Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds
- Thread starter trannyfucker
- Start date
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2019
This is just insulting to women. Thinking that your fucking dildos are the EXACT same as an actual penis? And then acting like we’re the sad repressed ones, GTFO troon. I also love how she first says that at least her “dicks” never fail to stay hard but then cries about the only worth men have is being a penis to go in a vagina.
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2018
This is just insulting to women. Thinking that your fucking dildos are the EXACT same as an actual penis? And then acting like we’re the sad repressed ones, GTFO troon. I also love how she first says that at least her “dicks” never fail to stay hard but then cries about the only worth men have is being a penis to go in a vagina.
I wish FTMs could read these hot takes before they get T, so they will at least know they are trading their dating pool for looking superficially like a man
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2019
This is just insulting to women. Thinking that your fucking dildos are the EXACT same as an actual penis? And then acting like we’re the sad repressed ones, GTFO troon. I also love how she first says that at least her “dicks” never fail to stay hard but then cries about the only worth men have is being a penis to go in a vagina.
Bold of her to assume that the average woman whose hetero as all hell doesn't also posses a drawer full of sex toys that serve the exact same purpose without the absolute troonsanity that dating a trans person would entail. There are very very few females who don't have at least one dildo and vibrator of their own and could easily go out and buy more if they so desired YET these same woman also still choose to date and have sex with real men because shockingly silicone and plastic do not compare to flesh and blood.
Strait women want an actual penis, it's what they like. Not a vagina. Not a penis you bought made of plastic. Not one made of stitching pieces of yourself to your crotch to create a frankenweiner. An. Actual. Penis.
Edit: I just wanted to add too that, you know, women also know where their own dicks have been vs. some nasty troon whose first to tout out about their drawerful.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2016
Something Norm MacDonald said on his podcast a couple of years ago has stuck with me. He was setting up a joke about cis-gendered people and the guest asked what is cis-gendered? "Oh it's an attempt to marginalize the majority."
Life isn't fair, suck it up, is a blatant attempt to marginalize real women, to push their interests and concerns to the fringes of acceptable discussion. Comparing the number of real women to fake women shows that fake women ain't shit population wise, even if all fictional women throughout the ages from Eve(of bible fame) to Hermione are added to those numbers real women living right this moment would still vastly outnumber them. But those belonging to the majority don't get to have a say in this, it is the 1% of the 1% that holds the 95% of the gender capital or whatever it can be called in this Bernie Sanders joke.
The risk going forward is that it can kill women's roles in women's sports. Why would a young women put in the time and effort to train for something they know they can never win and there is no future in it? For them it won't be a competition it will just be participation without the participation trophy and the only way to make some money from athletic pursuits will be building their name up by showing their asses on Instagram or general e-thottery. Very progressive.
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2019
Planned Parenthood of New York City Expands Access to Gender Affirming Hormone Therapy Across NYC
https://outline.com/Dpms6b (Archive taking forever, sorry)
Formatting is bad, and I'm too lazy to fix it...
Breitbart is ofc loving it...
Planned Parenthood Expands to Offer Transgender Hormones in New York City
Outline - Read & annotate without distractions
Outline is a free service for reading and annotating news articles. We remove the clutter so you can analyze and comment on the content.outline.com
playing the devils advocate, nothing I would ever do; or suggest to do.
PP tends to service the low/no income the poverty stricken and such, and quite honestly I used to like PP as I'm pro choice and VERY pro free contraceptives to the poor/impoverished/drug addicts etc. I've personally made small donations to them in the past, although this may change that. The point I'm trying to make is PP has typically had a no questions asked policy, anyone who doubts this should see steven crowders video on his transgender persona's trip to PP. Point being if PP is officially now the unvetted easy source for hormones, whats to stop a junkie from going in there scoring some free estrogen, or even more valuable some free testosterone aka steroids and selling it black-market?
This will end badly for troons and society in general. PP used to be about social responsibility in my opinion, that appears to have changed.
- Joined
- May 19, 2018
Pick one. And only one.
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2018
Pssshh
Planned Parenthood has always been about social engineering, not that I disagree entirely with the concept, it's not like we need more crack babies
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2015
There will be the league of penis possessors who get in trouble if they take hormones, and the league of penis possessors who get in trouble if they DON'T take hormones.
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2015
Lol she asks a question & rejects all answers which hurt her troon feelings.
Why did she even ask when she knew there would be "troonphobia"?
Because she wanted to write an article about how oppressed troons are and how ignorant & troobphobic the rest of the world
Salty trooned out lesbian who destroyed her body with testosterone overdoses wants to play the victim.
Seems like there is a hint that she regrets transitioning because she talks about how easy dating was in the past.
Also I love how she doesn't talk about dating mtfs. What a fucking hypocrite.
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2018
if a "no questions asked" policy is most conducive to social responsibility then you don't need to pick one. Like those places you can drop off a baby, no questions asked, to prevent them being abandoned in dumpsters.
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2018
Last edited:
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2019
Those crazy-eyes in the last pic, jesus fucking christ. Those are "I want to wear your skin" eyes.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
That's a rhetorical question, right?
"Would you misgender me? I'd misgender me HARD!"
queue-anon
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2019
This is just insulting to women. Thinking that your fucking dildos are the EXACT same as an actual penis? And then acting like we’re the sad repressed ones, GTFO troon. I also love how she first says that at least her “dicks” never fail to stay hard but then cries about the only worth men have is being a penis to go in a vagina.
Is she saying she'll settle for a pillow princess? Because it's not like she's getting off from sticking a strap-on in another woman. Either she's so deep in her delusion, she's fine never getting hers, or this is the FTM version of the "just the tip" rape rhetoric that MTF trannies use.
Either she wants straight women to get over their "vagina aversion" and go down on her, or she's the type of weirdo who doesn't expect an orgasm during sex. Most people inherently know the former is much more likely than the latter, which is why she's getting no straight female takers.
Has she even tried dating bisexual women, or does her date have to be straight for validation purposes?
Who knew the sexism in sports sponsorships would help women in the long run? There have been a lot of justifiable complaints about sports companies giving more money to hot female athletes than the best female athletes. Since literally no one wants to see a lantern-jaw tranny modeling women's sports apparel, that sexism is the only thing that will deny trannies real monetary gain from their cheating.
Dating? Easy? For lesbians? Since when? I constantly hear how hard it is for lesbians to find each other (which is even worse now that lesbian spaces are infested with both MTF and FTM trannies). It's kind of hard to take her seriously when she makes that claim.
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2019
There are quite a few social programs that only suceed becuase they are no questions asked, things like anonymous narcotics disposal, anonymous firearm disposal. Now I personally love guns and drugs but, I don't want them floating around society unchecked.
LateNightMuffin
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2019
not directly about trannies, but about something the trannies have wrought.
girl raped in 'unisex' bathroom.
great job, trannies.
Sandy High freshman sexually assaulted in school bathroom by another student, $450,000 lawsuit says
girl raped in 'unisex' bathroom.
great job, trannies.
Sandy High freshman sexually assaulted in school bathroom by another student, $450,000 lawsuit says
The mother of a former ninth grader at Sandy High School has filed a $450,000 lawsuit against the Oregon Trail School District, alleging the district failed to protect her daughter from being sexually assaulted in a school bathroom.
The girl, who was 15 at the time, has autism, post traumatic stress disorder and other conditions that “made her more susceptible to being a target of ridicule and harm by other students,” according to the lawsuit filed last month in Clackamas County Circuit Court. The suit says she was learning at a third-grade educational level and was taught in a “confined, one-on-one classroom setting” through the district’s special education program.
The suit alleges that in October 2017, educators changed the girl’s educational plan to remove “line of sight supervision” and to allow her to interact “with the general student population in regular education classes.”
The suit claims shortly after that, another student texted her photos of his genitals. He also took a photo of the girl’s cleavage that he showed to other students and school officials knew about that photo, the suit states.
That same month, the male student told the girl to meet him in a unisex bathroom, where he touched her with his genitals and ejaculated on her, according to the suit. The suit says the girl lacked the capacity to consent, the suit states.
Julia Monteith, the district’s communications director, said the district’s legal counsel "is aware of the claim and will work with the family’s representatives.”
During the alleged sexual assault, the girl was missing from her fifth period class from 13 to 45 minutes — far more than the three to five minutes she was allowed for bathroom breaks, the suit claims. If the girl was gone for longer than that, school officials were supposed to find her, the suit states.
Louren Oliveros, the family’s attorney, said the girl told her family about what happened that day, but it wasn’t until the next day that the school contacted the girl’s mother to inform her of the alleged assault.
The lawsuit doesn’t list the male student’s name, and Oliveros said he was a minor at the time.
Oliveros said police investigated and confiscated the male student’s phone, but she isn’t aware of any criminal charges being filed against him. Oliveros said she doesn’t know whether school officials disciplined the boy, but that’s part of what will be learned through the lawsuit.
-- Aimee Green
The girl, who was 15 at the time, has autism, post traumatic stress disorder and other conditions that “made her more susceptible to being a target of ridicule and harm by other students,” according to the lawsuit filed last month in Clackamas County Circuit Court. The suit says she was learning at a third-grade educational level and was taught in a “confined, one-on-one classroom setting” through the district’s special education program.
The suit alleges that in October 2017, educators changed the girl’s educational plan to remove “line of sight supervision” and to allow her to interact “with the general student population in regular education classes.”
The suit claims shortly after that, another student texted her photos of his genitals. He also took a photo of the girl’s cleavage that he showed to other students and school officials knew about that photo, the suit states.
That same month, the male student told the girl to meet him in a unisex bathroom, where he touched her with his genitals and ejaculated on her, according to the suit. The suit says the girl lacked the capacity to consent, the suit states.
Julia Monteith, the district’s communications director, said the district’s legal counsel "is aware of the claim and will work with the family’s representatives.”
During the alleged sexual assault, the girl was missing from her fifth period class from 13 to 45 minutes — far more than the three to five minutes she was allowed for bathroom breaks, the suit claims. If the girl was gone for longer than that, school officials were supposed to find her, the suit states.
Louren Oliveros, the family’s attorney, said the girl told her family about what happened that day, but it wasn’t until the next day that the school contacted the girl’s mother to inform her of the alleged assault.
The lawsuit doesn’t list the male student’s name, and Oliveros said he was a minor at the time.
Oliveros said police investigated and confiscated the male student’s phone, but she isn’t aware of any criminal charges being filed against him. Oliveros said she doesn’t know whether school officials disciplined the boy, but that’s part of what will be learned through the lawsuit.
-- Aimee Green
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2016
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2018
Should keep eyes on him, might be threadworthy.
Azovka
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2018
I’m just as creeped out with the wardrobe filled with dolls and kids’ toys in the background as I am with the rape-y looking dude.
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2015
School sued for telling six-year-old girl that girls are not real | Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms
OTTAWA: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (www.jccf.ca) is representing a young girl (“NB”) and her mother in an application before the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal against the Ottawa-Carleton District School Board, the child’s former teacher and the principal of the school. The...
www.jccf.ca
School sued for telling six-year-old girl that girls are not real
OTTAWA: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (www.jccf.ca) is representing a young girl (“NB”) and her mother in an application before the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal against the Ottawa-Carleton District School Board, the child’s former teacher and the principal of the school. The family brought the claim for discrimination on the basis of gender identity, for teaching NB and her class there are no such things as girls or boys. NB identifies strongly as a girl.
The amended application includes a claim for discrimination on the basis of sex, and notes the child’s rights to security of the person and equality under sections 7 and 15(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms have also been infringed.
This case has attracted considerable attention in the media, notably in columns by Barbara Kay (here and here), and by University of Toronto Psychology Professor Jordan Peterson.
In the early part of 2018, NB was a 6-year old student in a grade one class taught by “JB”. The teacher showed the class a YouTube video entitled, “He, She, and They?!? – Gender: Queer Kid Stuff #2”. The video contained a number of statements about gender identity, and asserted that “some people aren’t boys or girls” and that those who do not feel like a ‘she’ or a ‘he’ might not have a gender. In order to determine who is a girl or a boy – or neither, the video says, all you have to do is ask someone their pronouns.
On another occasion, JB drew a gender spectrum on the board and asked each student to identify where they fit on the spectrum. NB indicated that she was on the furthest end of the spectrum marked “girl.” JB then told the class that “girls are not real, and boys are not real.” This was extremely upsetting to NB.
NB went home and told her parents, repeatedly asking why her identity as a girl was “not real.” She stated that she was not sure if she wanted to be a mommy when she grew up, and asked if she could “go to the doctor” about this issue. NB also expressed feeling that she “had to do something” about the fact that she is a girl. This followed a lesson by JB on the concepts of gender spectrum and sex changes.
Neither the school nor JB obtained parental consent to teach this young child that her sense of self as a girl was a fiction. JB’s conduct undermined their daughter’s foundational concept of identity, and also contradicted biological reality, the application alleges.
Despite the family’s expression of concern, school officials refused to take any steps to correct the impact of these lessons on NB. Ultimately the family opted to move her to a different school, which made NB happy that she would no longer have a teacher who said that “girls are not real.” Even after moving to the new school, NB continued to be upset by her experience in JB’s class, and grappled with the concept that her own identity was not something real. “This table is real, and this fan is real, and even if the fan was made out of cardboard, it’s still real,” she expressed to her mother, who was concerned enough to seek guidance from a psychologist on how to assist her daughter, according to the application.
“If everyone has a gender identity, and gender identities are protected under the Code, then NB’s gender identity as a girl should be protected,” said Justice Centre staff lawyer Lisa Bildy. “If the School Board can accommodate the inclusion of trans and other gender identities into the classroom setting, then surely they can accommodate the inclusion of children who experience no discord between their biology and their sense of self.”
Some gender theorists and activists now argue not only that “gender identity” is on a spectrum, but that sex is also on a spectrum, meaning that there are no longer distinct categories of male and female. Among other things, the family is asking the Tribunal to award a remedy that the school board stop “teaching gender theory in any manner which suggests that sex categories of male and female do not exist, or are fluid, or exist on a spectrum.”
“To teach otherwise cannot be anything but discrimination on the basis of sex, which is a protected ground,” said Ms. Bildy. “If we cannot describe the physical reality of biological sex, then women can no longer defend their human rights as women.”