- Joined
- Aug 5, 2019
I really want that transcript....
Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.
- Thread starter 5t3n0g0ph3r
- Start date
I really want that transcript....
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2019
I think he means like what he did in the TCPA hearing, literally refusing to hear Ty's objections to Sam's arguments when it was sam's time, then refusing to hear any arguments ty made on his time because "he already ruled on that" and even going so far as to speak over him at one point.
And that really is a good question: we already know this can hit critical Chuppness, so, what if the judge has a bad day and decides to go off the rails again? How much popcorn will it require?
Edit: and while we're at it. Since by what others said Chupp is not in fact the worst thing to happen to texas' courts, I'll also ask: How the fuck does the COA deal with this shit? Did any of them ever have an aneurism from the sheer stupidity at display? 'Cause I would be either a raging alcoholic or a deranged nihilist if it was my job to deal with this shit on a regular basis. Probably both.
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2019
They have the catharsis of verbally destroying people they despise on and having it recorded for all time.
Nontransferable
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2018
The transcript for the hearing on November 8th.
diskboomer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2019
The twonk edited so much you cant search for words on it; and that exceptional watermark haha.
Chupp not taking any lemon curds it seems lol. If you get discovery, so can they.
Oh, you researched the case law? Hold on, where are your sources saying you can actually do this.
There it is, the line people were looking for.
Lemon is scared, this is what he thinks about his win regarding the Appeals
Seems Chupp thinks the attorneys fees are plenty already. Hmmmm So much for the TCPA keep costs down lol.
Chump thinks there will be additional hearings later, and that's where Slatosh as a witness can be deposed. Another hint the possible way the appeals might go.
Chupp seems rather short with Lemon man regarding possible work product privilage, and Lemon's attempts to try and get around it.
Chupp does not give a flying fuck about Lemon trying to bring up the affidavits. Since they were withdrawn, and he didn't consider them.
For some exceptional reason Lemon WANTS them on the record, and just in time for appeals
Last edited:
Anyone got a version that isn't cancer/bankruptcy inducing? I'm nit gonna read more than one page with this dumb watermark.
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2019
- Joined
- May 8, 2019
From his "seems like a lot already", he may actually try to go with the asking price, minus the sanctions.
Note: This is assuming he doesn't just say fuck it and lets it pass because appeals.
diskboomer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2019
These two parts are my favourite! Lemon is scared it seems. Yellow for Lemon
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2019
He's gonna blame the mosquitos for his exceptionalism and Chupp is gonna be like "Whatever iron lung. I've got a Little League game to get publicly intoxicated at in two hours."
diskboomer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2019
As cancer ridden as the watermark is, my god... Martinez is a treat to read. The guy is the best spoken of them all so far in transcripts.
Smooth rolling, clean arguments.
There's no way for them to twist this positively for the spednaught. Lemon comes off rather afraid and desperate at times with his answers to the judge.
Pointing out this is all meaningless,and simply to drive up the costs - which we all know it is.
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2019
Give me a bit and I can clean the document up again. His watermarking abilities suck.
Edit - haha. He tried to copy my hashtags.
Edit - haha. He tried to copy my hashtags.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Interesting that Lemoine is admitting the lawsuit may not even have been frivolous, although the fact the TCPA is responsible for the dismissal of entirely meritorious lawsuits is no longer a secret of any kind.
HighwayStar
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2019
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2019
See eceryone was telling me I was blindly putting my faith in these guys but I did my homework and I was not disappointed with what I was able to find with my amateur lurking skills.
I really think getting Martinez Hsu involved was the smartest move Ty could have made when he realized things weren't going to be as straightforward as they originally seemed.
Nontransferable
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2018
This was the transcript's final form?
I can't imagine
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2019
I mean, in the most literal sense, it's true; a dismissal doesn't actually prove anything, it just shows that something wasn't proven to a sufficient degree. He fancies himself a "TCPA expert", so he probably just reflexively gives that pedantic response about it, whether it's actually beneficial to his client or not.
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2019
diskboomer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2019
My god Lemon is a sleazy fuck!
Chupp admits to not reading "every TCPA case", but sees Lemon is trying to get them to drop the appeal, and it could cost them plenty.
The Spednaught abridged version!
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
The alleged purpose of this statute is to dispose of frivolous lawsuits only intended to chill protected speech. It's hard to see how dismissing a textbook case of tortious interference by threatening to cause financial harm to someone unless they illegally breach a contract is protected speech of any kind, much less that a suit over such behavior is frivolous.
He's trying to trick them into dropping it and losing the part over the dismissals, which he'd immediately argue if they did drop it. A lot of appellate rules are jurisdictional and if you file an untimely appeal they can simply refuse to hear it. There are probably equitable principles that might kick in if you had a brazenly dishonest lawyer openly trying to scam the other party out of their rights, but who would do that?