Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread



KickVic rando of the Midnight Hour
What ARE You..PNG




Shane the Sargonite 1.PNG

Shane the Sargonite 2.PNG

And JMK the crying bitch version of Shane being a sperg as usual.
 
So apparently Johnny Yong Bosch is replacing Vic as Sabo

View attachment 975636
Tbh I'd rather have someone he considered a friend take over the role. It's a lot better than if anyone else took it. Think of it as safeguarding the role in a sense. I could be completely wrong though.

Unless Bosch starts openly standing against Vic and stuff, I don't have a problem with this.
 
Tbh I'd rather have someone he considered a friend take over the role. It's a lot better than if anyone else took it. Think of it as safeguarding the role in a sense. I could be completely wrong though.

Unless Bosch starts openly standing against Vic and stuff, I don't have a problem with this.
God I hope that not the case. I'm glad Reuben Langdon (Dante) defended Vic but it hurt if Johnny (Nero) actually wasn't really a friend Vic said he was
 
Well shit, this came up again. I had thought they got it out of their systems, but the ability to let go of something after it's already been addressed has never been one of their strong points I suppose. I already said what I said before, so I'll just leave it at this:

Zack Davisson (and those with a similar opinion on the matter), how dare you push the narrative that I'm so fucking stupid that I would go without food to support my personal morals. That honestly pisses me off the most about this, more than assuming I'm alt-right or that I'm secretly Nick or some shit.

Man, that $1000 donation is still making people salty. It's amazing it took ten months for someone to think of saying something like 'this took half of my monthly income' to piss people off. I imagine if the message had been "It's worth going without food this month and spending all my income this month" they'd actually have melted into a puddle of goopy rage.
Who would have known this would have thrown them into such a frenzy? I definitely didn't intend to do that, as much as I'd love to claim otherwise. The entire point I was trying to push with that message was how I would happily support over twenty years of hard work with a meager two weeks of pay (after income taxes and shit). As is often the case, it goes COMPLETELY over their heads because they're too busy projecting themselves onto me because of the bad decisions they constantly make in life.

If you can't put an entire paycheck into a single transaction such as this without endangering your life, I would not consider you "financially capable".
 
So apparently Johnny Yong Bosch is replacing Vic as Sabo

View attachment 975636
On a mostly unrelated note

1571376082265.png


This is the same guy who bought last week's Robbie Daymond hoax hook line and sinker

1571376253066.png

1571376232037.png
 
Ok the stupid was too funny to pass up.


Spacebattles

Naw, there's an okay shot at going for an appeal on the basis of ineffective assistance.

Really? Vic's sticking with Nick? That seems like a decision of... questionable... wisdom.
He's an idiot, then. Even if Rekeita and Beard were fantastic attorneys, there's almost no overlap between appellate and trial litigation. It'd be like trying to higher a district attorney to handle your contract negotiation.

Also this kills his best appeal, ineffective assistance of council, and probably kills any shots at negligence referal or malpractice unless he can make a huge showing to support a second trial with the same people
.

These are the opinions of what I assume is a Canadian Paralegal, the funny part comes from his following post less than 5 posts down from this one.

Right, but since they aren't going to be looking at anything NEW in the appeal, the chances of it being successful are nil.
Eh. I didn't follow it closely to necessarily say that's true. If there's evidence that was excluded or arguments that things were improperly excluded or barred, there's space for limited new evidence to be introduced.

The problem is the standard for an AntiSLAPP motion is extremely generous to the plaintiff, so it's very unlikely that this is the case.


This idiot is claiming that Vic's best show for appeals is accusing his counsel of wrongdoings, and it also doesn't know anything about the case, to the point where it's not sure of the presented evidence... The cherry on top? This incompetent idiot is a moderator of the tread... Dear heavens that is both funny and sad.

Archive
 
Also for fans of One Piece, Kickvic is like the WG, and the Shanes and Rons are Shichibukai. If you follow the manga you know what happens to undesirables as soon as the main players don't need them.

Crocodile is too awesome to have been anyone from KickVic tbh, he at least got shit done, and Boa Hancock is a literal waifu. I dunno who'd be Moriah, though. He can at least prove he has true and honest PTSD from being raped by a giant dragon man.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Mr. 0
Ok the stupid was too funny to pass up.


Spacebattles

Naw, there's an okay shot at going for an appeal on the basis of ineffective assistance.


He's an idiot, then. Even if Rekeita and Beard were fantastic attorneys, there's almost no overlap between appellate and trial litigation. It'd be like trying to higher a district attorney to handle your contract negotiation.

Also this kills his best appeal, ineffective assistance of council, and probably kills any shots at negligence referal or malpractice unless he can make a huge showing to support a second trial with the same people
.

These are the opinions of what I assume is a Canadian Paralegal, the funny part comes from his following post less than 5 posts down from this one.


Eh. I didn't follow it closely to necessarily say that's true. If there's evidence that was excluded or arguments that things were improperly excluded or barred, there's space for limited new evidence to be introduced.

The problem is the standard for an AntiSLAPP motion is extremely generous to the plaintiff, so it's very unlikely that this is the case.


This idiot is claiming that Vic's best show for appeals is accusing his counsel of wrongdoings, and it also doesn't know anything about the case, to the point where it's not sure of the presented evidence... The cherry on top? This incompetent idiot is a moderator of the tread... Dear heavens that is both funny and sad.

Archive
The first post on that page says it all perfectly. "Vic didn't do anything so egregious that an apology tour wouldn't fix. Everyone would welcome him back and he would restore his image. I wouldn't support him, and I'll hate him for forever and never accept him back. The only reason he's #StillFired #AlmostDead is because he sued." There's like 5 steps of logic missing within 3 paragraphs.
 
This idiot is claiming that Vic's best show for appeals is accusing his counsel of wrongdoings, and it also doesn't know anything about the case, to the point where it's not sure of the presented evidence... The cherry on top? This incompetent idiot is a moderator of the tread... Dear heavens that is both funny and sad.

Needless to say this is pure idiocy. For one thing, this absolute pinhead seems to think Nick is Vic's lawyer. How many fucking times do these morons have to be told he isn't? Nick is a lawyer. Nick is a guy who talks about the case. Nick is not in fucking Texas and is not Vic's lawyer.

Also, amazingly finding something dumber and even more ignorant to say, he claims there's an ineffective assistance of counsel appeal in civil cases. Needless to say, there fucking isn't. That's a criminal issue.

It's amazing how these morons manage to be fractally wrong on every level where it's even possible to be wrong, never coming within a statute mile of saying anything remotely correct no matter how much they spout off.
 
Ok the stupid was too funny to pass up.


Spacebattles

Naw, there's an okay shot at going for an appeal on the basis of ineffective assistance.


He's an idiot, then. Even if Rekeita and Beard were fantastic attorneys, there's almost no overlap between appellate and trial litigation. It'd be like trying to higher a district attorney to handle your contract negotiation.

Also this kills his best appeal, ineffective assistance of council, and probably kills any shots at negligence referal or malpractice unless he can make a huge showing to support a second trial with the same people
.

These are the opinions of what I assume is a Canadian Paralegal, the funny part comes from his following post less than 5 posts down from this one.


Eh. I didn't follow it closely to necessarily say that's true. If there's evidence that was excluded or arguments that things were improperly excluded or barred, there's space for limited new evidence to be introduced.

The problem is the standard for an AntiSLAPP motion is extremely generous to the plaintiff, so it's very unlikely that this is the case.


This idiot is claiming that Vic's best show for appeals is accusing his counsel of wrongdoings, and it also doesn't know anything about the case, to the point where it's not sure of the presented evidence... The cherry on top? This incompetent idiot is a moderator of the tread... Dear heavens that is both funny and sad.

Archive

What's funny is that he makes a bunch of hottakes about Vic's counsel, and then says "Well, if the facts were (what the facts are) they'd actually have a chance." Yes. Wouldn't it be wild if the judge didn't follow Anti-SLAPP procedure at all, excluded evidence he shouldn't have, and refused to let the plaintiff make arguments? Wew. That'd be appealable for sure.

Anyway, one reason spacebattles is so bad is that you will legitimately get warnings and forum-wide bans if you disagree in threads. Providing evidence is usually brushed off as gishgallopping, and refusing to be derailed is usually considered bad faith, and tl;dr they won't let people fight against majority opinion to any efficacy. Anyone who tries will generally get ousted, and then they start listening to their own echoes and think it means the world agrees with them.
 
Well shit, this came up again. I had thought they got it out of their systems, but the ability to let go of something after it's already been addressed has never been one of their strong points I suppose. I already said what I said before, so I'll just leave it at this:

Zack Davisson (and those with a similar opinion on the matter), how dare you push the narrative that I'm so fucking stupid that I would go without food to support my personal morals. That honestly pisses me off the most about this, more than assuming I'm alt-right or that I'm secretly Nick or some shit.


Who would have known this would have thrown them into such a frenzy? I definitely didn't intend to do that, as much as I'd love to claim otherwise. The entire point I was trying to push with that message was how I would happily support over twenty years of hard work with a meager two weeks of pay (after income taxes and shit). As is often the case, it goes COMPLETELY over their heads because they're too busy projecting themselves onto me because of the bad decisions they constantly make in life.

If you can't put an entire paycheck into a single transaction such as this without endangering your life, I would not consider you "financially capable".
I didn't publically call it, but I had a feeling that your donation was gonna get their panties in a wad.

In addition to jealousy at not having that money to throw around, I think they are also jealous that their side doesn't have that level of loyalty/dedication.

You know, that brings me to another thought, can't believe I haven't got around to talking about this the whole time I've been here, but think about this. ANYONE, literally ANYONE, could have made a GFM or similar fundraiser for the defendents. IMO, the fact that nothing like that exists, is the most telling and interesting thing when comparing the two sides. Not ONE of these KV white knights/SJW orbiters have made a warchest for them in response to Vic's. That's actually pretty SAD when you think about it.
 
I didn't publically call it, but I had a feeling that your donation was gonna get their panties in a wad.

In addition to jealousy at not having that money to throw around, I think they are also jealous that their side doesn't have that level of loyalty/dedication.

You know, that brings me to another thought, can't believe I haven't got around to talking about this the whole time I've been here, but think about this. ANYONE, literally ANYONE, could have made a GFM or similar fundraiser for the defendents. IMO, the fact that nothing like that exists, is the most telling and interesting thing when comparing the two sides. Not ONE of these KV white knights/SJW orbiters have made a warchest for them in response to Vic's. That's actually pretty SAD when you think about it.

They haven't made it because hitting 5k of a 300k goal after 10 months would be embarrassing. Plus, they are still furiously masturbating to the idea that Vic will pay them that warchest instead. Should TCPA fail, we'll probably see people toss around the idea of 'evening the playing field with a GFM'. But then Nick will happily remind Ron of the time he said a real man didn't let other people pay for his court fees.
 
I didn't publically call it, but I had a feeling that your donation was gonna get their panties in a wad.

In addition to jealousy at not having that money to throw around, I think they are also jealous that their side doesn't have that level of loyalty/dedication.

You know, that brings me to another thought, can't believe I haven't got around to talking about this the whole time I've been here, but think about this. ANYONE, literally ANYONE, could have made a GFM or similar fundraiser for the defendents. IMO, the fact that nothing like that exists, is the most telling and interesting thing when comparing the two sides. Not ONE of these KV white knights/SJW orbiters have made a warchest for them in response to Vic's. That's actually pretty SAD when you think about it.
I think the only reason that they haven't is because they still believe TCPA is their payday.

At best, they're awarded reasonable attorneys fees, which wouldn't be everything because of all the bullshit they're pulling.

At worst they lose or partially lose on TCPA and suddenly Lemwaaah realizes he isn't getting paid in weebbux
 
I didn't publically call it, but I had a feeling that your donation was gonna get their panties in a wad.

In addition to jealousy at not having that money to throw around, I think they are also jealous that their side doesn't have that level of loyalty/dedication.

You know, that brings me to another thought, can't believe I haven't got around to talking about this the whole time I've been here, but think about this. ANYONE, literally ANYONE, could have made a GFM or similar fundraiser for the defendents. IMO, the fact that nothing like that exists, is the most telling and interesting thing when comparing the two sides. Not ONE of these KV white knights/SJW orbiters have made a warchest for them in response to Vic's. That's actually pretty SAD when you think about it.

Ron said himself a real man wouldn't beg for money online and pay his own attorneys fees. Looking forward to the chimp out when the TCPA gets appealed.
 
Ron said himself a real man wouldn't beg for money online and pay his own attorneys fees. Looking forward to the chimp out when the TCPA gets appealed.

So begging for money in any other situation is okay though, right? Since almost all the other people he associates with online have made GFMs for one reason or another.
 
New fag here.
me being the exceptional individual that I am have no idea who this JMK guy is. All I’ve heard is that he is some dude that cried during a debate. Why is he so thirsty for attention?

Welcome!

JMK is in it for the clout. Much like Senpai is Home and Mad Black Atheist, JMK wants to stir shit up and take the easy route instead of actually working to build a channel.

He could make KickVic videos as Marzgurl has been begging for someone to take the fight to YouTube and yet he only wants debates. He wants someone to bring an audience to him.

It is also funnier just to have him sperg out ineffectively.

I didn't publically call it, but I had a feeling that your donation was gonna get their panties in a wad.

In addition to jealousy at not having that money to throw around, I think they are also jealous that their side doesn't have that level of loyalty/dedication.

You know, that brings me to another thought, can't believe I haven't got around to talking about this the whole time I've been here, but think about this. ANYONE, literally ANYONE, could have made a GFM or similar fundraiser for the defendents. IMO, the fact that nothing like that exists, is the most telling and interesting thing when comparing the two sides. Not ONE of these KV white knights/SJW orbiters have made a warchest for them in response to Vic's. That's actually pretty SAD when you think about it.

That is a good point. Doucette has made... 5 GoFundMe campaigns for this case. And Marzgurl did one.

Granted Ron said he wouldn't go E-Begging but that money is out of pocket until the court case is done. At least 2 more months of lawyer bills with the possibility of even more. With the way nothing is going according to plan, Chupp may wind up shorting them on lawyer fees. (I.e. Chupp's definition of "reasonable" leaves them in a hole at the end of this.) The defendants might wind up bankrupt even if they win because they fell behind on everything else.

Ron isn't getting that Audi. Ron might have to downgrade to a Ford Pinto.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 972380
A thank you to the lovely tipsy tea cup who found this post again, and the doxers that made this possible. Wading through that austism probably scarred their brains forever.
hahaha so basically the conslut blocked everyone but is now sad she's not getting any attention or asspats so has her fatty friend repost for her. Oh boy...take the L demonique
 
Back