Lolcow Timothy "TJ" Church / Cowlick - Failed Literotica Writer &/or Null's Best Friend

I haven't thought about that case in a long time. Someone on the staff thought that a crowdfunding campaigns was a pyramid scheme.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Have a Pepsi
He also likes to argue with admins because he feels that he deserves some kind of respect. After being banned on one of his sites one of the admins suggested that he could come back if he cut out his sockpuppet shit and go on probation and he said no to both of those ideas.

I say No to his false story.

He doesn't understand that the owner of a site has final say in how the site is run.

I understand that. I simply try to help staff & members by pointing-out mistakes, suggesting improvements & the like, whereas the majority of you appear quietly happy with low quality (& maybe joined partially due to that, due to your own low-quality intelligence, social skills, etc.).

Also he lacks reading comprehension skills.

I comprehend most things fine when they are worded properly & those words spelled correctly.
 
I say No to his false story.



I understand that. I simply try to help staff & members by pointing-out mistakes, suggesting improvements & the like, whereas the majority of you appear quietly happy with low quality (& maybe joined partially due to that, due to your own low-quality intelligence, social skills, etc.).



I comprehend most things fine when they are worded properly & those words spelled correctly.
What is your opinion of Brianna Wu? Recently she has been using Jace and Tyce's actions against her to further bolster her victim complex and is now calling for the head of @copypaste, the owner of 8chan. What are your thoughts on the situation?
 
I say No to his false story.
You wouldn't be a lolcow if you gave up easily.
I understand that. I simply try to help staff & members by pointing-out mistakes, suggesting improvements & the like, whereas the majority of you appear quietly happy with low quality (& maybe joined partially due to that, due to your own low-quality intelligence, social skills, etc.).
Model kiwi you are Teej.
 
I understand that. I simply try to help staff & members by pointing-out mistakes, suggesting improvements & the like, whereas the majority of you appear quietly happy with low quality (& maybe joined partially due to that, due to your own low-quality intelligence, social skills, etc.).
I'm guessing the "& the like" covers your insults and general rudeness. You go on to insult people in that very same sentence. Nobody has any obligation or reason to cooperate with someone throwing a childish tantrum.
 
I understand that. I simply try to help staff & members by pointing-out mistakes, suggesting improvements & the like, whereas the majority of you appear quietly happy with low quality (& maybe joined partially due to that, due to your own low-quality intelligence, social skills, etc.).
Kind of rantish post. This is more about trying to reason with someone who is unreasonable. Hopefully something in this post will get through to him.

TJ, I have direct quotes from you (and responses for that matter) where you say the mods have broken rules and therefore should be banned. You then try to ban evade, breaking a major rule in the process. You may see you're actions as helpful but most of the mods find you pathetic and annoying, so much so that they had to create a new site so they could actually have a mechanism to deal with your constant rule breaking. In fact someone made an 8 page comic series just discussing your stupid bullshit.

Also I think you meant to say quite happy. I'm not quietly happy with low quality, i'm actually quite boisterous when something makes me happy. However, I'm not above mentioning that this site has its flaws.

Also the low quality intelligence thing doesn't make much sense. I mean, I get it kind of because some physics students will say chemistry is just low quality physics, but it doesn't really make sense in the context of your statement. If you're trying to make a play on words.... well leave that to the good writers.

(Before you say it, no TJ, you're not a good writer. Your syntax is really awkward and hard to read. Most of your characters act really similar, and you have only a basic understanding of how to build a plot. Most of the stuff i've read by you has relied on deus ex machina to get to the part you want to write about which is normally a sign of a bad writer, however this in itself isn't what makes you a bad writer. Your sheer arrogance and ignorance makes you a bad writer.)

Also thought i'd say this real quick. For the first time in a while I thought TJ had actually not insulted someone in one of his post (something he does fairly consistently), but I was mistaken. I was prepared to congratulate him, but he fails again at the mere act of being able to have a decent conversation.

In closing: TJ, you can redeem yourself if you actually start reflecting on the stupid shit you've done, and listen to what others have told you. Then we might actually respect you in the slightest. Right now many of us think you're one of the most childish 30 year olds we've seen (OPL still has the most childish 30 year old locked down) and many of us, including me, actually worry that you may hurt yourself through your own arrogance (specifically in the whole diabetes thing). Most of us, while not condoning the actions of the people we make fun of, actually care about their health and well being. You're no exception, but the way you act is comical to us. Even though we make fun of you, we'd rather not have you in a diabetic coma again.

I'm sure this whole post will just fly way over your head, and you won't understand it at all. You seem to have trouble understanding most things people tell you. Honestly I think you're a waste of my time, but i'm hoping that you may wise up to some of this stuff.

I don't know why @Cowlick insist on writing to me in every response to this thread.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Reading Comprehension.png

TL ; DR I used the Kiwi farms colloquialism autism as a joke. TJ believes I was claiming him to be actually autistic. When I say it is a colloquialism he says he gets that but I shouldn't be claiming he is autistic. I then explain how it's a colloquialism and doesn't mean that (again). I also point out how he proved that he didn't understand it. He then does the very TJ Church thing of trying to refute logic with basically what breaks down to "Because I said so".

In short: TJ doesn't get logic. He doesn't want to admit when he fucked up, and he's autistic.
 
I simply try to help staff & members by pointing-out mistakes, suggesting improvements & the like, whereas the majority of you appear quietly happy with low quality (& maybe joined partially due to that, due to your own low-quality intelligence, social skills, etc.).

Can you recommend some high quality forums as an alternative?
 
I say No to his false story.

The only thing false is the use of the word "admin," but even that's only a technical fault, not a practical. Torg and I may only be moderators, but CHYOO and its forum are so thoroughly abandoned Torg and I were the de facto admins before CHYOA came around; and even now we still have immense pull. Therefore, it's fair to say an admin offered you a deal to return. And here is the start of that conversation, which quickly reveals you want to accept zero responsibility for your prior actions.

I understand that. I simply try to help staff & members by pointing-out mistakes, suggesting improvements & the like

Which can be done without ad hominem, 1 ratings, and feedback including "Shit." It also helps to understand that de facto admins do not have the power of proper admins and subsequently stop demanding we take actions beyond our power level. It would also be immensely beneficial if you started respecting people's wishes and opinions, and ceased to assume that all fan-fiction stories are automatically written for straight sex. On that note, stop using homosexuality as an insult if you want people to stop thinking of you as a homophobe.

See that? I made criticisms and suggestions on how you could improve others' opinion of you, rooted my criticisms in your own actions, and didn't make a single disparaging remark about you until right now. Now let's see you do that.

whereas the majority of you appear quietly happy with low quality (& maybe joined partially due to that, due to your own low-quality intelligence, social skills, etc.).

Well of course we like low quality. We like you, and quality doesn't get any lower than your standards.

I comprehend most things fine when they are worded properly & those words spelled correctly.

See, if I played your game, I'd complain about not being able to understand this because you forgot to put a verb after the ampersand. However, I have this thing called "common sense" that allows me to understand what you meant so long as your typos aren't too numerous and your sentences actually have some semblance of structure. I'm so sorry you weren't blessed with this ability and cannot use context to establish the meaning of a sentence.

Also, his edits to those threads. Chyoo crossover 2:

No, as all were answered incorrectly.

As the topic of the entire story is the site & its stories & writers, my work was on-topic. There was never any whining, or intentional bashing of any sites or staffers. (It is famously said the truth sets you free, not leave you under the control of sadly-mistaken people like yourself.)

Also, feel free to add any banishments, as the same people have welcomed me back several times over, approved my later work, & in many cases admitted their mistakes.

Checkmate? Check & see you have none, and the same can be said for your ability of original thoughts or actions.

How do you react to this information?

I know you did, & I replied by truthfully saying it was not a bashing thread. Half the threads in this story are about characters or staff of/from other stories. Such is the nature of the beast... Reminds me, tell your mom Goodnight for me.

A Day:

Marley, as I still contact them and give them chances to correct their mistakes.

Fact is you appear to be on a track of only denying this without a new reason, which makes me believe you are doing so without even reading it. You (or a prior editor) approved my thread that originally filled this space, which makes it reasonable to expect it would be approved again. However, I am not about to submit it again when I have the feeling you will deny it regardless without reading, let alone reason.

Contact me with something other than a denial, & explain to me what it will require for you to react rightfully to the high-quality thread I usually submit.

What are you waiting for?!

Saving you from an intro question that doesn't fit your story.

Discuss.
 
The only thing false is the use of the word "admin," but even that's only a technical fault, not a practical. Torg and I may only be moderators, but CHYOO and its forum are so thoroughly abandoned Torg and I were the de facto admins before CHYOA came around; and even now we still have immense pull. Therefore, it's fair to say an admin offered you a deal to return. And here is the start of that conversation, which quickly reveals you want to accept zero responsibility for your prior actions.

That is a remarkable thread. How many new usernames did Mr. Church make in the course of that thread? At least 30, yes?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: RequiredName
I say No to his false story.



I understand that. I simply try to help staff & members by pointing-out mistakes, suggesting improvements & the like, whereas the majority of you appear quietly happy with low quality (& maybe joined partially due to that, due to your own low-quality intelligence, social skills, etc.).



I comprehend most things fine when they are worded properly & those words spelled correctly.
Stop avoiding questions, homie. Just want to have a polite discourse between two gentlemen.
 
Back