Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.

Twitch/Discord/YT Plays Law Firm: The VR Experience.

The chat spams "LATE AND GAY" as the defense waddles in.
When and if this case ever makes it to trial, I wonder if the court realizes how much money they could make if they had a pay-per-view trial. Complete with live chat. This makes me all warm and tingly just imagining it!
 
When and if this case ever makes it to trial, I wonder if the court realizes how much money they could make if they had a pay-per-view trial. Complete with live chat. This makes me all warm and tingly just imagining it!
"Excuse me, Your Honor, but we just received a $100 superchat from one WeebsWarrior9001 stating 'CUCK CUCK CUCK LEMOINE'S A CUCK.'

Also, we have a $1 superchat from a T. Greg Douchette saying 'Look at how relevant and popular I am now! Mom was wrong!'"
 
When and if this case ever makes it to trial, I wonder if the court realizes how much money they could make if they had a pay-per-view trial. Complete with live chat. This makes me all warm and tingly just imagining it!
Why do you think Judge Judy is so fucking popular, that shit has been running, uninterrupted, for twenty five fucking years

People love the legal drama.
 
"Excuse me, Your Honor, but we just received a $100 superchat from one WeebsWarrior9001 stating 'CUCK CUCK CUCK LEMOINE'S A CUCK.'

Also, we have a $1 superchat from a T. Greg Douchette saying 'Look at how relevant and popular I am now! Mom was wrong!'"

Ron spamming happy faces as Lemoine gets cucked because it isn't him getting cucked for once
 
So what exactly would it take for the trial to be recorded? Plenty of other courts have done it.
 
He really did have to say that. He cannot submit a billing invoice to the court that is materially different from the one he would submit for payment from his clients. That's at the very least dishonest, at most, a fraud upon the court, and would further boost Vic's claim that the fees are nonsense.

Shouldn't the defendants have already paid Lemoine's bill and Vic would be reimbursing them? Or is it normal to charge it all in one lump after the fact?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: TexOffender
Is it? he was the most competent lolyer in this case and didnt asked for alot.
mall guy is the tragic hero of the KV side.

I think because of the absolute retardation of every other lawyer on the defense side, Sam will get what he asked for just by asking for it. My favorite result other than everyone getting nothing would be for Sam to get what he asked for, all the others to get the same, but then have it docked as a penalty for wasting everyone's time with absolute bullshit.

love the fact that Chupp did in fact bitch out JSL on the one thing he cares about most

This is because it's completely fucking irrelevant to the case. The level of butthurt this pathetic excuse for a man has toward some drunken ranter in Minnesota does not make it relevant in the slightest. To Chupp, he is just wheezing about utter bullshit that has nothing to do with anything that's Chupp's job.

So what exactly would it take for the trial to be recorded? Plenty of other courts have done it.

Chupp's approval, which isn't going to happen. He doesn't even want people live tweeting.

"Excuse me, Your Honor, but we just received a $100 superchat from one WeebsWarrior9001 stating 'CUCK CUCK CUCK LEMOINE'S A CUCK.'

Also, we have a $1 superchat from a T. Greg Douchette saying 'Look at how relevant and popular I am now! Mom was wrong!'"

"Look at those faggot ass robes! Faggot, fag, fucking fag, Judge Chupp's a fag!"
 
Last edited:
It's almost like Nick doesn't make any impact to the actual court case itself. Who'da thunk it?

We say that, but they're going to do ANYTHING THEY CAN to put forth the "chupp chupp'd it up" stuff in front of Chupp because despite all evidence to the contrary, Judges and humans and humans gain a negative inference to people who insult them. Since Nick and the farms and whatnot are all tied to Vic in various ways, well, it's a no brainer.

"Hey chupp, these guys tied to the plaintiff think you're an idiot and are insulting you. How much in sanctions are you gonna add to punish them for it, eh eh eh??"
 
If Chupp were to somehow decide "I will award you zero dollars to fuck off" how strong of an argument of bias would it give Lemonaids?

I have a feeling no Appellate Court would buy that reasonable attorney's fees amounted to $0, but I'm pretty sure you're mostly joking.

In all seriousness, this whole fee dog-and-pony show is going to have to be reworked by the Appellate Court anyway, so the arguments being made are really more important than the actual numbers that Chupp comes up with. Obviously there's the matter of a surety bond that's involved, but that's not too big of a deal. This is mostly just the two sides trying to make themselves look good to their audience before going into the appeals process.
 
I have a feeling no Appellate Court would buy that reasonable attorney's fees amounted to $0, but I'm pretty sure you're mostly joking.

In all seriousness, this whole fee dog-and-pony show is going to have to be reworked by the Appellate Court anyway, so the arguments being made are really more important than the actual numbers that Chupp comes up with. Obviously there's the matter of a surety bond that's involved, but that's not too big of a deal. This is mostly just the two sides trying to make themselves look good to their audience before going into the appeals process.
So, how often does Chupp's rulings get appealed? I am curious because I have seen in one instance where it's said that 50 percent of his rulings were appealed, but I haven't confirmed it yet.
 
So, how often does Chupp's rulings get appealed? I am curious because I have seen in one instance where it's said that 50 percent of his rulings were appealed, but I haven't confirmed it yet.

The TCPA basically guarantees an appeal as long as the losing party wants to spend the money to keep fighting, so the frequency of Chupp's rulings getting appealed isn't really all that important. That said, I legit have no idea how often he gets appealed, nor how often those appeals result in a significantly different outcome. Appeals can occur for a lot of reasons though, and not all of them are necessarily because the judge screwed up, so even that information wouldn't really tell the whole story.
 
I have a feeling no Appellate Court would buy that reasonable attorney's fees amounted to $0, but I'm pretty sure you're mostly joking.

In all seriousness, this whole fee dog-and-pony show is going to have to be reworked by the Appellate Court anyway, so the arguments being made are really more important than the actual numbers that Chupp comes up with. Obviously there's the matter of a surety bond that's involved, but that's not too big of a deal. This is mostly just the two sides trying to make themselves look good to their audience before going into the appeals process.
anti-slapps imo should set a maximum roof. The plantiff should not be held accountable to the bad decision in lawyer's picked by the defence. Otherwise defendants who know they can win an anti-slapp could just hire lemon, since lemon already takes more money than he is worth.
 
Late and probably homosexual, but I haven't seen these docs posted here yet. Vic's response to Marchi, and VIc's objections to evidence
 

Attachments

Late and probably homosexual, but I haven't seen these docs posted here yet. Vic's response to Marchi, and VIc's objections to evidence

So in response to Marchi, they get the punctuation on Defendant's correct, probably because it's singular instead of the multiple Defendants of MoRonica/Funimation. But in the motion to strike evidence...

Screenshot 2019-11-22 at 1.15.52 AM.png


Still watching, BHBC. Sort your plurals and possessives.
 
Back