The thing to do with arrogant asshat judges like Chupp is that when they start going down the arrogant asshat train, you start getting them to make admissions on the record. What Ty did by point blank asking the Judge if not being able to secure a signature on affdavit from one of the conventions was enough to lose the TCPA was a great example of this. This is directly in contrast with what the TCPA statute calls for and Ty knows this. The judge probably knows this, which is why he answers with "maybe ." If I'm filing the appeal, I then go back and tell the court of appeals the law and further show them the judge making statements contrary to the law in his decision. It's real easy on my part and really embarrassing on the arrogant asshat judges part when his opinion is eviscerated by the appellate court's.