DESMOND IS AMAZING / desmondisamazing / Wendylou, Andrew, & Desmond Napoles - Child being abused/sexualized by parents for financial gain and fame.

  • Thread starter Thread starter RI 360
  • Start date Start date
queerape said:
So I managed to convince some of my liberal friends to rescind support of Desmond. It most certainly can be done, if you go about it in the right way. Here are some do's and don't's.

DO: frame it in terms of Desmond's page being "problematic". They respond well to that word, as it signifies something off about the narrative as opposed to anything inherent about the person. The word problematic means that something warrants further investigation.

DON'T: Use the word degenerate or make any references to degeneracy. You have to consider that misguided liberals would be supporting Desmond because they think they are supporting LGBTQ expression, and certainly they would not react well to the insinuation of LGBTQ people being degenerate.

DO: Suggest the problem is that Desmond is being exploited by his parents and pedophiles, and that a queer child is not being allowed to have a childhood free of sexualization. A liberal would be looking out for the wellbeing of a queer child in most cases.

DON'T: Suggest the problem is Desmond's queerness, or that Desmond is not actually queer and his parents are just telling him that. As much as you may believe in this being the case, a lot of gay people can know they are gay pretty young. Think about it, in general, it's not unusual to know what genders you like pretty young, many of you probably knew you liked men pretty young too (or women).

DO: Provide specific examples of the exploitation, like the Three Dollar Bill incident, the naked posing with drag queens, and the inappropriate comments on the pages that the parents leave up. Frank examples speak for themselves.

DON'T: Link to any news articles on Desmond, as those can be accused of having a conservative bias since few liberal outlets are willing to report on it.

ESPECIALLY DON'T : Link to this KF thread as evidence.
Click to expand...


At this point you're not even addressing the central problem of a child being allowed into homosexual spaces, which are highly sexualized in the first place


Thanatos said:
Ugh, not even Putin could hold the floodgates closed forever.
Click to expand...

I’m almost certain the CIA is pushing degenerate shit in Russia to undermine Putin. It’s kind of like how Israel broadcasts porn into Palestine. They know this shit weakens a society.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: Yawning Asperchu, JelloJerk, The Jokester and 16 others
Ted Gazynski said:
I’m almost certain the CIA is pushing degenerate shit in Russia to undermine Putin. It’s kind of like how Israel broadcasts porn into Palestine. They know this shit weakens a society.
Click to expand...

I would honestly be shocked if they weren't. Also hasn't there been some funny business with American embassies flying the queer flag instead of the stars and stripes?
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: HIVidaBoheme, ωσкє вℓυє мυѕℓιм qυєєη, Dork Of Ages and 2 others
That fucking picture:
69603071_166254231182922_8872756630475410699_n.jpg
"URGH why won't those stupid right wingers understand why there is nothing sexual with me making my ten-year-old son dance at a gay bar for tips"
68961685_405231413400386_435973133410550729_n.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Nykysnottrans, HIVidaBoheme, Vulpes Incunta and 7 others
Tasty Tatty said:
Second kid who is dressing in 90s fashion, that's 20 years ago. In the 90s, I remember we had a bit of a 70s comeback, but it was mainstream and all over media. There is no 90s comeback right now as far as I'm aware for them to try to emulate. So, this probably confirms it's all the mother's influence and projection. IF these kids wanted to just dress as girls, they'd be dressed as little thots, not as gay divas from two decades ago.
Click to expand...

90s ia coming back. In the bland neutral way it was the first time. "Blossom" style and Doc Martins included
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: dark_lob1111, Nykysnottrans, Syaoran Li and 9 others
Abortions4All said:
Trans kids are perfect medical patients, and right now, there's not much that's gaining profit margin faster than healthcare. And these kids, wow, they are doozies. Endocrinologist bills forever, and it's going to get more complicated as they age. There'll be a built-in market of guinea pigs for any new formulation of hormones they can think of to dose people with, and insurance will cover any ridiculous dosing device or formulation for people who will beg and plead that they'll surely die otherwise.

But of course it doesn't stop with the endocrinologists. There's the surgeons, and the mental healthcare workers. And they all make money whether the person stays transitioned or not! When the market is bigger for surgeries to detransition than transition, the same doctors will be offering the "care." The same therapists, too, and endocrinologists.
Click to expand...
...so not only have all those virtue signallers looked the other way at female genital mutilation in POC countries (because "IT'S THEIR CULTURE!"), they've somehow made it lucrative enough to do the same thing, legitmately and on a larger scale, to males for it to be an entire industry.
 
  • Like
  • Horrifying
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: SassyAndMorbidlyObese, Troon Anthropologist, TheBlackVolga and 5 others
The girls it's being done to are perhaps even worse off than the boys. Chop off their breasts and hack out the womb, hair growth that won't stop even if they stop T. They're going to be in the market for implants, adoptions, surrogacy, HRT to replace their missing estrogen if they got the plumbing removed, hair removal, voice coaching (they can use the ones who coached MTFs before!), mastectomy bras. Wonderful markets, and all you have to do to exploit them is destroy people's reproductive capacity and endocrine balance!
 
  • Horrifying
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: VioletVonStabberton, Syaoran Li, Lizard Pope and 16 others
When Desmond dies (and I use the term "when" because everyone has a "when" time for their death, I hope St Peter whips him, sends him to Gods courtroom and God himself says he is not Amazing, and goes into the details of the real reason Noah's flood happened.

Then sends Desmond to new Sodom and Ghomora. The Hell of Buttfucking.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
Reactions: Yawning Asperchu, My cravat doesn't flutter, Eggbertha and 35 others
Ted Gazynski said:
At this point you're not even addressing the central problem of a child being allowed into homosexual spaces, which are highly sexualized in the first place
Click to expand...
They counter argue that saying something along the lines of "heterosexual spaces" also being sexualized somehow, or write up some essay about how evil a heteronormative society is and that showing straight shit to the kids is forcing our views on them, and not allowing them to decide for themselves or something. How should we respond to that?

Edit:

ATaxingWoman said:
"URGH why won't those stupid right wingers understand why there is nothing sexual with me making my ten-year-old son dance at a gay bar for tips"
68961685_405231413400386_435973133410550729_n.jpg
Click to expand...

I lost count of the times they've pulled off the "nuh-uh, YOU'RE viewing it as sexual!" card. Kids surrounded by grownass men in drag, then twerking and sensually dancing for the camera? Yeah, uh, totally innocent, nothing to see here
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Troon Anthropologist, UnsufficentBoobage, Dork Of Ages and 4 others
n33gr said:
They counter argue that saying something along the lines of "heterosexual spaces" also being sexualized somehow, or write up some essay about how evil a heteronormative society is and that showing straight shit to the kids is forcing our views on them, and not allowing them to decide for themselves or something. How should we respond to that?
Click to expand...
Kids aren't allowed in "straight spaces" where people hook up in the bathrooms and porn is shown on big screen tvs and strippers perform. So.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: snoot booper, NimertiS, Syaoran Li and 17 others
TrippinKahlua said:
When Desmond dies (and I use the term "when" because everyone has a "when" time for their death, I hope St Peter whips him, sends him to Gods courtroom and God himself says he is not Amazing, and goes into the details of the real reason Noah's flood happened.

Then sends Desmond to new Sodom and Ghomora. The Hell of Buttfucking.
Click to expand...

WTF, dude -- he's twelve? It's his parents you should be angry at. HE'S the victim here.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: My cravat doesn't flutter, Fireskull, Isaac Clarke and 41 others
Kids aren't allowed in "heterosexual" bars. Alas, I guess some irresponsible parent or an alcoholic can bring their kids to the bar, but at least they aren't forcing them to perform for the customer. In fact, I'm sure if some parent forces their 12 years old girl to dance there, police would be closing down the place in a snap.

The whole "it's not sexual, duh" argument is moronic and it's almost insulting that they believe we're that stupid and we don't know about their "gay culture" they keep asking us to respect. Yes, straight people go to bars to hook up, but some just go to spend time with friends or to have a drink. There is not one single exclusive purpose for a bar or a tavern or whatever . On the other fucking hand, gay bars exist with the only specific purpose of gay people to find other gay people so they can hook up. Otherwise, they'd go to a "normal" bar instead to spend time. What's next? Taking Desmond to a brothel and say it's not "sexual" because he's not the one having sex? Morons.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Yawning Asperchu, broken chiyron, Dededon't and 19 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back