Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

[Xenomorphs Are Cute]

He did, and I keep seeing people use that number to say contractual tortoise interference at KamehaCon is no longer a thing. That's pointedly ignoring the fact Vic had to hire Ty (and thus has to pay legal fees) to do that, plus had to pay for his own security. And that's also ignoring that Vic was cloistered alone on another floor and wasn't allowed to participate in panels.

He probably still made more than anyone else.

What makes this even better is the fact that the people who are behind all Vic is going through can & are losing much more in terms of both money & reputation.

 

[Confused Doggo]

View attachment 1033075View attachment 1033076View attachment 1033077

http://archive.li/Bwxne

"I was visiting friends."
I call bullshit on him having friends. Also, who is this guy?

 

[Confused Doggo]

(I think that teacher had us compare "The Giver" with "The Truman Show" for how a "planned" society works. )

Since your teacher was clearly reaching by comparing the two, I have to assume that the real reason they had you watch it was because it's a good movie.

 

[theworstkindofeurofag]

The whole "Monica got an Edward Elric cosplayer kicked out of a con" story was at least partly debunked. The person who posted this story to twitter was a friend of the person who that allegedly happened to and she later posted she was disappointed with her friend telling lies. Hero Hei dedicated a whole stream to debunking that story, he called the hotel which allegedly kicked the cosplayer out due to Monica's request and found out the hotel wasn't connected to the con at all. Think he concluded eventually the story didn't happen, then the person who posted that story made their tweets about how disappointed they were with their friend. Pretty funny that ISWV themselves spent so much time trying to verify that story.

Monica herself denied it, but of course that doesn't mean much. I personally don't like spreading lies (or stories that could be lies) about people, even if I don't like them. I'm however fine with saying that Monica's a backstabbing, lying cunt, since that's the truth. (Can't really truthfully call her fat anymore, sadly)

Spirit was the one who disrupted Marchi's panel. Ironically, he was also the one who told Marz the Yakuza would go after her. He's a genuine autist and also has some sort of speech disorder. He's also black, which again confirms Marchi fears black men, with her getting him kicked out and avoiding the process server and all. Bet that homeless man that allegedly harassed her recently was just some old black dude asking for change.

Anyhow, Spirit went to her panel and asked something autistic like: " Why did you betray Vic?" He also filmed with his phone which was not allowed. Marchi dunked on him in front of everyone, made fun of his speech if I remember correctly and eventually got him kicked out by security (so much for her fearing for her life). Dude posted about it on twitter and got into fights with KV. Someone tricked his autistic, simple mind into giving his location away outside of the convention center by telling him they wanted to meet up. They then called the cops on him and got him permanently banned from the con (and I think other cons as well).

Don't quote me on any of that stuff. There have to be archived tweets and stuff probably a thousand pages back, I'm too lazy to look for them now.

 

[TexOffender]

Emmett Initiative on Twitter: "Pedophilia isn’t actually a crime unti…

archived 2 Dec 2019 14:45:15 UTC

archive.li

I'm thinking about punching pepper in her racist ugly ass face.

Also emmett confirmed for having a young waifu.

 

[Dumb Bitch Smoothie]

View attachment 1033542


I'm thinking about punching pepper in her racist ugly ass face.

Also emmett confirmed for having a young waifu.

Emmett dear that's not a good look if you want people to believe you aren't as bad as the dude you're condemning.

I don't think Shane would even share a particularly bad hot take like that.

 

[HighwayStar]

Emmett dear that's not a good look if you want people to believe you aren't as bad as the dude you're condemning.

I don't think Shane would even share a particularly bad hot take like that.

Then again, Shane did put his driver’s license on Twitter like an idiot, so anything is possible.

 

[Commander]

Emmett dear that's not a good look if you want people to believe you aren't as bad as the dude you're condemning.

I don't think Shane would even share a particularly bad hot take like that.

Lolis are that one subject that you stay out of the crossfire because there will be 100 arrows coming your way especially if you are like most people being in the middle ground. Emmett said something that would get him 1000 arrows as while what he said ain't wrong, a disturbed mind is a disturbed mind and not something to touch.

 

[Dumb Bitch Smoothie]

Then again, Shane did put his driver’s license on Twitter like an idiot, so anything is possible.

Shane does stuff for attention because he's got the mind of a teenager.
And a nasty boner for asspats.

Lolis are that one subject that you stay out of the crossfire because there will be 100 arrows coming your way especially if you are like most people being in the middle ground. Emmett said something that would get him 1000 arrows as while what he said ain't wrong, a disturbed mind is a disturbed mind and not something to touch.

Having the wrong opinions is punishable so I'm curious to see if any of KV chimps out or if someone chooses to defend him.

 

[WarJams]

I don't think Emmutt is going to find much of a receptive audience when the people he's pitching his tent with are the exact lot of people who DO subscribe to the idea of there being "thought crimes."

 

[P5Fever]

View attachment 1033542

Emmett Initiative on Twitter: "Pedophilia isn’t actually a crime unti…

archived 2 Dec 2019 14:45:15 UTC

archive.li

I'm thinking about punching pepper in her racist ugly ass face.

Also emmett confirmed for having a young waifu.

Did Emmet actually defend pedos?
Come on KV, ISWV took out their trash, take out yours.

 

[Garm]

Since your teacher was clearly reaching by comparing the two, I have to assume that the real reason they had you watch it was because it's a good movie.

I asked why she didn't have us watch "Pleasantville" (black and white to keep everyone happy.) She replied "It has adult themes that the school wouldn't clear for the classroom."

I cut her slack because teachers have a administrators they have to appease.

 

[FadeIntoObsurity]

People who want to protect the rights of fictional characters are a certain kind of exceptional. Lolis are indeed sitting on a fine line for most people, but there is nothing inherently wrong with them. They aren't real. So if said loli is drawn in a sexualized manner there is no harm done to anyone. That's the main difference between looking at real children being forced into sexual situations and mere drawings... The harm that is being done. Despite the fact that there are people like Sarah Widenhefty that would say that there is no harm in people looking at photos of real child pornography because they aren't the ones committing acts on the children, they are consuming content and enabling the behaviors of those who do said acts to create more content. If it is just a character in a compromising position... no one is being forced into anything because a drawing does not have thoughts or feelings. People do have lots of weird fetishes. Some people have sexual fantasies that would be considered crimes if acted upon. I'll have to agree as long as there is no harm being done to others, let them enjoy their weird sex fantasies. Lolis are not my cup of tea, but I can get along with those who find those characters cute and shit. As long as they are not going after real kids, who should care?

 

[HighwayStar]

Didn't Vic make like $30K there this year? Hate to say it, but any VA that skips out on easy money like that to score woke points is beyond stupid.

And that’s why Vic didn’t have to pay as many fees as expected and why Monica, Ron and Funimation are now probably sitting on a mountain of debt.

 

[theworstkindofeurofag]

People who want to protect the rights of fictional characters are a certain kind of exceptional. Lolis are indeed sitting on a fine line for most people, but there is nothing inherently wrong with them. They aren't real. So if said loli is drawn in a sexualized manner there is no harm done to anyone. That's the man difference between looking at real children being forced into sexual situations and mere drawings... The harm that is being done. Despite the fact that there are people like Sarah Widenhefty that would say that there is no harm in people looking at photos of real child pornography because they aren't the ones committing acts on the children, they are consuming content and enabling the behaviors of those who do said acts to create more content. If it is just a character in a compromising position... no one is being forced into anything because a drawing does not have thoughts or feelings. People do have lots of weird fetishes. Some people have sexual fantasies that would be considered crimes if acted upon. I'll have to agree as long as there is no harm being done to others, let them enjoy their weird sex fantasies. Lolis are not my cup of tea, but I can get along with those who find those characters cute and shit. As long as they are not going after real kids, who should care?

I'd be worried that dudes who look at loli shit everyday would get tired of it after a while. Then they'd most likely seek out pictures of real kids. Then videos. And then they'd probably seek out kids irl to harm themselves.

Sure, I bet not everybody who looks at loli ends up looking at CP. Still, the thought of some people jerking off to fictional children being fucked is weird enough.

IDK man. Can't really get behind the loli shit, can't get behind people wanting to ban it either.

 

[Aria]

People who want to protect the rights of fictional characters are a certain kind of exceptional. Lolis are indeed sitting on a fine line for most people, but there is nothing inherently wrong with them. They aren't real. So if said loli is drawn in a sexualized manner there is no harm done to anyone. That's the man difference between looking at real children being forced into sexual situations and mere drawings... The harm that is being done. Despite the fact that there are people like Sarah Widenhefty that would say that there is no harm in people looking at photos of real child pornography because they aren't the ones committing acts on the children, they are consuming content and enabling the behaviors of those who do said acts to create more content. If it is just a character in a compromising position... no one is being forced into anything because a drawing does not have thoughts or feelings. People do have lots of weird fetishes. Some people have sexual fantasies that would be considered crimes if acted upon. I'll have to agree as long as there is no harm being done to others, let them enjoy their weird sex fantasies. Lolis are not my cup of tea, but I can get along with those who find those characters cute and shit. As long as they are not going after real kids, who should care?

Loli is gross disgusting and degenerate but if it can stop them from abusing kids then I'm fine with it.if there is research out there that proves that loli is a gateway to child abuse then it should be banned.

 

[LuNaS]

Did Emmet actually defend pedos?
Come on KV, ISWV took out their trash, take out yours.

Taking his post at face value he didn't, but again taking his post at face value his definition of pedophile isn't really the same definition that most people use.

For what I can get he says that untill someone commits a crime they can't be considered guilty even if their inclinations are taboo, but possession of child porn is a crime and young fictional characters porn isn't (at least not to my knowledge if someone knows of a country law or stage law that prohibits fictional porn I would be glad to hear about it). But there is the whole enchilada of whether you can say someone is a pedophile just for liking fictional characters that look or are young.

Funnily enough, the moral and legal ramifications of animated/drawn porn depicting young characters is a somewhat nuanced theme where I have seen people arguing convincingly for either side of whether it's right or wrong.

In my opinion it's certainly better that the alternative, even if it's not something I would buy or possess.

 

[Tipsy Tea Cup]

View attachment 1033542

Emmett Initiative on Twitter: "Pedophilia isn’t actually a crime unti…

archived 2 Dec 2019 14:45:15 UTC

archive.li

I'm thinking about punching pepper in her racist ugly ass face.

Also emmett confirmed for having a young waifu.

Seems like Pepper Troon hasn't learned her lesson the last time she was suspended.

 

[FadeIntoObsurity]

I'd be worried that dudes who look at loli shit everyday would get tired of it after a while. Then they'd most likely seek out pictures of real kids. Then videos. And then they'd probably seek out kids irl to harm themselves.

Sure, I bet not everybody who looks at loli ends up looking at CP. Still, the thought of some people jerking off to fictional children being fucked is weird enough.

IDK man. Can't really get behind the loli shit, can't get behind people wanting to ban it either.

Yeah, but you have to look at it the other way too. If there wasn't any loli content to look at or satisfy their disgusting tastes, then it may put real kids in harms way. At least knowing if someone enjoys that kind of content, you can keep an eye on them to make sure they leave real children alone. I also find it to be fucked up, but there are a lot of fucked up fetishes in this world.

I don't like lolis myself, nor am I fond of those who are TOO into lolis... But yeah, that's why this shit is a real gray area for most people.

Loli is gross disgusting and degenerate but if it can stop them from abusing kids then I'm fine with it.if there is research out there that proves that loli is a gateway to child abuse then it should be banned.

Agreed.

 

[P5Fever]

Taking his post at face value he didn't, but again taking his post at face value his definition of pedophile isn't really the same definition that most people use.

For what I can get he says that untill someone commits a crime they can't be considered guilty even if their inclinations are taboo, but possession of child porn is a crime and young fictional characters porn isn't (at least not to my knowledge if someone knows of a country law or stage law that prohibits fictional porn I would be glad to hear about it). But there is the whole enchilada of whether you can say someone is a pedophile just for liking fictional characters that look or are young.

Funnily enough, the moral and legal ramifications of animated/drawn porn depicting young characters is a somewhat nuanced theme where I have seen people arguing convincingly for either side of whether it's right or wrong.

In my opinion it's certainly better that the alternative, even if it's not something I would buy or possess.

Oh I know KV has a very different definition. However if Emmet wants to insist Vic is a pedo when Vic has never acted upon or even had such thoughts, he’s a moron for then making this claim. He’s an even bigger moron because most in KV would definitely not subscribe to that. They are the thought police. By their own autism standards, he’s a pedo apologist. Therefore he needs to be kicked.

Either they hypocritically defend his comment, or they chase him out. Either way is entertainment for me.