Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger) 2: The Revenge

Status
Not open for further replies.
@Holden here is my initial draft for a counter piece to your own. Any opinions?

A case for work!

We live in an era with many challenges, but during our lives we must face one inevitable challenge.

How will we live and what kind of world will we create before we leave this world?

As technology has pushed forward, increasingly at a faster rate as our tools and knowledge of the world has grown; we face a very serious dilemma. We live in a day in time where almost every person of a certain age may not ever theoretically die. New developments in age resistance, disease control, organ/tissue replacement, cybernetics, and agriculture create a circumstance that may create a human race that is potentially immortal and even beyond mere biology. Death is not inevitable any more under such circumstances. It is optional.

Do we live in this world as our ancestors did with the belief that we created the future through our offspring, or do we look at the future through a new understanding that we create the future through our choices and what we create? This resolve and desire to create is what can propel us forward and allow us to become something more than just biological. We can transcend our past and develop a new way of life. We focus on who we are, what we do, and what we create, rather than mere procreation. We become a people of ideas and endeavor rather than base urges that those who continue to look backwards obsess about. We are a the builders of a brave new world of opportunity rather than a huddled mass. We must be better than those who simply opt out of life and seek to spend their days mired in petty gender and historic revisionism.

To build this brave new world one must be willing to work just for the chance to make your mark on the world and change it with your vision.

It is your choices and your contributions to the world that allow you to change its course, not your genes or lesser instincts.

We work no longer for just a wage, but we work as a way to improve and develop ourselves and our world.

We live to pursue a life of excellence; the highest excellence, and thus we must strive and endeavor to achieve it.
 
So all you want removed from the wiki is your real name?
He's already said it's not even his real name. He's also said we don't have his real address.
We don't have ANY of his accurate personal information on here, as he claims. So, again, no crimes have been committed.

i gave what i claim to be my real name and city on the blog. i want any other variations of my first name, surnames, addresses and phone numbers removed -your sources for that are jack shit.

besides that, all incorrect claims. not claims that show i'm bad. incorrect claims.
You said these were wrong. The fact that they aren't your real name, city, address, and phone number means there's nothing wrong with us having them up there.

Here, I'll help you out here.
Hey guys!
Name: Macie Hieferbean
Gender: Female
Address: 1600 Pennsylvania Ave Northwest, Washington DC 20500
Phone number: (202) 456-1111
bingo.

they do. i am under no obligation to say that.


the article you talk about isn't confirmed to be about me and doesn't contain a full name at all. you lose.
1) your name isn't a personal secret. Just saying.
2) your address is also not a personal secret.
Clarification of 1 and 2, by your own countries penal code, names, numbers, addresses, and criminal record are NOT personal secrets.

The fact that you've said this information is false means you have no claims anyway.
The law, again, only applies when there is an actual harm done.
What harm was done Holden? There has to be an injury for a crime to be committed. What injury has been done?
 
When you say "not even rape is rape"
an act of rape and a crime of rape aren't the same. just like stealing a cent isn't the same as stealing a million dollars.

So, again, no crimes have been committed.
there were. you see, people whose pics and addresses you have do exist.
 
I'm sorry, your argument is rape and rape aren't the same thing.
my argument is that the act and crime of rape aren't the same thing.

a rape of a slut is a non-event. nobody sane cares about that, since sluts have nothing worthy to take. it's virtually like taking a cent. raping a chaste woman or a married woman should be punishable, but not raping a slut.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
a rape of a slut is a non-event. nobody sane cares about that, since sluts have nothing worthy to take. it's virtually like taking a cent. raping a chaste woman or a married woman should be punishable, but not raping a slut.

Get your head out of the gutter. I challenged you intellectually with a case for work. What is your response?
 
raping a chaste woman or a married woman should be punishable
and yet marriage apparently doesn't "really exist" in the west.

I'm going to bed. If I dream of you and wake up in a cold sweat you will hear me scream your name all the way from Wisconsin.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Ti-99/4A
Last edited by a moderator:
there were. you see, people whose pics and addresses you have do exist.
So? What's the harm done?
They haven't seen it so there's no harm done.
Remember, you said that when you put that picture of that girl on a blog that there was no problem with it because she never saw it? Same thing. They've never seen their name up here, or their picture, so, not a problem.
They've also not had their reputation tarnished by having that information up there. AND if they did find out, all they would have to do it contact Null and provide proof that the information me have for you is actually their's and he'd take it down immediately.
Null is a very kind man. He protects the innocent. We've completely removed all names and traces of people who have been accidentally doxed by lolcows here.

And yet again I'll say this: there is no law in Croatia that state that a name, address, or a picture is "personal secret".
Croatian law that talks about personal secret:
"A personal secret is information about a person, which is stipulated to be a secret by law, some other regulation or the bylaw of a competent body passed in accordance with the law. This does not include public record or things like name, age, criminal records, pictures provided to the public, and other publicly accessible materials"
 
  • Winner
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse
a rape of a slut is a non-event. nobody sane cares about that, since sluts have nothing worthy to take. it's virtually like taking a cent. raping a chaste woman or a married woman should be punishable, but not raping a slut.

Thank you for providing more proof of your insanity for the wiki. We do our best to make sure you are well represented.
 
Wait, I think I get it! It's like if guy who calls himself "incel" says he's suffering. It's not really suffering. It'd be like losing a cent. Because it's not actually suffering. Because incel isn't real, it's just shitty men who run people out of their lives and then cry about it.
 
So? What's the harm done?
They haven't seen it so there's no harm done.
who says that they haven't seen it? who says there is no harm done?

awb - your case is shitty. most people won't change anything by working. if some feel like they could they should work. but the fact is that a very small percent actually will.

We do our best to make sure you are well represented.
really? this obviously isn't the case.
 
Remember how what's his face could have completely eliminated years of people wondering about if his wife was a real doll or not if he had just provided a video of her doing human things instead of taking weird photoshopped pictures?

Holden could completely eliminate any confusion if he would just provide what part of the Croatian penal code backs him up.
I've provided the copy of the penal code in question, have read it through, and yet, I have no found a single article that helps him out.

He claims it exists... but of course, he refuses to provide any evidence.. as usual.
who says that they haven't seen it? who says there is no harm done?
Who says they have seen it and who says it's done harm?
With claims for defamation or a violation of a penal code, you have to prove a harm was done. I don't have to prove a harm wasn't done.
If they had seen it they would have contacted the Admins already. Just saying.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back