Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

If you thought regular trannies were delusional, incel trannies are even more delusional.
Found this gem on r/trannymaxxing.
LOL
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20191110_223537.jpg
    Screenshot_20191110_223537.jpg
    232.2 KB · Views: 640
  • Screenshot_20191110_223609.jpg
    Screenshot_20191110_223609.jpg
    389.7 KB · Views: 666
  • Screenshot_20191110_223626.jpg
    Screenshot_20191110_223626.jpg
    397.5 KB · Views: 660
  • Screenshot_20191110_223640.jpg
    Screenshot_20191110_223640.jpg
    358.8 KB · Views: 640
  • Screenshot_20191110_223659.jpg
    Screenshot_20191110_223659.jpg
    348.7 KB · Views: 532
  • Screenshot_20191110_223713.jpg
    Screenshot_20191110_223713.jpg
    387.6 KB · Views: 519
  • Screenshot_20191110_223726.jpg
    Screenshot_20191110_223726.jpg
    390 KB · Views: 499
  • Screenshot_20191110_223742.jpg
    Screenshot_20191110_223742.jpg
    383.4 KB · Views: 446
  • Screenshot_20191110_223803.jpg
    Screenshot_20191110_223803.jpg
    339.3 KB · Views: 571
Wow. Sometimes the tubby ones can almost pass as unfortunate looking frumpy women. This guy has had (according to his recent posts) a brow lift, chin and jaw shaving, forehead made smaller, hair transplant, nose job, eye lift and buccal fat removal and he's not even approaching the level of homely frump. If he actually lost weight I think he'd look even worse.

Also the hair removal and transplant did not work, like at all.

I wonder how much money he's blown on this pipe dream transition fantasy, and I wonder even more if he thinks it's been worth it.

I've made a previous post about this dude's FFS journey here: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/reddits-trans-community.33028/page-535#post-5454688

The surgeon who took his money and accomplished that has to be either delusional about his own competence levels or a sociopath. Probably the latter.
 
What is it with troons having the plebiest taste in media?

And more then then that, what is it about them that makes said media make them think they're troons in the first place?

Like... do they watch the series with the magical girl lesbian bears and it just clicks on such a level they'll sign whatever is in front of them at the consent clinic?
 
/u/Jasminetg has had full FFS, HRT, Spironolactane, breast implants, laser hair removal, 120 hours of electrolysis, hairline advancement, and this is the end result. They went to Argentina to get FFS done, and it doesn't even look like the surgeon did much. He looks the same. He's also pretty fat, and has been transitioning for over 2 year, consistent level of fatness. How can you go let some Argentinian dude hack up your face but you can't diet?


His band size is 46! The average American woman is a 34 lol.


He tried to go shopping for his 46A bra.


If you don't know what this means, his width is massive, and he has no chest. A is the second smallest size that most brands probably don't even carry.

This is his beautiful womanly voice. He's had professional voice coaching.


They're also obsessed with Victorian gowns and sexually aroused by the idea of becoming a porcelain doll. They had a post about how they dream of becoming a centaur, mermaid, doll, bimbo, a snake. I think he deleted it after the itsafetish post.


Proof is the flair in MTF matches the itsafetish post.


He used to be a cross dresser.


He started transitions because of the Disney movie Frozen.


Blanchard wrote this guy's biography!
If he would have chose fitness and maybe a facelift to handle those jowls he could have been a decent-looking guy. How unpleasant and depressing it must to have to wear all that makeup and a wig all the time and end up with that result. Why go through all that and not focus on fitness?
 
Wow. Sometimes the tubby ones can almost pass as unfortunate looking frumpy women. This guy has had (according to his recent posts) a brow lift, chin and jaw shaving, forehead made smaller, hair transplant, nose job, eye lift and buccal fat removal and he's not even approaching the level of homely frump. If he actually lost weight I think he'd look even worse.

Also the hair removal and transplant did not work, like at all.
[/QUOTE]

I don't think laser hair removal worked on him because it works best on light-skinned people with dark hair. Light skin/light hair is a no go and so is dark skin/dark hair. The lasers destroy the melanin in the hair follicle. So it didn't work because his hair is grey.

Looking at an old picture of him, you can kind of see the differences from FFS, but he still doesn't look like a female.


Before https://i.redd.it/2oh6xivnymu21.jpg

After https://i.redd.it/1ozh3ukyndv31.png
 
View attachment 1004032

I'm beginning to notice more and more trans people on dumb internet comments calling people who disagree with them "transphobic science deniers."

The "transphobic" label is nothing new, but "science deniers" is what's confounding to me. When asked to elaborate, rather than elaborate, they invariably insist that the person they're arguing with should read Wikipedia without so much as pointing at an article to read, coupled with the tried-and-true method of saying it's not their job to support their own arguments.

It really seems like they're just trying to repurpose the arguments they're normally faced with as their own. Except they don't understand why people call them "science deniers" and just assume they can use that for their own means without needing to justify or explain it. Calling those in favor of transitioning "science deniers" has basis in reality, and it's almost tiring how often the people calling them that will point to chromosomes or prenatal development. Yet when those in favor of transitioning call their opponents "science denier," they just end it there, and I'd rather see the same reasoning being repeated ad nauseam than zero reasoning being used at all.
the troons are right on this one.

it's simple, really: academics in meme fields like sociology and its various offshoots and sub-fields (womens studies and gender studies in particular) have decided that gender is a fluid spectrum and all trans people are valid, so if you say anything to the contrary you are literally contradicting the findings of established scientists and experts in the field, which makes you a science denier.

for me personally this isnt a big deal because i consider all social 'science' to be nothing but ideology and politics with no relation to actual reality or scientific inquiry, but if you (like most people) consider social science real science then you have no real option but to submit to the troons, otherwise you're a literal science denier on par with anti-vaxers and flat earth loons.
 
the troons are right on this one.

it's simple, really: academics in meme fields like sociology and its various offshoots and sub-fields (womens studies and gender studies in particular) have decided that gender is a fluid spectrum and all trans people are valid, so if you say anything to the contrary you are literally contradicting the findings of established scientists and experts in the field, which makes you a science denier.

for me personally this isnt a big deal because i consider all social 'science' to be nothing but ideology and politics with no relation to actual reality or scientific inquiry, but if you (like most people) consider social science real science then you have no real option but to submit to the troons, otherwise you're a literal science denier on par with anti-vaxers and flat earth loons.
That's only true insofar that they'll say you deny "science," but falls apart when they also say you fail to understand biology as well.

Fields such as sociology and psychology are seen as "soft sciences" and there is a lot of genuine elitism in academia stemming from those who study fields like chemistry or engineering. If I remember correctly, both sociology and psychology are also covered under "arts" rather than "sciences" in most universities. That doesn't devalue their legitimacy, but a majority of what is theorized in sociology and psychology are post hoc and unfalsifiable. When pitted against something with predictive and demonstrative results such as biology, you get an argument which resembles a creationist debating an evolutionary biologist. In short, both are technically "sciences," but one is significantly more impactful and reliable than the other, hence why it is conversely called a "hard science."

Either way, them calling people "science deniers" is an overwhelmingly vague counter if that's the route they want to take with that argument, and is an incredibly dubious one at that. Yet if that's their approach, then saying that the people they're arguing against also fail to grasp biology is just outright wrong in that regard. In other words, it's just a stupid thing to say and falls apart like paper mache in water when scrutinized, so it's baffling to me why this kind of argument is spreading like wildfire.
 
That's only true insofar that they'll say you deny "science," but falls apart when they also say you fail to understand biology as well.

Fields such as sociology and psychology are seen as "soft sciences" and there is a lot of genuine elitism in academia stemming from those who study fields like chemistry or engineering. If I remember correctly, both sociology and psychology are also covered under "arts" rather than "sciences" in most universities. That doesn't devalue their legitimacy, but a majority of what is theorized in sociology and psychology are post hoc and unfalsifiable. When pitted against something with predictive and demonstrative results such as biology, you get an argument which resembles a creationist debating an evolutionary biologist. In short, both are technically "sciences," but one is significantly more impactful and reliable than the other, hence why it is conversely called a "hard science."

Either way, them calling people "science deniers" is overwhelmingly vague counter if that's the route they want to take with that argument, and is an incredibly dubious one at that. Yet if that's their approach, then saying that the people they're arguing against also fail to grasp biology is just outright wrong in that regard. In other words, it's just a stupid thing to say and falls apart like paper mache in water when scrutinized, so it's baffling to me why this kind of argument is spreading like wildfire.
These are the same people who will say troons have female brains and point to that one study where trannies scored within normal range, at the edge but within normal range, as men. Shockingly their results coincided closely with gay men iirc. That's if they even know about the study. You hear that shit repeated ad nauseum without anything to back it up.
 
Why? WHY is it always blue fucking lipstick? The one lipstick color that never matches anything. As if it wasn't bad enough, this one also looks like they've been on a special vegan diet for 3 years.
You know, breaking beauty standards yada yada...
Even though their existence is already breaking beauty standards.
 
Back