2019-10-16 - Federal Grand Jury Subpoena

Status
Not open for further replies.
So, what could be done about it?
"We suspect a felony, not otherwise speficied, may have occured, surrender all user data" seems pretty shady.

Presumably if they get an indictment before the grand jury it will eventually be unsealed whenever they have whoever it is in custody. A federal grand jury is nothing to fuck with.
 
A subpoena to what amounts to an overglorified shitpost. This feels fishy, why didnt he get the same amount of shit when that aussie sperg shot muslims?
Is it because a certain Zionist demographic was the target this time (even though not a single shekelmaster was hurt)?

Really gets those noggin joggin doesnt it.
 
Last edited:
Oh ok so a federal court is trying to do all this shit then. That makes it even dumber. How the fuck are they even gonna get this sort of info from a foreign entity?

By doing whatever it takes. This guy routinely extradites people from all over the world (including from Germany).
 
The only thing I could possibly think of would be his doKumentation file on the grounds of it possessing information regarding the construction of bullets and explosives? I mean he never really gives out a comprehensive recipe or anything of the sort but that is the only thing I could think of... is that even illegal?

Even if that were the case, why would a grand jury being investigating it a mere week after it happened? Why isn't the request coming from law enforcement if dissemination of the information is regarded as potentially dangerous?

The justification for this request doesn't make much sense.
 
So, do you have any viable options to run things outside the US for good, and tell Mr. (((Berman))) that you don't care about his faggot law?
Other than that, what does our in-house counsel have to say about this? Any good angle to object/move to quash that subpoena?

What case do they even presume to have here? A "suspected felony" for uploading some sped's manifesto, doesn't exactly sound convincing.
Null has talked about this in streams, and he can correct me if I'm wrong. In respect to running Kiwi Farms even though the US is bad, everywhere else is worse. Nowhere else has speech protections as strong as the first amendment.
And just from my own knowledge, when you need to do business in a country it's best to cooperate with law enforcement in the moment and fight it later if it's unlawful. Fighting it "on the streets" as it were will only make it worse.
 
From his Wikipedia article of "Greatest Hits."

Major prosecutions announced by Berman
U.S. v Rafatnejad et al.[50][51]
U.S. v New York City Housing Authority[52][53]
U.S. v Christian Toro and Tyler Toro[54]
U.S. v Freedman et al.[55]
U.S. v Therese Okoumou[56]
U.S. v MTA et al.[57][58]
U.S. v City of Mount Vernon[59][60]
U.S. v Collins et al.[27]
U.S. v Hernandez et al.[37]
U.S. v Cesar Altieri Sayoc[33]
U.S. v Natalya Vladmirovna Veselnitskaya[40]
U.S. v Michael Avenatti[61]
U.S. v Rochester Drug Co-operative[62]
U.S. v Doud[62]
U.S. v Jeffrey Epstein[63][64]
U.S. v. Juan Antonio Hernández, who is the brother of the current President of Honduras Juan Orlando Hernandez.
 
From his Wikipedia article of "Greatest Hits."

Major prosecutions announced by Berman
U.S. v Rafatnejad et al.[50][51]
U.S. v New York City Housing Authority[52][53]
U.S. v Christian Toro and Tyler Toro[54]
U.S. v Freedman et al.[55]
U.S. v Therese Okoumou[56]
U.S. v MTA et al.[57][58]
U.S. v City of Mount Vernon[59][60]
U.S. v Collins et al.[27]
U.S. v Hernandez et al.[37]
U.S. v Cesar Altieri Sayoc[33]
U.S. v Natalya Vladmirovna Veselnitskaya[40]
U.S. v Michael Avenatti[61]
U.S. v Rochester Drug Co-operative[62]
U.S. v Doud[62]
U.S. v Jeffrey Epstein[63][64]
U.S. v. Juan Antonio Hernández, who is the brother of the current President of Honduras Juan Orlando Hernandez.

Kf thread when? Let’s mock this asshole and akiva Cohen.2.0 idiot. Fuck this guy.

Jokes aside, im bad at law, is this a serious thing for once? Or can you just deny it since they’re demanding stuff from our fellow kiwis?
 
Last edited:
Do we know WHERE these documents were originally posted? Is there any chance they appeared here first?

Could they be wanting to see the user's details to ensure he WASN'T the same person that originally uploaded them?

Struggling to figure out why a supposed repost of the documents would get their attention. The question as to why any interest in the shooting is even more difficult. Part of a case against 8chan?
 
Do we know WHERE these documents were originally posted? Is there any chance they appeared here first?

Could they be wanting to see the user's details to ensure he WASN'T the same person that originally uploaded them?

Struggling to figure out why a supposed repost of the documents would get their attention. The question as to why any interest in the shooting is even more difficult. Part of a case against 8chan?
By the time they were posted here the Deutsch door cuck had already been arrested so assuming he was the person who originally posted the manifesto and photos they couldn't be the same person.
 
From his Wikipedia article of "Greatest Hits."

Major prosecutions announced by Berman
U.S. v Rafatnejad et al.[50][51]
U.S. v New York City Housing Authority[52][53]
U.S. v Christian Toro and Tyler Toro[54]
U.S. v Freedman et al.[55]
U.S. v Therese Okoumou[56]
U.S. v MTA et al.[57][58]
U.S. v City of Mount Vernon[59][60]
U.S. v Collins et al.[27]
U.S. v Hernandez et al.[37]
U.S. v Cesar Altieri Sayoc[33]
U.S. v Natalya Vladmirovna Veselnitskaya[40]
U.S. v Michael Avenatti[61]
U.S. v Rochester Drug Co-operative[62]
U.S. v Doud[62]
U.S. v Jeffrey Epstein[63][64]
U.S. v. Juan Antonio Hernández, who is the brother of the current President of Honduras Juan Orlando Hernandez.
There are two things relating to things that go boom in there, specifically the Toros and Sayoc (not counting his attempt to charge someone for blowing up the World Trade Center). That is the only connection with his prior cases to the current proceeding I see in here, in both cases it appears the FBI and local law enforcement acted on leads after threats were made so that makes this seem like a rather odd proceeding like mentioned prior.
 
Do we know WHERE these documents were originally posted? Is there any chance they appeared here first?

Could they be wanting to see the user's details to ensure he WASN'T the same person that originally uploaded them?

Struggling to figure out why a supposed repost of the documents would get their attention. The question as to why any interest in the shooting is even more difficult. Part of a case against 8chan?
I fail to see what could be gained even if he WAS the OP of these documents, since the door cuck himself was imprisoned. The only other thing would be an accomplice which in this case baffles me as to why the Germans aren't investigating unless they came to the US legal system to get the info.
 
Alternative theory, fag0t is a glow in the dark plant.
View attachment 985793
View attachment 985794
This is doubtful, they've been pretty active on KF over a number of threads. Unless the government really likes Russell Greer and Lucas Werner, I don't see it being likely.
Additionally, I don't see a "fed" saying Atomwaffen are "fags and not intimidating" either. Could be wrong, but doesn't seem particularly fed-like.
Screenshot_20191026-063330_Chrome.jpg
Screenshot_20191026-062958_Chrome.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back