If he was acting on the first amended complaint and the TCPA opposition that had all the affidavits withdrawn, all that stuff, Vic's own claims, Chris Slatosch's, Chuck Huber's, weren't even in evidence so the judge didn't have a prima facie case, and the judge didn't make a mistake, unless refusing to accept Ty's last minute desperation filing was a mistake.
If nothing was in evidence, that's not the judge's fault.
It does if the reason there isn't a prima facie case is none of the evidence was admitted, and the reason for it not being admitted was Ty's fuckup.
If the judge admitted it and then ruled against it anyway, the judge fucked up.