Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger) 2: The Revenge

Status
Not open for further replies.
Holden said:
it doesn't. you're just repeating incorrect nonsense. women are sheepish and all women resemble the dominant ideology. every woman who wasn't in a religion here was exactly the same. every woman i met who was in a religion here was also exactly the same, just in a differently bad way.
Click to expand...

If that is true, and we are all so sheepish and dumb, why aren't we all agreeing with you on how much we love rape? Since we're all the same, I mean.

Holden, your logic is baaaaaa~d
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse and 24isthehighestnumber
4Macie said:
Why would paid sex remove your virginity but not incelship?
If you were a virgin at 20, you were not only a virgin but an incel. If you had sex with a hooker for your first time, would you be instantly placed into a non-virgin incel grouping?
Click to expand...

Better be careful, if you confuse him with logic he shuts down.
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse and 4Macie
Holden said:
namaz - It absolutely means that. Not a single woman is sane marriage material here.
Click to expand...

If you're talking about the forums you do know we have married individuals? Hell even a few married couples that both browse the forum.

Holden said:
I said unpaid sex. Nobody ever said being incel and virgin are always the same thing. There are volcel virgins and non-virginal incels.
Click to expand...

All of those words are made up. I know because I checked two dictionaries.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse
Sammy said:
Couple things:
1) You can't seem to trust a woman. Why do want a relationship with someone you can't trust?
Click to expand...
I can somewhat trust a non-Western woman, because of two things 1. Their personalities aren't insane like those of western women. 2. The countries they're living in give better options to keep them in check. Drealm writes about this
Consequences are the only way to ensure good behavior in women. Women need consequences for divorce in order to remain married. My assumption here is all women by default have no morals. A woman will choose to remain married on the basis of relative consequences. Below is my list of strategic consequences I see enabling marriage, in no particular order.

1. Date or "marry" an illegal alien. She'll have no legal recourse and will be afraid to approach the law. The consequence of her leaving you will be she'll have to expose herself more to chances of being deported.

2. Date or "marry" a woman who doesn't speak English. Similiar to above, she'll have no way to understand the legal system. She'll need translation. The biggest consequence here is she'll have to learn English.

3. Date or "marry" a devout religious woman, who's denomination includes some aspect of going to hell for committing divorce or infidelity. The consequence here: burning in hell.

4. Date or "marry" a woman and create a closed loop social network for her. Indian culture is good at this. In Indian culture divorce rarely happens because the women know they'll be shunned by their entire social network. So the consequence here are losing all her friends.

5. Date or "marry" a woman and live in their foreign country. By living abroad you're not giving them the standard of living in your own country. Doing so allows you to hold up citizenship as in incentive for remaining with you. The consequence here is withdrawing chances of citizenship.



Sammy said:
2) You only partially responded to my questions. Please answer this question:
Click to expand...
This is a good question to repeat the answer, though I'm basically repeating myself. Yes, beating somebody until they are (hopefully not permanently) disabled is painful, but 1. It is still better than the sick procedure of seduction, which is the most malicious in the world since not everybody can use it, while basically everybody can beat. 2. As intelligence declines so will seduction, which at least takes some mental capacity and skill. Beating and raping are already being loved by women, since that's where things are heading towards.

Sammy said:
3) you seem really nonchalant about PHYSICALLY BEATING SOMEONE BLOODY to compare it to "throwing out the garbage" or "drinking water," pretty common everyday things.
Click to expand...
You misunderstand my point. I am not saying these are the same things, just that they're currently necessary for somebody like me, who'd want not to live in garbage, die out of thirst or have a long term relationship.
Sammy said:
Are you sure you're a nice guy you believe yourself to be?
Click to expand...
Oh, c'mon, Sammy. I never used this term at all nor do I believe I am a nice guy.

As for why some other don't need to rape and maim this is what I wrote on Reddit recently

If nobody broke your bones that's even worse, since it meant you went for complete seducers, men who had so much immorality and stupidity that they didn't even have to.

It's like it the mafia, where men with most power just have to nod. Same here - men with worst immorality and stupidity don't even have to beat women.


 
  • Dumb
Reactions: deductionotaku, Saney, NobleGreyHorse and 4 others
Holden said:
Also, Sammy - you have to understand Western women. Dynastia is an insane whore whose only, ONLY goal in life is to gulp retarded ape cocks. So messing up her face and stopping her from moving too much would hinder that.
Click to expand...

I live in the West, Shit-For-Brains. I interact with Western women every day of my life. I've dated some of them. Have you ever interacted directly with a Western woman? Ever?

Too Long; Didn't Read: I have a better understanding of Western women than you do. And you are so very wrong in what you believe they want.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse and Randall Fragg
Can I get a specific definition of what you consider "seduction" to be? From the way you talk it sounds like it means simply holding a conversation with a woman and being kind which the rest of the world tends to define as not being autistic.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse
Holden said:
I can somewhat trust a non-Western woman, because of two things 1. Their personalities aren't insane like those of western women. 2. The countries they're living in give better options to keep them in check. Drealm writes about this
Consequences are the only way to ensure good behavior in women. Women need consequences for divorce in order to remain married. My assumption here is all women by default have no morals. A woman will choose to remain married on the basis of relative consequences. Below is my list of strategic consequences I see enabling marriage, in no particular order.

1. Date or "marry" an illegal alien. She'll have no legal recourse and will be afraid to approach the law. The consequence of her leaving you will be she'll have to expose herself more to chances of being deported.

2. Date or "marry" a woman who doesn't speak English. Similiar to above, she'll have no way to understand the legal system. She'll need translation. The biggest consequence here is she'll have to learn English.

3. Date or "marry" a devout religious woman, who's denomination includes some aspect of going to hell for committing divorce or infidelity. The consequence here: burning in hell.

4. Date or "marry" a woman and create a closed loop social network for her. Indian culture is good at this. In Indian culture divorce rarely happens because the women know they'll be shunned by their entire social network. So the consequence here are losing all her friends.

5. Date or "marry" a woman and live in their foreign country. By living abroad you're not giving them the standard of living in your own country. Doing so allows you to hold up citizenship as in incentive for remaining with you. The consequence here is withdrawing chances of citizenship.




This is a good question to repeat the answer, though I'm basically repeating myself. Yes, beating somebody until they are (hopefully not permanently) disabled is painful, but 1. It is still better than the sick procedure of seduction, which is the most malicious in the world since not everybody can use it, while basically everybody can beat. 2. As intelligence declines so will seduction, which at least takes some mental capacity and skill. Beating and raping are already being loved by women, since that's where things are heading towards.


You misunderstand my point. I am not saying these are the same things, just that they're currently necessary for somebody like me, who'd want not to live in garbage, die out of thirst or have a long term relationship.

Oh, c'mon, Sammy. I never used this term at all nor do I believe I am a nice guy.

As for why some other don't need to rape and maim this is what I wrote on Reddit recently

If nobody broke your bones that's even worse, since it meant you went for complete seducers, men who had so much immorality and stupidity that they didn't even have to.

It's like it the mafia, where men with most power just have to nod. Same here - men with worst immorality and stupidity don't even have to beat women.
Click to expand...

Spoiler function, use it please!
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse
It's gotta really suck to be wrong about everything, spend hours a day making a fool of yourself online, sexually harassing women, getting arrested for death threats, asking your mom for sex (three times), taking FSchmidt seriously, contradicting yourself, posting links to articles that prove the opposite of what you think they do, have regular temper tantrums in public online forums, assaulted your own parents, make up false stories of child abuse, keep a laughable blame shifting list of whiny rants catalogued in a blog, like Nazis, display a seething hatred of women, AND advocate abolishing age of consent laws... All while trying to make some kind of impact and be taken seriously as an intellectual. I mean, he's stacked the deck against himself, but shit, that's an uphill battle if I've ever seen one.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back