(((Richard B. Spencer))) - Child Porn Supporting "Founder" of the "Alt-Right", Cucked by ANTIFA, Soyboy, ALLEGED Wife Beater

That part never made sense to me. Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the Romans let the non-white, non-latin groups in their empire still have rights and jobs?
I was referring to the unintentionally homoerotic nature of Roman society. Freedmen were allowed to participate in the empire, gain citizenship. Eumachia, the Public Priestess of Pompeii, is a good example of it. Aside from the inheritance she received, she made her fortune by herself, eventually becoming an important figure. Pretty impressive for the descendant of former slaves.

Non-white members of the Empire were a thing, too. IIRC there was a discovery of African skeletons in a Roman graveyard in Britain, but they were mostly around the Mediterranean. There were other non-white soldiers and merchants around in Roman Britain, but their numbers were few.
 
I was referring to the unintentionally homoerotic nature of Roman society. Freedmen were allowed to participate in the empire, gain citizenship. Eumachia, the Public Priestess of Pompeii, is a good example of it. Aside from the inheritance she received, she made her fortune by herself, eventually becoming an important figure. Pretty impressive for the descendant of former slaves.

Non-white members of the Empire were a thing, too. IIRC there was a discovery of African skeletons in a Roman graveyard in Britain, but they were mostly around the Mediterranean. There were other non-white soldiers and merchants around in Roman Britain, but their numbers were few.
Ooh, I think you're onto something here. I remember that Spencer even had a Greco-Roman-named, possibly pederast, pyramid scheme. "PHALANX"!
It was for young, aspiring alt-right bois looking for mentorship, and the hard, seasoned, adult altright men willing to groom them. All set in only the most serene, remote, and isolated of bucolic woodland cruising spots, of course.
 
Did he just call Jews octarunes? Doesn't that mean being 1/8th black?
Also fun is 'Quadroon'
How big of a fraction does it have to be before you are "accepted"? Octaroon sounds like a pretty weird thing to be upset about no matter how racist you are. Are you still considered filthy if you are one of those one sixtyfour adroon motherfuckers?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hanamura and Recoil
How big of a fraction does it have to be before you are "accepted"? Octaroon sounds like a pretty weird thing to be upset about no matter how racist you are. Are you still considered filthy if you are one of those one sixtyfour adroon motherfuckers?
"Nigger", "jungle-bunny", "spearchucker", "titsoon", "spade", and "mooly" are all for ignorant unwashed plebs. A sophisticated, old bloodline, classy uppercrust racist like Spencer only uses the most sophisticated and obscure of racial slurs.
 
How big of a fraction does it have to be before you are "accepted"? Octaroon sounds like a pretty weird thing to be upset about no matter how racist you are. Are you still considered filthy if you are one of those one sixtyfour adroon motherfuckers?
Even the equally-exceptional Nuremberg laws didn't consider 1/8th Jews (if both parents were white) as non-German blood and/or citizenship. Then again, part of their purpose was to get rid of Jewish people.
 
What makes you far right? What opinions do you hold to put you into that camp?

If the US has a choice that is good for the US but bad for Israel, should they take it?
i support traditional gender roles, oppose trannys, as pro-gun as they get, support capitalism private healthcare and all, believe that some cultures and races are better than others, want every illegal deported, pro-life, pro free speech

what else do i need?

america first, israel 2nd
 
i support traditional gender roles, oppose trannys, as pro-gun as they get, support capitalism private healthcare and all, believe that some cultures and races are better than others, want every illegal deported, pro-life, pro free speech

I think I'd classify this as the center of right wing (not be confused with center-right). Typically I place the line between far-right and regular-right to be whether they align their interests with an identity. But fair enough, I can see where you're coming from, thanks for answering.
 
i support israel and oppose white supermacy[sic]

some cultures and races are better than others
america first, israel 2nd

I'll fix it for you.
i support israel and their white supermacy[sic]

t some cultures and races are better than others
america first, israel firstest

If you hate being lumped with those wackos into the far right, then stop aligning yourself with the far right and actually stop acting as one.


Typically I place the line between far-right and regular-right to be whether they align their interests with an identity.
This doesn't make much sense to me. The traditional sense or left/right has nothing to do with race (far right=authoritarianism), the modern one also doesn't include race (far right=ancap and going further makes you an egoist).
Nazis who are often called far right were extreme civic nationalists, as long as you align with their statist idealism, you're an honorary. America and Australia had white only immigrations policies that were abolished.

In countries such as China and Japan, it's impossible to get citizenship. For China, if you're Chinese, you have one chance. Japan probably has something similar. Same with Israel and their DNA testing. Uganda even banned miscegenation with Chinese. I won't call any of these countries far right.

At this point, identitarianism deserves its own axis. Also, an identity can be formed around culture, does that make Norway far right since they have assimilation courses? If you want to talk strictly about racial identity, then again, I don't think anyone would call China, Japan, and Israel "far right".
 
Last edited:
i support traditional gender roles, oppose trannys, as pro-gun as they get, support capitalism private healthcare and all, believe that some cultures and races are better than others, want every illegal deported, pro-life, pro free speech

what else do i need?

america first, israel 2nd

That's a lot better than you made it sound initially.

Either way, you might want to read up on the sort of things Israel does (those are all separate links) and why people, right and left, are slowly warming up to the idea of not supporting them. (For transparency's sake, I don't support Palestine or any other country in the Middle East either.)
 
i support traditional gender roles, oppose trannys, as pro-gun as they get, support capitalism private healthcare and all, believe that some cultures and races are better than others, want every illegal deported, pro-life, pro free speech

what else do i need?

america first, israel 2nd
“I oppose white supremacy but some races are better than others.”
Pressing X to doubt
 
i support traditional gender roles, oppose trannys, as pro-gun as they get, support capitalism private healthcare and all, believe that some cultures and races are better than others, want every illegal deported, pro-life, pro free speech

what else do i need?

america first, israel 2nd

I don't think you know what the far right is. They don't like Israel at all and want it gone.
 
That part never made sense to me. Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the Romans let the non-white, non-latin groups in their empire still have rights and jobs?

Yes. Older empires, and even older countries (or countries at their origins), didn't mind a person's color, but their religion. In Spain, some Muslims were allowed to stay after they converted into Christianity. As soon as a person was made Christian, the rules for them changed, even certain slaves. Jews didn't want a conversion, that's why there were many problems with them.

That's, imo, why Spencer is never clear about white identity. IMO, and I could be wrong, I think that he sees whites as only anglos, and they don't share the same religion as Catholics and Orthodox, meaning, his white ethno-state does not imply every white. He's never been asked about this, because not many people pay attention on how important religion is in political movements.

Nobody's scared of this guy. Anywhere. Ever. The only reason people pretend to be scared of him is to justify their own actions, making him an unwitting (?) stool pigeon.

There are a lot of people who are scared of this guy. THere aren't many but they exist. And yes, we can blame media for giving him the importance he doesn't deserve, but some others who are wary of fake news also failed for this lie, e.g. our friend Kraut.

Then you have people like Jeff Holiday, whose crusade started because he was terrified of Spencer gaining traction and fearing he would end up deporting his wife because she's part-black... No, really, he actually has said this.

Thing is, Spencer has, at most, in the whole country, 1000 actual followers who actually believe what he says. And that's not enough to make a movement. Even if, for some miracle, they manage to put one of their people in government, this person will find him or herself blocked by every other normal American who would see this ideology as insanity. There is no way that scenario Holiday speaks about is gonna happen, ever, in USA and, I dare to say, in most sane parts of the world. You can have a few actual white supremacists running around making havoc, but that's not something you can't solve without a good bullet in the groin. There is no way average Americans are gonna shrug and agree with their neighours, friends, relative being deported or harmed just because they aren't white. And, if I'm correct in what I said above, even certain whites will be gone too. White Nationalists aren't very fond of Slavs and PIIGS.

riiiiiiiiiiiight

No jewish involvement in receiving migrant caravans in the US.

Or mass migration.

Jewish Involvement in Shaping American Immigration Policy, 1881-1965: A Historical Review
https://www.jstor.org/stable/27503587

Attitudes About Immigrants by Religious Affiliation
http://archive.li/jdbug#selection-1469.321-1469.343



View attachment 998718

That truck came from Central America, where it's common that people wear that star and or the swastica more as a fashion accesory than a political statement. I've met many people wearing Stars of David as fashion statements without being Jewish. Seem for swastikas. The most likely explanation is that these people are Christian Evangelicals. They use the Star of David too. Not everything is about muh Joos.
 
He's never been asked about this, because not many people pay attention on how important religion is in political movements.
He's asked about this by both Sargon and Styx in their infamous debate though.

Sargon's version was the hilarious one, where he didn't want to answer the response question whether Laurence Fishburn is white.
 
Back