U
UY 690
Guest
kiwifarms.net
Indeed. Some folks just wanna ranch for wonk points.Yeah, I'm ready to categorize the exceptional extremes as chaos seekers at this point.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Indeed. Some folks just wanna ranch for wonk points.Yeah, I'm ready to categorize the exceptional extremes as chaos seekers at this point.
Won't lie, laughed at "booty warrior."
I am ready to categorize them as Trolls looking to do what trolls do. Try to piss people off for their own amusement.Yeah, I'm ready to categorize the exceptional extremes as chaos seekers at this point.
Being a public figure because of the lawsuit isn't relevant.Filled courtrooms. Filled Facebook wall. Vic gets butts in the seats and that makes him a public figure, brother.
Shows that he's being honest about his opinions of his friend. For normal people that doesn't mean you condemn the person. You care about them in spite of their behavior or your opinion of their behavior.I thought it was odd that Chuck had to include his opinion of Vic having a lot of sex on his affidavit, calling it "shameful" and basically accusing him of manipulating women with his fame to fuck them. Also the comment about him cheating. I get it's Chuck's opinion, but it could only be detrimental to Vic, right? Especially the part about his "shameful" behavior. Never understood why he had to include that and Ty agreed to. Shouldn't have done that if he really wanted to help Vic.
I think it's less about being against Vic and more about him covering his own ass, so that if the case does happen to go south, he can just point at those lines, say he was misled by Vic or that he was naive, and that's that. While it's nice to think there's a possible "honesty" angle, it's way too optimistic for the people involved within the VA industry.I thought it was odd that Chuck had to include his opinion of Vic having a lot of sex on his affidavit, calling it "shameful" and basically accusing him of manipulating women with his fame to fuck them. Also the comment about him cheating. I get it's Chuck's opinion, but it could only be detrimental to Vic, right? Especially the part about his "shameful" behavior. Never understood why he had to include that and Ty agreed to. Shouldn't have done that if he really wanted to help Vic.
First : ISWV is not a hive... again... how do you know the people who try to cancel KV are the same as the ones who advocate against cancel culture ?The members of the ISWV side speak ill of cancel culture and yet they act with the same tools to try and create it.
Sabat's casting couch IS an unsubstantiated accusation at this point tho. We don't even have anyone coming forward with first hand accounts. Huber's account wasn't first hand.First : ISWV is not a hive... again... how do you know the people who try to cancel KV are the same as the ones who advocate against cancel culture ?
Secondly :
Cancel culture is canceling people because of unsubtantiated accusations... nothing to do with firing someone who's guilty of running a casting couch.
Of course we yet have to get the proof that Sabat is indeed guilty, but if he is, putting his ass in a cell certainly isn't cancel culture, it's simply justice.
Fact that is aknowledged by my message... maybe you should have read the last line more carefuly...Sabat's casting couch IS an unsubstantiated accusation at this point tho. We don't even have anyone coming forward with first hand accounts. Huber's account wasn't first hand.
Of course we yet have to get the proof that Sabat is indeed guilty, but if he is, putting his ass in a cell certainly isn't cancel culture, it's simply justice.
Fact that is aknowledged by my message... maybe you should have read the last line more carefuly...
EDIT:
Also, there is also a difference between accusations on twitter and accusations under oath, I would argue that the later have way more credit.
And in this particular case, Chuck's affidavit has way more weight than de defendants' because unlike them, he isn't trying to save his own ass.
He ought to calm down.Yeah, the worst part is it's still happening as I type![]()
Ok. My bad.Fact that is aknowledged by my message... maybe you should have read the last line more carefuly...
The members of the ISWV side speak ill of cancel culture and yet they act with the same tools to try and create it. This whole thing is a mess, and as i feared it's going to the petty fights. Here's some advice for Vic's Allies: SHUT THE FUCK UP!! Stop talking and let the information come from us. The farms remains neutral. We mock all who are worthy of mockery. If you do or say something stupid we will mock you, and it will be made public. Much like Gamergate and the SkepticTM community the egotistical thirst for political internet blood-sports turns one into the monster they wish to slay. This is how regardless of how legitimate your intentions, and ideas are, these communities all implode onto each other. For example, cannibalizing Ty for.......... bringing TCPA evidence to a TCPA hearing that the judge fucked up. Easy fix: Appeal, point out the mistake, and move on. Don't attack the judge on social media unless you want him to become your enemy and not just some bumbling, old, dumb-ass.
Onto Chuck. lets just assume he's "the guy." Neat! He's mad that his ass is on the chopping block too with no visible (read: immediate) results to save himself and Vic. Understandable. We all knew this legal battle would be long and arduous - Its too easy to take a loss (it may not even be a loss - only time can tell) and just throw the baby out with the bathwater, but please remember these things are very slow and painful. The internet age is the age of instant gratification - it's easy to forget this in court. Its easy to want to just Curse Ye Ha Me Ha people whom we find unpalatable but that's not what happens.
I've been in favor for a while now of creating a concise archive of the most damning statements (and their immediate context) made as an overview. of the events, so that any layperson can see whats happened. In no longer than 20 minutes of reading or viewing.
Ok ISWV wipe the Autistic, snot and spittle off your lip, act like adults, stand up and keep it moving.
Sorry, Ty deserves to be mocked as much as J. Sean for his past week of fuckups. He is not a defamation lawyer, so he's out of his element from the start. Then got a wrong read on Judge Chupp from the start. He fixes this by dumping 1,200 pages of disorganized crap on the court docket half an hour after the due date, cobbling it together in the last day. It helps he fucks up the notarization too through either laziness, negligence, or who even knows, Ty hasn't said much about it. This filing was shit, on a scale of 1-10 with Landau being a 1, J. Sean's was a 2 and Ty's was a 3. And all the while he does this as tens of thousands of people are watching every move he and his firm make which makes this case disproportionately important from a business perspective.For example, cannibalizing Ty for.......... bringing TCPA evidence to a TCPA hearing that the judge fucked up. Easy fix: Appeal, point out the mistake, and move on.
ISWV using cancel culture is nasty business but necessary. Cancel culture is a tool that people... As a society, should agree "this should never be used."...
I think humans forget things too quickly and that is why we have cancel culture. Everyone forgot how shitty things get when things like this happen. So you have to pound on the people who took the tool off the rack and their enablers.