Oh, so you're agreeing that you place strawmen to attack. Other than that, that statement is an irrelevant insult, so nothing to address here. Same old, same old. In fact, you contradict yourself below by saying I keep coming back to say stuff, so clearly I do "use my mouth".
The fact is, there has been no convincing argument that they aren't seen as "autonomous human beings". What I replied to was the attempt to show that they aren't seen as them, so my point (that you predictably missed) that people have expectations for other's behaviour even in normal situations in which people acknowledge others as fully autonomous needs to be directly addressed. I showed that them expecting behaviour was not sufficient to comprise a failure to recognise autonomy. Can't you actually make a good counter argument instead of childish insults and incoherent retarded ramblings? I'm getting a bit bored.
And this is an example of why I think you're retarded. You see, it goes beyond mere differences in opinion, and has gotten to the stage where you make claims about factual information that can be objectively measured. In other words, you're objectively wrong about things, instead of just having a different viewpoint. For example, "while she's asleep". She wasn't asleep, she was reaching over to get something. "without her permission" she already told me I could post pictures of her there. She's just not too fussed on direct pictures of her face there. Notice I have avoided any such pictures of her face on the LS forum.
The thing about her being "nude" is laughable too. By that reasoning, everyone is nude because they would be if not for their clothes. The pic shows her shoulders. Plenty of dresses show more than that, but aren't deemed "nude". It doesn't matter if she was nude at the time unless I show parts of her that she would actually take offence to.
Next, I don't care about people's views about me here. If I did, I'd be like wandering pussy and ingratiate myself before you.
What I care about, what annoys me, is misinformation and stupidity.
"woman-haters" is your own inability to deal with nuance; hence you just smear the forum into a crude simplification. If they were women haters, they'd hate women just for being women. If that were so, then they'd hate all women. As you can see, the posters on the site actually got along with and respected Enginehead. They also accept and respect TheCounter, who is a lesbian. Ember was a poster who was liked well enough. Point is, it's not women they hate, but when women enter the site with an arrogant/condescending attitude. You'll probably just dismiss this bit of information because you're resistant to learning anything that disagrees with what you want to see.
"shore up your flaccid, impotent ego"
You could make that assumption. Acting as though your opinions and assumptions are truth is your prerogative here.
But lets take a moment and actually look at the situation in context, use our brain for a second.
In comes a woman/troll to the forum. She claims that we have problems with girls because we're all so bitter etc.
So then I act cocky and dismissive towards her. She's overjoyed, because she's found something to backup her view. "look at him!", she says. "This must be why you're alone! Because you act like this!". So I let her hold this position for a while. Then, I drop it on her that I'm actually one of the few guys there who has a girlfriend. The douchiest one there. All the nice, reasonable guys discussing things with her as though she's not a troll? Nope. So perhaps now you see my motivations. My revealing I had a girl basically just pissed all over her rhetoric. A picture rubs it in.
