If a 5 year old has sex with an unconscious adult, who is the rapist? - Neither of them can legally consent...

assuming that the five year old would even have sex in the first place without being under the influence of previous sexual assault or rape experiences.
It's a fucked up five year old who's probably been raped, yeah. But that's not the point. The point is: who's legally responsible? Is the unconscious guy a kiddy diddler and the kid a victim, or is the kid a rapist and the adult a victim of a weird little psycho? Or are they both victims? Being a past rape victim shouldn't excuse the kid's actions imo.

Is this Amos Yee's alt account?
Ahh shit, you doxed me.

Change it to a 13 year old and it would make more sense.
It doesn't matter if it's a seventeen year old or a newborn. It's a hypothetical situation.
 
It's a fucked up five year old who's probably been raped, yeah. But that's not the point. The point is: who's legally responsible? Is the unconscious guy a kiddy diddler and the kid a victim, or is the kid a rapist and the adult a victim of a weird little psycho? Or are they both victims? Being a past rape victim shouldn't excuse the kid's actions imo.

The kid is the rapist because if the guy is dead (assuming if he's unconscious as in legit dead and not just knocked out), not only is it a rapist, it's a necrophiliac too.
 
A child can still be charged with murder. They can be charged with aggravated sexual assault as well.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: FuckedUp
Back