Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

[Keystone]

I'm just happy that Tito is still keeping it real

 

[TexOffender]

So basically since the vic stuff has died down for a bit dom has decided to start up shit for no reason at all.dom wants to be the victim but the end she keeps contradicting herself.

Why can't she stop lying.

She's posted the previous screencaps before. Don't remember seeing the cornholio response screen. Noticed the old screens don't show anybody's name. Her video supports exactly what Ty said on that stream with Nick and not her weird harassment narrative.

 

[P5Fever]

Chris: Do you have legal representation or someone we contact? Thank you for your time.
ConSlut:

 

[AStupidMonkey]

So she claims she was sent this

View attachment 972271

Twitter

archived 15 Oct 2019 18:16:24 UTC

archive.li

Spoiler: Messenger Screenshots

View attachment 972272

View attachment 972273

View attachment 972274

View attachment 972275

Then later on was "threatened" and she pulled a cornholio.

View attachment 972277

Twitter

archived 15 Oct 2019 18:19:19 UTC

archive.li

View attachment 972278

1. Funny that she omitted the headers for most of these. Funny because:
2. It looks like she's trying to imply that the "person running their social media" was Chris Slatosch.
3. "I was given a guest-badge," "I had a paid one, too." Given by whom? Had from where? All this passive voice just makes me believe the theories that Ronica and Co got her the extra badge.
4. None of which makes a lick of difference if the con later looks up her social media and sees her being a provocateur to one or more of their guests, and acting in-tandem with the ones breaking their contracts as some sort of protest.

 

[Immaculate Ape]

So she claims she was sent this

View attachment 972271

Twitter

archived 15 Oct 2019 18:16:24 UTC

archive.li

Spoiler: Messenger Screenshots

View attachment 972272

View attachment 972273

View attachment 972274

View attachment 972275

Then later on was "threatened" and she pulled a cornholio.

View attachment 972277

Twitter

archived 15 Oct 2019 18:19:19 UTC

archive.li

View attachment 972278

I fucking love when these shit stains act like contacting a lawyer or telling them if they continue acting like a fucking moron you will contact a lawyer is a "threat"

No, snowflakes. That is not a "threat" It's a consequence of breaking societal and legal rules

 

[Much Ado About Nothing]

1. Funny that she omitted the headers for most of these. Funny because:
2. It looks like she's trying to imply that the "person running their social media" was Chris Slatosch.
3. "I was given a guest-badge," "I had a paid one, too." Given by whom? Had from where? All this passive voice just makes me believe the theories that Ronica and Co got her the extra badge.
4. None of which makes a lick of difference if the con later looks up her social media and sees her being a provocateur to one or more of their guests, and acting in-tandem with the ones breaking their contracts as some sort of protest.

One of the screenshots have the 'days' listed rather than the actual dates. If that is the actual flow of the conversations it seems odd that the last messages were "thursday" and "friday". When the rest was from MARCH! It could be an old screenshot though, but why the represent it as a part of another conversation and entirely without handles indicating who it was from. How would we know that was Slatosch aside from her claiming it was.

In short: No nick/name/handle to show us who it was, one screenshot referencing the guestbadge does not match the dates with the other screenshots.

Seems shady, almost like she is trying to force and deceive her way into a victim narrative of sorts.

Edit to correct myself a little bit: Could be that all the screenshots are from sometime right after Kamehacon and all old, therefore one shows 'thursday and friday'. *removes tinfoil hat*. I guess my brain is just so trained to them being liars that it believes nothing they put out at this point. Fun that she drags them up now though. Guess she got bored and felt she lacked some limelight. I still find it odd that no names were included to show 'proof'.

 

[Dopey Cunt]

View attachment 972278

After seeing this I'm fairly convinced that none of these idiots actually know the legal definition of "threat" or "harassment" at all. Here's their own whacked out and ass backwards definition of those two things: Anyone who says anything that I don't like is either threatening me or harassing me.

First off she's not worth threatening, that's how irrelevant she is, no one gives a hot shit about her constant and thirsty attention whoring.

Second, she's being a disingenuous cunt here by purposely adding that "are you threatening me?" bit to frame Chris' harmless question as a threat to make herself look like a victim and to make him in turn look bad.

 

[Garm]

1. Funny that she omitted the headers for most of these. Funny because:
2. It looks like she's trying to imply that the "person running their social media" was Chris Slatosch.
3. "I was given a guest-badge," "I had a paid one, too." Given by whom? Had from where? All this passive voice just makes me believe the theories that Ronica and Co got her the extra badge.
4. None of which makes a lick of difference if the con later looks up her social media and sees her being a provocateur to one or more of their guests, and acting in-tandem with the ones breaking their contracts as some sort of protest.

How many cons has she tried to sneak into? I thought Prince Vegeta gave her one? Is this a separate incident?

 

[TexOffender]

After seeing this I'm fairly convinced that none of these idiots actually know the legal definition of "threat" or "harassment" at all. Here's their own whacked out and ass backwards definition of those two things: Anyone who says anything that I don't like is either threatening me or harassing me.

First off she's not worth threatening, that's how irrelevant she is, no one give a hot shit about her constant and thirsty attention whoring.

Second, she's being a disingenuous cunt here by purposely adding that "are you threatening me?" bit to frame Chris's harmless question as a threat to make herself look like a victim and to make him in turn look bad.

There's more conversation above it that doesn't line up with that last one from the previous. I'd like to know what the rest of it was, but i suppose if Slatosch is going to do anything legally he won't leak it out.

 

[AStupidMonkey]

I fucking love when these shit stains act like contacting a lawyer or telling them if they continue acting like a fucking moron you will contact a lawyer is a "threat"

No, snowflakes. That is not a "threat" It's a consequence of breaking societal and legal rules

Pointing out the hypocrisy is getting old now, but: Remember how perfectly fine it was when Ronica and co spread the lie they were going to press charges against Vic to get him kicked-out?

One of the screenshots have the 'days' listed rather than the actual dates. If that is the actual flow of the conversations it seems odd that the last messages were "thursday" and "friday". When the rest was from MARCH! It could be an old screenshot though, but why the represent it as a part of another conversation and entirely without handles indicating who it was from. How would we know that was Slatosch aside from her claiming it was.

In short: No nick/name/handle to show us who it was, one screenshot referencing the guestbadge does not match the dates with the other screenshots.

Seems weird.

I checked the dates, and they seem to match up. Friday woulda been the first day of the con, presumably.

But remember, she's not "telling us" it's Slatosch. She's just implying it, because she knows KV will unironically believe whatever narrative looks the worst for Vic. Like Nick has been saying all along.

Worse yet, she's REALLY BAD at it. These pricks couldn't out-lie a five year old. "Did you take the cookie from the cookie jar?" "What's a cookie jar?" "Did you take a cookie?" "I didn't eat it." "Show me what's in your hand." "Um... no."

 

[Dumpster dived waifu]

I was implying the action itself was shady as hell, no matter who it was done to. But the fact they seem to have kept Gray Haddock, Kathleen Zuelch and Shane Newville, people who did actual damage to Rooster Teeths brand, in the book just makes it stand out more.

It just seems even more petty than what I expected. They memory holed Vic in a 1984 style.

I know topic has switched to cocksleeve, but could I get that dark souls lore on why Gray and Kathleen are damaging? Havent heard shit before now.

 

[Much Ado About Nothing]

Pointing out the hypocrisy is getting old now, but: Remember how perfectly fine it was when Ronica and co spread the lie they were going to press charges against Vic to get him kicked-out?

I checked the dates, and they seem to match up. Friday woulda been the first day of the con, presumably.

But remember, she's not "telling us" it's Slatosch. She's just implying it, because she knows KV will unironically believe whatever narrative looks the worst for Vic. Like Nick has been saying all along.

Worse yet, she's REALLY BAD at it. These pricks couldn't out-lie a five year old. "Did you take the cookie from the cookie jar?" "What's a cookie jar?" "Did you take a cookie?" "I didn't eat it." "Show me what's in your hand." "Um... no."

Well it is not that, it all appears to be from the same chat 'app'. So it appear to show 'older dates' as exactly that, while never ones from the past week or so will just show as days. Kamehacon was in 1-3 may (fri-sunday). It's odd she'd present an old screenshot as part of this conversation as well. Why go through all that trouble to screenshot the entire convo, then just use an 'old' one at the end. I don't know though. Not very savvy on the social media front.

Should the screenshots even be real, there is no guarantee they are from Slatsoch since there is no name included in any of the conversation from either party. Aside Rob.

Net is slow, but editing myself to say: Could be that all the screenshots are from sometime right after Kamehacon and all old, therefore one shows 'thursday and friday'. *removes tinfoil hat*. I guess my brain is just so trained to them being liars that it believes nothing they put out at this point. Fun that she drags them up now though. Guess she got bored and felt she lacked some limelight.

 

[Roland Daggett]

Chris: Do you have legal representation or someone we contact? Thank you for your time.
ConSlut:
View attachment 972311

"Is that like a personal attack?"

 

[AStupidMonkey]

Well it is not that, it all appears to be from the same chat 'app'. So it appear to show 'older dates' as exactly that, while never ones from the past week or so will just show as days. Kamehacon was in 1-3 may (fri-sunday). It's odd she'd present an old screenshot as part of this conversation as well. Why go through all that trouble to screenshot the entire convo, then just use an 'old' one at the end. I don't know though. Not very savvy on the social media front.

Should the screenshots even be real, there is no guarantee they are from Slatsoch since there is no name included in any of the conversation from either party. Aside Rob.

I'm just going by the order they're presented here (maybe it's different in the original tweet chain), but I think you're over-reacting. Assuming her narrative: the "old tweets" are ones she had to look up later, because she would have had no reason to screenshot them at the time. The "new tweets" are things she totally WOULD have screenshoted, also they're more recent in the "timeline."

So that part of the story checks out. Let's not put truth-blinders on like the maggots in KV.

It's the rest of her story that doesn't add up to me.

EDIT: also, let me just point out, almost everyone who gets kicked out of a con made arrangements to show up and had a valid badge at some point. So I don't get why she thinks this is a win for her. Pretty much 100% guaranteed that all badges are subject to instant revocation for any or no reason at the discretion of the con-staff.

I'm also confused as to why she thought "staying silent" would help her case. What was Kameha Con going to do? Re-invite her after the con was already over? Sounds like she just went through her messages at a later date and decided she'd found a drama nugget. Also, that "I have video of me being harrassed by con staff" gambit lost it's value, so she's now she's squeezing the last drop of blood out of that nothingburger.

In summary: talk shit, get hit. Surprised pikachu meme.

 

[TheClappening]

If any of you have the Unlocked app, Vic will be streaming 6 PM CST.
View attachment 972270

Maybe it's just me, but 5 o'clock shadow Vic taking a selfie looks better than the photo op head shots.

 

[Much Ado About Nothing]

I'm just going by the order they're presented here (maybe it's different in the original tweet chain), but I think you're over-reacting. Assuming her narrative: the "old tweets" are ones she had to look up later, because she would have had no reason to screenshot them at the time. The "new tweets" are things she totally WOULD have screenshoted, also they're more recent in the "timeline."

So that part of the story checks out. Let's not put truth-blinders on like the maggots in KV.

It's the rest of her story that doesn't add up to me.

I loved the descriptor she gave of the group that cornered her outside the women's bathroom (supposedly) being 'Vic-stans, which included Vic's agent' and a youtuber that had harassed her and other people online. But in the clip you see 3 members of staff, some randos walking past in the background, and a person in grey a little off camera. They were also incredibly polite to her to be fair.

And yes, Cons are as far as I know able to revoke and ban to their own delight. Shane demonstrated that to us. They can revoke a pass for anything and everything. Including harassing a guest that never attended the con and wearing a Darkiplier t-shirt.

 

[Dopey Cunt]

There's more conversation above it that doesn't line up with that last one from the previous. I'd like to know what the rest of it was, but i suppose if Slatosch is going to do anything legally he won't leak it out.

That doesn't make any sense. Why would he threaten her over DMs when he knows that she can just leak the DMs to show he's threatening her? Again, she is cherry picking to be disingenuous instead of being honest and showing the whole conversation so that we can get some context. She does this because she knows he's actually not threatening her and revealing the whole conversation will show just that. Him asking if he can get in touch with her legal representation isn't a threat, it's a request which is markedly different than just telling her that he's going to get in contact with her legal representation. He's asking a question which she can just say no to or just ignore and that would be the end of it. There's a difference, one which she obviously can't tell.

 

[Roland Daggett]

I know topic has switched to cocksleeve, but could I get that dark souls lore on why Gray and Kathleen are damaging? Havent heard shit before now.

Gray Haddock was the galaxy brained genius behind Gen:Lock which was a complete and utter disaster. It lost Rooster Teeth a lot of money and the best thing people can say about it was that it was mediocre. Most I've heard about it was that it's a mess of a show with lousy lore, some cringy SJW writing (one character I believe was gender fluid and spent an entire scene explaining how they were gender fluid), and a bunch of half baked ideas. And they blew massive amounts of money on big named actors like David Tennant. It was such a catastrophe that Gray was basically kicked out of RT, but they tried to make it sound as polite as possible.

Kathleen Zuelch was an old time member of RT who'd been there since at least early RvB days. She voiced Glynda in RWBY, which is relevant for what happened with her. She openly supported Shane's letter (which called out RT for their crappy treatment of the people close to Monty after he died, them hijacking RWBY and getting rid of anyone who didn't obey the direction they wanted, and in general RT being an awful place for anyone who didn't tow the company line) and called out nepotism in the company. She was booted out of RT soon after and then Glynda was scrubbed from RWBY. Like she's had barely a mention since Volume 3 despite her being pretty important and she seems to have been completely excised from the show, which is weird cause when Mercury's old VA supported Shane's letter and called out RT for their crappy pay they just replaced Mercury with a Funi VA.

 

[AStupidMonkey]

That doesn't make any sense. Why would he threaten her over DMs when he knows that she can just leak the DMs to show he's threatening her? Again, she is cherry picking to be disingenuous instead of being honest and showing the whole conversation so that we can get some context. She does this because she knows he's actually not threatening her and revealing the whole conversation will show just that. Him asking if he can get in touch with her legal representation isn't a threat, it's a request which is markedly different than just telling her that he's going to get in contact with her legal representation. He's asking a question which she can just say no to or just ignore and that would be the end of it. There's a difference, one which she obviously can't tell.

Also, her answer shows her motives. She wanted a juicy screenshot to get KV all riled up. Do we actually believe he didn't respond to that? Also, the screenshot looks a little short, like it's been snipped off midway. And it's clear it was taken mid-conversation (or it'd be "Yesterday" or "insert date here.") Why doesn't she want anyone to see his answer?

More interesting, look at Chris's last message that's almost entirely cut off.

Looks like:
NOW.
NOW?
HOW.
HOW?

Funny how we didn't get that either.

 

[Dumpster dived waifu]

Gray Haddock was the galaxy brained genius behind Gen:Lock which was a complete and utter disaster. It lost Rooster Teeth a lot of money and the best thing people can say about it was that it was mediocre. Most I've heard about it was that it's a mess of a show with lousy lore, some cringy SJW writing (one character I believe was gender fluid and spent an entire scene explaining how they were gender fluid), and a bunch of half baked ideas. And they blew massive amounts of money on big named actors like David Tennant. It was such a catastrophe that Gray was basically kicked out of RT, but they tried to make it sound as polite as possible.

Kathleen Zuelch was an old time member of RT who's been there since at least early RvB days. She voiced Glynda in RWBY, which is relevant for what happened with her. She openly supported Shane's letter (which called out RT for their crappy treatment of the people close to Monty after he died, them hijacking RWBY and getting rid of anyone who didn't obey the direction they wanted, and in general RT being an awful place for anyone who didn't tow the company line) and called out nepotism in the company. She was booted out of RT soon after and then Glynda was scrubbed from RWBY. Like she's had barely a mention since Volume 3 despite her being pretty important and she seems to have been completely excised from the show, which is weird cause when Mercury's old VA supported Shane's letter and called out RT for their crappy pay they just replaced Mercury with a Funi VA.

For Gray: Get woke, go broke. I saw one trailer for Gen:lock and dismissed the entire thing when I noticed RT shadow-banning any comments that mentioned the shitty 15fps framerate.

For Kathleen: Sucks, but it's not unsurprising that RT would drop her. As for the scrubbing of her character, I think it's a toss up over not wanting to recast her and Miles/Kerry forgetting that that character exists.

F to spit on RT's grave.