Shy Hard 2: Shy Harder

"This is simply liberal feminist propaganda. Feminist cannot except the truth that rape is quite simply about filling a biological need. Feminists much prefer this myth which is designed to demonize rapists"

Fschmidt (did i spell that right? His name's so horrendous i can't tell) you fucknugget rape isn't about attraction, it's about power. God, I hate that mentality about as much as "homosexuality is a choice" (I bet one of them's said that before, can I get confirmation?).:mad:
 
  • Agree
  • Disagree
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse, Count groudon and Holdek
ArtistChu said:
"This is simply liberal feminist propaganda. Feminist cannot except the truth that rape is quite simply about filling a biological need. Feminists much prefer this myth which is designed to demonize rapists"

Fschmidt (did i spell that right? His name's so horrendous i can't tell) you fucknugget rape isn't about attraction, it's about power. God, I hate that mentality about as much as "homosexuality is a choice" (I bet one of them's said that before, can I get confirmation?).:mad:
Click to expand...

Try telling that to Marjan, see what happens. Guaranteed to end hilariously.
And yes, you spelled his name right.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Holdek
Saney said:
Does that link take you to the Members only forum? Because that link won't let me see the page,says I need to log in.
Click to expand...

Open.

EDIT: You're right. Members only. I thought it said open.
 
Had a question, and apologies if this is the wrong thread. Anyone know where the association of fedora hats with MRAs came from? I'm definitely missing something here. Is it just an article of clothing a skeevy guy might wear to seem presentable to da ladies, or is there something else?
 
Pinball Lizard said:
Had a question, and apologies if this is the wrong thread. Anyone know where the association of fedora hats with MRAs came from? I'm definitely missing something here. Is it just an article of clothing a skeevy guy might wear to seem presentable to da ladies, or is there something else?
Click to expand...

They just showed up a lot in pictures of ill-dressed fat neckbeards, to the point they got associated with things and attitudes associated with ill-dressed fat neckbeards. That picture of the Puggsley actor probably had something to do with it, too. Ironically, a lot of male SJWs are also ill-dressed fat neckbeards.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Marvin, Randall Fragg and Pinball Lizard
AnOminous said:
They just showed up a lot in pictures of ill-dressed fat neckbeards, to the point they got associated with things and attitudes associated with ill-dressed fat neckbeards. That picture of the Puggsley actor probably had something to do with it, too. Ironically, a lot of male SJWs are also ill-dressed fat neckbeards.
Click to expand...

If you think about it, it's weird.
 
Picklechu said:
Not really. It's the same bunch of maladjusted dudes who can't get laid. They just go about it in different ways.
Click to expand...

Wouldn't it be safe to say that some SJW males do get laid, even if it's few and far in between?
 
Wow such idiocy. "Lookists" are the whiniest people around, and that applies too to the feminists who want everyone to find their stretch marks and body hair attractive, because they think that being attractive is a universal human right and not something that occurs naturally in a very very very tiny part of the population and everybody else has to work their ass off for. Then they whine about being discriminated against when usually their personality is shit too and no one would like them anyway.
Society has placed so much importance on women's appearance over time, and now that women might possibly have similar standards for men it's all wuuuh discrimunation.

Regarding the fedora thing, I don't know where it started but I definitely noticed on my own a high percentage of MRAs and atheist people (bc it's also women) wear fedora hats. I think that they wanted to be ahead of the fashion trends and stand out as being unique, and the fedora made a slight resurgence around the same time. It was easy to get yet not commonly worn. I actually bought a fedora circa 2009 because they seemed trendy but still unique in the street fashion community. I never wore it lol.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: steelsheep, Marvin, Count groudon and 1 other person
meltychocolate said:
Wow such idiocy. "Lookists" are the whiniest people around, and that applies too to the feminists who want everyone to find their stretch marks and body hair attractive, because they think that being attractive is a universal human right and not something that occurs naturally in a very very very tiny part of the population and everybody else has to work their ass off for. Then they whine about being discriminated against when usually their personality is shit too and no one would like them anyway.
Society has placed so much importance on women's appearance over time, and now that women might possibly have similar standards for men it's all wuuuh discrimunation.

Regarding the fedora thing, I don't know where it started but I definitely noticed on my own a high percentage of MRAs and atheist people (bc it's also women) wear fedora hats. I think that they wanted to be ahead of the fashion trends and stand out as being unique, and the fedora made a slight resurgence around the same time. It was easy to get yet not commonly worn. I actually bought a fedora circa 2009 because they seemed trendy but still unique in the street fashion community. I never wore it lol.
Click to expand...

They're all annoying. Most of the time they aren't fedoras. They're trilbies, the fedora's retarded cousin.
 
Thanks to this thread, I have now discovered the existence of Love-shies. :oops:

Quick questions before I continue reading the thread, but do a majority of love-shies want an actual interpersonal relationship or are they just hung up on sex? Is sex on a pedestal as the ultimate goal, and after sex is there an endgame? I tried reading Holden's thread, but it was a complete wash and I had no idea what he was trying to convey. (And I assume he's the exception and not the rule)
 
HickoryDickory said:
Thanks to this thread, I have now discovered the existence of Love-shies. :oops:

Quick questions before I continue reading the thread, but do a majority of love-shies want an actual interpersonal relationship or are they just hung up on sex? Is sex on a pedestal as the ultimate goal, and after sex is there an endgame? I tried reading Holden's thread, but it was a complete wash and I had no idea what he was trying to convey. (And I assume he's the exception and not the rule)
Click to expand...
Most just want a piece. They're just too inept to get it.
 
HickoryDickory said:
Thanks to this thread, I have now discovered the existence of Love-shies. :oops:

Quick questions before I continue reading the thread, but do a majority of love-shies want an actual interpersonal relationship or are they just hung up on sex? Is sex on a pedestal as the ultimate goal, and after sex is there an endgame? I tried reading Holden's thread, but it was a complete wash and I had no idea what he was trying to convey. (And I assume he's the exception and not the rule)
Click to expand...
As far as I remember, they want to have sex though I'm sure many of them don't want to be friend-zoned.
 
HickoryDickory said:
Thanks to this thread, I have now discovered the existence of Love-shies. :oops:

Quick questions before I continue reading the thread, but do a majority of love-shies want an actual interpersonal relationship or are they just hung up on sex? Is sex on a pedestal as the ultimate goal, and after sex is there an endgame? I tried reading Holden's thread, but it was a complete wash and I had no idea what he was trying to convey. (And I assume he's the exception and not the rule)
Click to expand...

It's a combination of wanting companionship with the opposite sex without it being a huge ordeal, not being flaked on, and not doing an 180 personality shift on them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back