Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

[Much Ado About Nothing]

I thought this was crap he floated but hasn't actually filed yet

He filed this today, it is just close to a carbon copy from the first notice of deposition thing he did a few days ago.
It will also be difficult to get approved.
Since he wants some of it to have happened yesterday before Slatosch got served.

See category place.
He wanted this on the 30th Oct, at 5 pm
He served Slatoch on 30th Oct at 6:59 pm.
Wants the Deposition on 1st November at 10:30 am. There is a 30 business days notice when you serve a subpeona I believe (I am no lawman, pls correct me if I am wrong)




I am not sure how he's gonna apply this retroactively.
The date and place he wanted in his last filing is also gone.
No 7th of November, written documents only, and in court BEFORE Judge Chupp.
We're back to Hilton Suites in Odessa. In person.

 

[ZombiU&Me]

Crossposting from the Lawsuit thread, into here, cause Lemwah is still goin on the crazy. Thank you to @5t3n0g0ph3r for sharing the document

Does Lemwah even know what he wants with this deposition?
In the filing yesterday he claimed he wanted it to be written documents only, and held at the courthouse before Judge Chupp on the 7th
And now we're back to 1st of November, at that Hilton suites place in Odessa, with the box to have Slatosch show up in person ticked.

View attachment 992261

View attachment 992262
Delivered 30th, signed under oath 31st. The request for subpoena still doesn't met the days required to notice a witness.

View attachment 992263
He still wants it to happen tomorrow. at 10:30 pm. I think he's trying to get Slatosch in contempt of court or some weird shit.

Why is he so desperate for this specific date?

Does Funi have a fiscal quarter coming up or something? My Hero is airing already...no Dragonball stuff...hmm mm. Whip out the tinfoil hats boys and boys pretending to be girls, shake off the Low T scalp sweat they tend to come with.

 

[PrinceofAllCucks]

View attachment 992273
View attachment 992278
He filed this today, it is just close to a carbon copy from the first notice of deposition thing he did a few days ago.
It will also be difficult to get approved.
Since he wants some of it to have happened yesterday before Slatosch got served.
View attachment 992274
See category place.
He wanted this on the 30th Oct, at 5 pm
He served Slatoch on 30th Oct at 6:59 pm.
Wants the Deposition on 1st November at 10:30 am. There is a 30 business days notice when you serve a subpeona I believe (I am no lawman, pls correct me if I am wrong)
View attachment 992277

View attachment 992275

I am not sure how he's gonna apply this retroactively.
The date and place he wanted in his last filing is also gone.
No 7th of November, written documents only, and in court BEFORE Judge Chupp.
We're back to Hilton Suites in Odessa. In person.

Rule 205.2 issues that a written notice, if only for the intent of providing documents, requires a 10 day notice in order to be timely notifying the nonparty. If it's for a deposition of the nonparty, there is no prior notice required. Now, if Lemoine were smart, he would've only requested the deposition, rather than subpoena for documents as well, because now he's technically in violation of the rule by not giving Slatosch the 10 day notice.

Edit: Full text of the notice as well as citation.
A party seeking discovery by subpoena from a nonparty must serve, on the nonparty and all parties, a copy of the form of notice required under the rules governing the applicable form of discovery. A notice of oral or written deposition must be served before or at the same time that a subpoena compelling attendance or production under the notice is served. A notice to produce documents or tangible things under Rule 205.3 must be served at least 10 days before the subpoena compelling production is served.

 

[damian]

Not really worth its own thread, but Vic is at my local mall.


Setting up:



Line is short, it’s a weekday after all.


With fans:


Vic giving candy to kids:

 

[BrandedEagle]

Is it possible lemoine isn't desperate but pissed that he's not getting his payout now or ever and so in his tiny brain decided to throw everything out in an attempt to make the suit impossible for either side to win? ie prejudice everyone involved?

 

[Much Ado About Nothing]

Is it possible lemoine isn't desperate but pissed that he's not getting his payout now or ever and so in his tiny brain decided to throw everything out in an attempt to make the suit impossible for either side to win? ie prejudice everyone involved?

@Nontransferable was kind enough to explain something to me in the other thread. Which is.
The one from yesterday is a Notice of Submission hearing, which is written only, wanted date is 7th. It is a thing where they try to argue for letting Lemwah question Slatosch.

HOWEVER

Lemwah, wants the deposition on the 1st, in other words, tomorrow at 10:30 am. It seems a little ....odd....
And like @PrinceofAllCucks pointed out, does not even follow the given rule concerning giving the witness time to gather information and prepare.

 

[ZombiU&Me]

Is it possible lemoine isn't desperate but pissed that he's not getting his payout now or ever and so in his tiny brain decided to throw everything out in an attempt to make the suit impossible for either side to win? ie prejudice everyone involved?

It really does seem like it on the surface, not even trying to meme here. He seems very desperate. I almost think he's trying to piss Chubb off enough to throw everything out and just want nothing to do with the case and then force even more time to be spent potentially finding a new judge and thus waste more time and money. Course this is me trying to find logic in something that seems illogical.

 

[HighwayStar]

@Nontransferable was kind enough to explain something to me in the other thread. Which is.
The one from yesterday is a Notice of Submission hearing, which is written only, wanted date is 7th. It is a thing where they try to argue for letting Lemwah question Slatosch.

HOWEVER

Lemwah, wants the deposition on the 1st, in other words, tomorrow at 10:30 am. It seems a little ....odd....

How any of this makes sense to even the most experienced of lawmen is beyond me. Shouldn’t he be granted permission first before deposing someone? Even a law noobie would know that.

 

[Much Ado About Nothing]

How any of this makes sense to even the most experienced of lawmen is beyond me. Shouldn’t he be granted permission first before deposing someone? Even a law noobie would know that.

I assume that is what he'd be granted after the hearing. If he was successfull in his arguments of why he should be able to depose Slatoch.

 

[P5Fever]

It was the first thing I noticed. It is terrible of me to say, but perhaps he should see a doctor about removing it, and/or check if it is malignant or cancerous.

 

[HighwayStar]

I assume that is what he'd be granted after the hearing. If he was successfull in his arguments of why he should be able to depose Slatoch.

I hope Ty has caught wind about these mind games Phlegmoine is playing today. This sounds like somebody trying to hide a few skeletons in their closet.

 

[theworstkindofeurofag]

Lemoine really shouldn't be allowed to get away with this. I hope Slatosch fights back.

 

[BrandedEagle]

I assume that is what he'd be granted after the hearing. If he was successfull in his arguments of why he should be able to depose Slatoch.

So something to bring up is I don't think these even have any weight. unlike before, the dismissal is certain. all that's left are sanctions/payouts and then appeal. as such, slatosch can literally tell lemoine to suck a dick and make him go whine to chupp to make a court order. there are no repurcussions to slatosch saying no at this point, especially since, as lemoine foolishly pointed out, he not a party to the suit and so can give no fucks about chupp's mood.

in other words... unlike before, where Ty had to consider Chupp's mood regarding depo's and subpeona's, Slatosch doesn't need to give a fuck and can make lemoine fight for every inch regardless of if it pisses Chupp off. It only holds weight when Chupp himself signs an order.

 

[TexOffender]

Not really worth its own thread, but Vic is at my local mall.
View attachment 992287

Setting up:
View attachment 992286


Line is short, it’s a weekday after all.
View attachment 992285View attachment 992289

With fans:
View attachment 992288View attachment 992294View attachment 992295

Vic giving candy to kids:
View attachment 992291View attachment 992296View attachment 992292

Man, he always looks so happy to be meeting fans.

Can already hear the troon patrol REEEEEEing about him using copyrighted images.

 

[TheClappening]

Man, he always looks so happy to be meeting fans.

Can already hear the troon patrol REEEEEEing about him using copyrighted images.

Those pants, though.

Also in my head Vic is handing packets of Jelly Belly for the memes. Especially to the little kids because he's totally really going to molest them.

 

[Tipsy Tea Cup]

Lemonsperg is that little kid at the playground yelling at you from the sandbox. Except you cant play with him in the sandbox unless its under his rules and if they aren't his rules he cries to his parents. In this case, it was the Rule 11 agreement and Chupps hearings.

The defendants were pretty much able to get away with discovery abuse, bogus citations, late filings, and moving the goal post. One wonders when Lemonsperg will get sanctioned.

 

[secondclass]

He wanted this on the 30th Oct, at 5 pm
He served Slatoch on 30th Oct at 6:59 pm.
Wants the Deposition on 1st November at 10:30 am. There is a 30 business days notice when you serve a subpeona I believe (I am no lawman, pls correct me if I am wrong)

Here's how this played out:
1. On October 23, JSL subpoenas Slatosch for a November 1 deposition, and includes a document request. I assume it's served promptly, but I don't remember seeing anything on service. These types of requests have no specific limit on the number of days of notice; the rules merely provide for "reasonable time" to prepare. The cases interpreting "reasonable time" says that it has to be >4 days absent emergency (not business days).

2. On October 28, Ty moves to quash. This automatically stays the deposition until there is a hearing.

3. On October 29, JSL moves to compel and notices up a hearing. The hearing is on November 7, and it's "by submission" (ie. each side just submits briefs; no oral arguments).

4. On November 7, Ty will (hopefully) file a brief explaining why this discovery shouldn't be allowed. JSL may file another brief explaining why it should be, but he doesn't have to. The judge will rule, and if he orders Slatosch's deposition, it's likely that he will order a specific date or a date range (like, the deposition must take place on the week of November XX or not at all).

 

[Dumpster dived waifu]

One wonders when Lemonsperg will get sanctioned.

In my perfect world, shit gets darker for ISWV, KV runs millions of victory laps, Lemonfag gets his depositions, and Chupp gives Lemonfag ludicrous attorney fees. And then we reach the dawn, appeal goes through and Vic is handed a better judge. Ty starts slamdunking every court hearing, and best of all, KV reach such amazing levels of outrage reeing that they commit a crime and are punished for it.

No other outcome will spawn as entertaining of a shitshow.

 

[Commander]

So lemonhead finally went off the deep end. I mean I see you all trying to reason but currently he is on the winning side. Well I'm pretty sure Lemoine is a complete incompetent dumbass who has no idea what he is doing tbh. You can't make sense of what he is doing because he just is that incompetent to the point I would feel safer with Mr. Snack Tray himself representing me. This is the man who went into a million dollar case with a picture of a dumpster fire as sound argument. There's also now way Rial and Toye can even afford what is going on. I'm not even sure if they win they will be free of debt. 5 lawyers now. Yesh.

Been a while since I made a post but I do look at the thread once in a while. Feel bad for Vic having to handle the chimp outs. Ty too. I can't even comprehend Lemoine right now.

 

[Much Ado About Nothing]

Here's how this played out:
1. On October 23, JSL subpoenas Slatosch for a November 1 deposition, and includes a document request. I assume it's served promptly, but I don't remember seeing anything on service. These types of requests have no specific limit on the number of days of notice; the rules merely provide for "reasonable time" to prepare. The cases interpreting "reasonable time" says that it has to be >4 days absent emergency (not business days).

2. On October 28, Ty moves to quash. This automatically stays the deposition until there is a hearing.

3. On October 29, JSL moves to compel and notices up a hearing. The hearing is on November 7, and it's "by submission" (ie. each side just submits briefs; no oral arguments).

4. On November 7, Ty will (hopefully) file a brief explaining why this discovery shouldn't be allowed. JSL may file another brief explaining why it should be, but he doesn't have to. The judge will rule, and if he orders Slatosch's deposition, it's likely that he will order a specific date or a date range (like, the deposition must take place on the week of November XX or not at all).

Well is it though?

This needs to be thrown into your timeline:

"A party seeking discovery by subpoena from a nonparty must serve, on the nonparty and all parties, a copy of the form of notice required under the rules governing the applicable form of discovery. A notice of oral or written deposition must be served before or at the same time that a subpoena compelling attendance or production under the notice is served. A notice to produce documents or tangible things under Rule 205.3 must be served at least 10 days before the subpoena compelling production is served. "

4. Rule 205.3(a) is modified as follows: "Notice; subpoena. A party may compel production of documents and tangible things from a nonparty by serving - a reasonable time before the response is due but no later than 30 days before the end of any applicable discovery period - the notice required in Rule 205.2 and a subpoena compelling production or inspection of documents or tangible things."

Are they even in discovery at this point? Is that what he is claiming.

I will not understand why he is still, attempting to get the deposition tomorrow, when his hearing to get this approved. Which it needs to be after all. A court need to review and okay it. Which , lets be honest, Chupp probably will cause he certainly doesn't read stuff from the plaintiff's side. It will not be a'oked until he does. So it will have to happen after the 7th....if we go by logic. This case doesn't really follow that however.

I do however agree with you on that it will likely be scheduled at some other point should it be given the green light to proceed.