty then added unsworn ones. So there isn't anything to be done about them. They could try and strike the amended petition but good luck with that.

And unless one of the people who signed them comes forward and says they didn't sign it, nothing with the affidavits is going to matter. There were no damages and they were withdrawn.
 
He has to demonstrate that the notarized affidavits were not properly notarized (affiants were not there in person). You raise a good point about intent; there is an intent requirement for fraud. He knew the notarization was untrue when he signed it; I believe that is sufficient to meet the intent requirement.
Affidavits that are not part of the court case (which they are not, seeing how they were withdrawn almost immediately, long before they could have had any impact upon said case) are irrelevant to that court case.
If Ty can be proven to have committed notary fraud (unlikely) it will be a cause of action against Ty that is entirely separate from the Vic's case.
Bringing this before the court after being informed that the affidavits are withdrawn and will be replaced with pretty much identical unsworn declarations is truly exceptional because it makes one look like a desperate moron.
 
And if Sony doesnt tell them "Listen stop losing money"

Funimation is a decimal point on a spreadsheet buried in an accounting portfolio worth billions. They bring in pittance compared to the movie studios, entertainment properties, and hardware that Sony sells. The ONLY thing that matters is bringing Funimation to the public eye and having Sony lumped in with them for EVERYTHING. Much like Star Wars Battlefront II was lumped with Disney and Gambling. You see how shit the Mouse got out the Chainsaw to EA when everyone said "Oh my God there's gambling in this Disney property!" Public reputation is vital for these large companies to maintain a positive brand image. You want to bring down Funimation, you drag Sony into this over and over and over again. Sony will force Funimation's hand much like any large company as it makes Sony look bad which causes people not to buy Sony products (See Gillette and Proctor And Gamble's 8 BILLION dollar write down) and the cancer and taint spreads like the Black Plague across all of Sony's property.

Stain Sony with this shit and Funimation will kowtow faster than Boogie2988 on a tweetbattle.

Thanks for the reply.

ANN: "If you're not first, you're last."

That hearkens back from the VERY early days of newspaper publishing. It costs you nothing to submit a retraction in the back of the obituary section saying "We made an oopsie" but you get all the hot takes if you push the story out FIRST.

From what I've heard Lemoine hasn't won a single TCPA case. Is that true?

Lemoine consider's tying up clients for YEARS in appeals with his TCPA motions as "Victory's." From the 6 I recall him working on (I believe they are all listed under his initial TCPA filing) none are "COMPLETE" and all are "UNDER APPEAL"
 
Last edited:
"Strike Chart for Plaintiff's Objections to Rial/Toye evidence and Defendants' supplemental evidence" was just posted to TXCourts.
I don't feel like give them another $3 for a strike chart.
 
Nope. You can't undo documented fraud.
IDK why it is so hard for people to understand that the court is not going to allow Vic's case to be prejudiced by a clerical mistake from his lawyer. This is exactly why there is so much wrangling and fuckery before a case is put before the court for a decision. They are trying to iron out obvious wrinkles that could lead to an appeal for issues unrelated to the actual facts of the case. It's not a hard concept.
Lemoine consider's tying up clients for YEARS in appeals with his TCPA motions as "Victory's."
They're victories for his wallet.
 
Last edited:
"Strike Chart for Plaintiff's Objections to Rial/Toye evidence and Defendants' supplemental evidence" was just posted to TXCourts.
I don't feel like give them another $3 for a strike chart.
I can hear it from here. The power of autism and west nile has somehow extended his voice!


REEEEEEEE not enough time REEEEEEE move to strike. -lemonfurher
 
  • Like
Reactions: AStupidMonkey
That’s his signature, the “tor” they’re bitching about is literally the font that e-signing a pdf gives you, if Vic authorized or even just signed the Vic and it was edited to add the “tor” there’s Nothing wrong with it. Lemonfuhrer is just grasping at the straws. Let’s say Vic wins TCPA, if they strike that document at trial nothing stops them from reintroducing the same statement with a sworn one. its quite literally a move to try and get the case thrown out beyond the TCPA and “win” on a technicality. The subpoena will get quashed, if not retracted, because it’s ultimately contempt since there is a stay on ALL discovery.

It's not just that. One of the arguments they raise is that the new document of September 2 has the same signature. Literally the same, but without the "tor".
 
We won't know the judges decision for a while, but at least we'll get a general idea of how it's gone.

The entertaining part will be that law twitter will have its own version of how things went that won't have any basis in reality.

Anyone know how long until we'll get a transcript of the hearing?
 
It's not just that. One of the arguments they raise is that the new document of September 2 has the same signature. Literally the same, but without the "tor".

Was this raised in an actual filing or on twitter?
 
Back