Debate Alt-Right Retards

The Alt-Right - a bunch of basement-dwelling aspies who believe they are the master race.
That depends, European Alt-right is alot less autistic.
but well they are still faggots. had a beer with some austrians from the Identitären Bewegung by chance, and they were total faggots.
they realy didnt like my idea of ending the klein Deutsche solution in favor of the groß deutsche solution under emperor Georg Friedrich,
 
That depends, European Alt-right is alot less autistic.
but well they are still faggots. had a beer with some austrians from the Identitären Bewegung by chance, and they were total faggots.
they realy didnt like my idea of ending the klein Deutsche solution in favor of the groß deutsche solution under emperor Georg Friedrich,
Also there isnt a single Alt Right brand
 
Also there isnt a single Alt Right brand
Its just a cover to be socialist without having to follow all the rules the left has for themself.
there are maybe a hand full of rightwing people in the US, and they are not very loud.
fullfilling the promise the US gave their savior, to make it a country ruled by the Hohenzollern isnt sexy for some reasons...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rabidcolombian
Hey, you know that thing about a group of people that's true 99% of the time? Well, have you ever considered that it isn't true 1% of the time? Defeated by your own logic. Anyway, race isn't real and evolution stopped at the neck because Thomas Sowell exists.

Ironically, all the degenerates and untermensch on the alt-right are a decent argument against any innate superiority of whites.
 
That's just because many countries in Europe don't tolerate freespeech like the US, so the incelfags have to keep their most exceptional ideas to themselves.
I dont know, most Incels in Europe are Feminists and not alt-right
the alt-right in europe is mostly older men and younger conservatives with a drinking problem and scars in their faces.
they fight each other with swords to see who is the bottom bitch this week.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Bum Driller
If white people as a race were worth preserving they wouldn't be having problems in the first place.

If you examine what root ideas that forces you to accept, you would do away with morality itself altogether. After all, it's the kind of thinking that would legitamize every genocide, every murder, every type of tyranny. We should stop suicide hotlines, end any kind of psychological aid. How can there be virtues if you do not help those in need? How could accepting your idea not lead you exactly there?

And if you discard morality, what point is there in discussing these things? Might makes right collapses everything into a moralless morass. Then they exist only as shimmers that you might deceive others into following for your own benefit.
 
If you examine what root ideas that forces you to accept, you would do away with morality itself altogether. After all, it's the kind of thinking that would legitamize every genocide, every murder, every type of tyranny. We should stop suicide hotlines, end any kind of psychological aid. How can there be virtues if you do not help those in need? How could accepting your idea not lead you exactly there?

And if you discard morality, what point is there in discussing these things? Might makes right collapses everything into a moralless morass. Then they exist only as shimmers that you might deceive others into following for your own benefit.
Honestly I don't think what I wrote even makes sense. I just tried to give better bait, not good bait.
 
And if you discard morality, what point is there in discussing these things? Might makes right collapses everything into a moralless morass. Then they exist only as shimmers that you might deceive others into following for your own benefit.

This is literally my ideology, whoa.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Your Weird Fetish
The Alt-Right - a bunch of basement-dwelling aspies who believe they are the master race.
"racial supremacy" is nothing but a jewish canard and a spook to induce in gentile midwits racial neurosis over what's simple kin affinity

furthermore, to provide a narrative for racial others and mongrels in huwhite societies to tear their hosts down within the judeo-huwhite moral framework by means of delegitimising the huwhite superfamily

huwhite people beware, here and elsewhere, the post I'm responding to is a common attempt by an off-huwhite to manipulate you and delegitimise your existence
 
"racial supremacy" is nothing but a jewish canard and a spook to induce in gentile midwits racial neurosis over what's simple kin affinity
Except that Adolf Hitler explicitly believed that the Aryan race was a "natural aristocrat" that deserved rulership over the world, and Nazism explicitly divided the world's ethnic groups into strata, with certain races destined to chattel slavery in a fully realized implementation of the work. In addition, apartheid was an explicitly supremacist movement, along with the philosophies of Imperial China and contemporary Zimbabwe. "All people not of our own are not people at all" is more than "simple kin affinity", and your attempt to conflate the two is weasel words.
Your point here can be debunked entirely by reading Mein Kampf.
 
Sometimes I wonder if the left's obsession with pyrrhic victories could end up permanently disempowering the DNC, effectively dissolving its footprint from certain areas of the public discourse for an indeterminate number of future generations.

I say this because there seems to be this model of sacrificing credibility for relevance that's really leading contemporary left leaning folks around by the nose. Like the journo who went through that Carson guy's twitter 8 years back to get him cancelled with Busch Brewers. He fucked over a guy trying to donate money to sick kids, because of wrongthink 8 years back. The journo ended up getting fired, but he generated a LOT of attention before that, like a child pulling pigtails on the playground.

It's like the mode of the day is to slay sacred cows because the sheer transgression of it all happens to generate a lot of relevancy very quickly. Unfortunately, the practice is the complete opposite of sustainable. It's like burning your furniture instead of paying your heating bill. Maybe they reconcile that with dreams of how their actions are disassembling the machine/patriarchy/fascism?
 
Last edited:
Except that Adolf Hitler explicitly believed that the Aryan race was a "natural aristocrat" that deserved rulership over the world, and Nazism explicitly divided the world's ethnic groups into strata, with certain races destined to chattel slavery in a fully realized implementation of the work.
nonsense, anti-german blood libel and post-war jewish horror stories coinciding with the US civil rights mythology ie "muh slavery"

and in this particular case, it's also projection - according to jewish myth, their messiah was supposed to lead them to victory against all their enemies and achieve complete world domination and enslavement (Jesus was the last guy who'd fit the bill, which is why they rejected him as a false messiah)
In addition, apartheid was an explicitly supremacist movement
it's simple segregation, I'm more appalled at the implication that whites have no right to separate themselves from racial others and keep their own spaces for themselves, that it's an act of "supremacy" (read: wrong moral bad bad invalid) to not mix it up
"All people not of our own are not people at all" is more than "simple kin affinity", and your attempt to conflate the two is weasel words.
Your point here can be debunked entirely by reading Mein Kampf.
akshually, you should try reading it yourself instead of trying to argue based on what you imagine is written there
 
nonsense, anti-german blood libel and post-war jewish horror stories coinciding with the US civil rights mythology ie "muh slavery"
Okay, so you deny the Holocaust (unless you mean something else by "anti-German blood libel".) I'll skip past the usual nonsense and go straight to: why would the Nazi party, which made the removal or extermination of all Jews from their territory and which carried out state-sanctioned seizures of property from Jews, forced them to live separately from other ethnic groups, wear clear physical identifiers, and denied them many privileges granted to non-Jews, round them up and ship them to heavily-guarded remote labor camps and camps that had no clear labor structures, but which did have large crematoriums designed to quickly process remains? I suspect it was hardly for a jolly day at the beach.

it's simple segregation, I'm more appalled at the implication that whites have no right to separate themselves from racial others and keep their own spaces for themselves, that it's an act of "supremacy" (read: wrong moral bad bad invalid) to not mix it up.
When you establish a country outside of your ancestral homeland, import a labor force of a different ethnic group, and then deny that ethnic group freedom of movement, residence, employment, or the vote, deliberately refuse to allow them to consume spirits, ban both races from any romantic relations across racial lines, and shoot those who protest not being given representation in what is nominally "their" government, that is very different from restricting immigration in land which was ancestrally "yours". I think racial segregation is a backwards ideology, but the latter at least has a rationale that doesn't smack of sheer thuggery.
To be clear, the actions of the Chinese government along the same line to the Uyghur and the actions against the Afrikaaner people currently by the government of South Africa are equally reprehensible in my eyes.


akshually, you should try reading it yourself instead of trying to argue based on what you imagine is written there

I don't believe for a moment that you've read Mein Kampf, any more than I believe bleating 'counterjihad' types have read the Quran.
In response to these, a quotation from Volume 2, Chapter I of Mein Kampf, "Weltanschauung And Party"

Adolf Hitler said:
Over against all this, the VÖLKISCH concept of the world recognizes that the primordial racial elements are of the greatest significance for mankind. In principle, the State is looked upon only as a means to an end and this end is the conservation of the racial characteristics of mankind. Therefore on the VÖLKISCH principle we cannot admit that one race is equal to another. By recognizing that they are different, the VÖLKISCH concept separates mankind into races of superior and inferior quality. On the basis of this recognition it feels bound in conformity with the eternal Will that dominates the universe, to postulate the victory of the better and stronger and the subordination of the inferior and weaker. And so it pays homage to the truth that the principle underlying all Nature's operations is the aristocratic principle and it believes that this law holds good even down to the last individual organism. It selects individual values from the mass and thus operates as an organizing principle, whereas Marxism acts as a disintegrating solvent. The VÖLKISCH belief holds that humanity must have its ideals, because ideals are a necessary condition of human existence itself. But, on the other hand, it denies that an ethical ideal has the right to prevail if it endangers the existence of a race that is the standard-bearer of a higher ethical ideal. For in a world which would be composed of mongrels and negroids all ideals of human beauty and nobility and all hopes of an idealized future for our humanity would be lost forever.
On this planet of ours human culture and civilization are indissolubly bound up with the presence of the Aryan. If he should be exterminated or subjugated, then the dark shroud of a new barbarian era would enfold the earth.
Mein Kampf and the Nazi ideology explicitly states that the races exist in a hierarchy of superior and inferior kinds, with the Aryan (a term synonymous with "German" in Nazi ideology) as the highest.
 
Mein Kampf and the Nazi ideology explicitly states that the races exist in a hierarchy of superior and inferior kinds, with the Aryan (a term synonymous with "German" in Nazi ideology) as the highest.
You were talking in terms of "All people not of our own are not people at all" a moment ago. Odd, but that quote you copypasted from some website obviously says nothing of the sort- merely a greater love for one's own people. How very odd.
 
Odd, but that quote you copypasted from some website obviously says nothing of the sort- merely a greater love for one's own people.
A "greater love" for one's own people... by exterminating other races because they aren't Hilter's vision of the master race? Perhaps you should read up the Nazi's stance on Arabs during World War II.

Why is the Alt-Right keen on supporting fascism and totalitarianism knowing full well they'll be cannon fodder in this supposed war?
 
Back