Community Tard Baby General (includes brain dead kids) - Fundies and their genetic Fuckups; Parents of corpses in denial

Harlequin babies are fucking horrifying and it may not be in the vein of this thread but I honestly feel bad for any mother who has to go through nine months or so of pregnancy to have a harlequin fetus come out. "Here maam do you want to hold your baby?" "*dinosaur scream noises and sobbing*" I saw one in my friends mom's medical textbook when I was like 10 and look how I ended up, Im posting on Kiwi Farms.
Not to mention the fact that unless they have other defects they will be 100% mentally normal. It's like with progeria, you realize from a very early age that you're freakishly deformed, and while there's a lot that can be done in the modern day, at the end of the day your physical appearance is still fucked. It's incredibly depressing, and I imagine it's painful even with being continuously caked in grease.

At least the Hartley's weren't aware they were mutants, and Jaxon doesn't have enough brain to know he barely even has a brain.
 
HI is was definitely incompatible with life until the last forty years or so when they studied what the issues were and came up with ways to treat it. I think the first surviving infants with HI were born in 1980s in the USA.

Honestly, given the life of pain (fuck off doctors with your mincing 'discomfort'), the horrific appearance and highly limited lifestyle even when properly treated, I'd rather die at birth and risk reincarnation as an earthworm.

I don't really get this modern culture of lIfE aT aNy cOsT!!! regrading severe congenital disability, when it basically sentences people to nothing but shortened lives of pain and misery which then in modern society, we're all supposed to admire and give awards to the sufferers out of ... what, guilt? Oh, such courage! It's not like charging into a gun nest to take out the enemy, living with those disabilities isn't a matter of courage, it's your life, you didn't choose it, you can't change it or swap it for somehting easier, where the fuck does courage come into it? Endurance, maybe, slapping on a fake smile, yeah, but courage, give it a fucking rest you overcompensating fucks.

I take great exception to parents who put their animal, primate need to breed over the actual quality of life of whatever messes they produce too. Like the girl I mentioned with four dead HI siblings .. fuck those parents. Why the fuck WOULD you choose to risk it and plop out these messes time and time again? Sterilization or abortion should be a fucking DUTY when you have such fucked genetics as a couple. I mean, fuck off and get a tubal and a vasectomy between you and just stop foisting pain on your broken progeny and escalating medical and welfare costs on society.
 
Honestly, given the life of pain (fuck off doctors with your mincing 'discomfort'), the horrific appearance and highly limited lifestyle even when properly treated, I'd rather die at birth and risk reincarnation as an earthworm.

It would be better to be a functional earthworm and live a normal earthworm life and ultimately drown in the rain or be eaten by a mole or something than to be a monster with an artificially extended life of shit, agony and seizures.
 
they used to think it wasn't compatible with life, but you just have to use an industrial amount of moisturizers and baths to keep them from gettng cracked skin. The kids usually lose the ends of their fingers from skin constricting the blood flow, but they aren't mentally exceptional any more often than other children. They can have lives that contribute to society (or decide to end it all, whatever). I watched a documentary about a woman with a hartley esque story of having one baby with HI, and then she decided with her husband to try again and accept any outcome, which was another kid with HI who also had cerebral palsy. Whoops. To be fair, they couldn't detect the condition in utero like they did with lola hartley. It was super creepy because they were deformed and british.

anyway, I was on twitter looking for more updates on the custody fight with the "trans" kid in texas, and texas right to life groups tried to piggyback a kid being taken off of life support onto the save james hashtag.


this is a horrible case.

tl;dr is this kid has serious heart/lung problems and will die without a permanent ventilator. They dope the kid up so they won't pull out the vent, and when they go off the drugs the kid is in pain. They have done many surgeries to try and fix the underlying problem and nothing has worked. The child is 9 months old and has spent their entire life in intensive care, almost all of it under heavy sedation. The hospital tried to get 20 different facilities to take the kid and none would. I am guessing the next stop is new jersey or some other place where you can put people in human filing cabinets. Eventually the ability of the drugs to sedate is going to have diminishing returns and I guess their mom will restrain them or something? 9 months is an awfully long time to be drugged, they have brain damage from lack of stimulus if nothing else. This is a weird case where keeping them alive will make them exceptional.
Jesus Christ these pro-lifers are stupid AF. 0A711456-4E4F-4200-AEA1-C16E20FAA178.jpeg
Someone said in this thread earlier New Jersey has closed that loophole. If she is allowed to live, the continued care at the level required would probably bankrupt a facility. I would be surprised if any can be found.
 
Jesus Christ these pro-lifers are stupid AF. View attachment 1007649
Someone said in this thread earlier New Jersey has closed that loophole. If she is allowed to live, the continued care at the level required would probably bankrupt a facility. I would be surprised if any can be found.

Prepare your MOTI ratings everyone cause here is an open letter to pro-lifers.

Dear guano insane pro-lifers,

If you are anti-vaxx (which by the way only provides immunization against diseases and only a very, very, very small fraction of the population cannot get/handle vaccines due to poor immune systems or are allergic to one of the ingredients, therefore they rely on herd immunization to keep themselves healthy) yet want beyond horribly disfigured things that barely constitute as human to be born, then you aren't pro-life you are pro-birth. Also I suggest all of you try out a windex cocktail, they are quite delicious.

Sincerely,

Me.
 
Prepare your MOTI ratings everyone cause here is an open letter to pro-lifers.

Dear guano insane pro-lifers,

If you are anti-vaxx (which by the way only provides immunization against diseases and only a very, very, very small fraction of the population cannot get/handle vaccines due to poor immune systems or are allergic to one of the ingredients, therefore they rely on herd immunization to keep themselves healthy) yet want beyond horribly disfigured things that barely constitute as human to be born, then you aren't pro-life you are pro-birth. Also I suggest all of you try out a windex cocktail, they are quite delicious.

Sincerely,

Me.
Let's face it, they blatantly reveal themselves to be pro-birth every time they pressure women in a lousy position to raise children who are considering abortion by pretending they'll totally help her once it's born. And then leave her to her own devices before the placenta comes out. And since they were promised all this help they never even considered putting the kid(s) up for adoption. I wish there was a way to give more awareness for the women these scumbags lie to and put in this position. Ironically, the thing that raised considerable awareness of this for me/my classmates was a video in abstinence-only sex ed.
 
Let's face it, they blatantly reveal themselves to be pro-birth every time they pressure women in a lousy position to raise children who are considering abortion by pretending they'll totally help her once it's born. And then leave her to her own devices before the placenta comes out. And since they were promised all this help they never even considered putting the kid(s) up for adoption. I wish there was a way to give more awareness for the women these scumbags lie to and put in this position. Ironically, the thing that raised considerable awareness of this for me/my classmates was a video in abstinence-only sex ed.

Off topic and a possible PL: that reminds me of when I had eighth grade sex ed that was abstinence only and I asked how abortions worked, the teacher just said 'it's a terrible thing' but didn't answer how it worked. So when I got home to my pro-life mom and asked how they perform it she gave me a straight forward answer that explained it. No avoiding the question, no beating around the bush, just a straightforward "Vacuum out the fetus".

tl;dr my fucking parents explained sex ed better than my teacher did and that concerns me.
 
Off topic and a possible PL: that reminds me of when I had eighth grade sex ed that was abstinence only and I asked how abortions worked, the teacher just said 'it's a terrible thing' but didn't answer how it worked. So when I got home to my pro-life mom and asked how they perform it she gave me a straight forward answer that explained it. No avoiding the question, no beating around the bush, just a straightforward "Vacuum out the fetus".

tl;dr my fucking parents explained sex ed better than my teacher did and that concerns me.
Tbf, based on my knowledge of the American education system (source: the film Mean Girls, mostly), that’s pretty standard.
From what I remember, the U.K. had ok sex ed, but it was more putting condoms on fake dicks for a laugh, rather than in-depth explanations of abortions.

Though, with all our recent mostly dead babies kept alive for the sake of rabid protesters, maybe it doesn’t make much difference.
 
Tbf, based on my knowledge of the American education system (source: the film Mean Girls, mostly), that’s pretty standard.
From what I remember, the U.K. had ok sex ed, but it was more putting condoms on fake dicks for a laugh, rather than in-depth explanations of abortions.

Though, with all our recent mostly dead babies kept alive for the sake of rabid protesters, maybe it doesn’t make much difference.
Maybe it varies from place to place, but for me they didn't even bother to explain how a single-celled egg turns into a baby. All actual informative sex related questions and topics weren't considered "need to know" information, because abstinence-only sex ed is being shown pictures of STD-ridden genitals and videos of struggling, poor, single moms and being told this will happen every time we have sex.

The worst thing though it biology classes weren't allowed to cover how a single-celled egg turns into a baby (human or otherwise) either, even though it was covered in the textbook to transition from studying single-celled organisms to more complicated lifeforms. We just skipped over those pages straight to multi-cellular organisms, and I don't doubt it has everything to do with how abstinence-only sex ed was given a monopoly on a subject they don't even cover.
 
Let's face it, they blatantly reveal themselves to be pro-birth every time they pressure women in a lousy position to raise children who are considering abortion by pretending they'll totally help her once it's born. And then leave her to her own devices before the placenta comes out. And since they were promised all this help they never even considered putting the kid(s) up for adoption. I wish there was a way to give more awareness for the women these scumbags lie to and put in this position. Ironically, the thing that raised considerable awareness of this for me/my classmates was a video in abstinence-only sex ed.

Speking of adoption, which is always touted as the alternative to abortion? They DESPISE women who willingly give up their pwecious baby. They like the idea of some 'childless couple' getting a nice normal, healthy fresh from the oven kiddo (rare as hen's teeth now, most adoptees are awful FAS messes wrangled from their alky/junkie mothers far too late and the like), but the actual mother? Fuck her, she's a non-woman for not clinging and moo-crying herself into an aneurysm or suicidal ideation at the thought of giving up a child. The judgement is HUGE for not 'falling in wuv' with said baby and wanting to keep it. I've heard enough gross single mother cows backpatting themselves and each other for keeping their unhappy accidents from various one-nighters and three month serious 'relationships' to know how it goes:

"i cOUlD NeVaH mY cHiDRUn are mAh LYFE!" (because you have no life of your own because you threw it away multiple times by ill-considered birthing with feckless useless men)
"wHat iS WRONG with ANY WOmAn wHo cAn gIVe up Her CHYLD????"
"sHe dOeSn'T kNow WhAT lOVE IS!"
"no rEAL WomAN cUd gIve Up thur BaYbEEEEEE!"

They are massive, emotionally driven mongs at every juncture and adoption is no different. They get really MAD at any woman who doesn't choose their grim lifestyles because they feel she got away with something while they had to suffer, and that just will not do.
 
Speking of adoption, which is always touted as the alternative to abortion? They DESPISE women who willingly give up their pwecious baby. They like the idea of some 'childless couple' getting a nice normal, healthy fresh from the oven kiddo (rare as hen's teeth now, most adoptees are awful FAS messes wrangled from their alky/junkie mothers far too late and the like), but the actual mother? Fuck her, she's a non-woman for not clinging and moo-crying herself into an aneurysm or suicidal ideation at the thought of giving up a child. The judgement is HUGE for not 'falling in wuv' with said baby and wanting to keep it.

I read a book once, a study of women who got pregnant out of wedlock and placed their babies for adoption in the pre Roe vs Wade era. It was just absolutely horrifying because as you said, the birth mothers got nothing but judgment, no support, no acknowledgement of the terrible loss they endured.

They were just expected to pretend this unintended pregnancy followed by adoption didn’t happen and the baby didn’t exist. Obviously this didn’t work and many of these women were essentially ruined for life by the experience of being more or less forced to give away their baby and then never speak of it again.

One woman who was interviewed for the book, after placing her firstborn for adoption she married and had more kids and raised them. One of those kids got cancer and died age 13. The mom said the loss of the 13yo to cancer was actually more bearable than the loss of her firstborn baby to adoption. Because at least she knew her 13yo was dead, not lost or sad or suffering, and could go to talk to her grave, but she had no idea what happened to her first baby, was it happy, was it loved?
 
MINNEAPOLIS (WCCO) — Last weekend was opening weekend for deer rifle hunters in Minnesota — and it was a hunt to remember for a Twin Cities family.

Nineteen-year-old Pierce Pennaz has Down syndrome, and thanks to a new law he was able to go hunting with his dad and bag his first buck in Jackson County.

“We got up Saturday morning, early, 5 a.m. We got Pierce roused out of bed, got him dressed for the weather,” said Steve Pennaz.

Despite being under the weather, Pierce and his dad waited for hours before a six-point buck happened by.

“I had no idea where it came from. All I know is I said, ‘Pierce, there’s a buck,’” said Steve. “He had about a 120-yard shot, which is a long shot for a 20-gauge, and he made a perfect hit on the deer.”

It was a magical moment dad and son weren’t able to share a year ago. Pierce was part of an apprentice program where you can hunt with a parent or guardian for two years. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources told Steve that to be able to hunt after that, his son needed to pass a firearms safety course. So Steve asked for help, hoping for a way Pierce could continue to hunt with him.

“I wanted to extend the apprentice period so that when we hunt, he’s right here,” said Steve.

Thanks to Rep. Jim Nash of Waconia and other lawmakers, a bill extending the apprentice program became law last spring — and that had Pierce looking forward to fall.

“Pierce was screaming, ‘I got him! I got him! I did it! I did it!’” said Steve.

It wasn’t a trophy buck, but for father and son, it was still a treasure. The video of Pierce’s first deer spread across Facebook.

“I woke up Sunday morning and I admit I was crying,” said Steve. “I just said what an amazing experience, and what an amazing young man.”
 
MINNEAPOLIS (WCCO) — Last weekend was opening weekend for deer rifle hunters in Minnesota — and it was a hunt to remember for a Twin Cities family.

Nineteen-year-old Pierce Pennaz has Down syndrome, and thanks to a new law he was able to go hunting with his dad and bag his first buck in Jackson County.

“We got up Saturday morning, early, 5 a.m. We got Pierce roused out of bed, got him dressed for the weather,” said Steve Pennaz.

Despite being under the weather, Pierce and his dad waited for hours before a six-point buck happened by.

“I had no idea where it came from. All I know is I said, ‘Pierce, there’s a buck,’” said Steve. “He had about a 120-yard shot, which is a long shot for a 20-gauge, and he made a perfect hit on the deer.”

It was a magical moment dad and son weren’t able to share a year ago. Pierce was part of an apprentice program where you can hunt with a parent or guardian for two years. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources told Steve that to be able to hunt after that, his son needed to pass a firearms safety course. So Steve asked for help, hoping for a way Pierce could continue to hunt with him.

“I wanted to extend the apprentice period so that when we hunt, he’s right here,” said Steve.

Thanks to Rep. Jim Nash of Waconia and other lawmakers, a bill extending the apprentice program became law last spring — and that had Pierce looking forward to fall.

“Pierce was screaming, ‘I got him! I got him! I did it! I did it!’” said Steve.

It wasn’t a trophy buck, but for father and son, it was still a treasure. The video of Pierce’s first deer spread across Facebook.

“I woke up Sunday morning and I admit I was crying,” said Steve. “I just said what an amazing experience, and what an amazing young man.”

If you decide that it would be a fantastic idea to let a tard shoot a gun- then I'm sorry to say that you deserve to get shot by said tard.
 
Tbf, based on my knowledge of the American education system (source: the film Mean Girls, mostly), that’s pretty standard.
From what I remember, the U.K. had ok sex ed, but it was more putting condoms on fake dicks for a laugh, rather than in-depth explanations of abortions.

Though, with all our recent mostly dead babies kept alive for the sake of rabid protesters, maybe it doesn’t make much difference.

I teach sex ed in the UK in both a science classes and PSHE (social health) classes and I'd say the UK is pretty good for sex ed. In science it's part of the curriculum to learn about the menstrual cycle, how the zygote develops into the foetus and what happens at each stage of growth. It's also part of the curriculum to learn about genes and genetic counciling when the kids get to GCSE (13-16 years old). I guess it depends on the teacher and how comfortable they are with answering a teenager's question about reproduction but a lot of good information is in the core curriculum that all kids have to learn.
 
MINNEAPOLIS (WCCO) — Last weekend was opening weekend for deer rifle hunters in Minnesota — and it was a hunt to remember for a Twin Cities family.

Nineteen-year-old Pierce Pennaz has Down syndrome, and thanks to a new law he was able to go hunting with his dad and bag his first buck in Jackson County.

“We got up Saturday morning, early, 5 a.m. We got Pierce roused out of bed, got him dressed for the weather,” said Steve Pennaz.

Despite being under the weather, Pierce and his dad waited for hours before a six-point buck happened by.

“I had no idea where it came from. All I know is I said, ‘Pierce, there’s a buck,’” said Steve. “He had about a 120-yard shot, which is a long shot for a 20-gauge, and he made a perfect hit on the deer.”

It was a magical moment dad and son weren’t able to share a year ago. Pierce was part of an apprentice program where you can hunt with a parent or guardian for two years. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources told Steve that to be able to hunt after that, his son needed to pass a firearms safety course. So Steve asked for help, hoping for a way Pierce could continue to hunt with him.

“I wanted to extend the apprentice period so that when we hunt, he’s right here,” said Steve.

Thanks to Rep. Jim Nash of Waconia and other lawmakers, a bill extending the apprentice program became law last spring — and that had Pierce looking forward to fall.

“Pierce was screaming, ‘I got him! I got him! I did it! I did it!’” said Steve.

It wasn’t a trophy buck, but for father and son, it was still a treasure. The video of Pierce’s first deer spread across Facebook.

“I woke up Sunday morning and I admit I was crying,” said Steve. “I just said what an amazing experience, and what an amazing young man.”
Why was this even reported? It’s not exactly going to be a feel good piece to a normal person and it doesn’t really... say much about anything.
I can’t imagine who would be positively moved outside of their very local community and maybe other sped warrior parents who like hunting.
 
I don't think there's anything wrong with intellectually disabled people hunting as long as they pass safety courses and whatnot, but I don't see why it should be news either. "Inspiration porn" is the term the disability community uses for shit like this, and they tend to consider it patronizing and obnoxious.
 
I don't think there's anything wrong with intellectually disabled people hunting as long as they pass safety courses and whatnot, but I don't see why it should be news either. "Inspiration porn" is the term the disability community uses for shit like this, and they tend to consider it patronizing and obnoxious.
What I took out of it was their son could NOT pass the safety course so the extension of this apprenticeship was the only means he could still hunt. Thats unsafe for not only everyone there, but the son as well. They kinda tried to hide that portion though....
 
I teach sex ed in the UK in both a science classes and PSHE (social health) classes and I'd say the UK is pretty good for sex ed. In science it's part of the curriculum to learn about the menstrual cycle, how the zygote develops into the foetus and what happens at each stage of growth. It's also part of the curriculum to learn about genes and genetic counciling when the kids get to GCSE (13-16 years old). I guess it depends on the teacher and how comfortable they are with answering a teenager's question about reproduction but a lot of good information is in the core curriculum that all kids have to learn.
This is exactly what I learned in 7th grade health/ sex ed decades ago in the Bible Belt. The US had gone backwards, I see.
 
Back