I also wonder when this sub will ultimately get shut down by Reddit for hate speech.
More people should read stuff like this before going through with SRS.
And this is why Penny Oaken /r/Bardfinn the rabidly censorious Reddit mod should not be allowed to take down /r/NeovaginaDisasters or /r/MedicalGore or /r/detrans or any other sub where SRS regret is openly and graphically discussed or shown: because there is
the potential for non-infringing use for such a sub, and that alone is grounds to keep it up. Some doctors force trannies to sign NDAs and prohibit them from posting pictures of their results in the social media. What if a trannie with a botched SRS decides to take to /r/NeovaginaDisasters to tell their story? Suppose this trannie looked at all the other subs and all they saw there were shiny happy trannies that worship their SRS doctors like demi-Gods. Such a trannie with botched SRS would decide they can't go to the other subs and speak honestly about what happened. Thus you get a chilling effect and eventually a distorted view of what's actually going on with SRS. I love how these SJWs claim to be "anti-gatekeeper", but all this censorship they want to push through on Reddit will only help crooked doctors hiding behind NDAs, not their botched patients.
Penny the censorious Reddit mod is now trying to hijack /r/TransRights:
Requesting /r/TransRights Bardfinn 1 point
The subreddit was banned because the prior moderation team permitted content that violated the Content Policy against violent content.
If granted this subreddit, I will recruit a diverse team of moderators who understand and enforce consistently the Reddit Content Policy; publish and enforce a set of clear, concise, and fair rules for the subreddit; and actively grow and recruit the community both on and off Reddit.
I have three moderators already recruited.
"I will recruit a diverse team of moderators", let me guess, the same ones that moderate /r/mouthfeel?
And of course, once he has hijacked /r/TransRights, he will use it to argue why it is his "right" to censor the whole of Reddit.
I have a question about these hijackings or cybersquattings or whatever the fuck they're called. Can someone, say another mod on Reddit, object to Penny taking over the sub? On the basis that he is going to run the sub in a completely biased, one-sided manner? (Not that I want to do this, I really don't have any fucking time for the timesuck that is Reddit, I just want to know how this works.)
Suppose there was a mod who was a lawyer, or a law student/professor, posting under their real name, a respected community member/mod, they had already moderated one or several law-related subs, everyone understood that they really know their shit, but they were legally neutral or more conservative in their views on trans rights. Could such a mod file an objection arguing that Penny Oaken is not going to run /r/TransRights in a fair or balanced manner or recruit a "diverse" team like he claims to? Obviously whatever Penny saying in that message is just some pro-forma bullshit that he will violate as soon as he gets the sub. It's to be expected that he will just bring in more of his fellow trannies to run the sub and they will prevent any analysis that goes against their SJW ideology from being posted or discussed. You know he will never allow
an article such as this to be posted, when lawyers and legal students on his sub might want to read it anyway, if only to prepare a better argument. Because unlike Penny and his fellow censorious SJWs, an actual lawyer cannot demand that the judge censor the opposition's lawyer just because he's making an argument you don't like. SJWs can avoid having to argue back but a lawyer has to.
Over the years I have seen some serious and thoroughly researched and sourced articles from more conservative legal analysts on the topic of trans rights, but I highly doubt Penny would ever allow any of those to make it onto /r/TransRights despite these articles being on-topic and entirely about the topic in terms of the legal aspects.
Or suppose one of those radical feminist lawyers from WoLF would publish an article that is nothing but a legal analysis of Title VII and Title IX precedents (these are the two civil rights laws that TERFs are obsessed with trannies taking over and using for themselves, which they already do anyway and so do gay men, straight men, etc). I am pretty sure such an article would be on-topic when it comes to trans rights, but I am also sure Penny would still prevent that article from ever being posted or discussed on /r/TransRights.
Basically, is it even possible for someone else to object to such a hijacking/squatting of an existing sub by a mod who is known to be extremely censorious, unfair, one-sided and biased?