Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.

The order Judge Chupp signed says that the defendants can ask about Chris Slatosch again at the hearing on November 21st. If the hearing is pushed back to a later date, do they still get to do that?

1573886087100.png


Edit: guys at BHBC, could you please get a grip on the typos? It's a 2 page motion, proofreading isn't hard.

Ryan Sellers is a bigger boomer than Ty.

1573891378083.png

1573891388779.png

1573891401504.png

1573891414170.png

1573891432436.png
 
Last edited:
The order Judge Chupp signed says that the defendants can ask about Chris Slatosch again at the hearing on November 21st. If the hearing is pushed back to a later date, do they still get to do that?

View attachment 1011870
Fairly certain that they would still have the right to do so, even if the date of the hearing is moved. Unless I'm mistaken and it's hard locked to the 21st, cause then I'd be laughing until the new year.
 
I'm anticipating a domino effect with Slatosch: MoRonica can ride the 'believe wahmen' narrative until enough people are brought in under guilt by association with Vic, then it becomes a problem of now this won't get solved unless Chupp sacks up.
 
  • Horrifying
Reactions: ConSluttant
The order Judge Chupp signed says that the defendants can ask about Chris Slatosch again at the hearing on November 21st. If the hearing is pushed back to a later date, do they still get to do that?

View attachment 1011870



Ryan Sellers is a bigger boomer than Ty.

View attachment 1011897
View attachment 1011898
View attachment 1011899
View attachment 1011900
View attachment 1011901

That is Chupp torture. They told him he'd only have to read 2 pages, but then there's three. And then four. And then wtf is solo??

Chupp will be crying by the end of that document, just because he had to do almost three times the amount of reading that he thought he would. Or he'll stop on page two.
 
Ryan Sellers is a bigger boomer than Ty.

1573891378083.png

1573891388779.png

1573891401504.png

1573891414170.png

1573891432436.png
What on earth are they doing? Is it really that hard to write a document without any grammatical or spelling errors? Or wrongly numbering the pages? I know it doesn't matter in the end, but come on. They get paid more in one hour than I get paid in a day and they can't do this shit right.

Did opposing counsel ever make any noticable grammatical and spelling errors in their filings? I remember Lemoine claiming two times in filings that he was plaintiff's counsel which was pretty funny. That's all I can remember. The TCPA filing by Lemoine was also horribly formatted as far as I remember.
 
At least they sacked Rian Johnson after the last disaster.
Yeah, they got his twin cousin, Bryan Thompson instead.

To go back in track with the lawsuit, now I wonder if Chupp will sign the extention, or if the defense will submit one with blatant prejudice to the plaintiff, and that Chupp's gonna sign that one.
 
Did opposing counsel ever make any noticable grammatical and spelling errors in their filings? I remember Lemoine claiming two times in filings that he was plaintiff's counsel which was pretty funny. That's all I can remember. The TCPA filing by Lemoine was also horribly formatted as far as I remember.

Lemoine's and Casey's filings have been abominations of formatting, punctuation, references, and everything technical. He gets the arguments and things like "plaintiff's counsel" wrong from time to time. They are way worse than anything BHBC has produced.

I pick on Plaintiff mistakes because they tend to be weird, easily catchable grammar things (other than the sloppy TCPA response). It seems pretty clear that they are going through multiple revisions, and the small in-sentence edits get messed up and aren't caught with a final proofreading. Like someone had a different phrase then re-wrote it, but didn't change the verb tense leading in to it, or fix the conclusion at the end of the sentence.

Remember kids, the only good nazi is a grammar nazi!
 
Yeah, they got his twin cousin, Bryan Thompson instead.

To go back in track with the lawsuit, now I wonder if Chupp will sign the extention, or if the defense will submit one with blatant prejudice to the plaintiff, and that Chupp's gonna sign that one.
Whatever is the most retarded thing, Chupp will do.
 
Whatever is the most exceptional thing, Chupp will do.
I'm betting more on "lazy". It's gonna be hard work to not suck Defendant's dicks now that he started. If he doesn't stay the course and give only the defendant's stuff attention (like the motions, the binder, the arguments), then he only have to deal with the shit that comes from one appeal.
 
I'm betting more on "lazy". It's gonna be hard work to not suck Defendant's dicks now that he started. If he doesn't stay the course and give only the defendant's stuff attention (like the motions, the binder, the arguments), then he only have to deal with the shit that comes from one appeal.
But it won't matter. Appeals are handled by the appeals court, from both sides, and handed to the judge in one decision.
 
What on earth are they doing? Is it really that hard to write a document without any grammatical or spelling errors? Or wrongly numbering the pages? I know it doesn't matter in the end, but come on. They get paid more in one hour than I get paid in a day and they can't do this shit right.

Did opposing counsel ever make any noticable grammatical and spelling errors in their filings? I remember Lemoine claiming two times in filings that he was plaintiff's counsel which was pretty funny. That's all I can remember. The TCPA filing by Lemoine was also horribly formatted as far as I remember.
It might be the high pay rates that cause these errors, doctors are infamous for writing too fast to be legible so it's not surprising that lawyers with similar pay grades don't take the time to proofread.
 
It might be the high pay rates that cause these errors, doctors are infamous for writing too fast to be legible so it's not surprising that lawyers with similar pay grades don't take the time to proofread.

I have read lots of legal documents. I would calculate it in the hundreds of thousands, and possibly over a million. My personal opinion is the calibre of legal documents filed in this case is below average as literacy goes. I hope the other side hires literal morons to proofread their documents, and I hope Ty's firm hires at least a high school graduate to go over these things.
 
I have read lots of legal documents. I would calculate it in the hundreds of thousands, and possibly over a million. My personal opinion is the calibre of legal documents filed in this case is below average as literacy goes. I hope the other side hires literal morons to proofread their documents, and I hope Ty's firm hires at least a high school graduate to go over these things.
I'll offer to proofread for fifty bucks an hour... Nothing compared to what they make!
 
Back