Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger) 2: The Revenge

Status
Not open for further replies.
how is he a pedophile again?
Are you always this stupid or are you making a special effort today?
How do you think he's a pedophile? He actively lusts after small children and draws pictures of naked children getting plowed by adults.
what do you mean by "valid" sexual orientation? something is either sexual orientation or not. how old were the children?
Again, are you just make special efforts for today or what?
You can have sexual orientations that aren't deemed ok or "valid". Wanting to fuck sheep, for example, is not considered a good/valid sexual orientation.
Your friend Mala actively suggested (and believed) that it should be an ok thing to want to sexually touch an 8 year old (or under, he went to like 6 or something in his picture). A 'valid' sexual orientation means that it's a sexual orientation that isn't deemed deviant or disgusting. Pedophilia is not a valid sexual orientation.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Ti-99/4A
you're an idiot.
you can whine all you want but i am just stating the facts your very own posts say.
Guess that makes you the idiot...
Yes, you are not sane.
Just calling me this doesn't make it so.
See...?

I'm thinking of making my quote bag available to the rest of the forum... anyone think that's a bad idea?

How long has it been since your country's last genocide, again?
Infinite number of years, since it never happened? Unlike your genocide of American Indians.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_persecution_of_Serbs

*cough* I guess 70 = Infinity to you...

:edit: You claim to be a fucking Historian... how the fuck can you be so completely ignorant of the history of your own fucking country???
 
Are you always this stupid or are you making a special effort today?
How do you think he's a pedophile? He actively lusts after small children and draws pictures of naked children getting plowed by adults.
From what he told me he is pansexual. So what is wrong with that?

Are you always this stupid or are you making a special effort today?
How do you think he's a pedophile? He actively lusts after small children and draws pictures of naked children getting plowed by adults.

Again, are you just make special efforts for today or what?
You can have sexual orientations that aren't deemed ok or "valid". Wanting to fuck sheep, for example, is not considered a good/valid sexual orientation.
Your friend Mala actively suggested (and believed) that it should be an ok thing to want to sexually touch an 8 year old (or under, he went to like 6 or something in his picture). A 'valid' sexual orientation means that it's a sexual orientation that isn't deemed deviant or disgusting. Pedophilia is not a valid sexual orientation.

I see. But in any case, he 1. is not a pedophile, just pansexual 2. he can't control it anyway. I am against pedophiles who didn't molest kids being punished and for them to have controlled legal access to things like child porn.
 
From what he told me he is pansexual. So what is wrong with that?
I see. But in any case, he 1. is not a pedophile, just pansexual 2. he can't control it anyway. I am against pedophiles who didn't molest kids being punished and for them to have controlled legal access to things like child porn.
Do...do you even know what pansexual is?
Pansexual is the sexual desire/attraction of any gender identity or any sex... not age. Wanting to screw and touch a 6 year old is not pansexual. Wanting to touch little kids like he does makes him a pedophile. You don't need to actually touch children to be a pedophile... the fact that he draws this stuff, writes stories, and actively wants there to be literally no age of consent makes him a pedophile.

...you want pedophiles to have access to child porn? Omg holden has reached an all time low.
 
a good example of that are your claims about caves or that other thing about condoms which you said you were paraphrasing
Now, prove it's a lie... rather than a paraphrasing of WHAT YOU SAID YOURSELF.

And Marijan? You've made one hell of a lot of assumptions about people, along with changing what they've said... if a couple of paraphrases and metaphors are "good examples" of me not managing to interpret what you say correctly, then the astronomical number of outright rewrites you've done is more than enough evidence that you cannot understand a fucking word said to you.

Feel free to try to argue that it's different when you do it, because then it's THE TRUTH... that's just https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/special-pleading and is evidence that you are engaging in illogical thinking.

...you want pedophiles to have access to child porn? Omg holden has reached an all time low.
I would argue that having access to cartoon child porn is the lesser of two evils... but actual child porn, with actual children in it? FUCK NO!!!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There is nothing broken about that. I explained it in the very post you're replying to.

In order to have sex with a modern Western skank you can't treat her like "a person". You need to treat her like manure and kick her out brutally the moment you fuck her. If you offer her anything but sex she will jail you. In case of men like me, who can't use seduction, you need to be 10 times more brutal and act with untold savagery. If I don't break a woman's spine, legs, teeth, skulls, everything, I am seen as an insane criminal.

You do know what loving a Western woman will result in? I recently had the chance to read a woman's open bragging that she and a wife of a guy who didn't cheat on his wife and took care of his kids arranged so that this woman, with support of his wife, can accuse him of rape and have him locked up. Why? His wife was disgusted by the fact that he took care of his kids and didn't abuse her while she was fucking retarded thugs on the side. When he didn't like that he was simply removed from society as somebody who no longer had a worth as cash cow. His kids weren't really his and now he is in prison. If he raped, abused, maimed and cheated on women he'd be free and successful. That is what trying to "love" a modern Western woman gets you. In their eyes, everybody who isn't abusive, murderous scum is only good as cash cow to pay taxes for Western governments to fund these insane lifestyles and if he rebels even slightly he must be destroyed. In fact, they're so intolerant and violent that they more and more jail even the men who do pay taxes for sluts, simply because they can't stand them. This is because feminist women are criminally insane psychopaths who want all men who aren't attractive to them (which means completely violent and murderous scumbags) destroyed. Of course, all the manginas fully supported her and claimed she was right to do that. Do you now understand why I'm terrified due to the fact I have never raped anybody?

In case of men like me, who can't use seduction, you need to be 10 times more brutal and act with untold savagery. It takes enormous amounts of immorality and stupidity to have sex with modern skanks and the guys who do it also impregnate retarded sluts on a weekly basis.

If the world actually worked like that, there would be a lot more people in wheelchairs. And here in the US, I rarely see a person in one.

Your logic is flawed. To put it *VERY* lightly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ti-99/4A
If the world actually worked like that, there would be a lot more people in wheelchairs. And here in the US, I rarely see a person in one.
this is simply because there are still a lot of seducers who need that kind of brutality. but as men like me, poor in seduction, wake up (and employ what we need to attract sluts) and as kids become more and more feral (thus making seduction too hard of a concept) there will be more and more. a society where everybody rapes is better than a society of seducers.

*don't need that kind of brutality
 
Your logic is flawed.
"logic"

shwgrl.gif
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Overcast
this is simply because there are still a lot of seducers who need that kind of brutality. but as men like me, poor in seduction, wake up (and employ what we need to attract sluts) and as kids become more and more feral (thus making seduction too hard of a concept) there will be more and more. a society where everybody rapes is better than a society of seducers.
Are you poor in seduction because you're autistic? By your own admission you exhibit multiple symptoms, and Elliot was an Aspie and so was Ben Moynihan. It seems pretty common among the MRA/LoveShy crowd.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ti-99/4A
Do...do you even know what pansexual is?
Pansexual is the sexual desire/attraction of any gender identity or any sex... not age. Wanting to screw and touch a 6 year old is not pansexual. Wanting to touch little kids like he does makes him a pedophile. You don't need to actually touch children to be a pedophile... the fact that he draws this stuff, writes stories, and actively wants there to be literally no age of consent makes him a pedophile.

...you want pedophiles to have access to child porn? Omg holden has reached an all time low.
Ok, it seems really is the definition of pansexualism. But what is he then, since I know he just recently had a girlfriend of his age? He can't just be a pedophile then?

As for access to child porn, of course. Why punish people for something that they can't control and have no blame over? That's sick.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back