Lolcow Timothy "TJ" Church / Cowlick - Failed Literotica Writer &/or Null's Best Friend

[deductionotaku]

That is a remarkable thread. How many new usernames did Mr. Church make in the course of that thread? At least 30, yes?

Just during that thread's life? Not before it existed or after I locked it? 118 on CHYOO, plus rippitydoo for the forums and r0manh0liday for CHYOA, to make a grand total of 120 usernames created during that thread's life. Given that the thread lasted for approximately ten months before he stopped with the sockpuppets, that's an average of 12 usernames per month, roughly equaling a new username every two and a half days. On top of that, he's had two or three new usernames since then that I haven't listed since the site is practically unmoderated, and one additional sockpuppet over at CHYOA. And that's just what I know about, the ones he's used to contribute something. Although, TJ Church insists that he created some of these before the thread started and only began using them to make contributions once we started cracking down on him - which implies he used these usernames to self-rate his work. However, I'll consider all of them to be registered after the thread started since that's when he began to openly use them.

Feel free to double check my numbers, though. That's a long list of usernames, and I may have miscounted one or two. Head over to the first post for the master list. His first registration after the thread started was ripples. And since I have a free day today, I think I'll calculate the average rating for the TJChurch threads.

Pretty pathetic when you look at the numbers, eh TJ Church?

 

[TM Ambrose]

However, I have this thing called "common sense" that allows me to understand what you meant so long as your typos aren't too numerous and your sentences actually have some semblance of structure. I'm so sorry you weren't blessed with this ability and cannot use context to establish the meaning of a sentence.

This being said, TJ has trouble picking up on the nuances of a conversation. He doesn't understand how language may vary between social groups and typically has trouble with conversation flow.
Also I love when people get hung up about one word. Like when I said you were an admin. Apparently if you get one technical detail wrong (no matter how small) you're completely wrong, unless you're TJ who gets a lot of things wrong, but says it doesn't matter.

 

[Chuggernaut]

This being said, TJ has trouble picking up on the nuances of a conversation. He doesn't understand how language may vary between social groups and typically has trouble with conversation flow.
Also I love when people get hung up about one word. Like when I said you were an admin. Apparently if you get one technical detail wrong (no matter how small) you're completely wrong, unless you're TJ who gets a lot of things wrong, but says it doesn't matter.

Social isolation tends to result in that kind of thing.

 

[TM Ambrose]

Social isolation tends to result in that kind of thing.

TJ isn't isolated. The store clerk knows his name. *is totally not being sarcastic right now*

I figured out why TJ insulted Hawking

Hawking fired first.

 

[Hawker Hurricane]

I comprehend most things fine when they are worded properly & those words spelled correctly.

 

[Have a Pepsi]

Where does anyone find these pictures of him? Is his mouth always so disfigured and does his head always look so oddly placed?

 

[TM Ambrose]

Just read the literotica thread. Really interesting. When TJ tries to hide his identity he doesn't change his writing style at all. This leads to him getting outed, which of course leads to his knee jerk reaction of claiming that he is not TJChurch (even thought it's obvious). Eventually it will come out that yes, he is in fact him. He'll then try to claim superior intelligence even though his transparent ruse was immediately called

 

[Crisseh]

I understand that. I simply try to help staff & members by pointing-out mistakes, suggesting improvements & the like, whereas the majority of you appear quietly happy with low quality (& maybe joined partially due to that, due to your own low-quality intelligence, social skills, etc.).

Making 120+ sockpuppets, talking shit to mods, trying to get around bans is "trying to help"...

Man TJ, I'd hate to see when you don't try helping.

 

[TM Ambrose]

I comprehend most things fine when they are worded properly & those words spelled correctly.

The irony in this is rich.

 

[Ca Ira]

" @Cowlick , stop being X."

"You said I am X. In fact, I am not X at all. It is you who is X!"

Repeat until the heat death of the Universe.

 

[Joe_Cracker]

He's issued judgment calls against numerous forums (usually ones that banned him). None of these forums are actually listed as members of the OFP.

He demanded that IGN obey his orders. Guess how successful that was.

It went better then I thought it would http://z13.invisionfree.com/onlineforumpolice/index.php?showtopic=35

 

[Have a Pepsi]

" @Cowlick , stop being X."

"You say I am X, but we both know every person who can think knows I am not X. Ironically, the fact that you called me X proves that you, in fact, are X, but, I forgive &/or accept you/that you did not realize this, because you, like Ambrose, are clearly incapable of any actual thought. We both know you're terrible at English, anyway (ironic, as your life itself is terrible)."

Repeat until the heat death of the Universe.

Edited for accuracy.

 

[TM Ambrose]

It went better then I thought it would http://z13.invisionfree.com/onlineforumpolice/index.php?showtopic=35

I doubt it was because of you. Please don't take credit for things like this. Also please stay on topic.

 

[Mr. X]

It went better then I thought it would http://z13.invisionfree.com/onlineforumpolice/index.php?showtopic=35

Any changes there had nothing to do with your judgment calls, FYI.

 

[MrsFrizzle]

Where does anyone find these pictures of him? Is his mouth always so disfigured and does his head always look so oddly placed?

He has hydrocephaly, so, yeah.

 

[Have a Pepsi]

He has hydrocephaly, so, yeah.

I know hydrocephaly makes one's head swell, but he's the first one I've seen that looks like the back of his head was glued onto his neck.

 

[MrsFrizzle]

I know hydrocephaly makes one's head swell, but he's the first one I've seen that looks like the back of his head was glued onto his neck.

The same genetic miscoding can fuck up the development of the cervical vertebrae. And teef, too.

 

[Hawker Hurricane]

 

[RequiredName]

Mr. @Cowlick, how many black friends do you have?

 

[Kitlen]

Okay guys so holy shit, I am trying to have a rational argument with the Teej and holy crap is he misconstruing everything and making everything damn well impossible. Can I post it on here? I'm at a loss and that says a lot for someone who's had 8 pages of PMs with the dude. Seriously, I like to think myself a relatively logical person and have even studied a bit of rhetoric but this is just beyond me.

Edit: I don't think I'm going to ask Teej permission for this one because he is being so utterly stupid and pig headed.

Here we go, folks. Part one.

Dude, how come only you are the one with the truth? You have made conjectures about other forum members and their intelligence and education, yet you repeatedly have put forth your claims of education and see them as gospel truth. TJ, you are being a hypocrite. When your actions are hypocritical, people tend not to believe you.

Dude, you have a computer and I guarantee a camera (since you have posted photos of yourself online), don't give me that bullshit.

1] Why am "only" I "the one" telling the truth?! I posted no negative opinions of any members until they posted things like that which prove(d) the opinion I posted was really a fact.... Also, the old standby of the fact that I wouldn't have come here if not for the thread that started with my name in a question but actually contained a bunch of negative statements about me (a list that increases every day) with none of them ever proven.

2] I agree about disbelief of hypocrites. However, since I am not (as you claim) the least bit hypocritical here (OK maybe a bit, but once again, only getting the treatment to those I've received it from), the statement is off-topic.

3] I already in the topic explained the reason(s) why I could but won't post pictures of myself in any of the the threads. When we began this, I thought you were better than most of the members, but now you are doing the same as the majority of them: Questioning or doubting my statements rather than admitting the inability to prove those you have made.

Part 2: Electric Boogaloo
I hit a soft spot with the Teej because he sends me a massive rant.

1. TJ, nothing negative was posted about you originally. All that was asked were questions, as to why you were a lolcow and how the person who posted this came to this conclusion. You are the one that instigated insults, and of course, received such in kind. You HAVE been proven to have irritated other forums and even members here, you can't deny that.

2. Thank you for conceding that you can be hypocritical, I appreciate that.

3. TJ, I was not asking you to post pictures of yourself, I was asking you to post proof of your work. You're right, most people won't or cannot prove their claims, but you can. You are the subject here, not the forum members.

1] Conceding you may be right, I checked the first post of the thread, & found,... "...is depicted as a person... He almost certainly overreacts to trivial matters... He makes numerous glaring grammatical errors... He abuses the site's voting system in order to promote himself and denigrate others, and... exploited the outdated coding... and to get his poorly-written threads automatically approved...a strange environment for his trolling behavior, because of a refreshingly antiquated site design. They appear not only incapable of permanently banning him, but have demonstrated an unwillingness to oppose this status quo...The subject's writing style is typified by...and combinations thereof (the infamous "&/or" that has become his staple).

I have provided an example image demonstrating his general idiom, his attitude toward moderators and writing style, although there are plenty of other examples...He also opts to quote pieces of text from whoever he's arguing against, relying on the "I am rubber, you are glue," defense, ignoring moderators, and flagrant hypocrisy (i.e. not responding to questions aimed at him).

On a further note, the subject also...is vehement to deny his diagnosis, also alludes to taking his medication. A sincere attempt was made to implore upon him the importance of taking his condition seriously, but this genuine offer of sympathy was likely not taken seriously by the moderators and was deleted, resulting in user banishment... A further claim was made of making private information public, but this is untrue (that is untrue).

I have included these source links for reference:
BlogEnfarcement Its content can be found later in the thread at THIS post.
"Usernames to Beware" thread on the Literotica forums Chyoo section.
He also has accounts on various wrestling website forums, such as WrestlingForum and WrestlingZone.

Does this qualify for a "Lolcow"? Has this been sufficient? If I'm mistaken, then I'll willingly drop the matter. Thank you for your time, and if this is somehow not in line with the site's manifest, then I apologize. (See? Apology from poster who also admits it may not be in line with rest of site. If not reason to delete, threads should exist about every person living.)"

Also, I have already admitted to irritations & the like, but unbiased eyes looking at any of these will see I was not the instigator in any case.

3A] You're right, most people won't or cannot prove their claims, but you can. = They can prove no claims about me or themselves, which is super-ironic, since most of them have made the claims about themselves largely to disprove claims I made about them, which many have actually proven when posting their own unproven claims about themselves.

3B] You are the subject here, not the forum members. = Impossible, as the individual is part of the group, so it is an all-or-none situation. (Never mind getting multiple "Alerts" daily that members give positive ratings ro simply like my posts, whether in threads or on each other's "profile" pages.)

Part Three

You basically just quoted a bunch of stuff and then said "Yeah, you're right, but I like my logic better and I'm just going to throw a tantrum about all the other forum members."

You are right in that you did not instigate our awareness to your existence on these forums, but you decided to get involved and perpetuated it instead of leaving it alone. TJ, do you think someone would put up your information for no good reason? People keep digging up more and more convincing evidence about you, doesn't that tell you something?

Also your point 3A was going fine but then got extremely confusing at the end. You need to separated your sentences more, commas alone will not suffice. So you can agree we are on even playing field, hmm? Then you have no right to claim the high ground. Forum members here have also been registered for years and have been consistent in their claims and actions on the forum. You, on the other hand, have not and have made very inconsistent statements.

False, that is bad logic. X does not = Z simply because it is X. That is terrible rhetoric. X+Y=Z as you have two factors that can reasonably be combined to create a new statement. X=X because it is a singular statement. You have said that the "individual is part of the group, so there!" False. You did an X=Z statement. Yes, the individual is part of the group, but the group has decided to examine you as a particular individual so yes, you are indeed the subject.

1] I didn't do that basically or any other way at all.

2] I never decided to perpetuate it. I decided to act in a way to do what all agree is the right thing & get it removed from here. (I was not the one who began the awareness of anyone here to my existence, but this is now adding far more about me online, none of which should ever have existed.) Clearly, that caused the exact opposite, but regardless, as nothing about me ever should have existed here, making what did/does exist longer is not truly a step any further in a wrong direction.) Also, I didn't think anyone would put my info up for no good reason, but most of what has been put up here is not true info, good, or put up for any reason, so that thought on my part is wrong on all counts.

3] I don't know what "3A" refers to... Nor do I know where you or anyone else here get off attempting to correct any mistakes I make in how I write sentences, etc. when many of you make same (& worse) mistakes.

4] I don't agree any of us are on a level playing field... Perhaps any number of you with each other, but none with me. I have always had (& retain) the high ground. Also, I don't claim to be a longtime member here, & would go back to before I ever joined if it were possible (so long as that also meant no mention of me existed here.) Also, I deny any claim I have made inconsistent statements except in quotes of/response to any of the many times other members here have (as you claim I've done) claimed moral high ground & then proven quite the opposite, or made & on their own dis-proven intelligence claims.

5] "X doesn't equal Z.... X+Y = Z." Obviously A is A; Simple, obvious fact. The rest is you going on using letters as though it is the use & explanation of mathematical properties, when all it truly is is a thinly-veiled attempt to hide the fact it would behoove you to disagree with me, but were you to attempt doing so, you have no facts or legs to stand on.

5B] Perhaps my favorite part is this: You have said that the "individual is part of the group, so there!" False. You did an X=Z statement. Yes, the individual is part of the group, but the group has decided to examine you as a particular individual so yes, you are indeed the subject.

For example, individual: Lennon. Group: Beatles. Ringo is within weeks of being inducted into the local Hall of Fame for his non-Beatle work, but that certainly doesn't make him, Sir Paul, or the late John any less a Beatle or a part of the group's history/accomplishments/etc. Likewise, I only became a member here due to things said about me by other members. Regardless, I am a member here &/or a part of the membership.

In addition, you cannot admit I am part of the group, & then tell me how "the group has decided to..." do anything. I never agreed with that decision, would not do so if given the opportunity, & was never asked any question in that realm.

Seriously guys, I am so lost. He just starts rambling and making sub-points and it's all lost on me. Discuss?