Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.

Also why let one of your best witnesses get deposed by opposing counsel if you can help it?
It's not like the opposing council is the only one who gets to participate in the deposition. If 2nd AP is in question (and therefore Slatosh' declaration) seems to me this would be one way to make sure his story gets told.

IDK if there is some sort of rules against evidence given post judgement being included in an appeal (seems to me this situation is unique, or at least uncommon) so this is why I ask.
 
Well, obviously, Lemoine needs to file a notice to move to quash the notice of the motion to quash the notice of oral deposition. That will show that bastard Ty.
But then Ty will file a notice to quash the quashing of the quash of the oral deposition. It's quashes all the way down.

Also quash doesn't look like a word anymore.
 
It's not like the opposing council is the only one who gets to participate in the deposition. If 2nd AP is in question (and therefore Slatosh' declaration) seems to me this would be one way to make sure his story gets told.

IDK if there is some sort of rules against evidence given post judgement being included in an appeal (seems to me this situation is unique, or at least uncommon) so this is why I ask.
In an appeal, only evidence that was already on record up to the time of the hearing is allowed in.

And we still don't know what's what because Chupp made several things Shrodinger's Evidence.

Also, in a deposition, friendly counsel is pretty much limited to objecting. Ty wouldn't be asking questions.
 
It's not like the opposing council is the only one who gets to participate in the deposition. If 2nd AP is in question (and therefore Slatosh' declaration) seems to me this would be one way to make sure his story gets told.

IDK if there is some sort of rules against evidence given post judgement being included in an appeal (seems to me this situation is unique, or at least uncommon) so this is why I ask.

The appeals court can look at anything in the record. Even if something is "stricken" it's still in the record, especially since a point of appeal would be that it shouldn't have been.
 
The appeals court can look at anything in the record. Even if something is "stricken" it's still in the record, especially since a point of appeal would be that it shouldn't have been.
If Chupp didn't consider something but Ty still bought it to court is it in the record for the appeals court to consider or what?
 
Also, in a deposition, friendly counsel is pretty much limited to objecting. Ty wouldn't be asking questions.
I don't want to be pedantic, but I believe this is incorrect. There is allowance for a cross-examination as well as for redirect and re-cross. I am not familiar enough to know what kinds of questions are proper in cross-exam.

Edit: Here is a source for that. It is on the Mass. Gov. website, but according to Wikipedia "depositions are carried out under Rule 30 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure".
Examination and cross-examination of witnesses may proceed as permitted at the trial under the provisions of Rule 43(b). The officer before whom the deposition is to be taken shall put the witness on oath and shall personally, or by someone acting under the officer's direction and in the officer's presence, record the testimony of the witness. The testimony shall be taken stenographically or by voice writing or recorded by any other means ordered in accordance with subdivision (b)(4) of this rule. If requested by one of the parties, the testimony shall be transcribed. In lieu of participating in the oral examination, parties may serve written questions in a sealed envelope on the party taking the deposition and such party shall transmit them to the officer, who shall propound them to the witness and record the answers verbatim.
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Crabbo
I don't want to be pedantic, but I believe this is incorrect. There is allowance for a cross-examination as well as for redirect and re-cross. I am not familiar enough to know what kinds of questions are proper in cross-exam.
Pretty sure cross is for trial. In deposition only the deposing party gets to ask stuff.

Remember Ron's depo? Casey was stuck in the corner muttering "objection to form" every five seconds. And that was all he got to say. Well other than to take a shot at Top-CEC, but that didn't go well, either.
 
If Chupp didn't consider something but Ty still bought it to court is it in the record for the appeals court to consider or what?

It's up to them what they consider. If Chumpp just outright refused to look at evidence brought to him for literally no reason at all, they'll want to see what that was.

I don't want to be pedantic, but I believe this is incorrect. There is allowance for a cross-examination as well as for redirect and re-cross. I am not familiar enough to know what kinds of questions are proper in cross-exam.

Edit: Here is a source for that. It is on the Mass. Gov. website, but according to Wikipedia "depositions are carried out under Rule 30 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure".

That's federal rules. This is state court. Parties can cross examine, and sometimes do, but it's usually the other side taking the deposition in the first place.
 
Pretty sure cross is for trial. In deposition only the deposing party gets to ask stuff.

Remember Ron's depo? Casey was stuck in the corner muttering "objection to form" every five seconds. And that was all he got to say. Well other than to take a shot at Top-CEC, but that didn't go well, either.
TRCP Rule 199.5 (b)
Oath; examination. Every person whose deposition is taken by oral examination must first be placed under oath. The parties may examine and cross-examine the witness. Any party, in lieu of participating in the examination, may serve written questions in a sealed envelope on the party noticing the oral deposition, who must deliver them to the deposition officer, who must open the envelope and propound them to the witness.
 
Last edited:
Lemonfurher's trying to get info on if Vic is planning on suing anyone else. He REALLY REALLY wants to know if BHBH and Slatosch spoke about anyone else, or if Slatosch has turned over any information on anyone else, or if someone else (Igor / Iago) pulled TI with him. It'll make his case to "sanction that entire evil Go Fund Me that is enabling such horrific behavior" stronger.

More importantly, it looks like Jim Bullock flat old told the brain damaged fuck that Ty and An Lee are out of the offices on the 21st, 22nd, and 23rd, in response to an email from him asking for permission for a hearing on Nov 11-15th, Nov 18-22nd, so before Ty came back to work on the 24th he tried to hit them with this filing.

He then asked for a deposition on the 1st, not the 11th, because he's a brain damaged fuck. I'm presuming the idiot didn't realize that October 23rd to November 1st is 7 days but only 5 BUSINESS days, because he's a brain damaged fuck. Or he just assumes BHBH are stupid enough to let him get away with that sort of thing.

Edit: Looking at it, they're trying to have the deposition at a hotel in Midland, Texas, for some reason, which is 20 miles from Odessa, but 300 miles from Tarrant County.

He's also trying for the privledged documents, again.

1572325146155.png
 
Lemonfurher's trying to get info on if Vic is planning on suing anyone else. He REALLY REALLY wants to know if BHBH and Slatosch spoke about anyone else, or if Slatosch has turned over any information on anyone else, or if someone else (Igor / Iago) pulled TI with him. It'll make his case to "sanction that entire evil Go Fund Me that is enabling such horrific behavior" stronger.

More importantly, it looks like Jim Bullock flat old told the brain damaged fuck that Ty and An Lee are out of the offices on the 21st, 22nd, and 23rd, in response to an email from him asking for permission for a hearing on Nov 11-15th, Nov 18-22nd, so before Ty came back to work on the 24th he tried to hit them with this filing.

He then asked for a deposition on the 1st, not the 11th, because he's a brain damaged fuck. I'm presuming the idiot didn't realize that October 23rd to November 1st is 7 days but only 5 BUSINESS days, because he's a brain damaged fuck. Or he just assumes BHBH are stupid enough to let him get away with that sort of thing.

Edit: Looking at it, they're trying to have the deposition at a hotel in Midland, Texas, for some reason, which is 20 miles from Odessa, but 300 miles from Tarrant County.

He's also trying for the privledged documents, again.

View attachment 989024
Holy SHIT that third one. THAT is worthy of some nasty rebukes.
 
What is going through that mosquito eaten brain that he thinks there are recordings of any of that shit? What a chud.
.......He may record those himself and assume others do as well. Which would be creepy, and illegal w/o notification in some states.

Also A/C privilege . So even if they did exist, no, he can't touch.
 
.......He may record those himself and assume others do as well. Which would be creepy, and illegal w/o notification in some states.

Also A/C privilege . So even if they did exist, no, he can't touch.

Slatosch isn't his client. Well, unless he is. But even if he's just a witness it's clearly work product.
 
this is the third or fourth time he's asked for priveleged info. I didn't think anything much of it at the time in depo when he asked Vic for something and Ty had to object, but at this point the mosquito seems to have convinced him that 'priveleged' means 'I need to see it'. Can he be sanctioned or slapped at all for consistently asking for information he knows he can't have in the hopes of getting it anyway?

i know, there's plenty they can slap Lemoine with as it is, but this seems like some kind of unethical behavior.
 
this is the third or fourth time he's asked for priveleged info. I didn't think anything much of it at the time in depo when he asked Vic for something and Ty had to object, but at this point the mosquito seems to have convinced him that 'priveleged' means 'I need to see it'. Can he be sanctioned or slapped at all for consistently asking for information he knows he can't have in the hopes of getting it anyway?

i know, there's plenty they can slap Lemoine with as it is, but this seems like some kind of unethical behavior.

I think the mosquito actually turned him into an anti-superhero. Unlike Spider-Man, Mosquito-Man only has the power to be a disgusting, bloodsucking, subhuman piece of shit.
 
this is the third or fourth time he's asked for priveleged info. I didn't think anything much of it at the time in depo when he asked Vic for something and Ty had to object, but at this point the mosquito seems to have convinced him that 'priveleged' means 'I need to see it'. Can he be sanctioned or slapped at all for consistently asking for information he knows he can't have in the hopes of getting it anyway?

i know, there's plenty they can slap Lemoine with as it is, but this seems like some kind of unethical behavior.

Considering who the Judge is, I fully expect Chupp to order Ty to turn over his computers, servers, and passwords for Lemonfurher to examine at his leisure.
 
Back