- Joined
- Aug 3, 2018
A case presents its self for your consideration,
The Canadian pornographic website Pornhub has an Alexa rank of 31, and is easily one of the most visited websites of the decade. On this site, "Xev Bellringer" is one of the most popular pornographic "performers" in the world, ranking as the 28th most popular actresses. Age 31, she has approximately 169 million views. To put this in perspective, this number of views only relates to that single website. It does not include other pornographic sites that are popular in both the United States and abroad. In addition, the number of impressions and influence that person has is likely much larger, as said media is circulated and discussed. This is a person who by no means is an outlier or fringe.
What sets this person apart from her peers is the nature of her channels content. Specializing in incest role play, and in particular implied underage role play, her ability to act is unusual for the industry. Most of her videos revolve around having sexual congress with "young boys" well in compromising situations.
Her channel exploded in popularity in 2015 and continues to grow. With her growth her husband became more involved, and took a more active part in the production of her media, including playing the part of implied under age youth. This extends to impregnating her on video. Becoming pregnant, with a boy from what I have heard on 4chan, she continues to produce pornography, this time featuring her pregnancy.
I think that someone who produces underage incest pornography in her situation might not do so simply because it sells. She had to have started simply because that sort of thing interested her. If this is true, I have to wonder what that poor kid is going to grow up like. I wonder if that kid is going to be sexually abused by his parents. And if not, what is going to happen to him when he eventually discovers his mothers "career". Considering the popularity, it is likely he will. Maybe someone will tell him, or maybe he finds it one day well browsing.
Either way, that has to fuck with your mind. He is going to see his mom role playing raping someone in his situation, or he is going to see his literally fetal body being used as an "accessory" in a pregnancy porn video by his mom. All for the benefit of strangers to masturbate to.
I think that @Null made an interesting point bring up Shadman's drawing of real underage children. In his stream he mentioned how if that young girl was to see that picture of herself being raped by someone she knew, it might be damaging. Because of this potential damage, because Shadman's art depicted a real child, there was a clear victim. What Shadman did was illegal in Nulls eyes, and more importantly it was evil.
I think that an apt comparison would be to Daddy0Five. he was a youtuber that Jim made a video on. I am sure there is a thread on him, after all now he has his own wiki. Basically he would borderline abuse his kids for views on YouTube, and well it was going on YouTube did nothing. I think that Bellringer is doing something similar.
Humans adapt to stimuli overtime: For example, if a man starts using heroin, at first just a small dose will be enough. After a few weeks he will notice that it does not feel the same, so he ups the dosage. Within a year or five, depending on his own preferences and biology, he maybe been using several times what he previously did just to get the same high. And so, repeated super-stimulation causes the user to require more and more of that stimulation to get the same amount of dopamine.
I think that pornography is the same way. When you first start using vanilla is enough to get you off, but after 15 years you are watching trap orgies, or whatever your preferences are. I think that societies are fractal, that is to say that they behave just like individuals do. Just as you can place enough pressure on a person to make them snap, you can also place enough pressure on a society so as to make it break. This is simple really, societies are just the agglomerations of many people.
What happens when a society requires more and more extreme brands of pornography due to repeated exposure? I think you end up with a demand for Xev Bellringer.
"We are reaching peek Weinmar" as the phrase goes. In the days of the Republic, you could walk down one street and have sex with children for money, and walk down another and have sex with men, and walk down another and have sex with pregnant women.
Where do I see this going?
Recently we watched what happened when Jordan Peterson got deepfaked. It was an impressive proof of concept for the technology.
nakedsecurity.sophos.com
Deepfakes were also used to steal money by fraud.
What if you designed a deepfake program to generate Shota or Loli themed hyper-real animations that do not constitute illegal CP? Think about this, it is perfectly legal in the US to make 2d or 3d animations of drawn children. What if you just used a computer to make it? It would be a legal form of CP, and could be tailored to the users preferences by changing a few parameters in a program. I can see eventually deepfake characters being designed from the faces of real children, or popular child actors.
I was talking to a guy who tried to make a neural network that generated fury art for fun. It did not work but it was a funny idea. One day the technology could advance to such a point where this is possible. consider it, infinite custom tailored porn on demand.
If there are a billion people using the internet, and just a fraction of them are sick fucks, there would certainly be a massive demand for this. And if society continues to need more and more extreme pornography to satiate its desire, that fraction as a portion of the population would increase. Eventually it might even be semi-mainstream, in the same way furies are.
The Canadian pornographic website Pornhub has an Alexa rank of 31, and is easily one of the most visited websites of the decade. On this site, "Xev Bellringer" is one of the most popular pornographic "performers" in the world, ranking as the 28th most popular actresses. Age 31, she has approximately 169 million views. To put this in perspective, this number of views only relates to that single website. It does not include other pornographic sites that are popular in both the United States and abroad. In addition, the number of impressions and influence that person has is likely much larger, as said media is circulated and discussed. This is a person who by no means is an outlier or fringe.
What sets this person apart from her peers is the nature of her channels content. Specializing in incest role play, and in particular implied underage role play, her ability to act is unusual for the industry. Most of her videos revolve around having sexual congress with "young boys" well in compromising situations.
Her channel exploded in popularity in 2015 and continues to grow. With her growth her husband became more involved, and took a more active part in the production of her media, including playing the part of implied under age youth. This extends to impregnating her on video. Becoming pregnant, with a boy from what I have heard on 4chan, she continues to produce pornography, this time featuring her pregnancy.
I think that someone who produces underage incest pornography in her situation might not do so simply because it sells. She had to have started simply because that sort of thing interested her. If this is true, I have to wonder what that poor kid is going to grow up like. I wonder if that kid is going to be sexually abused by his parents. And if not, what is going to happen to him when he eventually discovers his mothers "career". Considering the popularity, it is likely he will. Maybe someone will tell him, or maybe he finds it one day well browsing.
Either way, that has to fuck with your mind. He is going to see his mom role playing raping someone in his situation, or he is going to see his literally fetal body being used as an "accessory" in a pregnancy porn video by his mom. All for the benefit of strangers to masturbate to.
I think that @Null made an interesting point bring up Shadman's drawing of real underage children. In his stream he mentioned how if that young girl was to see that picture of herself being raped by someone she knew, it might be damaging. Because of this potential damage, because Shadman's art depicted a real child, there was a clear victim. What Shadman did was illegal in Nulls eyes, and more importantly it was evil.
I think that an apt comparison would be to Daddy0Five. he was a youtuber that Jim made a video on. I am sure there is a thread on him, after all now he has his own wiki. Basically he would borderline abuse his kids for views on YouTube, and well it was going on YouTube did nothing. I think that Bellringer is doing something similar.
Humans adapt to stimuli overtime: For example, if a man starts using heroin, at first just a small dose will be enough. After a few weeks he will notice that it does not feel the same, so he ups the dosage. Within a year or five, depending on his own preferences and biology, he maybe been using several times what he previously did just to get the same high. And so, repeated super-stimulation causes the user to require more and more of that stimulation to get the same amount of dopamine.
I think that pornography is the same way. When you first start using vanilla is enough to get you off, but after 15 years you are watching trap orgies, or whatever your preferences are. I think that societies are fractal, that is to say that they behave just like individuals do. Just as you can place enough pressure on a person to make them snap, you can also place enough pressure on a society so as to make it break. This is simple really, societies are just the agglomerations of many people.
What happens when a society requires more and more extreme brands of pornography due to repeated exposure? I think you end up with a demand for Xev Bellringer.
"We are reaching peek Weinmar" as the phrase goes. In the days of the Republic, you could walk down one street and have sex with children for money, and walk down another and have sex with men, and walk down another and have sex with pregnant women.
Where do I see this going?
Recently we watched what happened when Jordan Peterson got deepfaked. It was an impressive proof of concept for the technology.
Scammers deepfake CEO’s voice to talk underling into $243,000 transfer
The voice had the hint of a German accent and the same “melody” that an employee recognized in his boss’s voice.
nakedsecurity.sophos.com
Deepfakes were also used to steal money by fraud.
What if you designed a deepfake program to generate Shota or Loli themed hyper-real animations that do not constitute illegal CP? Think about this, it is perfectly legal in the US to make 2d or 3d animations of drawn children. What if you just used a computer to make it? It would be a legal form of CP, and could be tailored to the users preferences by changing a few parameters in a program. I can see eventually deepfake characters being designed from the faces of real children, or popular child actors.
I was talking to a guy who tried to make a neural network that generated fury art for fun. It did not work but it was a funny idea. One day the technology could advance to such a point where this is possible. consider it, infinite custom tailored porn on demand.
If there are a billion people using the internet, and just a fraction of them are sick fucks, there would certainly be a massive demand for this. And if society continues to need more and more extreme pornography to satiate its desire, that fraction as a portion of the population would increase. Eventually it might even be semi-mainstream, in the same way furies are.
