Tacky Clothes of Tumblr

Azafran90 said:
that' just the Barbie Fashionistas line, Mattel's way or saying "uggo mums, you can STFU, here's the ugly realism you wanted!". They're clearly made for the moms because little girls don't even know what body-type they're going to have as adults and they don't care.
My daughter got a fat one once as a present and she was heavily disappointed that she couldn't interchange her clothes with the other dolls...Because, you know, Barbies having all the same body MAY be because they're fucking fashion dolls instead or tools of the patriarchy...

Back on topic:
View attachment 971759
Click to expand...

LOL, it's our own little Womb Wizard.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: THOTHunterAlice, Ellesse_warrior, UnsufficentBoobage and 11 others
Steph really is a trendsetter. ghost celeb/murderer bfs and blue lipstick will be the hottest thing in 2020.

Why are mullets a big thing among genderspecial women? I've been seeing shag haircuts come back which look cute (look on instagram and someone like devon crimson on youtube), but those are more feminine looking. I guess mullets are considered androgynous for them?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Phosphophyllite, HIVidaBoheme, UnsufficentBoobage and 2 others
1573207776449.png
1573207802683.png

That "jumpsuit" cost $200. Would have been fuckin' better to have gone to Dickies and bought a pair of coveralls for a quarter of the price, but since she totally isn't a girl and apparently doesn't mind that the thing doesn't fit, she could go even lower by buying from the men's section!
 
  • Winner
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: tasty humane burger, Star Child, Friendly_AI and 4 others
NoFeline said:
View attachment 1001827View attachment 1001828
That "jumpsuit" cost $200. Would have been fuckin' better to have gone to Dickies and bought a pair of coveralls for a quarter of the price, but since she totally isn't a girl and apparently doesn't mind that the thing doesn't fit, she could go even lower by buying from the men's section!
Click to expand...
And of course, She's wearing the ceremonial ugly glasses of softboihood.
 
  • Like
Reactions: THOTHunterAlice, Star Child and exhausted
the_masked_man said:
who in their right mind would think this shit looks goodView attachment 1001984View attachment 1001986
Click to expand...
I know that complex patterned shirts tend to be classified as "loud" but jesus christ i'm pretty sure the first one is deafening by that metric.

Also i love that the second one is basically a reversed hierarchy of questionable fashion choices

NoFeline said:
View attachment 1001827View attachment 1001828
That "jumpsuit" cost $200. Would have been fuckin' better to have gone to Dickies and bought a pair of coveralls for a quarter of the price, but since she totally isn't a girl and apparently doesn't mind that the thing doesn't fit, she could go even lower by buying from the men's section!
Click to expand...

anyone who thinks a monochrome jumper with no accenting looks good is either mentally unwell or in a cult.
 
  • Agree
  • DRINK!
Reactions: THOTHunterAlice, Parthenos, UnsufficentBoobage and 2 others
Star Child said:
tbh the first one is kinda cute in a tacky way. like i'd wear it ironically. but the second outfit just has no rhyme or reason? it's just a mish mash of different elements of that aesthetic
Click to expand...
The first could easily be a great for a party or go clubbing in. That shirt and skirt compo has some nice colors and form. With right make up and accessories, someone could easily pull off a silly but still pretty nice look.
 
  • Like
  • Optimistic
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: olybinewski, goma, madethistocomment and 3 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back