- Joined
- Sep 18, 2019
As the resident Danish building blocks expert, I'd like to urge people not to put any stock in the artwork of the Falcon being blown up;
- the artwork was on a limited release box sent out totards & thots social media influencers only
- it featured on one side of the box, with the other side having the Falcon blowing up Emo Ren's Donut Steel Shuttle
- the box contained the building sets for both craft, hence why both reasonably had to be included on the packaging
- LEGO has consistently gotten fucked by Disney in terms of spoilers;
i. For TFA, their original version of the emo shuttle couldn't spread its wings out because Disney refused to show LEGO's designers any late production concept art
ii. Also for TFA, LEGO ended up producing a Tard Order Snowspeeder that appeared for all of three seconds in a deleted scene - again because their designers were left in the dark by Disney
iii. For Ranger Solo; A Star Wars Flop, a set containing Enfys Nest (the little girl who started the Rebellion) appearing on the snowy planet had to be kept back until a post-movie wave of products to keep spoilers to a minimum.
iv. For The Last Jedi, LEGO ended up producing a 'Strandbeest' walker that appeared in early concept art but was completely axed from the movie.
It does not follow that the Danes would, this time around, suddenly receive word of such a crucial late-movie spoiler, let alone put it into production; take note that their new Falcon building set does not include escape pods - a useful thing to include if you knew that's how Lando and Chewie are going to survive, no? Because of all this, I very much doubt the Falcon will get blown up at all - but if it does, I hold that LEGO's depiction of it was completely accidental and separate from the movie's production (because, unlike Lucas and the prequels, Disney has largely been unable to properly deal with giving licensees enough pre-release material to work with.
tl;dr don't use LEGO packaging as support for the 'FUBAR Falcon' theory.
- the artwork was on a limited release box sent out to
- it featured on one side of the box, with the other side having the Falcon blowing up Emo Ren's Donut Steel Shuttle
- the box contained the building sets for both craft, hence why both reasonably had to be included on the packaging
- LEGO has consistently gotten fucked by Disney in terms of spoilers;
i. For TFA, their original version of the emo shuttle couldn't spread its wings out because Disney refused to show LEGO's designers any late production concept art
ii. Also for TFA, LEGO ended up producing a Tard Order Snowspeeder that appeared for all of three seconds in a deleted scene - again because their designers were left in the dark by Disney
iii. For Ranger Solo; A Star Wars Flop, a set containing Enfys Nest (the little girl who started the Rebellion) appearing on the snowy planet had to be kept back until a post-movie wave of products to keep spoilers to a minimum.
iv. For The Last Jedi, LEGO ended up producing a 'Strandbeest' walker that appeared in early concept art but was completely axed from the movie.
It does not follow that the Danes would, this time around, suddenly receive word of such a crucial late-movie spoiler, let alone put it into production; take note that their new Falcon building set does not include escape pods - a useful thing to include if you knew that's how Lando and Chewie are going to survive, no? Because of all this, I very much doubt the Falcon will get blown up at all - but if it does, I hold that LEGO's depiction of it was completely accidental and separate from the movie's production (because, unlike Lucas and the prequels, Disney has largely been unable to properly deal with giving licensees enough pre-release material to work with.
tl;dr don't use LEGO packaging as support for the 'FUBAR Falcon' theory.