Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

[Godzilla@1989]

Can't wait to see this blow up on those man babies' face. Also, this is a great opportunity for many people to learn what a utter hack Pelosi truly is.

 

[Super-Chevy454]

Can't wait to see this blow up on those man babies' face. Also, this is a great opportunity for many people to learn what a utter hack Pelosi truly is.

Yeah and we would sing "Nancy Pelosi is a bitch" based on a well known South Park song.

 

[Flexo]

so keeping up with the right-wing TDS, I really do feel like the world is going insane...

First up, was listening to Goldberg's podcast where he talks with Adam White. Two quotes I'm going to transcribe.
https://ricochet.com/podcast/remnant-jonah-goldberg/impeachy-keen-democrats/#comments

At the 27ish min mark, I think Jonah all but calls out @It's HK-47 and the rest of this board to a challenge.

Which there was [a quid pro quo]. And I'm willing to fight anybody with sticks who thinks there wasn't a quid pro quo at this point.​

Then around the 35 min mark, Adam White says:

President Trump doesn't get the benefit of the doubt because of "lock her up." . . .​

The problem is, all the conventions of a deference that we afford presidents and the space we give them to use their presidential power; is all contingent upon our vision of what a normal president is and what lawyers sometimes call a presumption of regularity.​

​

President Trump having smashed that box on his way into the office, he and his supporters can't really be offended now when the rest of the system doesn't treat him like a normal president, doesn't give him those benefits of a doubt. We need conventional statesmen in office so that we can trust them...​

Jonah has continued with this thread in one of his latest articles.

Trump’s Best Option for Avoiding Impeachment: An Apology | National Review

The longer the president defends a lie, the more Americans will resent being lied to.

www.nationalreview.com

The president is accused — politically, not criminally — of trying to force the Ukrainian president to tar former vice president Joe Biden with an investigation into his alleged “corruption” in exchange for the release of military aid and a meeting in the Oval Office. I believe a plain reading of the rough transcript of a phone call between Trump and Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky supports the charge. So does testimony from the top American diplomat in Ukraine, William Taylor, as well as several other Trump appointees and aides, including Tuesday’s testimony from Alexander Vindman, a National Security Council staffer who listened to the phone call. There’s still due diligence to be done, but it seems implausible they’re all lying.​

​

Common sense also works against the president. If Trump were sincerely concerned about Ukrainian corruption, why has he never expressed similar concerns about corruption anywhere else? And, why, if the issue is Ukrainian corruption generally, did the Trump administration focus on the alleged corruption of a single Ukrainian firm, Burisma, where Biden’s son sat on the board?​

Oh, and I have a LOT less sympahty for this whole "Why has he never expressed similar concerns?" when freakin' BYRON YORK pointed out that Trump HAS in previous years.

Thinking clearly about Trump and aid to Ukraine

There's been a lot of confusion about what, exactly, President Trump's concerns were before withholding and later approving U.S. military aid to Ukraine. Mick Mulvaney, the acting White House chief of staff, made a hash of things during his much-discussed press conference on Thursday. Media…

www.washingtonexaminer.com

EDIT: OH yeah! Forgot to add. In that podcast above, Jonah is now seriously arguing over whether bringing up the server thing in the call to Ukraine is grounds for the 25th amendment. Like, serious seriously.

 

[heyitsmike]

Yeah and we would sing "Nancy Pelosi is a bitch" based on a well known South Park song.

Or "Three Blind Mice" because Pelosi, Schiff and Nadler are blind as all get out if they can't see that this will end badly for them.

 

[BR55]

so keeping up with the right-wing TDS, I really do feel like the world is going insane...

First up, was listening to Goldberg's podcast where he talks with Adam White. Two quotes I'm going to transcribe.
https://ricochet.com/podcast/remnant-jonah-goldberg/impeachy-keen-democrats/#comments

At the 27ish min mark, I think Jonah all but calls out @It's HK-47 and the rest of this board to a challenge.

Which there was [a quid pro quo]. And I'm willing to fight anybody with sticks who thinks there wasn't a quid pro quo at this point.​

Then around the 35 min mark, Adam White says:

President Trump doesn't get the benefit of the doubt because of "lock her up." . . .​

The problem is, all the conventions of a deference that we afford presidents and the space we give them to use their presidential power; is all contingent upon our vision of what a normal president is and what lawyers sometimes call a presumption of regularity.​

​

President Trump having smashed that box on his way into the office, he and his supporters can't really be offended now when the rest of the system doesn't treat him like a normal president, doesn't give him those benefits of a doubt. We need conventional statesmen in office so that we can trust them...​

Jonah has continued with this thread in one of his latest articles.

Trump’s Best Option for Avoiding Impeachment: An Apology | National Review

The longer the president defends a lie, the more Americans will resent being lied to.

www.nationalreview.com

The president is accused — politically, not criminally — of trying to force the Ukrainian president to tar former vice president Joe Biden with an investigation into his alleged “corruption” in exchange for the release of military aid and a meeting in the Oval Office. I believe a plain reading of the rough transcript of a phone call between Trump and Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky supports the charge. So does testimony from the top American diplomat in Ukraine, William Taylor, as well as several other Trump appointees and aides, including Tuesday’s testimony from Alexander Vindman, a National Security Council staffer who listened to the phone call. There’s still due diligence to be done, but it seems implausible they’re all lying.​

​

Common sense also works against the president. If Trump were sincerely concerned about Ukrainian corruption, why has he never expressed similar concerns about corruption anywhere else? And, why, if the issue is Ukrainian corruption generally, did the Trump administration focus on the alleged corruption of a single Ukrainian firm, Burisma, where Biden’s son sat on the board?​

Oh, and I have a LOT less sympahty for this whole "Why has he never expressed similar concerns?" when freakin' BYRON YORK pointed out that Trump HAS in previous years.

Thinking clearly about Trump and aid to Ukraine

There's been a lot of confusion about what, exactly, President Trump's concerns were before withholding and later approving U.S. military aid to Ukraine. Mick Mulvaney, the acting White House chief of staff, made a hash of things during his much-discussed press conference on Thursday. Media…

www.washingtonexaminer.com

EDIT: OH yeah! Forgot to add. In that podcast above, Jonah is now seriously arguing over whether bringing up the server thing in the call to Ukraine is grounds for the 25th amendment. Like, serious seriously.

My familiarity with Goldberg's thinking leads me to believe that Jonah doesn't think Trump did anything wrong per say...
But instead in true cuckservative fashion thinks that Trump brought it on himself by "provoking" the Left. In other words "Why did the Right make the Left hit them?"
He said a lot of that same crap during the Muller shit as well.
That line of thinking is pretty much the logic of an abuser but what do you expect from a man who thinks that eating the opposition's shit with a smile and asking for more is good political strategy.
You're not at the Harvard Debating Society anymore Jonah, you're in American politics you either fight hard, dirty and to win or you get effortlessly slaughtered like your idol Romney did.

 

[Adamska]

Or "Three Blind Mice" because Pelosi, Schiff and Nadler are blind as all get out if they can't see that this will end badly for them.

Nahh, they're just trying to kick smoke still; they're still too chickenshit and aware it'd demolish them to pull the trigger given that it's not even a full inquiry yet.

 

[Scandinadian Bacon]

Without the media how can I tell if this is shopped or not?
View attachment 992047

Trump Awards Medal Of Bravery To Chewbacca For Heroic Deeds During Battle Of Yavin

WASHINGTON, D.C.—Trump has awarded galactic hero Chewbacca his long-awaited Medal of Bravery for his performance in the Battle of Yavin.The Wookiee had been snubbed by other presidents, who turned him down for the award despite his being nominated numerous times."AMERICAN HERO!" Trump tweeted...

babylonbee.com

Trump later fessed up that he was just having some fun. A court has ruled that having fun is an impeachable offense.

I totally remember this ceremony happening. In fact I think I was the one that took this picture.

So you can consider this confirmed. Also troops out of Yavin when?

 

[MirrorNoir]

This is Cuck News Network.

How a Trump impeachment could lead to a Pelosi presidency

Should Democratic efforts to remove President Trump from office succeed, Vice President Pence would succeed to the presidency -- under normal circumstances. But if Pence, too, were to be impeached and removed from office, we could find ourselves with a President Pelosi, writes Paul Callan.

edition-m.cnn.com

To be fair, it's not a new thing this scenario.

It's the wettest of wet dreams; impeach Trump and Pence with Pence getting removed first so that Pelosi is made VP and once Trump is gone, Pelosi is made the unelected President of the United States.

Most TDS types have downplayed this scenario, because of the implications (IE it makes it irrevocably clear that this is an illegal coup) but the fact that they are talking about it like this, indicates they A. think they can pull it off and B. Need to press the scenario as something that could happen to distract from the fact that impeachment has no actual chance of happening.

 

[AlexJonesGotMePregnant]

I made this for a WW thread but figured it was worth posting here.

 

[Owen Grady]

I mean, someone had to do it.

 

[JambledUpWords]

 

[Dante Alighieri]

Did we ever get past shock and denial?

 

[MembersSchoolPizza]

And how many Democrats voted to impeach Bill Clinton, hmm? Why do these fools constantly act indignant when their political enemies refuse to shoot themselves in the foot?

Five, for the record, although not all of them voted for all of the articles, since there were multiple. Which is another thing this clownshoes shitshow has managed to forget - you can't just "vote to impeach", you have to vote for specific articles seperately. "President Bob did this, this, and this specific thing. Now we're going to vote if we should impeach him on each of those things, separately." Not just "President bob is a poopypants, should we get rid of him?"

 

[Jason "Qriist" Close]

Five, for the record, although not all of them voted for all of the articles, since there were multiple. Which is another thing this clownshoes shitshow has managed to forget - you can't just "vote to impeach", you have to vote for specific articles seperately. "President Bob did this, this, and this specific thing. Now we're going to vote if we should impeach him on each of those things, separately." Not just "President bob is a poopypants, should we get rid of him?"

"President Bob is WORSE than a poopypants!"

 

[The Great Chandler]

View attachment 992799View attachment 992800

I have a feeling he used to post anti-religion content prior to Trump being the new black.

 

[Matthew216]

I’m genuinely not sure how the Left will react to this.

Trump is now officially a Florida resident.

 

[Dante Alighieri]

I’m genuinely not sure how the Left will react to this.

Trump is now officially a Florida resident.

I don't think it means anything super important outside a political statement and a few small tax benefits.

Which means the Democrats are going to react as usual.

 

[Super-Chevy454]

The impeachment attempt from the TDS gang might come to haunt them back. https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/11/dems_impeachment_vote_puts_them_in_big_trouble.html

Dems' impeachment vote puts them in big trouble
By David K. Rehr
Yesterday's partisan House vote to advance the impeachment process is a double-edged sword for Democrats.
Since his surprise election in November 2016, Washington insiders have tried to drive the duly elected president out of office. First, it was based on a connection with Trump business interests and Russia. We endured nearly two years of lawyers amassing testimony and hearing from various witnesses. Americans footed a $40-million tab. There were no charges, and the process turned out to be a turd.

Then Democrats in Congress moved to the president's business interests. Reveal your tax returns. Give us your financial data, has been the cry by partisans. That issue is being resolved in the courts and may not be settled until after the next presidential election. No tab has been placed on this inquiry.
Now we are on to the famous Ukraine phone call. The president is accused of "quid pro quo," asking that the government investigate potential corruption charges against a potential political opponent's son, who may have been benefited financially when Biden was vice president. Hunter Biden was paid $50,000 monthly to sit on a Ukrainian company with no energy experience. His only experience was being the vice president's son. No average American would be even be considered for a position like this. Charges have been made on other potential "sweet deals" in other nations.

President Trump released a transcript of the conversation to clarify an unnamed "whistleblower's" complaint. There was no "quid pro quo" during the call. Ukraine received its aid; no Ukraine inquiry has been opened on the Biden family. But House Democrats won't let it go.
Congressman Adam Schiff, the pit bull for the partisan effort, lied about not knowing about the whistleblower. Apparently, his staff and partisan Democrat lawyers helped draft the complaint. Oh, the whistleblower wasn't actually on the call. He only heard another person's memory of it. Schiff is now holding secret hearings to find disgruntled federal employees who do not share President Trump's politics to give their opinion of the conversation.

It turns out that the whistleblower is a partisan Democrat who was fired from the White House for leaking information to the media. The more we know and the more that is made public, the more frustrated House Democrats must feel.
Meanwhile, President Trump did nothing inappropriate. The committee has apparently over 90 hours of transcript that has not been released to the public. This star chamber has become the star chamber of the century. Rep. Schiff appears to be coaching witnesses and keeps Republicans from asking legitimate questions.

 

[thismanlies]

I’m genuinely not sure how the Left will react to this.

Trump is now officially a Florida resident.

Can’t say I blame him. If I had a few billion dollars to my name and my state was going on fishing expedition after fishing expedition looking for anything even resembling a crime, I’d tell them and their tax department to eat a bucket of dog shit with an ice cream scoop.

 

[Manwithn0n0men]

Can’t say I blame him. If I had a few billion dollars to my name and my state was going on fishing expedition after fishing expedition looking for anything even resembling a crime, I’d tell them and their tax department to eat a bucket of dog shit with an ice cream scoop.

If I had a Billion Dollarydoos I'd live in Nevada, Florida, Texas or Alaska