Shane Holmberg / Shane Presley Holmberg - The Containment Cell for The Breaker of Chairs, Eater of Shoes, Groomer of His Child Bride

[Aria]

Your first statement answers the second. It is wrong to shame any girl/woman based on nothing but their choice of clothing. Do you go out on Halloween night and intentionally slut shame the 7 and 8 year old girls Vic flirts with just because of their costume?

shane answer the damn question.

 

[Kari Kamiya]

Intentionally crossposting because:

Your first statement answers the second. It is wrong to shame any girl/woman based on nothing but their choice of clothing. Do you go out on Halloween night and intentionally slut shame the 7 and 8 year old girls Vic flirts with just because of their costume?

Dear God, I hope he wasn't the one who passed out candy to trick-or-treaters, that he instead remained holed up in his corner so he couldn't auction his child bride at the door.

 

[Shane_Yes_That_One]

@Shane_Yes_That_One W You have any ideas on what Lemoine was fishing for regarding Slatosch? You seemed to think it was worth the effort.

Yes.

What I can tell you though is that he was threatened in many ways by Ty and what Chris told others was not the same story you all heard from Nick.

 

[HighwayStar]

Well to start, when I see a young child in a costume my first thought isn't that it's "revealing". You're a sick fuck.

Did you seriously compare your bullshit wardrobe policy at a convention to Halloween? Like somehow a convention that's supposed to be professionally run with a set of strict rules is the same as what parents allow their children to wear in the outside world? Please get bent.

 

[Duke-Diggler]

Well to start, when I see a young child in a costume my first thought isn't that it's "revealing". You're a sick fuck.

Yeah, you don't mind it being "revealing" because you secretly fap to kids wearing that stuff.

 

[Aria]

Yes.

What I can tell you though is that he was threatened in many ways by Ty and what Chris told others was not the same story you all heard from Nick.

why are you lying shane?

 

[Shane_Yes_That_One]

shane answer the damn question.

I did. Those people whose first thoughts on seeing young children in costumes is "That is revealing" are sick fucks.

why are you lying shane?

If only text message histories didn't exist. But they do. You will see it eventually.

 

[PrinceofAllCucks]

The guy you are referring to was not wearing the shirt. He had it in his bag and pulled it out while being banned. But he is also being banned at lots of shows around Texas so it is bigger than what happened at mine. He apparently already had a history with some of them.

But by your tweets, you had already banned him months before the con had even taken place. Why would you allow someone you had already banned, someone you admit was being banned at a lot of cons around Texas, to continue stalking through the convention? Because you wanted him to spend money before kicking him out of the door? Seems like pretty shady business practice to me.

Edit:

If only text message histories didn't exist. But they do. You will see it eventually.

The last time you tried to release the text messages to help exonerate Ron, all you did was validate Nick's screenshots of the messages. You know what, keep helping. It'll be funnier that way.

 

[Garm]

Yes.

What I can tell you though is that he was threatened in many ways by Ty and what Chris told others was not the same story you all heard from Nick.

Since that deposition isn't going to happen, why don't you spill the beans? Clearly you have evidence of something egregious happening.

 

[Aria]

If only text message histories didn't exist. But they do. You will see it eventually.

press x to doubt.

 

[HighwayStar]

Since that deposition isn't going to happen, why don't you spill the beans? Clearly you have evidence of something egregious happening.

Yeah tell us something you know, Shane. Or perhaps you're going to resort to the classic method of evading questions like you've done in the past.

 

[Duke-Diggler]

I did. Those people whose first thoughts on seeing young children in costumes is "That is revealing" are sick fucks.

Sick for not whoring out your children? Can we call chris hansen and see if you're actually a child molester?

Yes.

What I can tell you though is that he was threatened in many ways by Ty and what Chris told others was not the same story you all heard from Nick.

You seem to conflate "criticism" with "threats" an awful lot. Real life is not twitter, faggot.

 

[Shane_Yes_That_One]

But by your tweets, you had already banned him months before the con had even taken place. Why would you allow someone you had already banned, someone you admit was being banned at a lot of cons around Texas, to continue stalking through the convention? Because you wanted him to spend money before kicking him out of the door? Seems like pretty shady business practice to me.

Nah. Our reg just sucked and let him in. We didn't have his picture plastered everywhere or anything so the person who let him in didn't get the notification.

 

[teriyakiburns]

You will see it eventually.

Like we've never heard that one before. Find a new tune, Shane.

 

[Shane_Yes_That_One]

Yeah tell us something you know, Shane. Or perhaps you're going to resort to the classic method of evading questions like you've done in the past.

Who said it wasn't going to happen? Stop listening to Nick. Don't even trust me, wait till the transcript. Chupp said not right now, not that it was never going to happen.

 

[FadeIntoObsurity]

Yes.

What I can tell you though is that he was threatened in many ways by Ty and what Chris told others was not the same story you all heard from Nick.

Please enlighten us on how he was "threatened". Because I'm not sure if you and your pals understand what threats really are. Also you need to be more specific. Being vague only shows you're trying to mislead.

Also, there are clothes out there that many adults would deem inappropriate for children to wear. Stripper wear is one of those things... So saying people not wanting to see kids in those types of clothes as being "sick" just shows how twisted you really are. It isn't normal...

 

[Shane_Yes_That_One]

press x to doubt.

There are much better ones.

 

[PrinceofAllCucks]

Nah. Our reg just sucked and let him in. We didn't have his picture plastered everywhere or anything so the person who let him in didn't get the notification.

You knew about him months beforehand. You're telling me, with your supposed blacklists that every con apparently has, you didn't notify staff about banned individuals so that they can't get in and cause a scene?
Edit:

There are much better ones.

View attachment 1003617

This is seriously all you have? The messages you posted before about Ty literally doing his job as Vic's lawyer to get discovery against the defendants? You know that if he didn't comply Ty would've just subpoenaed him for the material, because that's how you retrieve discovery, right? This is literally nothing.

 

[Duke-Diggler]

Nah. Our reg just sucked and let him in. We didn't have his picture plastered everywhere or anything so the person who let him in didn't get the notification.

You had control of the con and are responsible for managing registrations. You explicitly and publicly banned ONE specific person, and you somehow can't fathom actually barring him from entering?

Do you really have control of the con? Or do you actually just pretend you do while stuffing your face full of shoes?

 

[Kari Kamiya]

Yeah tell us something you know, Shane. Or perhaps you're going to resort to the classic method of evading questions like you've done in the past.