- Joined
- Mar 5, 2019
Ty's motion to quash immediately stays whatever it was quashing, until the court rules on it.
Constant regeneration can explain why Vic doesn't appear to age.
Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread
- Thread starter mindlessobserver
- Start date
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2019
Well he has changed the date around it all a few times now. Latest one is 7th of november, which is still not a 30 days notice, which he is supposed to give according to some laws. Again, disclaimer, I am not a lawman, so I don't know how it works if it is 'only' documents. Or if that makes a difference at all.
Have not seen anything from Chupp. I am just imagining him wanting to light everything on fire.
BrandedEagle
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 21, 2019
honestly it doesn't matter. Chupp has to wait 30 days to do anything or he could get slapped with sanctions by higher courts for failing to follow procedure more clear than acid.
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2019
He really doesn't have any confidence in his win.
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2019
This is the new guy, partner of the firm. Also a Super Lawyer, because of course he is. I hope this will be good. I now have high hopes.
Jeffrey W. Hellberg, Jr. is a partner in the litigation section of Wick Phillips, and is the head of the firm’s appellate section.
Jeff’s practice focuses on all aspects of trial and commercial litigation, from pre-lawsuit resolution, trial, post-trial activity, and appeal of judgments rendered by a trial court. Jeff has represented individuals, small business owners, financial institutions, and Fortune 500 companies in all types of disputes. Jeff has successfully represented plaintiffs and defendants in numerous bench trials, jury trials, and arbitrations. In addition, Jeff has successfully represented appellants and appellees in the state and federal appellate courts.
So this is the 5th guy involved now. Just by Team MoRonica. Even if Ethan did not have his name on the papers, I did see his name mentioned elsewhere.
This dapper chap here is new to me however. Entire list is: Casey, Perez, Lemwah, Mingehull, and HeLLBerG. I mean, I kinda hope he lives up to the name somehow.
Jeffrey W. Hellberg, Jr. is a partner in the litigation section of Wick Phillips, and is the head of the firm’s appellate section.
Jeff’s practice focuses on all aspects of trial and commercial litigation, from pre-lawsuit resolution, trial, post-trial activity, and appeal of judgments rendered by a trial court. Jeff has represented individuals, small business owners, financial institutions, and Fortune 500 companies in all types of disputes. Jeff has successfully represented plaintiffs and defendants in numerous bench trials, jury trials, and arbitrations. In addition, Jeff has successfully represented appellants and appellees in the state and federal appellate courts.
So this is the 5th guy involved now. Just by Team MoRonica. Even if Ethan did not have his name on the papers, I did see his name mentioned elsewhere.
This dapper chap here is new to me however. Entire list is: Casey, Perez, Lemwah, Mingehull, and HeLLBerG. I mean, I kinda hope he lives up to the name somehow.
theworstkindofeurofag
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2019
Chupp is a dirtbag that doesn't care about anything. Just because I criticize Ty does not mean I think Chupp's competent.
Chupp's probably going to either 1. wave everything through because he doesn't give a shit either way or 2. dismiss everything because he doesn't care either way. He's not biased, I guess he just always wants to take the easy way out.
Or that. Best option.
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2019
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2019
- Joined
- May 3, 2019
I have the urge just to stab that spot it makes me feel uncomfortable.
LuNaS
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2019
"The appeal has no chance of working. Also, completely unrelated to that, we are consulting with an appeals specialist, just because we want to increase the billing hours."
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2019
It was the first thing I noticed. It is terrible of me to say, but perhaps he should see a doctor about removing it, and/or check if it is malignant or cancerous.
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2019
Weeb wars: Where the internet cancer can lead to real cancer.
xyz741
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 24, 2019
I realize this isn't how the "law" or "legal profession" works, but I feel like MoRon's claims that they want to see this in court or show off everything to people in court should nullify Anti-SLAPP. The whole point of Anti-SLAPP is to block FRIVOLOUS lawsuits which are purely intended to shut someone up. It should be obvious that Vic is doing this to theoretically clear his name (at least "legally" if not entirely in the public consciousness). It seems like the perfect example case for someone trying to tear down Anti-SLAPP laws in general, since every citizen is guaranteed the right to have the grievance adjudicated by the prevailing judicial authority. If absolutely nothing else, the idea that Vic is trying to silence the corporate entity funimation with the lawsuit, is pretty ludicrous.
Considering the law as written, I'd say its even money on whether the appeal fails, but this whole situation sours my opinion on the anti-SLAPP statutes. This seems like that law is being abused as badly (if not moreso) as was feared of the lawsuits it is designed to stop. (I don't follow the legal profession closely admitedly, did we seriously have a rash of "shut up" lawsuits before Anti-SLAPP? Some of the precedent setting cases prove that it did happen, but was it really that common?) And besides, if the defense lawyers are seriously working under the assumption that they'll get paid on successful Anti-SLAPP (rather than definite client payments) couldn't you just get the same result by filing counter-suit when someone comes after you and awarding attorney fees and such to the "winner"?
But I also wonder how much leeway judges have on sentencing in this kind of matter. This honestly seems like a soap opera that should've gone to small claims court and ended with someone making a big public statement based on the result rather than giant monetary payouts either way.
Considering the law as written, I'd say its even money on whether the appeal fails, but this whole situation sours my opinion on the anti-SLAPP statutes. This seems like that law is being abused as badly (if not moreso) as was feared of the lawsuits it is designed to stop. (I don't follow the legal profession closely admitedly, did we seriously have a rash of "shut up" lawsuits before Anti-SLAPP? Some of the precedent setting cases prove that it did happen, but was it really that common?) And besides, if the defense lawyers are seriously working under the assumption that they'll get paid on successful Anti-SLAPP (rather than definite client payments) couldn't you just get the same result by filing counter-suit when someone comes after you and awarding attorney fees and such to the "winner"?
But I also wonder how much leeway judges have on sentencing in this kind of matter. This honestly seems like a soap opera that should've gone to small claims court and ended with someone making a big public statement based on the result rather than giant monetary payouts either way.
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2019
Well he should have seen it coming. His eyes look like they have that extra peripheral going on there.
No wonder he looked more decent in that pic with the glasses covering up them frog eyes.
- Joined
- May 11, 2019
I fully retract my earlier post about this sped looking vaguely human. The lack of a jawline, non-existent chin and the problem glassed place him firmly in the male feminist fold.
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2019
If you do that, will they let him back in Tiphares?
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2019
Looks like the start of a zebiba to me. Muslim prayer bump. Maybe he's a snackbar rather than a snack tray
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2019
Crossposting from the Lawsuit thread, into here, cause Lemwah is still goin on the crazy. Thank you to @5t3n0g0ph3r for sharing the document
Does Lemwah even know what he wants with this deposition?
In the filing yesterday he claimed he wanted it to be written documents only, and held at the courthouse before Judge Chupp on the 7th
And now we're back to 1st of November, at that Hilton suites place in Odessa, with the box to have Slatosch show up in person ticked.
Delivered 30th, signed under oath 31st. The request for subpoena still doesn't met the days required to notice a witness.
He still wants it to happen tomorrow. at 10:30 pm. I think he's trying to get Slatosch in contempt of court or some weird shit.
Why is he so desperate for this specific date?
Does Lemwah even know what he wants with this deposition?
In the filing yesterday he claimed he wanted it to be written documents only, and held at the courthouse before Judge Chupp on the 7th
And now we're back to 1st of November, at that Hilton suites place in Odessa, with the box to have Slatosch show up in person ticked.
Delivered 30th, signed under oath 31st. The request for subpoena still doesn't met the days required to notice a witness.
He still wants it to happen tomorrow. at 10:30 pm. I think he's trying to get Slatosch in contempt of court or some weird shit.
Why is he so desperate for this specific date?
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2019
I thought this was crap he floated but hasn't actually filed yet
HighwayStar
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2019
Wait...what? So he’s constantly flip-flopping on the dates now? What is going on in that small brain of his?