DESMOND IS AMAZING / desmondisamazing / Wendylou, Andrew, & Desmond Napoles - Child being abused/sexualized by parents for financial gain and fame.

  • Thread starter Thread starter RI 360
  • Start date Start date
A comment was left on this video from that one weirdo devoting to CWC's delusions :cryblood::
View attachment 1010012

Responding to:

From this last performance it looks like someone spent 47 seconds trying to teach Desmond a few ballet moves using gifs. It doesn't help cuz Desmond really doesn't have any natural sense of rhythm and more importantly, the desire.

Dance muthafucka, DANCE!
 
It’s everywhere. Please, someone make it stop!

View attachment 1011015

Oh, and here is the guy organizing it, Chuck Rozanski. Definitely looks like someone you’d let near your child.

DFE263CA-B3EA-4D61-8382-0F9F184E939D.jpeg
 
A comment was left on this video from that one weirdo devoting to CWC's delusions :cryblood::
View attachment 1010012

Responding to:
What Performance? The poor fucking kid still hasn't been taught how to dance, sing or just perform in front of an audience.

All he's doing is ticking the box for the box for the Smithsonian, so they can say they've reached out to protected classes.
 
I wonder how many great ancient civilizations had their own versión of SJW moms right before their downfall.

Let’s get one thing clear. Piggylou is not an SJW. Some of her defenders are, but she doesn’t give two shits about social justice and progressivism. She’s a vapid attention whore who knows her plain jane appearance will take her nowhere, so she decided to turn her child into a freak and a morbid curiosity in order to become “relevant” and get the attention she so desperately craved. Along the way she learned she can use SJW idiots as a shield to her blatant child abuse and sexual exploitation of a minor and she’s milking it for all it’s worth.
 
sounds age appropriate
Good Lord, it quotes it as if it's some cutesy thing. Raiding mommy's closet or smearing lipstick on his face to be "pretty" is normal for that age (ish, probably like 3-4 though), not imitating gay men imitating an oversexualized caricature of women.

And the funny fucking thing is, people like piggylou think folks who are cool with their sons playing dressup in moderate feminine clothes are "too conservative".
 
One thing I don't understand is why these drag queens are comfortable around children. Imagine I was a burlesque performer. Not all take off their clothes, but the show is meant to be sexy and sensual. Why would I want kids around? I'd have to keep it mild and "family friendly". The whole act is about being edgy, and that's fine. I would be the first one to say "hey, don't bring kids here, let me act in the way I wanted without worrying about censorship".

Not all these drag performers are pedos. Why do they admit children around them if they know it's gonna ruin their act? And, even if they're ok with it, why bringing kids to something that they know is gonna be sexual at some point. It's the same as being a prostitute and bring your child and say "no, no, she's not gonna have sex, she's just gonna watch!".

Correction, this is something NAMBLA labeled themselves, they are not part of the actual LGBTQ community in any way, shape, or form. At least they weren’t allowed until now, clueless progressives sure left the door wide open for them with this Notsexual™ crossdressing child stripper bullshit.

Because there is not some sort of "LGBT Official Institution", no one can say "you don't belong to us". I get that they are not LGBT, but they can call themselves that if they wanted because there is not some organization telling them "no, you're not".
 
That's the most fucked up thing, Desmond could very well have been molested by this point and we'd never know it. Piggy has a huge incentive to cover up anything that happens to Desmond lest Piggy lose her cash cow. She literally has financial incentive to make damn sure if her son is ever molested that he doesn't say a damn word about it. Hell, she may even have conditioned him to fear speaking about it.
Bold of you to assume she isn't actively pimping her son out.

One thing I don't understand is why these drag queens are comfortable around children. Imagine I was a burlesque performer. Not all take off their clothes, but the show is meant to be sexy and sensual. Why would I want kids around? I'd have to keep it mild and "family friendly". The whole act is about being edgy, and that's fine. I would be the first one to say "hey, don't bring kids here, let me act in the way I wanted without worrying about censorship".

Not all these drag performers are pedos. Why do they admit children around them if they know it's gonna ruin their act? And, even if they're ok with it, why bringing kids to something that they know is gonna be sexual at some point. It's the same as being a prostitute and bring your child and say "no, no, she's not gonna have sex, she's just gonna watch!".
I'll always be suspicious of adults in adult spaces who allow children and teenagers to interact. I'm more aware of it being a problem in the NSFW art community since I'm part of it, where 15-17 year olds will continuously follow and try to interact with people who draw porn for a living and I've heard people defending it like "Oh, well it's a safe space for them to learn about sexuality and porn." No it fucking isn't, it's an adult oriented community and they're painting targets on their backs for any unsavory predators that inevitably find themselves in these communities.
 
Because there is not some sort of "LGBT Official Institution", no one can say "you don't belong to us". I get that they are not LGBT, but they can call themselves that if they wanted because there is not some organization telling them "no, you're not".

GLAAD can easily go out tomorrow and hold a press conference and condemn NAMBLA and say that they and the rest of LGBT community wants nothing to do with them. The fact that they haven't makes you wonder if the hierarchy of GLAAD and other gay rights groups isn't made up of pedophiles.
 
Last edited:
Probably a very unpopular opinion, but I don't see a lot wrong with that "family friendly drag" poster.

Kids wanting to dress up in opposite gender clothing is fine. Boys wanting to play with makeup and dresses is fine. If the kids want to put on some fun clothes and makeup and have a dance party on a runway, that's all fine. I think it's good to allow kids to experiment with different ideas and identities, WITHIN LIMITS.

The problem is when it becomes sexualized, linked to sexual preference, exploited, and pimped out to the media. I know that drag was originally a sexual, raunchy, burlesque performance in its origin, but if we're going to allow "drag kids" to be a thing, of course all of that must be removed. In this one particular case I don't see anything sexy or raunchy about it; in fact, the event specifically labels itself family-friendly.

Those kids all appear to be wearing age-appropriate costumes and smiling, not like Desmond's dead-eyed grimace either. If you put "Halloween Parade" on the poster, nobody would be the wiser. Half of the makeups just look like face paint.

tl;dr: if a "drag kid" event just consists of happy, healthy kids dressing from the opposite clothing section at Target/Spirit Halloween and walking on a runway or dancing around a little, I don't see an issue.

edit: maybe it's the term "drag" that's an issue. Leftists love making up new words, maybe they can make one up for non-sexual kiddy "drag".
 
Probably a very unpopular opinion, but I don't see a lot wrong with that "family friendly drag" poster.

Kids wanting to dress up in opposite gender clothing is fine. Boys wanting to play with makeup and dresses is fine. If the kids want to put on some fun clothes and makeup and have a dance party on a runway, that's all fine. I think it's good to allow kids to experiment with different ideas and identities, WITHIN LIMITS.

The problem is when it becomes sexualized, linked to sexual preference, exploited, and pimped out to the media. I know that drag was originally a sexual, raunchy, burlesque performance in its origin, but if we're going to allow "drag kids" to be a thing, of course all of that must be removed. In this one particular case I don't see anything sexy or raunchy about it; in fact, the event specifically labels itself family-friendly.

Those kids all appear to be wearing age-appropriate costumes and smiling, not like Desmond's dead-eyed grimace either. If you put "Halloween Parade" on the poster, nobody would be the wiser. Half of the makeups just look like face paint.

tl;dr: if a "drag kid" event just consists of happy, healthy kids dressing from the opposite clothing section at Target/Spirit Halloween and walking on a runway or dancing around a little, I don't see an issue.

edit: maybe it's the term "drag" that's an issue. Leftists love making up new words, maybe they can make one up for non-sexual kiddy "drag".
The problem is the drag queens in attendance. If you removed their presence, maybe it wouldn't be so bad. But, there's like maybe 10% of the drag community that isn't either a pedo or mentally ill. And most of the time they don't even do a basic background check on these dudes (which is how convicted pedos on a sex registry were still allowed to do drag story time at libraries).

I'm also not sure that we need to encourage kids to do this. Kids do lots of things simply because everyone else is doing them. If your kid wants to do it, I guess I wouldn't advocate discouraging them (just keep the performances at home, not out in public) -- but I think a lot of kids get into this because their parents (especially the moms) are getting them interested. I mean, someone has to drive these kids to events like this. And most parents aren't going to be willing to give up precious time after work or on weekends for something that they aren't really on board with.

And if they aren't given access to it on TV or the internet -- how are they even learning about drag in the first place? I don't think kids need to know about drag because it is an ADULT form of entertainment. I mean, you could remove the sexual parts of pole dancing and let strippers teach kids how to do it as a "fun exercise" (which is already being done, btw) -- but do your kids really need to know about pole dancing at a young age? I always liked the joke about it being a parent's job to keep their daughters off the pole. I'd also say it's their job to keep their kids from becoming drag queens, too. That's not an outcome any parent really wants, except the degenerates ones.
 
Back