- Joined
- Mar 21, 2019
Steven King would have to break free of the Twitter cult first before he could write a horror story about it.
Nick Rekieta's Weeb Wars videos & livestreams - MULTIPLE SLURS
- Thread starter damian
- Start date
- Status
Steven King would have to break free of the Twitter cult first before he could write a horror story about it.
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
He could write a story about an alcoholic, drug addicted writer from Maine struggling with his Twitter addiction. If nothing else Steven King is great at coming up with unique protagonists who are totally not exactly the same from story to story to story...
Markorian
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2019
An alcoholic, drug addicted writer from Maine struggling with his Twitter addiction THAT ALSO HAS PSYCHIC POWERS AND FIGHTS REDNECK CHRISTIANS
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2019
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
With the help of a magical negro. Can't forget the magical negro.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
All I know about is one about whether state SLAPP laws apply in federal court, and that only affects Meyer's case.
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2019
Yeah but it DOES appear to be a good time to enforce incorporation of the 7th Amendment, which kills the Anti-SLAPP in Federal Court argument dead
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2019
Oh is THAT why Law Twitter's collective anus is so inflamed at the mere thought of Federal Court?
They're still circling their wagons over an article that used a Federal website to explain the difference between trial and appellate courts.
Law Twitter is going absolute ballistic because they're trying to say the article is misleading people that Vic's case is going to Federal Court of Appeals, even though nothing in the article says that at all
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2019
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2019
Oh is THAT why Law Twitter's collective anus is so inflamed at the mere thought of Federal Court?
They're still circling their wagons over an article that used a Federal website to explain the difference between trial and appellate courts.
Law Twitter is going absolute ballistic because they're trying to say the article is misleading people that Vic's case is going to Federal Court of Appeals, even though nothing in the article says that at all
No, it's because they're just plain dumb. I would come up with more flowery language to describe their stupidity but there aren't enough words in the human tongue to describe it.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Oh is THAT why Law Twitter's collective anus is so inflamed at the mere thought of Federal Court?
They're still circling their wagons over an article that used a Federal website to explain the difference between trial and appellate courts.
Law Twitter is going absolute ballistic because they're trying to say the article is misleading people that Vic's case is going to Federal Court of Appeals, even though nothing in the article says that at all
I'd just ignore them, you know less every time you read one of their tweets. It's going to be appealed, if it is appealed, to the Second Court of Appeals in Fort Worth. Federal courts (other than SCOTUS) do not act as appeals courts to state courts, nor can cases tried in state courts be relitigated in federal court.
If this is appealed past the Second Court of Appeals, it would be to the Supreme Court of Texas. Because it is about issues they have ruled on fairly voluminously, there is a somewhat better than usual chance they'd hear the case. SCOTUS almost certainly wouldn't, though, because there's no issue for them.
There is actually a circuit split on the Erie doctrine issue of whether state anti-SLAPP statutes like the TCPA can be raised in federal court. Trump in fact won such a case, based on Texas law, in a California federal court case. However, since then, the Fifth Circuit ruled that the TCPA does not apply in federal court. The D.C. Circuit Court has also ruled that the D.C. anti-SLAPP statute doesn't apply in federal court.
Fascinatingly enough, the author of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals opinion is one Brett Kavanaugh who is now on the Supreme Court. I assume he is still of the same opinion on that issue.
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2019
What exactly does that mean? I'm such a bad law, and I didn't watch that part of the stream.
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2019
Don't blame yourself. Apparently so is Chupp
Yeah I wonder what he would think about falsely accusing someone of rape....and Justice Thomas...
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2019
But when and why did Senpai actually start orbiting MBA? And was he publically anti-ISWV during this time?Interestingly enough, he [SiH] made a tweet a while back and pinned it on his Twitter saying that he's cutting ties with MBA after watching TUG's livestream about MBA. He also begged people not to minecraft him.
Sen on Twitter
“I saw MBAs stream from @ThatUmbrella 's stream today gotta say that was just too much I didn't expect him to EVER go that far. Oh well, I've officially disassociated with MBA hope there's no bad blood aka don't try to kill me plz.”twitter.com
And to answer @P5Fever 's question, MBA first went after Perfection for harassment and pedophilia - which he had proof on him. When ANN falsely flagged Hero Hei, MBA started making livestreams and videos about him. If anyone seen HH's video that he posted on Twitter saying that he's gonna challenge MBA, he [MBA] is described as emotional by Hei. MBA's allegations against Hei were even denied by Hei himself. With MBA's beef with ISWV people, he says that they're making cash off of Vic - which he didn't provide proof of it.
When it came to Senpai being with MBA via association - which he had in the past as he claims, I hate to say that not only the damage is already done. He was late to leave MBA because of the threats by MBA were made towards ISWV people over a parody account on Twitter. He should of known that his association with MBA - including his actions - does cost him to lose support and respect from other people.
I've watched two Senpai streams since coming on the Farms - the one where he called out then interviewed the DBZA Chichi VA for her statement on parody accounts (to which she backpedaled and apologized) and his sad "debate" with JMK, the one where JMK stormed off because of music in the background (which Senpai somehow inexplicably forgot he did to his stream, and apparently no-fuckin-body else could hear or knew about). In those streams, he was still apparently ISWV, yet if I'm not mistaken, at least the JMK stream was during the time he was showing up in MBA chats.
And judging by his video titles and thumbnails, the whole time he has still been making ISWV/pro-Vic content. So yeah, he's a dumbfuck for riding with MBA, he's pretty exceptional and one of the weeker ISWV youtubers, but I don't get why you guys are saying his entire Weeb Wars stance has changed. Unless I am missing some things.
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2019
Assuming you're not trolling me:
Where an appeal is something like "we of the higher court disagree with your ruling, please correct it," a writ of mandamus is "Boy, you done fucked up this case, and if you don't fix it like we tell you to, we're coming to your court and we're bringing the belt."
Also Nick didn't cover it. People like @AnOminous found it out.
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2019
Why would you think I'm trolling? I'm a shitposter, not a troll, and I thought my post was pretty straightforward. I'm just a drunk hillbilly who is ignorant of the law.
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2019
Stupid amount of trolls lately being intentionally ignorant, so people are suspicious of anything. Nothing personal.
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2019
Yeah but that post had no troll leanings at all.
Plus I think I've been here long enough(only a few months but you can still get a reading from a poster in that timeframe), and participated in enough discussions, that it would be clear that I'm not a troll.
I'm not mad, just confused at how @OneHandClapping could have interpreted that as a troll post.
- Joined
- May 13, 2019
I mean, *looks to the past few days* it's like it seems there are a couple of people that have appeared sensible at first than make a COMPLETE heel turn to exceptional lengths. Plus text basically holds only a part to understand intention, the other is VERY difficult to discern in text form, and that is emotion, you really have to try to get the correct emotion you intend to have written to be. It's the flaw in text only interactions, emotion is often lost in translation to text.
It's why I find the video deposition vs the transcripts of the deposition are very distinctly interpreted differently. The transcript is easy to project your own views over it, cause you can't see the emotion. Anyways, long little speech here. Not sure why I typed so much, but oh well. It is what it is.
tldr: Basically, sometimes intention is a bitch to really concretely gauge via text, leaving assumptions the only way to continue, and not everyone likes to just assume one's intention. Cause that's when misunderstandings happens and nobody wants to have to deal with that.
Last edited:
- Status