Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿



They doxed the dog because Trump did not declassify the name.
lol. They got trolled again. Who cares what the dog's name was but it's handler?
 
Anecdote is anecdotal, of course, but I thought this wa kind of cool.

I had breakfast with a friend this morning. She went through the Srebernica Massacre and is a therapist now. I know she's a therapist for mostly people from war-torn areas. She's told me in the past about Somalians, DRC-ese, Kosovans, Afghanis etc., and I mentioned the WaPo thing about Baghdadi "revered muslim scholar" or whatever bullshit. She seemed nauseated by that. I know she does a lot of group therapy with women from war torn areas, and this morning she mentioned that most of her clients are refugees, and Trump regularly comes up in conversation, always positively. The death of al-Baghdadi, with a group therapy session of rescued ISIS brides, apparently had everyone laughing and hugging and giddy this week. She said the Syrian and Iraqi clients laughed at how obvious Trump's pull out was to effect that killing. "Even ten year olds could understand what he did," she said.

Anyhow, I trust her very much about this, and it kind of gave me hope. She told me she doesn't have a refugee client who isn't at least somewhat positive about Trump. It warmed my cockles a bit.

Just trying to fit that into how actual victims of shit must view these cucked scumbags, dangerhaired bigots, and overpaid media liars.

Anyways, anecdote is anecdotal.
 
lol. They got trolled again. Who cares what the dog's name was but it's handler?
Trump is hiding something by not releasing the dog's name. By leaking the dogs name to the reporter, and the reporter doxing the dog, they are striking back against Trump. Surely this release will lead to information that will bring the dictator to his knees...
 
Rather than rating that dumb, I'll respond:

In what way does referring to him as austere rather than revered in any way detract from what I wrote, or in any way show anything but an anti-Trump/pro-ISIS bias from WaPo?

You just thought to respond with essentially: "It's HAMBURGERS! not HAMBERDERS!"

A very rigorous defense, I must say.
 


They doxed the dog because Trump did not declassify the name.

Dogs have a sex, not a gender you fucking twats.
 
Last edited:
Anecdote is anecdotal, of course, but I thought this wa kind of cool.

I had breakfast with a friend this morning. She went through the Srebernica Massacre and is a therapist now. I know she's a therapist for mostly people from war-torn areas. She's told me in the past about Somalians, DRC-ese, Kosovans, Afghanis etc., and I mentioned the WaPo thing about Baghdadi "revered muslim scholar" or whatever bullshit. She seemed nauseated by that. I know she does a lot of group therapy with women from war torn areas, and this morning she mentioned that most of her clients are refugees, and Trump regularly comes up in conversation, always positively. The death of al-Baghdadi, with a group therapy session of rescued ISIS brides, apparently had everyone laughing and hugging and giddy this week. She said the Syrian and Iraqi clients laughed at how obvious Trump's pull out was to effect that killing. "Even ten year olds could understand what he did," she said.

Anyhow, I trust her very much about this, and it kind of gave me hope. She told me she doesn't have a refugee client who isn't at least somewhat positive about Trump. It warmed my cockles a bit.

Just trying to fit that into how actual victims of shit must view these cucked scumbags, dangerhaired bigots, and overpaid media liars.

Anyways, anecdote is anecdotal.
People who think Trump would prefer a benefits freeloading, criminal American born white person over a hard working, clean nosed foreign born brown or black immigrant are beyond reason and cannot be helped.
 
Media releases classified information that terrorists might use to go after a dog: That’s journalism, guys. It’s our job to inform the people.

Wikileaks releases thousands of emails that costs Hillary Clinton the election: That’s literally treason! I can’t wait to write an article defending the drone strike that kills Julian Assange.

There is a reason they don't release the dog's name. If your opponent knows the dog's name, they can call it by its name and try to get it to a place where they can shoot it or otherwise harm it, or get it identify itself. Also general OpSec shit about now any ISIS people working near american personale know what dog name to listen out for.

Fuck Newsweek, and fuck that guy hard.
 
Rather than rating that dumb, I'll respond:

In what way does referring to him as austere rather than revered in any way detract from what I wrote, or in any way show anything but an anti-Trump/pro-ISIS bias from WaPo?

You just thought to respond with essentially: "It's HAMBURGERS! not HAMBERDERS!"

A very rigorous defense, I must say.
Because one is a fucking positive statement you absolute retard. Learn English.

Fuck, just look up the word, you idiot. Do you even know what either one means?

You know what, fuck it. The people in this thread go on sucking each others dicks and telling everyone they're totally fair if you come to the table with a valid argument, but I absolutely know you're all going to be sucking each other's dicks even further over this because you're going to do what this chucklefuck did and equate a misspelling to using entirely the wrong word to someone uninformed and reporting the reaction of someone you've essentially lied to. Of course if you fucking tell someone they said he was REVERED there's going to be a problem. That's nowhere near the neutral language they were even using! Were they dodging the issue? YES. Were they praising allah's great warrior? NO.
 
Last edited:
Because one is a fucking positive statement you absolute exceptional individual. Learn English.

Fuck, just look up the word, you idiot. Do you even know what either one means?

You know what, fuck it. The people in this thread go on sucking each others dicks and telling everyone they're totally fair if you come to the table with a valid argument, but I absolutely know you're all going to be sucking each other's dicks even further over this because you're going to do what this chucklefuck did and equate a misspelling to using entirely the wrong word to someone uninformed and reporting the reaction of someone you've essentially lied to. Of course if you fucking tell someone they said he was REVERED there's going to be a problem. That's nowhere near the neutral language they were even using! Were they dodging the issue? YES. Were they praising allah's great warrior? NO.
It's spelled HAMBURGER. Stop being exceptional. The quote was irrelevant to either the body or the gist of the post, and you are being a sped about something which carries the same point in what I wrote whether the quote was changed from "ISIS Terrorist" to "Austere Whatever", "Revered Whatever",or "Closet-Pederast Whatever"

You are getting butthurt over your own pedanticism.

Perhaps you should take a breather and not throw a tantrum, my boy, because you are currently having a tantrum.

FWIW, I Imisquoted the article when I told her about it, saying "Revered and Austere..."

Regardless, that's some fine derailing, sparky.
 
Because one is a fucking positive statement you absolute exceptional individual. Learn English.

Fuck, just look up the word, you idiot. Do you even know what either one means?

You know what, fuck it. The people in this thread go on sucking each others dicks and telling everyone they're totally fair if you come to the table with a valid argument, but I absolutely know you're all going to be sucking each other's dicks even further over this because you're going to do what this chucklefuck did and equate a misspelling to using entirely the wrong word to someone uninformed and reporting the reaction of someone you've essentially lied to. Of course if you fucking tell someone they said he was REVERED there's going to be a problem. That's nowhere near the neutral language they were even using! Were they dodging the issue? YES. Were they praising allah's great warrior? NO.

Your point is valid, but lol calm down.

Would've rated Drink otherwise.
 
Because one is a fucking positive statement you absolute exceptional individual. Learn English.

Fuck, just look up the word, you idiot. Do you even know what either one means?

You know what, fuck it. The people in this thread go on sucking each others dicks and telling everyone they're totally fair if you come to the table with a valid argument, but I absolutely know you're all going to be sucking each other's dicks even further over this because you're going to do what this chucklefuck did and equate a misspelling to using entirely the wrong word to someone uninformed and reporting the reaction of someone you've essentially lied to. Of course if you fucking tell someone they said he was REVERED there's going to be a problem. That's nowhere near the neutral language they were even using! Were they dodging the issue? YES. Were they praising allah's great warrior? NO.
Maybe it's just the lingering effects of the Protestant reformation, but "Austere" usually has a positive connotation, not quite as much as "Revered" though.
 
“I don’t care if I go to jail” says the engineer who’ll have to explain to his boss and every job interview afterwards why he got arrested for assaulting an old man.
Mattias Ajple's presence has already been scrubbed from one of his companies sites, Kusadama Enterprises:


1572388200513.png
Even in his official photos from the website of one of the companies he founded, CMO Labs, Matt Ajple looks like a smug twat.

Not sure he has to worry about a boss.
 
Back