DESMOND IS AMAZING / desmondisamazing / Wendylou, Andrew, & Desmond Napoles - Child being abused/sexualized by parents for financial gain and fame.

[JohnMc]

I wonder how many great ancient civilizations had their own versión of SJW moms right before their downfall.

The Roman Empire and every other great civilization fell because of moral decay and social deviancy. So yeah the concept of SJWs has always existed in one form or another. There's always an asshole who wants to destroy what someone else built.

 

[Tasty Tatty]

There is a good Daria episode that explores this situation (despite they take the SJW route on it a bit). One of the students requests a model agency to go to their schools to try and recruit models. Daria and Jane are, of course, against this and Jodie asks them why they always have to be contrarian, people should be free to do whatever they want, right?

Jodie: "If a kid wants to take a modelling class, you can't tell them no."

Daria: "Maybe not, but you don't have to let the fashion mob push the classes on school grounds, either."

Jane: "Yeah, it's not fair to the drug dealers. They have to wait behind the parking lot."

Jodie: "It's completely voluntary. What's the problem?"

Daria: "No problem. But why stop at modelling? Maybe there's a go-go bar downtown that would like to come here and recruit lap dancers."

We are already on the stage of schools allowing people who dress as women to perform suggestively entering schools. What's next? Actual prostitutes? That's kinda of the point, the slippery-slope that people keep saying it would never happen. Well, it's happening. We're now allowing kids to enter a world that is about sex and drugs. The only defense people like Wendilou have is "well, my kid doesn't do that!". Like I said before, we soon will take girls to an actual brothel, let them watch prostitutes be with clients, and say "well, the kids aren't actually the ones doing sex, right?", after all "sex worker is like any other job". Yes, I get that nobody gets to decide what kids should NOT do, but then, who gets to decide what they SHOULD do?

ETA: spelling/grammar.

 

[ATaleOfSofa]

Probably a very unpopular opinion, but I don't see a lot wrong with that "family friendly drag" poster.

The organizer:

The problem is when it becomes sexualized, linked to sexual preference, exploited, and pimped out to the media. I know that drag was originally a sexual, raunchy, burlesque performance in its origin, but if we're going to allow "drag kids" to be a thing, of course all of that must be removed.

Except no one is tripping over themselves to “de-sexualize” it. Child participants are still dressed up like little whores and sashay around the stage in a very adult, provocative manner.

Several people on Facebook have asked on their page whether there will be anything inappropriate during the event like the stuff they’ve seen online (Lactacia nude photo-op, the Desmond stripper fiasco, etc.) Instead of answering their questions and reassuring them his event is nothing like that, all of those posts/comments were immediately deleted and the users, I assume, were banned. A bit suspicious, don’t you think?

 

[Polexia Aphrodisia]

The organizer:
View attachment 1013132


Except no one is tripping over themselves to “de-sexualize” it. Child participants are still dressed up like little whores and sashay around the stage in a very adult, provocative manner.

Several people on Facebook have asked on their page whether there will be anything inappropriate during the event like the stuff they’ve seen online (Lactacia nude photo-op, the Desmond stripper fiasco, etc.) Instead of answering their questions and reassuring them his event is nothing like that, all of those posts/comments were immediately deleted and the users, I assume, were banned. A bit suspicious, don’t you think?

You're absolutely right, that organizer is certainly a creep. I also didn't know about the Facebook censoring.

I don't know, maybe I'm biased because I know a kid who liked to play dress-up in skirts and dresses and his parents were 100% normal, non-SJW types who never had any kind of sexualized LGBT material in their home. I don't think kids should be shamed and hidden away for wanting to wear non-gender-compliant clothing, if that clothing is appropriate for their age. Actually, NO extra attention should be given to those kids, positive or negative. It's just clothing.

But I also get the argument that drag is inherently sexual.

It's really pretty frustrating how SJWs push for "de-sexualizing", but in reality are just condoning sexual things to be done by/to younger and younger children. The whole narrative of "if you see a ten year old girl wearing booty shorts and a sports bra and think it is sexual, YOU are the pervert," and so forth. I'm no puritanical prude, but biological drives (and decades of marketing) code things as sexual, and therefore those things are not appropriate for children. Pole dancing is great exercise, sure, but it's still heavily stigmatized and associated with sex and strippers. While it's true that maybe we should re-evaluate that stigma and accept that it's just as much a form of dance and exercise as ballet or acrobatics, society isn't there yet and therefore by letting little Susie take kiddie pole classes you are stepping on a dangerous line.

I dunno. It's a mess.

 

[Cpl. Long Dong Silver]

It's not that confusing. LGTBQ degenerates who sexualize kids should be put to the sword/put on a cross/shot/gassed

 

[ATaleOfSofa]

The whole narrative of "if you see a ten year old girl wearing booty shorts and a sports bra and think it is sexual, YOU are the pervert," and so forth. I'm no puritanical prude, but biological drives (and decades of marketing) code things as sexual, and therefore those things are not appropriate for children.

What’s ironic is that if a girl was seen wearing something like that, the progressives would have a coronary, but if a boy struts around in that outfit, it is officially declared Notsexual™.

I think a lot of these idiots are (either intentionally or unintentionally) confusing finding something “sexual” and finding something “sexy.” There is obviously a big difference between the two, or at least it used to be obvious.

 

[Zeebie]

There is a good Daria episode that explores this situation (despite they take the SJW route on it a bit). One of the students requests a model agency to go to their schools to try and recruit models. Daria and Jane are, of course, against this and Jodie asks them why they always have to be contrarian, people should be free to do whatever they want, right?

Jodie: "If a kid wants to take a modelling class, you can't tell them no."

Daria: "Maybe not, but you don't have to let the fashion mob push the classes on school grounds, either."

Jane: "Yeah, it's not fair to the drug dealers. They have to wait behind the parking lot."

Jodie: "It's completely voluntary. What's the problem?"

Daria: "No problem. But why stop at modelling? Maybe there's a go-go bar downtown that would like to come here and recruit lap dancers."

We are already on the stage of schools allowing people who dress as women to perform suggestively entering schools. What's next? Actual prostitutes? That's kinda of the point, the slippery-slope that people keep saying it would never happen. Well, it's happening. We're now allowing kids to enter a world that is about sex and drugs. The only defense people like Wendilou have is "well, my kid doesn't do that!". Like I said before, we soon will take girls to an actual brothel, let them watch prostitutes be with clients, and say "well, the kids aren't actually the ones doing sex, right?", after all "sex worker is like any other job". Yes, I get that nobody gets to decide what kids should NOT do, but then, who gets to decide what they SHOULD do?

ETA: spelling/grammar.

Stripper story time at the local library

 

[Spastic Colon]

You're absolutely right, that organizer is certainly a creep. I also didn't know about the Facebook censoring.

I don't know, maybe I'm biased because I know a kid who liked to play dress-up in skirts and dresses and his parents were 100% normal, non-SJW types who never had any kind of sexualized LGBT material in their home. I don't think kids should be shamed and hidden away for wanting to wear non-gender-compliant clothing, if that clothing is appropriate for their age. Actually, NO extra attention should be given to those kids, positive or negative. It's just clothing.

But I also get the argument that drag is inherently sexual.

It's really pretty frustrating how SJWs push for "de-sexualizing", but in reality are just condoning sexual things to be done by/to younger and younger children. The whole narrative of "if you see a ten year old girl wearing booty shorts and a sports bra and think it is sexual, YOU are the pervert," and so forth. I'm no puritanical prude, but biological drives (and decades of marketing) code things as sexual, and therefore those things are not appropriate for children. Pole dancing is great exercise, sure, but it's still heavily stigmatized and associated with sex and strippers. While it's true that maybe we should re-evaluate that stigma and accept that it's just as much a form of dance and exercise as ballet or acrobatics, society isn't there yet and therefore by letting little Susie take kiddie pole classes you are stepping on a dangerous line.

I dunno. It's a mess.

But drag queens don't dress like normal, average women. They do "woman face". It is a sexualized caricature of women based on stereotypes. I don't care if boys like to put on dresses or play in mom's make up. But, if they do -- they'll imitate mom. Which means they (hopefully) won't be dressing like a hooker or putting on the garish make up of a drag queen which often looks like a scary clown face instead of like a woman. That's the difference. Drag culture is a very specific type of gender bending. In my opinion, it is the gender equivalent of black face. It isn't empowering -- it is just using womanhood as a costume for entertainment and laughs. I wouldn't want my son to think that this kind of "entertainment" is something fun because I find it disrespectful to women.

I have a boy and a girl. My kids were free to play with any toys. If my son picked up a Barbie, I didn't bat an eye. He would get into the costume box and play with the feather boas, princess wigs, and all kinds of stuff (and my daughter dressed up in the typically "boy" costumes). Again, no problem with that. Since I was the one who took him to daycare, he started copying me getting ready and when we would leave, he would put a purse on his arm just like mom. Those are normal things for kids to explore. Kids doing drag, though, is not normal. They aren't just acting like kids dressing up -- they are mimicking the dress, the mannerism, and the routines of drag queens. There really is nothing appropriate or okay about as far as I'm concerned.

Drag queens don't really rebel against gender stereotypes, if you think about it. They embrace them. They put them on like a costume and those stereotypically feminine things "transform" them into women. If they were really breaking gender stereotypes, they would embrace being men who wear heels, dresses and make-up. There wouldn't be any fake boobs or tucking required.

 

[Tasty Tatty]

If they were really breaking gender stereotypes, they would embrace being men who wear heels, dresses and make-up. There wouldn't be any fake boobs or tucking required.

Not even that. I don't need to wear any of that to be a woman.

 

[AlexJonesGotMePregnant]

GLAAD can easily go out tomorrow and hold a press conference and condemn NAMBLA and say that they and the rest of LGBT community wants nothing to do with them. The fact that they haven't makes you wonder if the hierarchy of GLAAD and other gay rights groups isn't made up of pedophiles.

GLAAD would lose the vast majority of their donations of they came out swinging against pedophilia. Gay rights are pretty much secured, the only people left fighting are pedos.

 

[escapegoat]

What’s ironic is that if a girl was seen wearing something like that, the progressives would have a coronary, but if a boy struts around in that outfit, it is officially declared Notsexual™.

Nope.

Go find an argument about "youth" pole dancing classes for girls. Same fucking thing. It's Notsexual, and if you disapprove of it or think it has anything to do with stripping, you're the pervert who shouldn't be thinking of kids as sexual.

 

[5ever a crab]

When you look at ratings of mainstream news sections covering Desmond, the ratings are very, very low with comments going against child drag queens (if the ratings/comments aren't disabled). So I doubt that there will be a new law in the future that legalizes pedophilia.
The slippery slope distopia is already happening imo, in the most heinous ways where the elites have set up a society/environment where it (seems) pointless to fight back against it.

Got molested by a hollywood producer when you were auditioning as a child actor? Better hope that Clinton doesn't kill you and your family. The CIA/FBI aren't gonna have your back, in fact they will do the dirty work, and clean everything up. Lol you and your group are gonna fight back? Better be good at hide and seek, google knows where everyone goes (and weapons). Also your sacrifices won't go anywhere, CIA/FBI already has ties with mainstream/social media and how the narrative is set, at most we'll just tell everyone that the explosions killed you all in a minor accident; everyone is already too ADD to remember your death and will be distracted by another trending video of cute puppies.
Even well received actors like Isaac Kappy was killed and dismissed as 'suicide', but he's not the only ones who were killed for trying to alert the public of pedophilia in entertainment etc.

It needs to be highlighted that kids being molested goes beyond any high academic scoring pressures, or bullying. I think normal joes don't realize that when someone goes through extreme circumstances and get traumatized/ptsd, they are 'ruined' for the rest of their life until they die. Now imagine an entire generation of kids having fucked up mental disorders beyond depression, and they grow up into adults who aren't fit to raise any child. It sounds hyperbolic, and there's been cases of irresponsible or overly protective parents using the 'muh children' argument; we have new technology where internet is part of surviving in our 1st world counties. Especially when this technology has created a false sense of absolute safety (more than ever in human history because of the massive info we've already and are receiving) and "nothing can go wrong".

Not sure how things can change with people being forced to use phones/internet to be a part of modern society; I'm sure people want to fight back, but its just that when the enemy already controls the biggest power houses and communication networks it might be impossible. This becomes further difficult when social media culture has these virtue signalers (regardless of whether they are/aren't whistleblowers or glowop double niggers) who only care about brownie points rather than actually doing the hard work, which in turn creates disasters because they make stupid decisions due to their half-assed passion, like with the walstreet debacle. Of course there's some local police/detectives who want to help, but they're pretty much on the same levels of citizens who have difficulty fighting against this.
There's no hope for Desmond; I'm taking the side of that he's not gonna go past 20 even. He was born and surrounded by nothing but psychos who strive to harm him in the worst ways they can. and can never be satisfied with anything other than what they do.

 

[ATaleOfSofa]

Nope.

Go find an argument about "youth" pole dancing classes for girls. Same fucking thing. It's Notsexual, and if you disapprove of it or think it has anything to do with stripping, you're the pervert who shouldn't be thinking of kids as sexual.

I’m starting to think that having children is the worst punishment you could inflict on them in our day and age.

 

[escapegoat]

Nah It's pretty easy to not take your kids to drag queen story hour, not let them dance at gay clubs at midnight, not sign them up for poledance lessons, not take them to Pride. It's actually something of a pain in the ass to do all that shit. You must crave those asspats.

 

[JohnMc]

GLAAD would lose the vast majority of their donations of they came out swinging against pedophilia. Gay rights are pretty much secured, the only people left fighting are pedos.

Says it all about these so called civil rights group, doesn't it?

 

[ATaleOfSofa]

Says it all about these so called civil rights group, doesn't it?

Most, if not all, civil rights and charity organizations turn corrupt, no matter how “noble” their original cause was.

 

[Markorian]

It's not that confusing. LGTBQ degenerates who sexualize kids should be put to the sword/put on a cross/shot/gassed

Cross is far too good for them, I say we bring back burning at the stake.

 

[Cpl. Long Dong Silver]

Cross is far too good for them, I say we bring back burning at the stake.

That or the old ISIS elevator off of roofs. Post modern problems require stone age solutions

 

[⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛]

GLAAD can easily go out tomorrow and hold a press conference and condemn NAMBLA and say that they and the rest of LGBT community wants nothing to do with them. The fact that they haven't makes you wonder if the hierarchy of GLAAD and other gay rights groups isn't made up of pedophiles.

Actually, they have done this before. It's even in the NAMBLA wiki article.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Man/Boy_Love_Association#Opposition

But.. as @Proud Tranadian rather bravely points out, this is not actually consonent with the expressed views of the 'gay community'. Big Gay is not condemning actual pedophiles preying on this pre-pubescent boy.

 

[SBG]

Tom Dillon talked a little in a recent podcast about how drag queens used to be known for their dirty jokes at bars, yet now are getting paraded around like they're meant to be the spokespeople of PC culture.

https://youtu.be/KcNMljjsqGg (not bothering finding the exact time)

It's sort of a recent phenomenon where you get one drag queen after another being uptight and acting like SJWs. I imagine it's because of trannies becoming the victim du jour for the past few years and believers of tranny ideology treating wanting to cross dress as equivalent to being the opposite sex. So they end up complaining about any drag queens that don't treat cross dressing with an absurd respect. Since the whole drag queen act is practically lampooning the nature of trannies.

I'd guess as a result of all this you have a lot of the pro-tranny crowd thus viewing drag queens as this weird sanitized moral police rather than the traditional dirty jokesters.