Latin America got anime (mainstream) about a decade before the US did and that helped out a bit I think. I'm guessing (similarly) like all the toonami kiddies that grew up watching DBZ Brbrbrbr went thru the same thing but with Cavayeros del Zobacco or w/e it is called other there.
I thought it was Toonami imploding in the late 00s due to a CN CEO wanting kids reality TV in Burgerland. DBZ and YGO got the dumb end of localization and were popular regardless.
That was more the second stage, first was I think in the 80s also toonami was reruns for most Mexican audiences, Dragon Ball and DBZ where in open tv way before Toonami.
There were a big number of anime, and most were received quite well in some sectors, Heidi is probably an anime that any child from the 80s or 90s has seen some episodes of, Dragon Ball was in open tv well into the 2000s and Caballeros del Zodiaco (in a funny side note sobaco means armpit) was a big deal with young boys, and girls, the Netflix remake had a very bad reaction in Latin America, probably worse than in USA.
My point (when I replied to I Love Beef Curtains) was that kids usually enjoy/grow to like anime when they see it at an early age. Nowadays I see kids waking with shonen/AoT t shirts and I see it no different than when kids would wear DB shirts when I was in school. Keyword anime. Webtoon/american imitation is mostly followed by teens and young adults.
Normally the story of a 30-year-old man saving a 17-year-old from a sexual predator would be nothing but commendable, but somehow Shane screws up even that.
(proceeds to eat a bag full of Chester's Hot Fries and an Arizona Ice Tea) Well, I'll help break things down for you. No, I am not doing this to be patronizing.
Cool so the shows main draw was being indecisive and people enjoyed that. For me it felt flat and I didn't bother much with it so I had no idea it went SJW. But then again what western toon hasn't gone SJW?
I just read the Dao of Dragonball "interview" of Lemoine...
Jesus Christ did these people slip in the shower and decide to write articles?
Not even a point in linking it because it's literally just asking a bunch of questions Lemoine non-comments, and then fallates Chupp.
My favorite part is how Dao just decides to believe everything Lemoine says as fact because Ty didn't respond for comment.
I can't stand these whiny little egoists who jut write hit pieces because because theyre mad senpai didnt notice them
But I thought you like NiER and JRPGs? Well, at least with your profile picture.... I'm just saying. I don't blame you though, it's how I felt when everyone went crazy over Teen Titans back in the day when I thought "I can just watch anime? Or classic Batman or Batman Beyond? Instead of this?"
You know what I mean. Plus that age is ripe with the whole "I wanna be a mangaka!" anime club weeaboo antics, unless teens are that lazy and slacking these days.
To add two point which are even more important in my opinion, at least that is how I got in to the show and why I stopped watching as well.
They figured, "hey, if it worked out for Doc Brown, it will work out for me!" *thunk*
He wants to protect his family, yet he gives out his address publically on Youtube, telling people to come see him of they got a problem.
People were already ahead of you. Still it's better to safe than sorry I suppose.This isn't reddit, why even post about content if you're too emotional to link to it? where do you think you're posting?
View attachment 964565
Monica Rial’s Lawyer Comments on Vic Mignogna’s Case Dismissal
Now that Vic Mignogna’s case has been dismissed, how does the attorney for the Defense respond? Hear from J. Sean Lemoine in this exclusive interview.
On October 5, I published an article titled Vic Mignogna’s Case: DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
The article details the results of Vic Mignogna’s case against the Defendants Monica Rial, Ron Toye, Jamie Marchi, and FUNimation, with a complete dismissal of all 17 of Vic’s claims by Judge John Chupp.
During the development of the article I sent questions to Monica Rial and Ron Toye’s lawyer, J. Sean Lemoine, but he was unavailable to respond until Monday morning, October 7, 2019.
J. Sean Lemoine is a Texas anti-SLAPP specialist who runs the Anti-SLAPP Texas website.
The Defendants attempted to use Texas Anti-SLAPP laws to dismiss the claims made by Vic Mignogna under the protections afforded by the right to free speech granted by the U.S. Constitution. The judge ruled in their favor.
Now that Lemoine has responded, I am publishing his response here. I have also added it to the end of the original article as an addendum.
Interview with J. Sean Lemoine
Derek: How do you or your clients respond to Chupp’s judgment?
J. Sean: Ms. Rial and Mr. Toye are very appreciative of the time and attention the Court put into the decision.
Derek: What occurred during the mediation process? Why were the two parties not able to find a middle ground?
J. Sean: Mediation is confidential.
Derek: Do you feel that Chupp took the threats of violence made against him by Vic’s supporters into account in his judgment for mediation? And then again in his final judgment today?
J. Sean: I do not know, but we believe the Court looked at the evidence and the law to make its determination.
Derek: How much money will Vic have to pay in damages? What has the Defendants’ legal expenses accrued to? And how much is an ‘appropriate sanction’? Opinions vary on Twitter from $250 to $750K, but you would know best.
J. Sean: The amount in attorneys’ fees and sanctions is up to the judge, but until submission and ruling, it’s not appropriate to comment.
Derek: How do you feel about Ty’s Tweet proclaiming this is just “Halftime.” Think he will appeal? And if he does appeal, will you continue to represent your clients?
J. Sean: Our hope is that Mr. Mignogna will accept the Court’s determination and put this dispute to rest once and for all. That said, we believe that the Court correctly interpreted the evidence and law, and that the Fort Worth Court of Appeals will do so as well.
Concluding Thoughts
We have a series of matter-of-fact responses here that don’t leave much room for speculation.
J. Sean Lemoine contends that Judge Chupp’s decision was based on the law and the evidence brought into the hearing.
He hopes that Vic Mignogna will accept the ruling and not file for an appeal. But if Vic does appeal, Lemoine believes that the Court of Appeals will rule in the same manner.
J. Sean Lemoine’s succinct responses stand in contrast with those of Vic Mignogna’s lawyer, Ty Beard, who discusses almost every nuance of the case in detail with Nick Rekieta on his livestreams.
I asked to speak with Ty, but did not receive a response.
How do you feel about Lemoine’s answers? Leave your comments below.
Archive everything.
>his kids
It's actually ironic that he gives no shits about the safety of his family, and it is also idiotic how he is setting up a dumb example of being a parent.
Yeah I've thought about that. It's possible that there is a REAL Crip somewhere out there who might be of the opinion that MBA did a bit too much talkin'.
But that would require someone to take him seriously, and consider him a threat.
