I did a doubletake at the assertion Vic "admitted everything".
The only thing he admitted is touching her hair, not pulling it... Uh...Is this some sort of game of exceptional telephone?
Well, it's twisting everything he's saying. Essentially, Vic categorically denying everything IS him agreeing to everything.
"I invited the twins into my room, I asked them if they wanted to do the thing. They said no. They left."
maybe he says at some point he gave them a closed mouth kiss, but I can't remember.
"See? He admitted to taking them in with the intent to have sex. This means that the twins' story is ABSOLUTELY true! He's just claiming not to know it wasn't wanted!"
"I made the joke but it wasn't sexual."
"See? He admits to making a sexually harassing joke."
"I kissed my coworker after flirting for a while, after she said I should close the door if we wanted to kiss. Afterwards we decided not to pursue anything further."
"See? He admits to going in and kissing her without asking! She was at work and sexually harassed, and he even admits to not continuing to talk to her afterward, because she was awkward and avoided him."
"I touched her hair, but that's it. I've never been attracted to Jamie."
"He made a gesture that suggests he might have yanked it, and that means maybe Jamie felt pain from it! Clearly he also said something sexy to her!"
"Yeah, I have some idea where she might have gotten the story of my yanking her hair from."
"See? He's admitting to pulling Monica's hair all the time!"
Like that. They mostly ignore the totally made up stories, and for the ones that are based off of real ones, they ignore that he says they happened drastically different and claim he's just saying "Well, they happened but I thought it was consensual!" - because obviously they just arbitrarily decide the defendants' version of events must be true and not Vic's, even though they are equally likely to be true by the telling.