TCPA Hearing 9/6/19 - Marchi ran from the Law, TI crumbles, conspiracy still on the table, and collective autism from all sides.

[Gypsymagic]

2 is Bingo! http://bbfpics.blogspot.com/?view=classic

View attachment 926277


View attachment 926278

I don't know Judge seems in the right to me, at least about TI. Ty seemed to be lacking enough evidence to bring tortious interference to court. You're trying to sue a guy and saying he interfered with multiple of your con appearances, but all you have is a single convention that Vic ended up going to anyway.

 

[quickthrowaway]

.View attachment 926419

Well look at that.

Source: http://www.therobingroom.com/texas/Judge.aspx?id=10297#comments

Edit (Theres More): https://tarrantbar.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/2019-Judicial-Evaluation-Results.pdf

This is interesting but I'm gonna warn that this can lead to confirmation bias.

 

[Garm]

Surely at minimum, thered be at least email correspondence - an invitation to appear, and an acceptance.

When Rekeita started covering this case, I remember him reading out a contract that he claimed was fairly standard example of the type of written contracts that are typical in these Con appearances.

I find it hard to believe Vics appearances are just agreeded to on verbal offers and acceptances. Thats pretty amateurish even in a somewhat fledging industry like Anime. Surely?

I believe Nick has argued that when a convention announces Vic, that seals the contract.

Vic's agent should have those things.

Problem is it seems that Chupp wanted (x+1) of whatever Ty provided.

 

[LawTwitter is Dumb]

This is interesting but I'm gonna warn that this can lead to confirmation bias.

Yea but i think its okay to point out he has done this before and seems to be a thing.

 

[DuckzillA]

.View attachment 926419

Well look at that.

Source: http://www.therobingroom.com/texas/Judge.aspx?id=10297#comments

Edit (Theres More): https://tarrantbar.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/2019-Judicial-Evaluation-Results.pdf

this is my shocked face

 

[LL 196]

Oh look at that it's exactly as I expected, Chupp's a prick and this is clearly going to get appealed successfully. Frankly pulling a stunt like that when you're a judge should be more punishable than it is. Nobody else on Earth gets to make a pouty face and tell everyone to fuck off instead of doing their job without some kind of consequences, but apparently judges can.

#comicsgate

The sentences after the typo are further to the right than everything else in the document. Gay ops?

View attachment 926400

Generic stuff

archived 7 Sep 2019 04:00:16 UTC

archive.fo

Gay ops? Possibly. The transcriber is "interpreting" what happened through a kickvic person who was there and filling in the blanks with that dallas morning news blogger. I'd rather wait for the official transcript at this point. For some reason nobody from #ISWV is able to get anything out there. Kickvic is much better at coming out of the gate with statements and trying to control the narratve.

 

[GenericReviewerDraco]

.View attachment 926419

Well look at that.

Source: http://www.therobingroom.com/texas/Judge.aspx?id=10297#comments

Edit (Theres More): https://tarrantbar.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/2019-Judicial-Evaluation-Results.pdf

I feel my anger rising to levels greater than my childhood sperg outs

 

[Mr. Sandwiches]

This is interesting but I'm gonna warn that this can lead to confirmation bias.

A pattern of behavior I don't think will gas up a confirmation bias, per say. There's speculation, and this is consistent with general feelings of Chupp's performance. I still believe Ty should have been overly prepared for his first knock at a TCPA.

 

[Immaculate Ape]

.View attachment 926419

Well look at that.

Source: http://www.therobingroom.com/texas/Judge.aspx?id=10297#comments

Edit (Theres More): https://tarrantbar.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/2019-Judicial-Evaluation-Results.pdf

So who stole the time machine this time, thoughts?

 

[LawTwitter is Dumb]

A pattern of behavior I don't think will gas up a confirmation bias, per say. There's speculation, and this is consistent with general feelings of Chupp's performance. I still believe Ty should have been more overly prepared for his first knock at a TCPA.

Honestly, not trying to use confirmation bias but this totally looks like it, doesn't seem like it matters how prepared you are, even with solid proof and evidence hell ask for more.

 

[Gypsymagic]

.View attachment 926419

Well look at that.

Source: http://www.therobingroom.com/texas/Judge.aspx?id=10297#comments

Edit (Theres More): https://tarrantbar.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/2019-Judicial-Evaluation-Results.pdf

I feel like this does the opposite you want it to. You have three reviews of extremely triggered lawyers, probably upset their frivolous lawsuits got dismissed fast, and then link to a report of 144 different ratings of Chupp and overall 120 of them rate him as Excellet or Satisfactory.

 

[Imperial Agent]

Bruh, will y'all quit posting already? Jesus Christ. Just caught up, and to everyone who told me not to bother reading it, well fuck you, you were right.

But I think I can clarify a few things:

Huber/Slatosch Affidavits were allowed, rather confusingly? Chupp allowed (and did not care about) the 15/30 minute late TCPA response. He refused to allow in the one filed a couple days later. I don't know how all of that works when you consider the defective affidavits were attached to the one that is currently still being considered, but the judge is fine with the new affadavits.... whatever.

Also the judge really did say the comment about the people in the court room = public figure, but it came off like a joke. People laughed with him.

Judge didn't seem to have a hate boner for Ty, he just seemed to have a hate boner for tedious arguments that contradicted what he felt was common sense.

Going to skim the transcript thing and I will let y'all know if it's accurate.

 

[LawTwitter is Dumb]

I feel like this does the opposite you want it to. You have three reviews extremely triggered lawyers, probably upset their frivolous lawsuits got dismissed fast, and then link to a report of 144 different ratings of Chupp and overall 120 of them rate him as Excellet or Satisfactory.

Are they plaintiff or defendant?

 

[RogerSmith77]

Oh look at that it's exactly as I expected, Chupp's a prick and this is clearly going to get appealed successfully. Frankly pulling a stunt like that when you're a judge should be more punishable than it is. Nobody else on Earth gets to make a pouty face and tell everyone to fuck off instead of doing their job without some kind of consequences, but apparently judges can.

Even if Ty wins the appeal, he still has this jackass rogue judge to contend with. And with the history I see this judge has, something tells me that even a ding from the COA isn't enough to put his ego in check.

 

[Lens Serial# 0000713d7c]

This standard for determing public figure though.

 

[Mr. Sandwiches]

Honestly, not trying to use confirmation bias but this totally looks like it, doesn't seem like it matters how prepared you are, even with solid proof and evidence hell ask for more.

I think Ty being more prepared for Chupp would have made it more obvious of Chupp's behavior, instead of having most of it fall on Ty because he couldn't answer any of Chupp's questions in detail. As you can see, no one is looking at Chupp right now, but Ty's performance. Even I put most of the onus on Ty at first.

 

[LawTwitter is Dumb]

I think Ty being more prepared for Chupp would have made it more obvious of Chupp's behavior, instead of having most of it fall on Ty because he couldn't answer any of Chupp's questions in detail. As you can see, no one is looking at Chupp right now, but Ty's performance. Even I put most of the onus on Ty at first.

I agree Ty should of went in over prepared and also filed things on time or even earlier.

But when your prepared for a Baseball game and then get handed Tennis rackets, what do you do at that point?

 

[Immaculate Ape]

I have no idea how to search this, but... how many times have any of the defense's lawyers been in Chupp's court?

 

[DuckzillA]

I think Ty being more prepared for Chupp would have made it more obvious of Chupp's behavior, instead of having most of it fall on Ty because he couldn't answer any of Chupp's questions in detail. As you can see, no one is looking at Chupp right now, but Ty's performance. Even I put most of the onus on Ty at first.

How TF do you prepare for someone like Chupp? Ya fucking can't, you know why? Because Chupp rules the court and when he gets distracted from the essence of the proceeding, you can't wrangle it back in without pissing off the beast.

 

[Hoss]

Even if Ty wins the appeal, he still has this jackass rogue judge to contend with. And with the history I see this judge has, something tells me that even a ding from the COA isn't enough to put his ego in check.

After that it goes to Jury selection so it doesn't matter as much. This is why Anti-Slapp is pure bullshit. It's a lawsuit.....for the lawsuit.
>Present the evidence pls
>TCPA blocks discovery
>"And I? May I say nothing, my Lord?"
>you don't have the evidence
>no, the TCPA blocks discovery on this
>so you don't have the evidence? dismissed

The First Amendment has caused more problems than helped. I mean shit, just throw out the goddamn 6th Amendment while you're at it cause lol fuck your ability to defend yourself.